↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SYO003^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:53:06 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.54s 1.31s
% Output   : Refutation 1.54s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   24 (  17 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  119 (  35 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  114 (  10   ~;   2   |;  14   &;  71   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  13  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   21 (  21   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   10 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%                                         (   4  !!;   0  ??;   0 @@+;   0 @@-)
%            Number of variables   :   41 (  15   ^;  17   !;   9   ?;  41   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(func_def_0,type,
    leibeq: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    vEPSILON: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > X0 ) ).

thf(func_def_11,type,
    sK0: $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_15,type,
    ph4: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(f27,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f26]) ).

thf(f26,plain,
    $true != $true,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f13,f24]) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ( ( sK0 @ sK1 )
    = $true ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f22]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK1 )
      = $true )
    | ( $true = $false ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f21,f15]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
    & ( ( leibeq @ sK2 @ sK1 )
      = $true )
    & ( ( sK0 @ sK1 )
     != $true ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f10,f11]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( ? [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
        ( ( $true
          = ( X0 @ X2 ) )
        & ( ( leibeq @ X2 @ X1 )
          = $true )
        & ( $true
         != ( X0 @ X1 ) ) )
   => ( ( $true
        = ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
      & ( ( leibeq @ sK2 @ sK1 )
        = $true )
      & ( ( sK0 @ sK1 )
       != $true ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ? [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( X0 @ X2 ) )
      & ( ( leibeq @ X2 @ X1 )
        = $true )
      & ( $true
       != ( X0 @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ? [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( X0 @ X1 ) )
      & ( ( leibeq @ X2 @ X1 )
        = $true )
      & ( $true
        = ( X0 @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
        ( ( ( ( leibeq @ X2 @ X1 )
            = $true )
          & ( $true
            = ( X0 @ X2 ) ) )
       => ( $true
          = ( X0 @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
        ( ( ( leibeq @ X2 @ X1 )
          & ( X0 @ X2 ) )
       => ( X0 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f3]) ).

thf(f3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X2: $i > $o,X1: $i,X0: $i] :
        ( ( ( leibeq @ X0 @ X1 )
          & ( X2 @ X0 ) )
       => ( X2 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,conjecture,
    ! [X2: $i > $o,X1: $i,X0: $i] :
      ( ( ( leibeq @ X0 @ X1 )
        & ( X2 @ X0 ) )
     => ( X2 @ X1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.zclfHsQkE0/DTF2THF_836.p',conj) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( X1 @ sK2 )
        = $false )
      | ( ( X1 @ sK1 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f20]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $o] :
      ( $true
      = ( ( X1 @ sK2 )
       => ( X1 @ sK1 ) ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f19]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $o] :
      ( $true
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
            ( ( Y0 @ sK2 )
           => ( Y0 @ sK1 ) )
        @ X1 ) ),
    inference(pi_clausification,[status(thm)],[f18]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
      @ ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
          ( ( Y0 @ sK2 )
         => ( Y0 @ sK1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f17]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] :
          ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
          @ ^ [Y2: $i > $o] :
              ( ( Y2 @ Y0 )
             => ( Y2 @ Y1 ) ) )
      @ sK2
      @ sK1 ) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[status(thm)],[f14,f16]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ( leibeq
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] :
          ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
          @ ^ [Y2: $i > $o] :
              ( ( Y2 @ Y0 )
             => ( Y2 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ( leibeq
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] :
          ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
          @ ^ [Y2: $i > $o] :
              ( ( Y2 @ Y0 )
             => ( Y2 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ( leibeq
