↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SYN999^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:51:42 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.48s 1.25s
% Output   : Refutation 1.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (  20 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  128 (  31 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  121 (  10   ~;   1   |;   4   &;  83   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  17  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   19 (  19   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    9 (   5 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%                                         (   6  !!;   0  ??;   0 @@+;   0 @@-)
%            Number of variables   :   37 (  20   ^;  13   !;   4   ?;  37   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(func_def_0,type,
    leibeq: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_13,type,
    sK3: $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_15,type,
    ph4: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(f45,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f44]) ).

thf(f44,plain,
    $true = $false,
    inference(backward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f22,f43]) ).

thf(f43,plain,
    ( ( sK3 @ sK0 )
    = $false ),
    inference(backward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f21,f28]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    sK0 = sK1,
    inference(leibniz_equality_elimination,[status(thm)],[f25]) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $o] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( X1 @ sK1 ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( X1 @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f24]) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $o] :
      ( $true
      = ( ( X1 @ sK1 )
       => ( X1 @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f23]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
            ( ( Y0 @ sK1 )
           => ( Y0 @ sK0 ) )
        @ X1 )
      = $true ),
    inference(pi_clausification,[status(thm)],[f17]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ( ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
      @ ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
          ( ( Y0 @ sK1 )
         => ( Y0 @ sK0 ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f16]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] :
          ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
          @ ^ [Y2: $i > $o] :
              ( ( Y2 @ Y0 )
             => ( Y2 @ Y1 ) ) )
      @ sK1
      @ sK0 ) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[status(thm)],[f13,f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( leibeq
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] :
          ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
          @ ^ [Y2: $i > $o] :
              ( ( Y2 @ Y0 )
             => ( Y2 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ( leibeq
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] :
          ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
          @ ^ [Y2: $i > $o] :
              ( ( Y2 @ Y0 )
             => ( Y2 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ( leibeq
    = ( ^ [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
        ! [X2: $i > $o] :
          ( ( X2 @ X0 )
         => ( X2 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,axiom,
    ( leibeq
    = ( ^ [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
        ! [X2: $i > $o] :
          ( ( X2 @ X0 )
         => ( X2 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tDlPxvbSWo/DTF2THF_12017.p',leibeq) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( ( leibeq @ sK1 @ sK0 )
    = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( leibeq @ sK0 @ sK1 ) )
    & ( ( leibeq @ sK1 @ sK0 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f9,f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ? [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
        ( ( ( leibeq @ X0 @ X1 )
         != $true )
        & ( ( leibeq @ X1 @ X0 )
          = $true ) )
   => ( ( $true
       != ( leibeq @ sK0 @ sK1 ) )
      & ( ( leibeq @ sK1 @ sK0 )
        = $true ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ? [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( leibeq @ X0 @ X1 )
       != $true )
      & ( ( leibeq @ X1 @ X0 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
        ( ( ( leibeq @ X1 @ X0 )
          = $true )
       => ( ( leibeq @ X0 @ X1 )
          = $true ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
        ( ( leibeq @ X1 @ X0 )
       => ( leibeq @ X0 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f3]) ).

thf(f3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1: $i,X0: $i] :
        ( ( leibeq @ X0 @ X1 )
       => ( leibeq @ X1 @ X0 ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i,X0: $i] :
      ( ( leibeq @ X0 @ X1 )
     => ( leibeq @ X1 @ X0 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tDlPxvbSWo/DTF2THF_12017.p',conj) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ( ( sK3 @ sK1 )
    = $false ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f20]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ( $false
    = ( ( sK3 @ sK0 )
