↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SYO015^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v9.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Feb 28 09:54:02 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.76s 1.54s
% Output   : Refutation 1.76s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   12 (   6 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   58 (  19 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   26 (  18   ~;   4   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   2 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    0 (   0 avg)
%            Number of FOOLs       :   38 (  38 fml;   0 var)
%            Number of types       :    0 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   1 usr;   3 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(f14,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f12,f13]) ).

tff(f13,plain,
    a = $true,
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[status(thm)],[f11]) ).

tff(f11,plain,
    ( ( a = $true )
    | ( a = $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9]) ).

tff(f9,plain,
    ( ( ( a = $true )
      | ( a = $true ) )
    & ( ( a != $true )
      | ( a != $true ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f8]) ).

tff(f8,plain,
    ( ( a = $true )
  <=> ( a != $true ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f7]) ).

tff(f7,plain,
    ~ ( ( a = $true )
    <~> ( a != $true ) ),
    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

tff(f6,plain,
    ~ ( ( a != $true )
    <~> ( a = $true ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

tff(f5,plain,
    ~ ( ( ( ~ a ) != a ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

tff(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( ( ~ a ) != a ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

tff(f1,conjecture,
    ( ( ~ a ) != a ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.XBQle2Ng9t/DTF2THF_4290.p',conj) ).

tff(f12,plain,
    a != $true,
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

tff(f10,plain,
    ( ( a != $true )
    | ( a != $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : SYO015^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v9.2.1.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.17/0.34  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Feb 25 06:17:32 EST 2026
% 0.17/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.34  Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.27/0.49  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.27/0.49  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.27/0.49  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/0.49  % File     : SYO015^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v9.2.1.
% 0.27/0.49  % Domain   : Syntactic
% 0.27/0.49  % Problem  : A is not equal to not A
% 0.27/0.49  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.27/0.49  % English  :
% 0.27/0.49  
% 0.27/0.49  % Refs     : [BB05]  Benzmueller & Brown (2005), A Structured Set of Higher
% 0.27/0.49  %          : [Ben09] Benzmueller (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.27/0.49  % Source   : [Ben09]
% 0.27/0.49  % Names    : Example 17 [BB05]
% 0.27/0.49  
% 0.27/0.49  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.27/0.49  %          : Without Boolean extensionality : CounterSatisfiable
% 0.27/0.49  % Rating   : ? v9.2.1
% 0.27/0.49  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    2 (   1 unt;   1 typ;   0 def)
% 0.27/0.49  %            Number of atoms       :    3 (   1 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.27/0.49  %            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   3 avg)
% 0.27/0.49  %            Number of connectives :    2 (   2   ~;   0   |;   0   &;   0   @)
% 0.27/0.49  %                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.27/0.49  %            Maximal formula depth :    2 (   2 avg)
% 0.27/0.49  %            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
% 0.27/0.49  %            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.27/0.49  %            Number of symbols     :    2 (   1 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.27/0.49  %            Number of variables   :    0 (   0   ^;   0   !;   0   ?;   0   :)
% 0.27/0.49  % SPC      : TH0_THM_EQU_NAR
% 0.27/0.49  
% 0.27/0.49  % Comments : 
% 0.27/0.49  % Bugfixes : Added ()s around negated sides of equations.
% 0.27/0.49  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/0.49  thf(a,type,
% 0.27/0.49      a: $o ).
% 0.27/0.49  
% 0.27/0.49  thf(conj,conjecture,
% 0.27/0.49      ( a != ( ~ a ) ) ).
% 0.27/0.49  
% 0.27/0.49  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/0.49  ------------------------
% 1.76/1.51  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.76/1.51  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.76/1.51  %%% Generated on Wed Feb 25 06:17:33 EST 2026
% 1.76/1.51  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.76/1.51  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.76/1.51  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.76/1.51  
% 1.76/1.51  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.XBQle2Ng9t/DTF2DTF4290.p
% See solution above
% 1.76/1.51  ------------------------
% 1.76/1.52  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.76/1.52  thf(a,type,
% 1.76/1.52      a: $o ).
% 1.76/1.52  
% 1.76/1.52  thf(conj,conjecture,
% 1.76/1.52      ( a != ~ a ) ).
% 1.76/1.52  ------------------------
% 1.76/1.54  % (4454)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_4290 for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 1.76/1.54  % (4457)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_4290 for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 1.76/1.54  % (4455)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_4290 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 1.76/1.54  % (4452)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_4290 for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 1.76/1.54  % (4458)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_4290 for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 1.76/1.54  % (4453)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_4290 for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 1.76/1.54  % (4456)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_4290 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 1.76/1.54  % (4457)First to succeed.
% 1.76/1.54  % (4452)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.76/1.54  % (4453)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.76/1.54  % (4457)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.76/1.54  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_4290
% 1.76/1.54  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_4290
% 1.76/1.54  tff(f14,plain,(
% 1.76/1.54    $false),
% 1.76/1.54    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f12,f13])).
% 1.76/1.54  tff(f13,plain,(
% 1.76/1.54    (a = $true)),
% 1.76/1.54    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[status(thm)],[f11])).
% 1.76/1.54  tff(f11,plain,(
% 1.76/1.54    (a = $true) | (a = $true)),
% 1.76/1.54    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9])).
% 1.76/1.54  tff(f9,plain,(
% 1.76/1.54    ((a = $true) | (a = $true)) & ((a != $true) | (a != $true))),
% 1.76/1.54    inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f8])).
% 1.76/1.54  tff(f8,plain,(
% 1.76/1.54    (a = $true) <=> (a != $true)),
% 1.76/1.54    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f7])).
% 1.76/1.54  tff(f7,plain,(
% 1.76/1.54    ~((a = $true) <~> (a != $true))),
% 1.76/1.54    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f6])).
% 1.76/1.54  tff(f6,plain,(
% 1.76/1.54    ~(~(a = $true) <~> (a = $true))),
% 1.76/1.54    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.76/1.54  tff(f5,plain,(
% 1.76/1.54    ~(~a != a)),
% 1.76/1.54    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.76/1.54  tff(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.76/1.54    ~(~a != a)),
% 1.76/1.54    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1])).
% 1.76/1.54  tff(f1,conjecture,(
% 1.76/1.54    (~a != a)),
% 1.76/1.54    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.XBQle2Ng9t/DTF2THF_4290.p',conj)).
% 1.76/1.54  tff(f12,plain,(
% 1.76/1.54    (a != $true)),
% 1.76/1.54    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.76/1.54  tff(f10,plain,(
% 1.76/1.54    (a != $true) | (a != $true)),
% 1.76/1.54    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9])).
% 1.76/1.54  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_4290
% 1.76/1.54  % (4457)------------------------------
% 1.76/1.54  % (4457)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.76/1.54  % (4457)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.76/1.54  
% 1.76/1.54  % (4457)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 1.76/1.54  % (4457)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.76/1.54  % (4457)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 1.76/1.54  % (4457)------------------------------
% 1.76/1.54  % (4457)------------------------------
% 1.76/1.54  % (4451)Success in time 0.018 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------