↑ Up

Lash---1.13.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Lash---1.13
% Problem  : SYN997^1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : lash -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  9 03:17:34 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 20.21s 20.41s
% Output   : Proof 20.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   17 (   9 unt;   0 typ;   1 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   29 (   1 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   48 (  17   ~;   5   |;   0   &;  16   @)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    8 (   8   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    9 (   7 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   13 (   1   ^;   9   !;   0   ?;  13   :)
%                                         (   0  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   3  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(ty_eigen__7,type,
    eigen__7: $i > $o ).

thf(h0,assumption,
    ! [X1: ( $i > $o ) > $o,X2: $i > $o] :
      ( ( X1 @ X2 )
     => ( X1 @ ( eps__0 @ X1 ) ) ),
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(eigendef_eigen__7,definition,
    ( eigen__7
    = ( eps__0
      @ ^ [X1: $i > $o] :
          ~ ( ~ ! [X2: $i] :
                  ~ ( X1 @ X2 )
           => ( X1
              @ @+[X2: $i] : ( X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[eigen__7])]) ).

thf(sP1,plain,
    ( sP1
  <=> ( eigen__7
      @ @+[X1: $i] : ( eigen__7 @ X1 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP1])]) ).

thf(sP2,plain,
    ( sP2
  <=> ! [X1: $i] :
        ~ ( eigen__7 @ X1 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP2])]) ).

thf(sP3,plain,
    ( sP3
  <=> ! [X1: $i > $o] :
        ( ~ ! [X2: $i] :
              ~ ( X1 @ X2 )
       => ( X1
          @ @+[X2: $i] : ( X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP3])]) ).

thf(sP4,plain,
    ( sP4
  <=> ! [X1: ( $i > $o ) > $i] :
        ~ ! [X2: $i > $o] :
            ( ~ ! [X3: $i] :
                  ~ ( X2 @ X3 )
           => ( X2 @ ( X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP4])]) ).

thf(sP5,plain,
    ( sP5
  <=> ( ~ sP2
     => sP1 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP5])]) ).

thf(conj,conjecture,
    ~ sP4 ).

thf(h1,negated_conjecture,
    sP4,
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj]) ).

thf(1,plain,
    ( sP1
    | sP2 ),
    inference(choice_rule,[status(thm)],[]) ).

thf(2,plain,
    ( sP5
    | ~ sP1 ),
    inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ( sP5
    | ~ sP2 ),
    inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ( sP3
    | ~ sP5 ),
    inference(eigen_choice_rule,[status(thm),assumptions([h0])],[h0,eigendef_eigen__7]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ( ~ sP4
    | ~ sP3 ),
    inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_unsat,[status(thm),assumptions([h1,h0])],[1,2,3,4,5,h1]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    $false,
    inference(eigenvar_choice,[status(thm),assumptions([h1]),eigenvar_choice(discharge,[h0])],[6,h0]) ).

thf(0,theorem,
    ~ sP4,
    inference(contra,[status(thm),contra(discharge,[h1])],[6,h1]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SYN997^1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : lash -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Oct  8 15:10:23 EDT 2025
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 20.21/20.41  % SZS status Theorem
% 20.21/20.41  % Mode: cade22grackle2x798d
% 20.21/20.41  % Steps: 396
% 20.21/20.41  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------