↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SYO010^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:45:00 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.84s 2.30s
% Output   : Refutation 3.84s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   17 (   9 unt;   0 typ;   1 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   30 (  11 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   68 (  14   ~;   5   |;   5   &;  39   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    4 (   4   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    8 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (  10   ^;  12   !;   0   ?;  22   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(leibeq_decl,type,
    leibeq: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(p_decl,type,
    p: ( $i > $i ) > $o ).

thf(f_decl,type,
    f: $i > $i ).

thf(sk1_decl,type,
    sk1: $i ).

thf(leibeq_def,definition,
    ( leibeq
    = ( ^ [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ! [C: $i > $o] :
          ( ( C @ A )
         => ( C @ B ) ) ) ) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ( ( ! [A: $i] : ( leibeq @ ( f @ A ) @ A )
      & ( p
        @ ^ [A: $i] : A ) )
   => ( p @ f ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( ! [A: $i] : ( leibeq @ ( f @ A ) @ A )
        & ( p
          @ ^ [A: $i] : A ) )
     => ( p @ f ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ~ ( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i > $o] :
            ( ( B @ ( f @ A ) )
           => ( B @ A ) )
        & ( p
          @ ^ [A: $i] : A ) )
     => ( p @ f ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ! [B: $i > $o,A: $i] :
      ( ( ~ ( B @ ( f @ A ) )
        | ( B @ A ) )
      & ( p
        @ ^ [C: $i] : C )
      & ~ ( p @ f ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[3]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    ( p
    @ ^ [A: $i] : A ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ~ ( p @ f ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ( ~ $true
    | ( ( p @ f )
     != ( p
        @ ^ [A: $i] : A ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[6,7]) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ( ( p @ f )
   != ( p
      @ ^ [A: $i] : A ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ( f
   != ( ^ [A: $i] : A ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(14,plain,
    ( ( f @ sk1 )
   != sk1 ),
    inference(func_ext,[status(esa)],[13]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ! [B: $i > $o,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( B @ ( f @ A ) )
      | ( B @ A ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( f @ A )
       != ( f @ A ) )
      | ( ( f @ A )
        = A ) ),
    inference(replace_leibeq,[status(thm)],[5:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( (=) @ $i @ ( f @ A ) ))]]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( f @ A )
       != ( f @ A ) )
      | ( ( f @ A )
        = A ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( f @ A )
      = A ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(63,plain,
    sk1 != sk1,
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[14,10]) ).

thf(64,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[63]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYO010^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.10/0.20  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.20  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.20  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.20  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.20  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.20  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.20  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.20  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 16:21:15 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.20  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.20  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.85/0.77  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.17/0.95  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (178ms). 
% 1.17/0.96  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.72/1.37  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.72/1.38  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.91/1.47  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.04/1.50  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.04/1.50  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.04/1.50  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.04/1.51  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.56/2.29  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.56/2.30  % Time passed: 1954ms (effective reasoning time: 1322ms)
% 3.56/2.30  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.84/2.30  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 3.84/2.30  % No. of inferences in proof: 16
% 3.84/2.30  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1954 ms resp. 1322 ms w/o parsing
% 3.84/2.34  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.84/2.34  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------