↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : SYO012_8 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 02:24:43 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 2.74s 1.10s
% Output   : Refutation 2.74s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   57 (   8 unt;   0 typ;   6 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  202 (  26 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  134 (  55   ~;  55   |;  15   &)
%                                         (   6 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of FOOLs       :   68 (  66 fml;   2 var)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   12 (   9 usr;  10 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
%            Number of variables   :    1 (   0 sgn   1   !;   0   ?;   1   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(func_def_0,type,
    bG0: $o ).

tff(func_def_3,type,
    bG1: $o ).

tff(pred_def_3,type,
    p: $o > $o ).

tff(f1,conjecture,
    ( p(( a
        & b ))
   => p(( b
        & a )) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj) ).

tff(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( p(( a
          & b ))
     => p(( b
          & a )) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

tff(f3,definition,
    ( ( b
      & a )
  <=> ( bG0 = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[bG0])],[fool_formula_definition]) ).

tff(f4,definition,
    ( ( a
      & b )
  <=> ( $true = bG1 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[bG1])],[fool_formula_definition]) ).

tff(f5,plain,
    ~ ( p(bG1)
     => p(bG0) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f2,f4,f3]) ).

tff(f6,plain,
    ( ~ p(bG0)
    & p(bG1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tff(f7,plain,
    ( ( ( a
        & b )
      | ( $true != bG1 ) )
    & ( ( $true = bG1 )
      | ~ a
      | ~ b ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

tff(f8,plain,
    ( ( ( a
        & b )
      | ( $true != bG1 ) )
    & ( ( $true = bG1 )
      | ~ a
      | ~ b ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f7]) ).

tff(f9,plain,
    ( ( ( b
        & a )
      | ( bG0 != $true ) )
    & ( ( bG0 = $true )
      | ~ b
      | ~ a ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tff(f10,plain,
    ( ( ( b
        & a )
      | ( bG0 != $true ) )
    & ( ( bG0 = $true )
      | ~ b
      | ~ a ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f9]) ).

tff(f11,plain,
    ( ( $true = bG1 )
    | ~ a
    | ~ b ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tff(f12,plain,
    ( b
    | ( $true != bG1 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tff(f13,plain,
    ( a
    | ( $true != bG1 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tff(f14,plain,
    ( ( bG0 = $true )
    | ~ b
    | ~ a ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

tff(f15,plain,
    ( a
    | ( bG0 != $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

tff(f16,plain,
    ( b
    | ( bG0 != $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

tff(f17,plain,
    p(bG1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

tff(f18,plain,
    ~ p(bG0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

tff(f20,plain,
    ! [X0: $o] :
      ( ( $false = (X0) )
      | ( $true = (X0) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[fool_exhaustiveness_axiom]) ).

tff(f22,definition,
    ( spl2_1
  <=> a ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

tff(f26,definition,
    ( spl2_2
  <=> b ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

tff(f30,definition,
    ( spl2_3
  <=> ( bG0 = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_3])],[avatar_definition]) ).

tff(f31,plain,
    ( ( bG0 != $true )
    | spl2_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f30]) ).

tff(f32,plain,
    ( ( bG0 = $true )
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f30]) ).

tff(f33,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_2
    | spl2_3 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f14,f30,f26,f22]) ).

tff(f34,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_3
    | spl2_1 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f15,f22,f30]) ).

tff(f35,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_3
    | spl2_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f16,f26,f30]) ).

tff(f37,definition,
    ( spl2_4
  <=> ( $true = bG1 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_4])],[avatar_definition]) ).

tff(f38,plain,
    ( ( $true != bG1 )
    | spl2_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f37]) ).

tff(f39,plain,
    ( ( $true = bG1 )
    | ~ spl2_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f37]) ).

tff(f40,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_2
    | ~ spl2_1
    | spl2_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f11,f37,f22,f26]) ).

tff(f41,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_4
    | spl2_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f12,f26,f37]) ).

tff(f42,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_4
    | spl2_1 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f13,f22,f37]) ).

tff(f45,plain,
    ( ~ p($false)
    | ( bG0 = $true ) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f18,f20]) ).

tff(f47,plain,
    ( p($false)
    | ( $true = bG1 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f17,f20]) ).

tff(f49,plain,
    ( p($false)
    | spl2_4 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f47,f38]) ).

tff(f50,plain,
    ( ~ p($false)
    | spl2_3 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f45,f31]) ).

tff(f52,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl2_3
    | spl2_4 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f50,f49]) ).

tff(f53,plain,
    ( spl2_3
    | spl2_4 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f52]) ).

tff(f61,plain,
    ( ~ p($true)
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f18,f32]) ).

tff(f64,plain,
    ( p($true)
    | ~ spl2_4 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f17,f39]) ).

tff(f66,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl2_3
    | ~ spl2_4 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f64,f61]) ).

tff(f67,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_3
    | ~ spl2_4 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f66]) ).