    = ( ^ [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
        ! [X2: $i > $o] :
          ( ( X2 @ X0 )
         => ( X2 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,axiom,
    ( leibeq
    = ( ^ [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
        ! [X2: $i > $o] :
          ( ( X2 @ X0 )
         => ( X2 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.zclfHsQkE0/DTF2THF_836.p',leibeq) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( ( leibeq @ sK2 @ sK1 )
    = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( ( sK0 @ sK1 )
   != $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09  % Problem  : SYO003^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.10  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.11/0.29  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.29  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.29  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.29  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.29  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.29  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 14:21:45 EST 2026
% 0.11/0.29  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.30  Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.16/0.39  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.16/0.39  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.16/0.39  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.39  % File     : SYO003^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.16/0.39  % Domain   : Syntactic
% 0.16/0.39  % Problem  : Leibniz equality obeys the congruence property under predicates
% 0.16/0.39  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.16/0.39  % English  :
% 0.16/0.39  
% 0.16/0.39  % Refs     : [BB05]  Benzmueller & Brown (2005), A Structured Set of Higher
% 0.16/0.39  %          : [Ben09] Benzmueller (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.16/0.39  % Source   : [Ben09]
% 0.16/0.39  % Names    : Example 7b [BB05]
% 0.16/0.39  
% 0.16/0.39  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.16/0.39  % Rating   : 0.00 v8.2.0, 0.15 v8.1.0, 0.09 v7.5.0, 0.00 v6.2.0, 0.14 v6.1.0, 0.00 v6.0.0, 0.14 v5.5.0, 0.17 v5.4.0, 0.20 v4.1.0, 0.00 v4.0.1, 0.33 v4.0.0, 0.00 v3.7.0
% 0.16/0.39  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    3 (   2 unt;   1 typ;   1 def)
% 0.16/0.39  %            Number of atoms       :    3 (   1 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.16/0.39  %            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
% 0.16/0.39  %            Number of connectives :    9 (   0   ~;   0   |;   1   &;   6   @)
% 0.16/0.39  %                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.16/0.39  %            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   5 avg)
% 0.16/0.39  %            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
% 0.16/0.39  %            Number of type conns  :    4 (   4   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.16/0.39  %            Number of symbols     :    2 (   1 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 0.16/0.39  %            Number of variables   :    6 (   2   ^;   4   !;   0   ?;   6   :)
% 0.16/0.39  % SPC      : TH0_THM_EQU_NAR
% 0.16/0.39  
% 0.16/0.39  % Comments : 
% 0.16/0.39  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.39  thf(leibeq_decl,type,
% 0.16/0.39      leibeq: $i > $i > $o ).
% 0.16/0.39  
% 0.16/0.39  thf(leibeq,definition,
% 0.16/0.39      ( leibeq
% 0.16/0.39      = ( ^ [X: $i,Y: $i] :
% 0.16/0.39          ! [P: $i > $o] :
% 0.16/0.39            ( ( P @ X )
% 0.16/0.39           => ( P @ Y ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.16/0.39  
% 0.16/0.39  thf(conj,conjecture,
% 0.16/0.39      ! [X: $i,Y: $i,P: $i > $o] :
% 0.16/0.39        ( ( ( leibeq @ X @ Y )
% 0.16/0.39          & ( P @ X ) )
% 0.16/0.39       => ( P @ Y ) ) ).
% 0.16/0.39  
% 0.16/0.39  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.39  ------------------------
% 1.36/1.28  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.36/1.28  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.36/1.28  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 14:21:46 EST 2026
% 1.36/1.28  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.36/1.28  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.36/1.28  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.36/1.28  
% 1.36/1.28  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.zclfHsQkE0/DTF2DTF836.p
% See solution above
% 1.36/1.28  ------------------------
% 1.36/1.29  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.36/1.29  thf(leibeq_decl,type,
% 1.36/1.29      leibeq: $i > $i > $o ).
% 1.36/1.29  
% 1.36/1.29  thf(leibeq,definition,
% 1.36/1.29      ( leibeq
% 1.36/1.29      = ( ^ [X: $i,Y: $i] :
% 1.36/1.29          ! [P: $i > $o] :
% 1.36/1.29            ( ( P @ X )
% 1.36/1.29           => ( P @ Y ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.36/1.29  
% 1.36/1.29  thf(conj,conjecture,
% 1.36/1.29      ! [X: $i,Y: $i,P: $i > $o] :
% 1.36/1.29        ( ( ( leibeq @ X @ Y )
% 1.36/1.29          & ( P @ X ) )
% 1.36/1.29       => ( P @ Y ) ) ).
