↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SYO016^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:53:08 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.29s 1.17s
% Output   : Refutation 1.29s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   21
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :  108 (  15 unt;   0 typ;  10 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  775 ( 118 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    9 (   7 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  690 ( 124   ~; 162   |;   0   &; 340   @)
%                                         (  10 <=>;  33  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   62 (  62   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   25 (  21 usr;  13 con; 0-2 aty)
%                                         (  21  !!;   0  ??;   0 @@+;   0 @@-)
%            Number of variables   :   54 (  39   ^;  15   !;   0   ?;  54   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(func_def_0,type,
    leibeq: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    h: $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_12,type,
    sK1: $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_14,type,
    ph2: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_16,type,
    sK3: $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_17,type,
    sK4: $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_18,type,
    sK5: $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_19,type,
    sK6: $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_20,type,
    sK7: $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_21,type,
    sK8: $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_22,type,
    sK9: $o > $o ).

thf(f533,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f44,f78,f142,f145,f160,f200,f303,f392,f397,f433,f457,f459,f477,f532]) ).

thf(f532,plain,
    ( spl0_6
    | spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f500,f31,f27,f56]) ).

thf(f56,definition,
    ( spl0_6
  <=> ! [X1: $o > $o] :
        ( ( ( X1 @ ( h @ $true ) )
          = $false )
        | ( ( X1 @ ( h @ $false ) )
          = $true ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_6])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f27,definition,
    ( spl0_1
  <=> ( ( h @ $false )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f31,definition,
    ( spl0_2
  <=> ( ( h
        @ ( !! @ ( $o > $o )
          @ ^ [Y0: $o > $o] :
              ( ( Y0 @ ( h @ $true ) )
             => ( Y0 @ ( h @ $false ) ) ) ) )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f500,plain,
    ( ! [X1: $o > $o] :
        ( ( ( X1 @ ( h @ $true ) )
          = $false )
        | ( ( X1 @ ( h @ $false ) )
          = $true ) )
    | spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f499]) ).

thf(f499,plain,
    ( ! [X1: $o > $o] :
        ( ( ( X1 @ ( h @ $true ) )
         => ( X1 @ ( h @ $false ) ) )
        = $true )
    | spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f498]) ).

thf(f498,plain,
    ( ! [X1: $o > $o] :
        ( ( ^ [Y0: $o > $o] :
              ( ( Y0 @ ( h @ $true ) )
             => ( Y0 @ ( h @ $false ) ) )
          @ X1 )
        = $true )
    | spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(pi_clausification,[status(thm)],[f497]) ).

thf(f497,plain,
    ( ( $false
     != ( !! @ ( $o > $o )
        @ ^ [Y0: $o > $o] :
            ( ( Y0 @ ( h @ $true ) )
           => ( Y0 @ ( h @ $false ) ) ) ) )
    | spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f485]) ).

thf(f485,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | ( $false
     != ( !! @ ( $o > $o )
        @ ^ [Y0: $o > $o] :
            ( ( Y0 @ ( h @ $true ) )
           => ( Y0 @ ( h @ $false ) ) ) ) )
    | spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f28,f33]) ).

thf(f33,plain,
    ( ( ( h
        @ ( !! @ ( $o > $o )
          @ ^ [Y0: $o > $o] :
              ( ( Y0 @ ( h @ $true ) )
             => ( Y0 @ ( h @ $false ) ) ) ) )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f31]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ( ( ( h @ $false )
     != $true )
    | spl0_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f27]) ).

thf(f477,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_2
    | spl0_10 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f476]) ).

thf(f476,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_2
    | spl0_10 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f475,f33]) ).

thf(f475,plain,
    ( ( ( h
        @ ( !! @ ( $o > $o )
          @ ^ [Y0: $o > $o] :
              ( ( Y0 @ ( h @ $true ) )
             => ( Y0 @ ( h @ $false ) ) ) ) )
     != $true )
    | spl0_10 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f472]) ).