     => ( sK3 @ sK1 ) ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f19]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
          ( ( Y0 @ sK0 )
         => ( Y0 @ sK1 ) )
      @ sK3 )
    = $false ),
    inference(sigma_clausification,[status(thm)],[f18]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ( $true
   != ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
      @ ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
          ( ( Y0 @ sK0 )
         => ( Y0 @ sK1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f15]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ( $true
   != ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] :
          ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
          @ ^ [Y2: $i > $o] :
              ( ( Y2 @ Y0 )
             => ( Y2 @ Y1 ) ) )
      @ sK0
      @ sK1 ) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[status(thm)],[f14,f12]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( $true
   != ( leibeq @ sK0 @ sK1 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ( ( sK3 @ sK0 )
    = $true ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f20]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : SYN999^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.15/0.33  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 14:21:54 EST 2026
% 0.15/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.33  Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.29/0.45  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.29/0.45  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.29/0.45  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.29/0.45  % File     : SYN999^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.29/0.45  % Domain   : Syntactic
% 0.29/0.45  % Problem  : Leibniz equality is symmetric
% 0.29/0.45  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.29/0.45  % English  :
% 0.29/0.45  
% 0.29/0.45  % Refs     : [BB05]  Benzmueller & Brown (2005), A Structured Set of Higher
% 0.29/0.45  %          : [Ben09] Benzmueller (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.29/0.45  % Source   : [Ben09]
% 0.29/0.45  % Names    : Example 6b [BB05]
% 0.29/0.45  
% 0.29/0.45  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.29/0.45  % Rating   : 0.11 v9.1.0, 0.12 v9.0.0, 0.10 v8.2.0, 0.38 v8.1.0, 0.36 v7.5.0, 0.29 v7.4.0, 0.00 v6.2.0, 0.29 v6.1.0, 0.14 v6.0.0, 0.29 v5.5.0, 0.33 v5.4.0, 0.40 v5.3.0, 0.60 v5.2.0, 0.40 v4.1.0, 0.33 v3.7.0
% 0.29/0.45  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    3 (   1 unt;   1 typ;   1 def)
% 0.29/0.45  %            Number of atoms       :    4 (   1 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.29/0.45  %            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   2 avg)
% 0.29/0.45  %            Number of connectives :    8 (   0   ~;   0   |;   0   &;   6   @)
% 0.29/0.45  %                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.29/0.45  %            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   4 avg)
% 0.29/0.45  %            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
% 0.29/0.45  %            Number of type conns  :    3 (   3   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.29/0.45  %            Number of symbols     :    2 (   1 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 0.29/0.45  %            Number of variables   :    5 (   2   ^;   3   !;   0   ?;   5   :)
% 0.29/0.45  % SPC      : TH0_THM_EQU_NAR
% 0.29/0.45  
% 0.29/0.45  % Comments : 
% 0.29/0.45  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.29/0.45  thf(leibeq_decl,type,
% 0.29/0.45      leibeq: $i > $i > $o ).
% 0.29/0.45  
% 0.29/0.45  thf(leibeq,definition,
% 0.29/0.45      ( leibeq
% 0.29/0.45      = ( ^ [X: $i,Y: $i] :
% 0.29/0.45          ! [P: $i > $o] :
% 0.29/0.45            ( ( P @ X )
% 0.29/0.45           => ( P @ Y ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.29/0.45  
% 0.29/0.45  thf(conj,conjecture,
% 0.29/0.45      ! [X: $i,Y: $i] :
% 0.29/0.45        ( ( leibeq @ X @ Y )
% 0.29/0.45       => ( leibeq @ Y @ X ) ) ).
% 0.29/0.45  
% 0.29/0.45  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.29/0.45  ------------------------
% 1.48/1.21  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.48/1.21  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.48/1.21  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 14:21:55 EST 2026
% 1.48/1.21  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.48/1.21  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.48/1.21  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.48/1.21  
% 1.48/1.21  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tDlPxvbSWo/DTF2DTF12017.p
% See solution above
% 1.48/1.21  ------------------------
% 1.48/1.22  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.48/1.22  thf(leibeq_decl,type,
% 1.48/1.22      leibeq: $i > $i > $o ).
% 1.48/1.22  
% 1.48/1.22  thf(leibeq,definition,
% 1.48/1.22      ( leibeq
% 1.48/1.22      = ( ^ [X: $i,Y: $i] :
% 1.48/1.22          ! [P: $i > $o] :
% 1.48/1.22            ( ( P @ X )
% 1.48/1.22           => ( P @ Y ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.48/1.22  
% 1.48/1.22  thf(conj,conjecture,
% 1.48/1.22      ! [X: $i,Y: $i] :
% 1.48/1.22        ( ( leibeq @ X @ Y )
% 1.48/1.22       => ( leibeq @ Y @ X ) ) ).