% 1.36/1.29  ------------------------
% 1.54/1.31  % (940)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_836 for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 1.54/1.31  % (941)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_836 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 1.54/1.31  % (939)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_836 for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 1.54/1.31  % (943)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_836 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 1.54/1.31  % (946)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_836 for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 1.54/1.31  % (938)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_836 for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 1.54/1.31  % (945)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_836 for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 1.54/1.31  % (941)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.54/1.31  % (941)------------------------------
% 1.54/1.31  % (941)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.54/1.31  % (941)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.54/1.31  % (941)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.54/1.31  
% 1.54/1.31  % (941)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 1.54/1.31  % (941)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.54/1.31  % (941)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.54/1.31  % (941)------------------------------
% 1.54/1.31  % (941)------------------------------
% 1.54/1.31  % (943)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.54/1.31  % (943)------------------------------
% 1.54/1.31  % (943)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.54/1.31  % (943)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.54/1.31  % (943)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.54/1.31  
% 1.54/1.31  % (943)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 1.54/1.31  % (943)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.54/1.31  % (943)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.54/1.31  % (943)------------------------------
% 1.54/1.31  % (943)------------------------------
% 1.54/1.31  % (945)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.54/1.31  % (945)------------------------------
% 1.54/1.31  % (945)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.54/1.31  % (945)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.54/1.31  
% 1.54/1.31  
% 1.54/1.31  % (945)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.54/1.31  % (945)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.54/1.31  % (945)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.54/1.31  % (945)------------------------------
% 1.54/1.31  % (945)------------------------------
% 1.54/1.31  % (940)First to succeed.
% 1.54/1.31  % (946)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.54/1.31  % (940)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.54/1.31  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_836
% 1.54/1.31  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_836
% 1.54/1.31  thf(func_def_0, type, leibeq: $i > $i > $o).
% 1.54/1.31  thf(func_def_2, type, vEPSILON: !>[X0: $tType]:((X0 > $o) > X0)).
% 1.54/1.31  thf(func_def_11, type, sK0: $i > $o).
% 1.54/1.31  thf(func_def_15, type, ph4: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 1.54/1.31  thf(f27,plain,(
% 1.54/1.31    $false),
% 1.54/1.31    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f26])).
% 1.54/1.31  thf(f26,plain,(
% 1.54/1.31    ($true != $true)),
% 1.54/1.31    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f13,f24])).
% 1.54/1.31  thf(f24,plain,(
% 1.54/1.31    ((sK0 @ sK1) = $true)),
% 1.54/1.31    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f22])).
% 1.54/1.31  thf(f22,plain,(
% 1.54/1.31    ((sK0 @ sK1) = $true) | ($true = $false)),
% 1.54/1.31    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f21,f15])).
% 1.54/1.31  thf(f15,plain,(
% 1.54/1.31    ($true = (sK0 @ sK2))),
% 1.54/1.31    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.54/1.31  thf(f12,plain,(
% 1.54/1.31    ($true = (sK0 @ sK2)) & ((leibeq @ sK2 @ sK1) = $true) & ((sK0 @ sK1) != $true)),
% 1.54/1.31    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f10,f11])).
% 1.54/1.31  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.54/1.31    ? [X0 : $i > $o,X1 : $i,X2 : $i] : (($true = (X0 @ X2)) & ((leibeq @ X2 @ X1) = $true) & ($true != (X0 @ X1))) => (($true = (sK0 @ sK2)) & ((leibeq @ sK2 @ sK1) = $true) & ((sK0 @ sK1) != $true))),
% 1.54/1.31    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.54/1.31  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.54/1.31    ? [X0 : $i > $o,X1 : $i,X2 : $i] : (($true = (X0 @ X2)) & ((leibeq @ X2 @ X1) = $true) & ($true != (X0 @ X1)))),
% 1.54/1.31    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f9])).
% 1.54/1.31  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.54/1.31    ? [X0 : $i > $o,X1 : $i,X2 : $i] : (($true != (X0 @ X1)) & (((leibeq @ X2 @ X1) = $true) & ($true = (X0 @ X2))))),
% 1.54/1.31    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6])).
% 1.54/1.31  thf(f6,plain,(
% 1.54/1.31    ~! [X0 : $i > $o,X1 : $i,X2 : $i] : ((((leibeq @ X2 @ X1) = $true) & ($true = (X0 @ X2))) => ($true = (X0 @ X1)))),
% 1.54/1.31    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.54/1.31  thf(f5,plain,(
% 1.54/1.31    ~! [X0 : $i > $o,X1 : $i,X2 : $i] : (((leibeq @ X2 @ X1) & (X0 @ X2)) => (X0 @ X1))),
% 1.54/1.31    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f3])).