thf(f472,plain,
    ( ( ( h
        @ ( !! @ ( $o > $o )
          @ ^ [Y0: $o > $o] :
              ( ( Y0 @ ( h @ $true ) )
             => ( Y0 @ ( h @ $false ) ) ) ) )
     != $true )
    | ( $true != $true )
    | spl0_10 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f283,f17]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ( ( sK1
      @ ( h
        @ ( !! @ ( $o > $o )
          @ ^ [Y0: $o > $o] :
              ( ( Y0 @ ( h @ $true ) )
             => ( Y0 @ ( h @ $false ) ) ) ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f15]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ( $false
    = ( ( sK1
        @ ( h
          @ ( !! @ ( $o > $o )
            @ ^ [Y0: $o > $o] :
                ( ( Y0 @ ( h @ $true ) )
               => ( Y0 @ ( h @ $false ) ) ) ) ) )
     => ( sK1 @ ( h @ $false ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f14]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: $o > $o] :
          ( ( Y0
            @ ( h
              @ ( !! @ ( $o > $o )
                @ ^ [Y1: $o > $o] :
                    ( ( Y1 @ ( h @ $true ) )
                   => ( Y1 @ ( h @ $false ) ) ) ) ) )
         => ( Y0 @ ( h @ $false ) ) )
      @ sK1 )
    = $false ),
    inference(sigma_clausification,[status(thm)],[f13]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( ( !! @ ( $o > $o )
      @ ^ [Y0: $o > $o] :
          ( ( Y0
            @ ( h
              @ ( !! @ ( $o > $o )
                @ ^ [Y1: $o > $o] :
                    ( ( Y1 @ ( h @ $true ) )
                   => ( Y1 @ ( h @ $false ) ) ) ) ) )
         => ( Y0 @ ( h @ $false ) ) ) )
   != $true ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( $true
   != ( ^ [Y0: $o,Y1: $o] :
          ( !! @ ( $o > $o )
          @ ^ [Y2: $o > $o] :
              ( ( Y2 @ Y0 )
             => ( Y2 @ Y1 ) ) )
      @ ( h
        @ ( ^ [Y0: $o,Y1: $o] :
              ( !! @ ( $o > $o )
              @ ^ [Y2: $o > $o] :
                  ( ( Y2 @ Y0 )
                 => ( Y2 @ Y1 ) ) )
          @ ( h @ $true )
          @ ( h @ $false ) ) )
      @ ( h @ $false ) ) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[status(thm)],[f11,f10,f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( leibeq
    = ( ^ [Y0: $o,Y1: $o] :
          ( !! @ ( $o > $o )
          @ ^ [Y2: $o > $o] :
              ( ( Y2 @ Y0 )
             => ( Y2 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ( leibeq
    = ( ^ [Y0: $o,Y1: $o] :
          ( !! @ ( $o > $o )
          @ ^ [Y2: $o > $o] :
              ( ( Y2 @ Y0 )
             => ( Y2 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ( ( ^ [X0: $o,X1: $o] :
        ! [X2: $o > $o] :
          ( ( X2 @ X0 )
         => ( X2 @ X1 ) ) )
    = leibeq ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,axiom,
    ( ( ^ [X0: $o,X1: $o] :
        ! [X2: $o > $o] :
          ( ( X2 @ X0 )
         => ( X2 @ X1 ) ) )
    = leibeq ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Ef6o0l781v/DTF2THF_14039.p',leibeq) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( ( leibeq @ ( h @ ( leibeq @ ( h @ $true ) @ ( h @ $false ) ) ) @ ( h @ $false ) )
   != $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ( leibeq @ ( h @ ( leibeq @ ( h @ $true ) @ ( h @ $false ) ) ) @ ( h @ $false ) )
   != $true ),
    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ( ( leibeq @ ( h @ ( leibeq @ ( h @ $true ) @ ( h @ $false ) ) ) @ ( h @ $false ) )
   != $true ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ( leibeq @ ( h @ ( leibeq @ ( h @ $true ) @ ( h @ $false ) ) ) @ ( h @ $false ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f3]) ).

thf(f3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( leibeq @ ( h @ ( leibeq @ ( h @ $true ) @ ( h @ $false ) ) ) @ ( h @ $false ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,conjecture,
    leibeq @ ( h @ ( leibeq @ ( h @ $true ) @ ( h @ $false ) ) ) @ ( h @ $false ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Ef6o0l781v/DTF2THF_14039.p',conj) ).

thf(f283,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ $true )
     != $true )
    | spl0_10 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f282]) ).

thf(f282,definition,
    ( spl0_10
  <=> ( ( sK1 @ $true )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_10])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f459,plain,
    ( spl0_6
    | ~ spl0_1
    | spl0_10 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f458,f282,f27,f56]) ).

thf(f458,plain,
    ( ! [X1: $o > $o] :
        ( ( ( X1 @ ( h @ $true ) )
          = $false )
        | ( ( X1 @ ( h @ $false ) )
          = $true ) )
    | ~ spl0_1
    | spl0_10 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f205,f283]) ).

