↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SYN997^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:51:42 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.61s 1.32s
% Output   : Refutation 1.61s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   5 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   62 (  20 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   80 (   9   ~;   2   |;   4   &;  56   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   28 (  28   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    8 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%                                         (   0  !!;   0  ??;   3 @@+;   0 @@-)
%            Number of variables   :   28 (   0   ^;  14   !;  14   ?;  28   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(func_def_1,type,
    vEPSILON: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > X0 ) ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    sK0: ( ( $i > $o ) > $i ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    sK1: ( ( $i > $o ) > $i ) > $i ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    ph3: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(f23,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f17]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    $true = $false,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f16,f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ! [X0: ( $i > $o ) > $i] :
      ( ( sK0 @ X0 @ ( sK1 @ X0 ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ! [X0: ( $i > $o ) > $i] :
      ( ( ( sK0 @ X0 @ ( X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) ) )
       != $true )
      & ( ( sK0 @ X0 @ ( sK1 @ X0 ) )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f6,f8,f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ! [X0: ( $i > $o ) > $i] :
      ( ? [X1: $i > $o] :
          ( ( ( X1 @ ( X0 @ X1 ) )
           != $true )
          & ? [X2: $i] :
              ( ( X1 @ X2 )
              = $true ) )
     => ( ( ( sK0 @ X0 @ ( X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) ) )
         != $true )
        & ? [X2: $i] :
            ( $true
            = ( sK0 @ X0 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ! [X0: ( $i > $o ) > $i] :
      ( ? [X2: $i] :
          ( $true
          = ( sK0 @ X0 @ X2 ) )
     => ( ( sK0 @ X0 @ ( sK1 @ X0 ) )
        = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ! [X0: ( $i > $o ) > $i] :
    ? [X1: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( X1 @ ( X0 @ X1 ) )
       != $true )
      & ? [X2: $i] :
          ( ( X1 @ X2 )
          = $true ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ? [X0: ( $i > $o ) > $i] :
      ! [X1: $i > $o] :
        ( ? [X2: $i] :
            ( ( X1 @ X2 )
            = $true )
       => ( ( X1 @ ( X0 @ X1 ) )
          = $true ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ? [X0: ( $i > $o ) > $i] :
      ! [X1: $i > $o] :
        ( ? [X2: $i] : ( X1 @ X2 )
       => ( X1 @ ( X0 @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X0: ( $i > $o ) > $i] :
      ! [X1: $i > $o] :
        ( ? [X2: $i] : ( X1 @ X2 )
       => ( X1 @ ( X0 @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ? [X0: ( $i > $o ) > $i] :
    ! [X1: $i > $o] :
      ( ? [X2: $i] : ( X1 @ X2 )
     => ( X1 @ ( X0 @ X1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.qJ5bK45LbH/DTF2THF_8012.p',conj) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( sK0 @ @@+ @ $i @ X0 )
      = $false ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f14]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( ( sK0 @ @@+ @ $i @ X0 )
        = $false )
      | ( $true != $true ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f11,f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ! [X0: ( $i > $o ) > $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( sK0 @ X0 @ ( @@+ @ $i @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) ) )
        = $true )
      | ( ( sK0 @ X0 @ X1 )
        = $false ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ! [X0: ( $i > $o ) > $i] :
      ( ( sK0 @ X0 @ ( X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) ) )
     != $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : SYN997^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.16/0.34  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 14:21:14 EST 2026
% 0.16/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.34  Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.29/0.46  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.29/0.46  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.29/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.29/0.46  % File     : SYN997^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.29/0.46  % Domain   : Syntactic
% 0.29/0.46  % Problem  : Test for validity of axiom of choice
% 0.29/0.46  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.29/0.46  % English  :
% 0.29/0.46  
% 0.29/0.46  % Refs     : [BB05]  Benzmueller & Brown (2005), A Structured Set of Higher
% 0.29/0.46  %          : [Ben09] Benzmueller (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.29/0.46  %          : [Hoe09] Hoeschele (2009), Towards a Semi-Automatic Higher-Orde
% 0.29/0.46  % Source   : [Ben09]
% 0.29/0.46  % Names    : Example 5 [BB05]
% 0.29/0.46  %          : choicei [Bro09]
% 0.29/0.46  
% 0.29/0.46  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.29/0.46  %          : Without choice : CounterSatisfiable
% 0.29/0.46  % Rating   : 0.17 v9.1.0, 0.12 v9.0.0, 0.08 v8.2.0, 0.09 v8.1.0, 0.17 v7.4.0, 0.11 v7.3.0, 0.20 v7.2.0, 0.12 v7.1.0, 0.14 v7.0.0, 0.12 v6.4.0, 0.14 v6.3.0, 0.17 v6.2.0, 0.50 v6.1.0, 0.17 v6.0.0, 0.50 v5.5.0, 0.80 v5.4.0, 0.75 v4.1.0, 1.00 v3.7.0
% 0.29/0.46  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    1 (   0 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