% 1.54/1.31  thf(f3,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.54/1.31    ~! [X2 : $i > $o,X1 : $i,X0 : $i] : (((leibeq @ X0 @ X1) & (X2 @ X0)) => (X2 @ X1))),
% 1.54/1.31    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f2])).
% 1.54/1.31  thf(f2,conjecture,(
% 1.54/1.31    ! [X2 : $i > $o,X1 : $i,X0 : $i] : (((leibeq @ X0 @ X1) & (X2 @ X0)) => (X2 @ X1))),
% 1.54/1.31    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.zclfHsQkE0/DTF2THF_836.p',conj)).
% 1.54/1.31  thf(f21,plain,(
% 1.54/1.31    ( ! [X1 : $i > $o] : (((X1 @ sK2) = $false) | ((X1 @ sK1) = $true)) )),
% 1.54/1.31    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f20])).
% 1.54/1.31  thf(f20,plain,(
% 1.54/1.31    ( ! [X1 : $i > $o] : (($true = ((X1 @ sK2) => (X1 @ sK1)))) )),
% 1.54/1.31    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f19])).
% 1.54/1.31  thf(f19,plain,(
% 1.54/1.31    ( ! [X1 : $i > $o] : (($true = ((^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((Y0 @ sK2) => (Y0 @ sK1))) @ X1))) )),
% 1.54/1.31    inference(pi_clausification,[status(thm)],[f18])).
% 1.54/1.31  thf(f18,plain,(
% 1.54/1.31    ($true = (!! @ ($i > $o) @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((Y0 @ sK2) => (Y0 @ sK1)))))),
% 1.54/1.31    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f17])).
% 1.54/1.31  thf(f17,plain,(
% 1.54/1.31    ($true = ((^[Y0 : $i]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: (!! @ ($i > $o) @ (^[Y2 : $i > $o]: ((Y2 @ Y0) => (Y2 @ Y1))))))) @ sK2 @ sK1))),
% 1.54/1.31    inference(definition_unfolding,[status(thm)],[f14,f16])).
% 1.54/1.31  thf(f16,plain,(
% 1.54/1.31    (leibeq = (^[Y0 : $i]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: (!! @ ($i > $o) @ (^[Y2 : $i > $o]: ((Y2 @ Y0) => (Y2 @ Y1))))))))),
% 1.54/1.31    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f8])).
% 1.54/1.31  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.54/1.31    (leibeq = (^[Y0 : $i]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: (!! @ ($i > $o) @ (^[Y2 : $i > $o]: ((Y2 @ Y0) => (Y2 @ Y1))))))))),
% 1.54/1.31    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f7])).
% 1.54/1.31  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.54/1.31    (leibeq = (^[X0 : $i, X1 : $i] : (! [X2 : $i > $o] : ((X2 @ X0) => (X2 @ X1)))))),
% 1.54/1.31    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f1])).
% 1.54/1.31  thf(f1,axiom,(
% 1.54/1.31    (leibeq = (^[X0 : $i, X1 : $i] : (! [X2 : $i > $o] : ((X2 @ X0) => (X2 @ X1)))))),
% 1.54/1.31    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.zclfHsQkE0/DTF2THF_836.p',leibeq)).
% 1.54/1.31  thf(f14,plain,(
% 1.54/1.31    ((leibeq @ sK2 @ sK1) = $true)),
% 1.54/1.31    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.54/1.31  thf(f13,plain,(
% 1.54/1.31    ((sK0 @ sK1) != $true)),
% 1.54/1.31    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.54/1.31  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_836
% 1.54/1.31  % (940)------------------------------
% 1.54/1.31  % (940)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.54/1.31  % (940)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.54/1.31  
% 1.54/1.31  % (940)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.54/1.31  % (940)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 1.54/1.31  % (940)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.54/1.31  % (940)------------------------------
% 1.54/1.31  % (940)------------------------------
% 1.54/1.31  % (937)Success in time 0.018 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------