thf(f205,plain,
    ( ! [X1: $o > $o] :
        ( ( ( X1 @ ( h @ $true ) )
          = $false )
        | ( ( sK1 @ $true )
          = $true )
        | ( ( X1 @ ( h @ $false ) )
          = $true ) )
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f204]) ).

thf(f204,plain,
    ( ! [X1: $o > $o] :
        ( ( ( sK1 @ $true )
          = $true )
        | ( ( ( X1 @ ( h @ $true ) )
           => ( X1 @ ( h @ $false ) ) )
          = $true ) )
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f203]) ).

thf(f203,plain,
    ( ! [X1: $o > $o] :
        ( ( ( sK1 @ $true )
          = $true )
        | ( ( ^ [Y0: $o > $o] :
                ( ( Y0 @ ( h @ $true ) )
               => ( Y0 @ ( h @ $false ) ) )
            @ X1 )
          = $true ) )
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(pi_clausification,[status(thm)],[f202]) ).

thf(f202,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ $true )
      = $true )
    | ( $false
     != ( !! @ ( $o > $o )
        @ ^ [Y0: $o > $o] :
            ( ( Y0 @ ( h @ $true ) )
           => ( Y0 @ ( h @ $false ) ) ) ) )
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f17,f29]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    ( ( ( h @ $false )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f27]) ).

thf(f457,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_10 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f456]) ).

thf(f456,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_10 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f448,f29]) ).

thf(f448,plain,
    ( ( ( h @ $false )
     != $true )
    | ~ spl0_10 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f438]) ).

thf(f438,plain,
    ( ( ( h @ $false )
     != $true )
    | ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl0_10 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f284,f16]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ( $false
    = ( sK1 @ ( h @ $false ) ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f15]) ).

thf(f284,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ $true )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl0_10 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f282]) ).

thf(f433,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_1
    | spl0_3
    | ~ spl0_6
    | ~ spl0_14
    | ~ spl0_15 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f432]) ).

thf(f432,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_1
    | spl0_3
    | ~ spl0_6
    | ~ spl0_14
    | ~ spl0_15 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f422,f370]) ).

thf(f370,plain,
    ( ( ( h @ $true )
      = $true )
    | spl0_3
    | ~ spl0_6 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f363,f37]) ).

thf(f37,plain,
    ( ( ( h @ $false )
     != $false )
    | spl0_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f36]) ).

thf(f36,definition,
    ( spl0_3
  <=> ( ( h @ $false )
      = $false ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_3])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f363,plain,
    ( ( ( h @ $false )
      = $false )
    | ( ( h @ $true )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl0_6 ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f304]) ).

thf(f304,plain,
    ( ( ( h @ $false )
      = ( h @ $true ) )
    | ~ spl0_6 ),
    inference(leibniz_equality_elimination,[status(thm)],[f57]) ).

thf(f57,plain,
    ( ! [X1: $o > $o] :
        ( ( ( X1 @ ( h @ $true ) )
          = $false )
        | ( ( X1 @ ( h @ $false ) )
          = $true ) )
    | ~ spl0_6 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f56]) ).

thf(f422,plain,
    ( ( ( h @ $true )
     != $true )
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_14
    | ~ spl0_15 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f408]) ).

thf(f408,plain,
    ( ( ( h @ $true )
     != $true )
    | ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_14
    | ~ spl0_15 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f396,f399]) ).

thf(f399,plain,
    ( ( ( sK5 @ $true )
      = $false )
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_14 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f391,f29]) ).

thf(f391,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK5 @ ( h @ $false ) ) )
    | ~ spl0_14 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f389]) ).

thf(f389,definition,
    ( spl0_14
  <=> ( $false
      = ( sK5 @ ( h @ $false ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_14])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f396,plain,
    ( ( ( sK5 @ ( h @ $true ) )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl0_15 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f394]) ).

thf(f394,definition,
    ( spl0_15
  <=> ( ( sK5 @ ( h @ $true ) )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_15])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f397,plain,
    ( spl0_15
    | spl0_10
    | spl0_3
    | ~ spl0_6 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f387,f56,f36,f282,f394]) ).

thf(f387,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ $true )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK5 @ ( h @ $true ) )
      = $true )
    | spl0_3
    | ~ spl0_6 ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f385]) ).

thf(f385,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ $true )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( sK5 @ ( h @ $true ) )
       => ( sK5 @ ( h @ $false ) ) )
      = $false )
    | spl0_3
    | ~ spl0_6 ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f384]) ).