cnf(s1,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_2
    | spl2_3 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f33]) ).

cnf(s2,plain,
    ( spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f34]) ).

cnf(s3,plain,
    ( spl2_2
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f35]) ).

cnf(s4,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_2
    | spl2_4 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f40]) ).

cnf(s5,plain,
    ( spl2_2
    | ~ spl2_4 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f41]) ).

cnf(s6,plain,
    ( spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_4 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f42]) ).

cnf(s7,plain,
    ( spl2_3
    | spl2_4 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f53]) ).

cnf(s10,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_3
    | ~ spl2_4 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f67]) ).

cnf(s11,plain,
    spl2_1,
    inference(rat,[],[s7,s2,s6]) ).

cnf(s12,plain,
    spl2_2,
    inference(rat,[],[s7,s3,s5]) ).

cnf(s13,plain,
    spl2_4,
    inference(rat,[],[s4,s11,s12]) ).

cnf(s14,plain,
    spl2_3,
    inference(rat,[],[s1,s11,s12]) ).

cnf(s15,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rat,[],[s10,s13,s14]) ).

tff(f68,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s15]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYO012_8 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.21  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.21  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.21  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.21  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.21  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.21  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.21  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.21  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 17:26:03 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.21  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.21  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.25  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.25  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.74/1.10  % (3776533)Detected formulas, will run a generic FOF schedule.
% 2.74/1.10  % (3776626)dis-1011_1_sil=16000:fde=unused:s2agt=70:random_seed=2357047832:s2a=on:i=139:gtg=position_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/139Mi)
% 2.74/1.10  % (3776626)First to succeed.
% 2.74/1.10  % (3776626)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-3776533"
% 2.74/1.10  % (3776624)lrs+1010_1_to=lpo:sil=32000:sos=on:spb=goal_then_units:bce=on:random_seed=1860257139:i=109:sd=1:ins=1:gsp=on:ss=axioms_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/109Mi)
% 2.74/1.10  % (3776621)lrs+10_1_ncem=casc2026/models/loop8.pt:sil=128000:tgt=full:npcc=on:drc=off:sp=weighted_frequency:spb=goal:fd=preordered:foolp=on:random_seed=2234498144:i=141193_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/141193Mi)
% 2.74/1.10  % (3776622)lrs+11_1_ncem=casc2026/models/loop8.pt:sil=128000:npcc=on:lma=off:spb=units:urr=ec_only:bce=on:s2agt=64:updr=off:random_seed=1498464682:i=134677:sd=20:aac=none:nm=16:ss=included:sgt=10_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/134677Mi)
% 2.74/1.10  % (3776625)dis-1010_2:3_sil=16000:sp=reverse_frequency:random_seed=4251385341:i=119:av=off:ss=axioms_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/119Mi)
% 2.74/1.10  % (3776624)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.74/1.10  % (3776624)------------------------------
% 2.74/1.10  % (3776624)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 2.74/1.10  % (3776624)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 2.74/1.10  % (3776624)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 2.74/1.10  % (3776624)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.74/1.10  % (3776624)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 2.74/1.10  % (3776624)Peak memory usage: 88 MB
% 2.74/1.10  % (3776624)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 2.74/1.10  % (3776625)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 2.74/1.10  % (3776628)dis-21_1_sil=8000:lcm=predicate:random_seed=249331637:st=5:avsq=on:i=129:avsqr=1,16:sd=3:aac=none:ep=RS:fsr=off:ss=included_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/129Mi)
% 2.74/1.10  % (3776628)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.74/1.10  % (3776628)------------------------------
% 2.74/1.10  % (3776628)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 2.74/1.10  % (3776628)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 2.74/1.10  % (3776628)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 2.74/1.10  % (3776628)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.74/1.10  % (3776628)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 2.74/1.10  % (3776628)Peak memory usage: 88 MB
% 2.74/1.10  % (3776623)lrs+1010_1_anc=all:sfv=off:to=kbo:ncem=casc2026/models/loop7.pt:sil=128000:npcc=on:prc=on:sos=all:bsr=unit_only:sac=on:random_seed=1290441723:i=141695:sd=1:nm=32:gsp=on:ss=included_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/141695Mi)
% 2.74/1.10  % (3776626)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 2.74/1.10  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 2.74/1.10  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 2.74/1.11  % (3776626)------------------------------
% 2.74/1.11  % (3776626)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 2.74/1.11  % (3776626)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 2.74/1.11  % (3776626)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 2.74/1.11  % (3776626)Termination reason: Refutation
% 2.74/1.11  % (3776626)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 2.74/1.11  % (3776626)Peak memory usage: 90 MB
% 2.74/1.11  % (3776626)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 2.74/1.11  % (3776626)------------------------------
% 2.74/1.11  % (3776626)------------------------------
% 2.74/1.11  % (3776533)Success in time 0.313 s
% 2.74/1.11  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------