% 1.48/1.22  ------------------------
% 1.48/1.24  % (12137)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_12017 for (2999ds/275Mi)
% 1.48/1.24  % (12134)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_12017 for (2999ds/27Mi)
% 1.48/1.24  % (12137)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.48/1.24  % (12137)------------------------------
% 1.48/1.24  % (12137)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.48/1.24  % (12137)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.48/1.24  
% 1.48/1.24  
% 1.48/1.24  % (12137)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.48/1.24  % (12137)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 1.48/1.24  % (12137)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 1.48/1.24  % (12137)------------------------------
% 1.48/1.24  % (12137)------------------------------
% 1.48/1.24  % (12134)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.48/1.24  % (12134)------------------------------
% 1.48/1.24  % (12134)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.48/1.24  % (12134)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.48/1.24  
% 1.48/1.24  
% 1.48/1.24  % (12134)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.48/1.24  % (12134)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 1.48/1.24  % (12134)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.48/1.24  % (12134)------------------------------
% 1.48/1.24  % (12134)------------------------------
% 1.48/1.25  % (12132)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_12017 for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 1.48/1.25  % (12133)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_12017 for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 1.48/1.25  % (12135)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_12017 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 1.48/1.25  % (12136)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_12017 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 1.48/1.25  % (12138)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_12017 for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 1.48/1.25  % (12135)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.48/1.25  % (12135)------------------------------
% 1.48/1.25  % (12135)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.48/1.25  % (12135)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.48/1.25  % (12135)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.48/1.25  
% 1.48/1.25  % (12135)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 1.48/1.25  % (12135)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.48/1.25  % (12135)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.48/1.25  % (12135)------------------------------
% 1.48/1.25  % (12135)------------------------------
% 1.48/1.25  % (12136)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.48/1.25  % (12136)------------------------------
% 1.48/1.25  % (12136)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.48/1.25  % (12136)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.48/1.25  % (12136)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.48/1.25  
% 1.48/1.25  % (12136)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.48/1.25  % (12136)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 1.48/1.25  % (12136)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.48/1.25  % (12136)------------------------------
% 1.48/1.25  % (12136)------------------------------
% 1.48/1.25  % (12133)First to succeed.
% 1.48/1.25  % (12138)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.48/1.25  % (12133)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.48/1.25  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_12017
% 1.48/1.25  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_12017
% 1.48/1.25  thf(func_def_0, type, leibeq: $i > $i > $o).
% 1.48/1.25  thf(func_def_13, type, sK3: $i > $o).
% 1.48/1.25  thf(func_def_15, type, ph4: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 1.48/1.25  thf(f45,plain,(
% 1.48/1.25    $false),
% 1.48/1.25    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f44])).
% 1.48/1.25  thf(f44,plain,(
% 1.48/1.25    ($true = $false)),
% 1.48/1.25    inference(backward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f22,f43])).
% 1.48/1.25  thf(f43,plain,(
% 1.48/1.25    ((sK3 @ sK0) = $false)),
% 1.48/1.25    inference(backward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f21,f28])).
% 1.48/1.25  thf(f28,plain,(
% 1.48/1.25    (sK0 = sK1)),
% 1.48/1.25    inference(leibniz_equality_elimination,[status(thm)],[f25])).
% 1.48/1.25  thf(f25,plain,(
% 1.48/1.25    ( ! [X1 : $i > $o] : (($false = (X1 @ sK1)) | ($true = (X1 @ sK0))) )),
% 1.48/1.25    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f24])).
% 1.48/1.25  thf(f24,plain,(
% 1.48/1.25    ( ! [X1 : $i > $o] : (($true = ((X1 @ sK1) => (X1 @ sK0)))) )),
% 1.48/1.25    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f23])).
% 1.48/1.25  thf(f23,plain,(
% 1.48/1.25    ( ! [X1 : $i > $o] : ((((^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((Y0 @ sK1) => (Y0 @ sK0))) @ X1) = $true)) )),
% 1.48/1.25    inference(pi_clausification,[status(thm)],[f17])).
% 1.48/1.25  thf(f17,plain,(
% 1.48/1.25    ((!! @ ($i > $o) @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((Y0 @ sK1) => (Y0 @ sK0)))) = $true)),
% 1.48/1.25    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f16])).
% 1.48/1.25  thf(f16,plain,(
% 1.48/1.25    ($true = ((^[Y0 : $i]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: (!! @ ($i > $o) @ (^[Y2 : $i > $o]: ((Y2 @ Y0) => (Y2 @ Y1))))))) @ sK1 @ sK0))),
% 1.48/1.25    inference(definition_unfolding,[status(thm)],[f13,f12])).
% 1.48/1.25  thf(f12,plain,(
% 1.48/1.25    (leibeq = (^[Y0 : $i]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: (!! @ ($i > $o) @ (^[Y2 : $i > $o]: ((Y2 @ Y0) => (Y2 @ Y1))))))))),
% 1.48/1.25    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f8])).
% 1.48/1.25  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.48/1.25    (leibeq = (^[Y0 : $i]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: (!! @ ($i > $o) @ (^[Y2 : $i > $o]: ((Y2 @ Y0) => (Y2 @ Y1))))))))),
% 1.48/1.25    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f7])).