thf(f384,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ $true )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ^ [Y0: $o > $o] :
            ( ( Y0 @ ( h @ $true ) )
           => ( Y0 @ ( h @ $false ) ) )
        @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | spl0_3
    | ~ spl0_6 ),
    inference(sigma_clausification,[status(thm)],[f374]) ).

thf(f374,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ $true )
      = $true )
    | ( $true
     != ( !! @ ( $o > $o )
        @ ^ [Y0: $o > $o] :
            ( ( Y0 @ ( h @ $true ) )
           => ( Y0 @ ( h @ $false ) ) ) ) )
    | spl0_3
    | ~ spl0_6 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f17,f370]) ).

thf(f392,plain,
    ( spl0_10
    | spl0_14
    | spl0_3
    | ~ spl0_6 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f386,f56,f36,f389,f282]) ).

thf(f386,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK5 @ ( h @ $false ) ) )
    | ( ( sK1 @ $true )
      = $true )
    | spl0_3
    | ~ spl0_6 ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f385]) ).

thf(f303,plain,
    ( spl0_3
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f302]) ).

thf(f302,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl0_3
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f233,f37]) ).

thf(f233,plain,
    ( ( ( h @ $false )
      = $false )
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(leibniz_equality_elimination,[status(thm)],[f141]) ).

thf(f141,plain,
    ( ! [X0: $o > $o] :
        ( ( ( X0 @ ( h @ $false ) )
          = $true )
        | ( ( X0 @ $false )
          = $false ) )
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f140]) ).

thf(f140,definition,
    ( spl0_8
  <=> ! [X0: $o > $o] :
        ( ( ( X0 @ $false )
          = $false )
        | ( ( X0 @ ( h @ $false ) )
          = $true ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_8])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f200,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_3
    | spl0_5
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f199]) ).

thf(f199,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_3
    | spl0_5
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f188,f137]) ).

thf(f137,plain,
    ( ( ( h @ $true )
      = $false )
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f135]) ).

thf(f135,definition,
    ( spl0_7
  <=> ( ( h @ $true )
      = $false ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_7])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f188,plain,
    ( ( ( h @ $true )
     != $false )
    | ~ spl0_3
    | spl0_5
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f184]) ).

thf(f184,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ( ( h @ $true )
     != $false )
    | ~ spl0_3
    | spl0_5
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f179,f181]) ).

thf(f181,plain,
    ( ( ( sK3 @ $false )
      = $false )
    | ~ spl0_3
    | spl0_5
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f178,f38]) ).

thf(f38,plain,
    ( ( ( h @ $false )
      = $false )
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f36]) ).

thf(f178,plain,
    ( ( ( sK3 @ ( h @ $false ) )
      = $false )
    | spl0_5
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f176,f53]) ).

thf(f53,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ $false )
     != $true )
    | spl0_5 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f52]) ).

thf(f52,definition,
    ( spl0_5
  <=> ( ( sK1 @ $false )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_5])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f176,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ $false )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK3 @ ( h @ $false ) )
      = $false )
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f175]) ).

thf(f175,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ $false )
      = $true )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( sK3 @ ( h @ $true ) )
       => ( sK3 @ ( h @ $false ) ) ) )
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f174]) ).

thf(f174,plain,
    ( ( ( ^ [Y0: $o > $o] :
            ( ( Y0 @ ( h @ $true ) )
           => ( Y0 @ ( h @ $false ) ) )
        @ sK3 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK1 @ $false )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(sigma_clausification,[status(thm)],[f171]) ).

thf(f171,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( !! @ ( $o > $o )
        @ ^ [Y0: $o > $o] :
            ( ( Y0 @ ( h @ $true ) )
           => ( Y0 @ ( h @ $false ) ) ) ) )
    | ( ( sK1 @ $false )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f17,f137]) ).

thf(f179,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK3 @ ( h @ $true ) ) )
    | spl0_5
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f177,f53]) ).

thf(f177,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK3 @ ( h @ $true ) ) )
    | ( ( sK1 @ $false )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f175]) ).

thf(f160,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f159]) ).

thf(f159,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f153]) ).

thf(f153,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f38,f29]) ).

thf(f145,plain,
    ( spl0_7
    | spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_6 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f110,f56,f27,f135]) ).

thf(f110,plain,
    ( ( ( h @ $true )
      = $false )
    | ( ( h @ $false )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl0_6 ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f83]) ).

thf(f83,plain,
    ( ( ( h @ $false )
      = ( h @ $true ) )
    | ~ spl0_6 ),
    inference(leibniz_equality_elimination,[status(thm)],[f57]) ).