% 0.29/0.46  %            Number of atoms       :    0 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.29/0.46  %            Maximal formula atoms :    0 (   0 avg)
% 0.29/0.46  %            Number of connectives :    4 (   0   ~;   0   |;   0   &;   3   @)
% 0.29/0.46  %                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.29/0.46  %            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   6 avg)
% 0.29/0.46  %            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
% 0.29/0.46  %            Number of type conns  :    3 (   3   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.29/0.46  %            Number of symbols     :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
% 0.29/0.46  %            Number of variables   :    3 (   0   ^;   1   !;   2   ?;   3   :)
% 0.29/0.46  % SPC      : TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR
% 0.29/0.46  
% 0.29/0.46  % Comments : Even with naive Skolemization this statement should not be
% 0.29/0.46  %            provable.
% 0.29/0.46  %          : 
% 0.29/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.29/0.46  thf(conj,conjecture,
% 0.29/0.46      ? [E: ( $i > $o ) > $i] :
% 0.29/0.46      ! [P: $i > $o] :
% 0.29/0.46        ( ? [Y: $i] : ( P @ Y )
% 0.29/0.46       => ( P @ ( E @ P ) ) ) ).
% 0.29/0.46  
% 0.29/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.29/0.46  ------------------------
% 1.46/1.28  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.46/1.28  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.46/1.28  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 14:21:15 EST 2026
% 1.46/1.28  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.46/1.28  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.46/1.28  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.46/1.28  
% 1.46/1.28  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.qJ5bK45LbH/DTF2DTF8012.p
% See solution above
% 1.46/1.28  ------------------------
% 1.46/1.29  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.46/1.29  thf(conj,conjecture,
% 1.46/1.29      ? [E: ( $i > $o ) > $i] :
% 1.46/1.29      ! [P: $i > $o] :
% 1.46/1.29        ( ? [Y: $i] : ( P @ Y )
% 1.46/1.29       => ( P @ ( E @ P ) ) ) ).
% 1.46/1.29  ------------------------
% 1.61/1.30  % (8295)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_8012 for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 1.61/1.31  % (8296)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_8012 for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 1.61/1.31  % (8296)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.61/1.31  % (8296)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.31  % (8296)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.61/1.31  % (8296)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.61/1.31  % (8296)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.61/1.31  
% 1.61/1.31  % (8296)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.61/1.31  % (8296)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.61/1.31  % (8296)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 1.61/1.31  % (8296)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.31  % (8296)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.31  % (8297)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_8012 for (2999ds/27Mi)
% 1.61/1.31  % (8298)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_8012 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 1.61/1.31  % (8299)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_8012 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 1.61/1.31  % (8300)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_8012 for (2999ds/275Mi)
% 1.61/1.31  % (8301)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_8012 for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 1.61/1.31  % (8298)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.61/1.31  % (8298)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.31  % (8298)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.61/1.31  % (8298)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.61/1.31  
% 1.61/1.31  
% 1.61/1.31  % (8298)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.61/1.31  % (8300)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.61/1.31  % (8300)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.31  % (8300)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.61/1.31  % (8298)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.61/1.31  % (8300)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.61/1.31  
% 1.61/1.31  
% 1.61/1.31  % (8298)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 1.61/1.31  % (8298)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.31  % (8298)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.31  % (8300)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.61/1.31  % (8300)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.61/1.31  % (8300)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 1.61/1.31  % (8300)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.31  % (8300)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.31  % (8299)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.61/1.31  % (8299)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.31  % (8299)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.61/1.31  % (8299)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.61/1.31  % (8299)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.61/1.31  
% 1.61/1.31  % (8299)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.61/1.31  % (8299)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 1.61/1.31  % (8299)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.61/1.31  % (8299)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.31  % (8299)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.32  % (8297)First to succeed.