% 1.48/1.25  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.48/1.25    (leibeq = (^[X0 : $i, X1 : $i] : (! [X2 : $i > $o] : ((X2 @ X0) => (X2 @ X1)))))),
% 1.48/1.25    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f1])).
% 1.48/1.25  thf(f1,axiom,(
% 1.48/1.25    (leibeq = (^[X0 : $i, X1 : $i] : (! [X2 : $i > $o] : ((X2 @ X0) => (X2 @ X1)))))),
% 1.48/1.25    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tDlPxvbSWo/DTF2THF_12017.p',leibeq)).
% 1.48/1.25  thf(f13,plain,(
% 1.48/1.25    ((leibeq @ sK1 @ sK0) = $true)),
% 1.48/1.25    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11])).
% 1.48/1.25  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.48/1.25    ($true != (leibeq @ sK0 @ sK1)) & ((leibeq @ sK1 @ sK0) = $true)),
% 1.48/1.25    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f9,f10])).
% 1.48/1.25  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.48/1.25    ? [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((leibeq @ X0 @ X1) != $true) & ((leibeq @ X1 @ X0) = $true)) => (($true != (leibeq @ sK0 @ sK1)) & ((leibeq @ sK1 @ sK0) = $true))),
% 1.48/1.25    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.48/1.25  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.48/1.25    ? [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((leibeq @ X0 @ X1) != $true) & ((leibeq @ X1 @ X0) = $true))),
% 1.48/1.25    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6])).
% 1.48/1.25  thf(f6,plain,(
% 1.48/1.25    ~! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((leibeq @ X1 @ X0) = $true) => ((leibeq @ X0 @ X1) = $true))),
% 1.48/1.25    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.48/1.25  thf(f5,plain,(
% 1.48/1.25    ~! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : ((leibeq @ X1 @ X0) => (leibeq @ X0 @ X1))),
% 1.48/1.25    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f3])).
% 1.48/1.25  thf(f3,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.48/1.25    ~! [X1 : $i,X0 : $i] : ((leibeq @ X0 @ X1) => (leibeq @ X1 @ X0))),
% 1.48/1.25    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f2])).
% 1.48/1.25  thf(f2,conjecture,(
% 1.48/1.25    ! [X1 : $i,X0 : $i] : ((leibeq @ X0 @ X1) => (leibeq @ X1 @ X0))),
% 1.48/1.25    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tDlPxvbSWo/DTF2THF_12017.p',conj)).
% 1.48/1.25  thf(f21,plain,(
% 1.48/1.25    ((sK3 @ sK1) = $false)),
% 1.48/1.25    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f20])).
% 1.48/1.25  thf(f20,plain,(
% 1.48/1.25    ($false = ((sK3 @ sK0) => (sK3 @ sK1)))),
% 1.48/1.25    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f19])).
% 1.48/1.25  thf(f19,plain,(
% 1.48/1.25    (((^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((Y0 @ sK0) => (Y0 @ sK1))) @ sK3) = $false)),
% 1.48/1.25    inference(sigma_clausification,[status(thm)],[f18])).
% 1.48/1.25  thf(f18,plain,(
% 1.48/1.25    ($true != (!! @ ($i > $o) @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((Y0 @ sK0) => (Y0 @ sK1)))))),
% 1.48/1.25    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f15])).
% 1.48/1.25  thf(f15,plain,(
% 1.48/1.25    ($true != ((^[Y0 : $i]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: (!! @ ($i > $o) @ (^[Y2 : $i > $o]: ((Y2 @ Y0) => (Y2 @ Y1))))))) @ sK0 @ sK1))),
% 1.48/1.25    inference(definition_unfolding,[status(thm)],[f14,f12])).
% 1.48/1.25  thf(f14,plain,(
% 1.48/1.25    ($true != (leibeq @ sK0 @ sK1))),
% 1.48/1.25    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11])).
% 1.48/1.25  thf(f22,plain,(
% 1.48/1.25    ((sK3 @ sK0) = $true)),
% 1.48/1.25    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f20])).
% 1.48/1.25  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_12017
% 1.48/1.25  % (12133)------------------------------
% 1.48/1.25  % (12133)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.48/1.25  % (12133)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.48/1.25  
% 1.48/1.25  % (12133)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.48/1.25  % (12133)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 1.48/1.25  % (12133)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.48/1.25  % (12133)------------------------------
% 1.48/1.25  % (12133)------------------------------
% 1.48/1.25  % (12131)Success in time 0.01 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------