thf(f142,plain,
    ( spl0_1
    | spl0_8
    | ~ spl0_6 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f129,f56,f140,f27]) ).

thf(f129,plain,
    ( ! [X0: $o > $o] :
        ( ( ( h @ $false )
          = $true )
        | ( ( X0 @ $false )
          = $false )
        | ( ( X0 @ ( h @ $false ) )
          = $true ) )
    | ~ spl0_6 ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f91]) ).

thf(f91,plain,
    ( ! [X0: $o > $o] :
        ( ( $true
          = ( ^ [Y0: $o] : Y0
            @ ( h @ $false ) ) )
        | ( ( X0 @ ( h @ $false ) )
          = $true )
        | ( ( X0 @ $false )
          = $false ) )
    | ~ spl0_6 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f57,f57]) ).

thf(f78,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_3
    | ~ spl0_5 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f77]) ).

thf(f77,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_3
    | ~ spl0_5 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f71,f38]) ).

thf(f71,plain,
    ( ( ( h @ $false )
     != $false )
    | ~ spl0_5 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f68]) ).

thf(f68,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ( ( h @ $false )
     != $false )
    | ~ spl0_5 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f16,f54]) ).

thf(f54,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ $false )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl0_5 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f52]) ).

thf(f44,plain,
    ( spl0_1
    | spl0_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f21,f31,f27]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ( ( ( h @ $false )
      = $true )
    | ( ( h
        @ ( !! @ ( $o > $o )
          @ ^ [Y0: $o > $o] :
              ( ( Y0 @ ( h @ $true ) )
             => ( Y0 @ ( h @ $false ) ) ) ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f20]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ( ( h
      @ ( !! @ ( $o > $o )
        @ ^ [Y0: $o > $o] :
            ( ( Y0 @ ( h @ $true ) )
           => ( Y0 @ ( h @ $false ) ) ) ) )
   != ( h @ $false ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f18]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ( ( h
        @ ( !! @ ( $o > $o )
          @ ^ [Y0: $o > $o] :
              ( ( Y0 @ ( h @ $true ) )
             => ( Y0 @ ( h @ $false ) ) ) ) )
     != ( h @ $false ) ) ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f17,f16]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : SYO016^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.10/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 14:21:29 EST 2026
% 0.11/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.32  Running /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.14/0.41  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.14/0.41  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.14/0.41  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.41  % File     : SYO016^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.14/0.41  % Domain   : Syntactic
% 0.14/0.41  % Problem  : Formula valid in MBb, but not in model classes not requiring b
% 0.14/0.41  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.14/0.41  % English  :
% 0.14/0.41  
% 0.14/0.41  % Refs     : [BB05]  Benzmueller & Brown (2005), A Structured Set of Higher
% 0.14/0.41  %          : [Ben09] Benzmueller (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.14/0.41  % Source   : [Ben09]
% 0.14/0.41  % Names    : Example 18a [BB05]
% 0.14/0.41  
% 0.14/0.41  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.14/0.41  %          : Without Boolean extensionality : CounterSatisfiable
% 0.14/0.41  % Rating   : 0.11 v9.1.0, 0.12 v9.0.0, 0.10 v8.2.0, 0.15 v8.1.0, 0.09 v7.5.0, 0.14 v7.4.0, 0.22 v7.2.0, 0.12 v7.1.0, 0.38 v7.0.0, 0.29 v6.4.0, 0.33 v6.3.0, 0.40 v6.2.0, 0.29 v6.1.0, 0.43 v5.5.0, 0.33 v5.4.0, 0.60 v5.1.0, 0.80 v4.1.0, 1.00 v4.0.1, 0.67 v3.7.0
% 0.14/0.41  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    4 (   1 unt;   2 typ;   1 def)
% 0.14/0.41  %            Number of atoms       :   11 (   1 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.14/0.41  %            Maximal formula atoms :    9 (   5 avg)
% 0.14/0.41  %            Number of connectives :   11 (   0   ~;   0   |;   0   &;  10   @)
% 0.14/0.41  %                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.14/0.41  %            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
% 0.14/0.41  %            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
% 0.14/0.41  %            Number of type conns  :    4 (   4   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.14/0.41  %            Number of symbols     :    5 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.14/0.41  %            Number of variables   :    3 (   2   ^;   1   !;   0   ?;   3   :)
% 0.14/0.41  % SPC      : TH0_THM_EQU_NAR
% 0.14/0.41  
% 0.14/0.41  % Comments : 
% 0.14/0.41  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.41  thf(leibeq_decl,type,
% 0.14/0.41      leibeq: $o > $o > $o ).
% 0.14/0.41  
% 0.14/0.41  thf(leibeq,definition,
% 0.14/0.41      ( leibeq
% 0.14/0.41      = ( ^ [X: $o,Y: $o] :
% 0.14/0.41          ! [P: $o > $o] :
% 0.14/0.41            ( ( P @ X )
% 0.14/0.41           => ( P @ Y ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.14/0.41  
