↑ Up

cocATP---0.2.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : cocATP---0.2.0
% Problem  : SYN997^1 : TPTP v7.5.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu---x86_64 x86_64--- ------Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% Model    : Unavailable
% CPU      : Unavailable
% Memory   : Unavailable
% OS       : Unavailable
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 0s
% DateTime : Mon Mar 28 13:41:29 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.44s 0.70s
% Output   : Proof 0.44s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11  % Problem    : SYN997^1 : TPTP v7.5.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.11/0.11  % Command    : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer   : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model      : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPUModel   : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % RAMPerCPU  : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS         : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime   : Fri Mar 11 04:13:24 EST 2022
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.11/0.33  ModuleCmd_Load.c(213):ERROR:105: Unable to locate a modulefile for 'python/python27'
% 0.11/0.34  Python 2.7.5
% 0.44/0.70  Using paths ['/home/cristobal/cocATP/CASC/TPTP/', '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/', '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/']
% 0.44/0.70  FOF formula ((ex ((fofType->Prop)->fofType)) (fun (E:((fofType->Prop)->fofType))=> (forall (P:(fofType->Prop)), (((ex fofType) (fun (Y:fofType)=> (P Y)))->(P (E P)))))) of role conjecture named conj
% 0.44/0.70  Conjecture to prove = ((ex ((fofType->Prop)->fofType)) (fun (E:((fofType->Prop)->fofType))=> (forall (P:(fofType->Prop)), (((ex fofType) (fun (Y:fofType)=> (P Y)))->(P (E P)))))):Prop
% 0.44/0.70  Parameter fofType_DUMMY:fofType.
% 0.44/0.70  We need to prove ['((ex ((fofType->Prop)->fofType)) (fun (E:((fofType->Prop)->fofType))=> (forall (P:(fofType->Prop)), (((ex fofType) (fun (Y:fofType)=> (P Y)))->(P (E P))))))']
% 0.44/0.70  Parameter fofType:Type.
% 0.44/0.70  Trying to prove ((ex ((fofType->Prop)->fofType)) (fun (E:((fofType->Prop)->fofType))=> (forall (P:(fofType->Prop)), (((ex fofType) (fun (Y:fofType)=> (P Y)))->(P (E P))))))
% 0.44/0.70  Found fofType_DUMMY:fofType
% 0.44/0.70  Found fofType_DUMMY as proof of fofType
% 0.44/0.70  Found (choice_operator0 fofType_DUMMY) as proof of ((ex ((fofType->Prop)->fofType)) (fun (E:((fofType->Prop)->fofType))=> (forall (P:(fofType->Prop)), (((ex fofType) (fun (Y:fofType)=> (P Y)))->(P (E P))))))
% 0.44/0.70  Found ((choice_operator fofType) fofType_DUMMY) as proof of ((ex ((fofType->Prop)->fofType)) (fun (E:((fofType->Prop)->fofType))=> (forall (P:(fofType->Prop)), (((ex fofType) (fun (Y:fofType)=> (P Y)))->(P (E P))))))
% 0.44/0.70  Found ((choice_operator fofType) fofType_DUMMY) as proof of ((ex ((fofType->Prop)->fofType)) (fun (E:((fofType->Prop)->fofType))=> (forall (P:(fofType->Prop)), (((ex fofType) (fun (Y:fofType)=> (P Y)))->(P (E P))))))
% 0.44/0.70  Got proof ((choice_operator fofType) fofType_DUMMY)
% 0.44/0.70  Time elapsed = 0.054242s
% 0.44/0.70  node=7 cost=85.000000 depth=3
% 0.44/0.70  ::::::::::::::::::::::
% 0.44/0.70  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.44/0.70  % SZS output start Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.44/0.70  ((choice_operator fofType) fofType_DUMMY)
% 0.44/0.70  % SZS output end Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------