% 1.61/1.32  % (8297)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.61/1.32  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_8012
% 1.61/1.32  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_8012
% 1.61/1.32  thf(func_def_1, type, vEPSILON: !>[X0: $tType]:((X0 > $o) > X0)).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(func_def_4, type, sK0: (($i > $o) > $i) > $i > $o).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(func_def_5, type, sK1: (($i > $o) > $i) > $i).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(func_def_7, type, ph3: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f23,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    $false),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f17])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f17,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ($true = $false)),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f16,f10])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ( ! [X0 : ($i > $o) > $i] : (((sK0 @ X0 @ (sK1 @ X0)) = $true)) )),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ! [X0 : ($i > $o) > $i] : (((sK0 @ X0 @ (X0 @ (sK0 @ X0))) != $true) & ((sK0 @ X0 @ (sK1 @ X0)) = $true))),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f6,f8,f7])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ! [X0 : ($i > $o) > $i] : (? [X1 : $i > $o] : (((X1 @ (X0 @ X1)) != $true) & ? [X2 : $i] : ((X1 @ X2) = $true)) => (((sK0 @ X0 @ (X0 @ (sK0 @ X0))) != $true) & ? [X2 : $i] : ($true = (sK0 @ X0 @ X2))))),
% 1.61/1.32    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ! [X0 : ($i > $o) > $i] : (? [X2 : $i] : ($true = (sK0 @ X0 @ X2)) => ((sK0 @ X0 @ (sK1 @ X0)) = $true))),
% 1.61/1.32    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f6,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ! [X0 : ($i > $o) > $i] : ? [X1 : $i > $o] : (((X1 @ (X0 @ X1)) != $true) & ? [X2 : $i] : ((X1 @ X2) = $true))),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f5,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ~? [X0 : ($i > $o) > $i] : ! [X1 : $i > $o] : (? [X2 : $i] : ((X1 @ X2) = $true) => ((X1 @ (X0 @ X1)) = $true))),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f4,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ~? [X0 : ($i > $o) > $i] : ! [X1 : $i > $o] : (? [X2 : $i] : (X1 @ X2) => (X1 @ (X0 @ X1)))),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.61/1.32    ~? [X0 : ($i > $o) > $i] : ! [X1 : $i > $o] : (? [X2 : $i] : (X1 @ X2) => (X1 @ (X0 @ X1)))),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 1.61/1.32    ? [X0 : ($i > $o) > $i] : ! [X1 : $i > $o] : (? [X2 : $i] : (X1 @ X2) => (X1 @ (X0 @ X1)))),
% 1.61/1.32    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.qJ5bK45LbH/DTF2THF_8012.p',conj)).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f16,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ( ! [X0 : $i] : (((sK0 @ @@+ @ $i @ X0) = $false)) )),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f14])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f14,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ( ! [X0 : $i] : (((sK0 @ @@+ @ $i @ X0) = $false) | ($true != $true)) )),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f11,f12])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f12,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ( ! [X0 : ($i > $o) > $i,X1 : $i] : (((sK0 @ X0 @ (@@+ @ $i @ (sK0 @ X0))) = $true) | ((sK0 @ X0 @ X1) = $false)) )),
% 1.61/1.32    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ( ! [X0 : ($i > $o) > $i] : (((sK0 @ X0 @ (X0 @ (sK0 @ X0))) != $true)) )),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9])).
% 1.61/1.32  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_8012
% 1.61/1.32  % (8297)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.32  % (8297)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.61/1.32  % (8297)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.61/1.32  
% 1.61/1.32  % (8297)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.61/1.32  % (8297)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 1.61/1.32  % (8297)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.61/1.32  % (8297)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.32  % (8297)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.32  % (8294)Success in time 0.021 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------