↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : SYO002^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:46:15 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.08s 0.26s
% Output   : Refutation 0.08s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   27 (  20 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  112 (  27 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  133 (   8   ~;   1   |;   2   &; 100   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  16  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   24 (  24   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   18 (  14 usr;   5 con; 0-4 aty)
%                                         (   6  !!;   0  ??;   0 @@+;   0 @@-)
%            Number of variables   :   40 (  20   ^;  17   !;   3   ?;  40   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    sTfun: ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    leibeq: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    vPI: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    vIMP: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    db0: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    db2: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    db1: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    vLAM: 
      !>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( X1 > X0 > X1 ) ).

thf(func_def_12,type,
    sK2: $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_13,type,
    vNOT: $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_14,type,
    sK3: $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_15,type,
    vEQ: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( X0 > X0 > $o ) ).

thf(f1,axiom,
    ( leibeq
    = ( ^ [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
        ! [X2: $i > $o] :
          ( ( X2 @ X0 )
         => ( X2 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',leibeq) ).

thf(f2,conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i,X0: $i,X2: $i > $i] :
      ( ( leibeq @ X0 @ X1 )
     => ( leibeq @ ( X2 @ X0 ) @ ( X2 @ X1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj) ).

thf(f3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1: $i,X0: $i,X2: $i > $i] :
        ( ( leibeq @ X0 @ X1 )
       => ( leibeq @ ( X2 @ X0 ) @ ( X2 @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f2]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ( leibeq
    = ( ^ [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
        ! [X2: $i > $o] :
          ( ( X2 @ X0 )
         => ( X2 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f1]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ( leibeq
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] :
          ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
          @ ^ [Y2: $i > $o] :
              ( ( Y2 @ Y0 )
             => ( Y2 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i > $i] :
        ( ( leibeq @ X1 @ X0 )
       => ( leibeq @ ( X2 @ X1 ) @ ( X2 @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f3]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ~ ! [X2: $i > $i,X0: $i,X1: $i] :
        ( ( $true
          = ( leibeq @ X1 @ X0 ) )
       => ( $true
          = ( leibeq @ ( X2 @ X1 ) @ ( X2 @ X0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f6]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ? [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i > $i] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( leibeq @ X1 @ X0 ) )
      & ( $true
       != ( leibeq @ ( X2 @ X1 ) @ ( X2 @ X0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( leibeq @ sK1 @ sK0 ) )
    & ( $true
     != ( leibeq @ ( sK2 @ sK1 ) @ ( sK2 @ sK0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1),skolemize(X2,sK2)],[f8]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( $true
   != ( leibeq @ ( sK2 @ sK1 ) @ ( sK2 @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( leibeq @ sK1 @ sK0 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( leibeq
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] :
          ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
          @ ^ [Y2: $i > $o] :
              ( ( Y2 @ Y0 )
             => ( Y2 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] :
          ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
          @ ^ [Y2: $i > $o] :
              ( ( Y2 @ Y0 )
             => ( Y2 @ Y1 ) ) )
      @ sK1
      @ sK0 ) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f11,f12]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ( $true
   != ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] :
          ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
          @ ^ [Y2: $i > $o] :
              ( ( Y2 @ Y0 )
             => ( Y2 @ Y1 ) ) )
      @ ( sK2 @ sK1 )
      @ ( sK2 @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f10,f12]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ( $true
   != ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
      @ ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
          ( ( Y0 @ ( sK2 @ sK1 ) )
         => ( Y0 @ ( sK2 @ sK0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f16]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
          ( ( Y0 @ ( sK2 @ sK1 ) )
         => ( Y0 @ ( sK2 @ sK0 ) ) )
      @ sK3 )
    = $false ),
    inference(sigma_proxy_clausification,[],[f17]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ( ( ( sK3 @ ( sK2 @ sK1 ) )
     => ( sK3 @ ( sK2 @ sK0 ) ) )
    = $false ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f18]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ( $false
    = ( sK3 @ ( sK2 @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f19]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( sK3 @ ( sK2 @ sK1 ) ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f19]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
      @ ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
          ( ( Y0 @ sK1 )
         => ( Y0 @ sK0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f15]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $o] :
      ( $true
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
            ( ( Y0 @ sK1 )
           => ( Y0 @ sK0 ) )
        @ X1 ) ),
    inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f22]) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $o] :
      ( $true
      = ( ( X1 @ sK1 )
       => ( X1 @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f23]) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $o] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( X1 @ sK1 ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( X1 @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f24]) ).

thf(f27,plain,
    sK0 = sK1,
    inference(leibniz_equality_elimination,[],[f25]) ).

thf(f37,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( sK3 @ ( sK2 @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f21,f27]) ).

thf(f38,plain,
    $true = $false,
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f37,f20]) ).

thf(f39,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f38]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYO002^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.18  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.18  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.18  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.18  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.18  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.18  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.18  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.18  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 16:18:41 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.19  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.19  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.22  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.08/0.23  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.26  % (3573557)Detected a higher-order problem, will run a greedy HOL sequence.
% 0.08/0.26  % (3573566)lrs+10_40_drc=off:e2e=on:si=on:uwa=one_side_interpreted:random_seed=514731404:s2a=on:i=87:rtra=on:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/87Mi)
% 0.08/0.26  % (3573566) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-3573557-3573566"...
% 0.08/0.26  % (3573566)...printing done.
% 0.08/0.26  % (3573566)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.08/0.26  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.08/0.26  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.08/0.26  % (3573566)------------------------------
% 0.08/0.26  % (3573566)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.08/0.26  % (3573566)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.08/0.26  % (3573566)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.08/0.26  % (3573566)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.08/0.26  % (3573566)Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 0.08/0.26  % (3573566)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.08/0.26  % (3573566)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.08/0.26  % (3573557)Success in time 0.015 s
% 0.08/0.26  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------