% 0.14/0.41  thf(h,type,
% 0.14/0.41      h: $o > $o ).
% 0.14/0.41  
% 0.14/0.41  thf(conj,conjecture,
% 0.14/0.41      leibeq @ ( h @ ( leibeq @ ( h @ $true ) @ ( h @ $false ) ) ) @ ( h @ $false ) ).
% 0.14/0.41  
% 0.14/0.41  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.41  ------------------------
% 1.29/1.13  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.29/1.13  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.29/1.13  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 14:21:30 EST 2026
% 1.29/1.13  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.29/1.13  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.29/1.13  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.29/1.13  
% 1.29/1.13  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Ef6o0l781v/DTF2DTF14039.p
% See solution above
% 1.29/1.13  ------------------------
% 1.29/1.14  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.29/1.14  thf(leibeq_decl,type,
% 1.29/1.14      leibeq: $o > $o > $o ).
% 1.29/1.14  
% 1.29/1.14  thf(leibeq,definition,
% 1.29/1.14      ( leibeq
% 1.29/1.14      = ( ^ [X: $o,Y: $o] :
% 1.29/1.14          ! [P: $o > $o] :
% 1.29/1.14            ( ( P @ X )
% 1.29/1.14           => ( P @ Y ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.29/1.14  
% 1.29/1.14  thf(h,type,
% 1.29/1.14      h: $o > $o ).
% 1.29/1.14  
% 1.29/1.14  thf(conj,conjecture,
% 1.29/1.14      leibeq @ ( h @ ( leibeq @ ( h @ $true ) @ ( h @ $false ) ) ) @ ( h @ $false ) ).
% 1.29/1.14  ------------------------
% 1.29/1.15  % (14138)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_14039 for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 1.29/1.16  % (14141)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_14039 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 1.29/1.16  % (14140)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_14039 for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 1.29/1.16  % (14142)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_14039 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 1.29/1.16  % (14143)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_14039 for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 1.29/1.16  % (14139)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_14039 for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 1.29/1.16  % (14144)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_14039 for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 1.29/1.16  % (14143)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.29/1.16  % (14143)------------------------------
% 1.29/1.16  % (14143)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.29/1.16  % (14143)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.29/1.16  
% 1.29/1.16  
% 1.29/1.16  % (14143)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 1.29/1.16  % (14143)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 1.29/1.16  % (14143)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 1.29/1.16  % (14143)------------------------------
% 1.29/1.16  % (14143)------------------------------
% 1.29/1.16  % (14141)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.29/1.16  % (14141)------------------------------
% 1.29/1.16  % (14141)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.29/1.16  % (14141)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.29/1.16  
% 1.29/1.16  % (14142)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.29/1.16  % (14142)------------------------------
% 1.29/1.16  % (14142)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.29/1.16  % (14142)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.29/1.16  % (14142)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.29/1.16  
% 1.29/1.16  % (14142)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.29/1.16  % (14142)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.29/1.16  % (14142)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.29/1.16  % (14142)------------------------------
% 1.29/1.16  % (14142)------------------------------
% 1.29/1.16  
% 1.29/1.16  % (14140)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.29/1.16  % (14140)------------------------------
% 1.29/1.16  % (14140)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.29/1.16  % (14140)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.29/1.16  
% 1.29/1.16  
% 1.29/1.16  % (14140)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.29/1.16  % (14140)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.29/1.16  % (14140)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.29/1.16  % (14140)------------------------------
% 1.29/1.16  % (14140)------------------------------
% 1.29/1.16  % (14141)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.29/1.16  % (14141)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.29/1.16  % (14141)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 1.29/1.16  % (14141)------------------------------
% 1.29/1.16  % (14141)------------------------------
% 1.29/1.16  % (14139)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.29/1.16  % (14139)------------------------------
% 1.29/1.16  % (14139)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.29/1.16  % (14139)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.29/1.16  % (14139)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.29/1.16  
% 1.29/1.16  % (14139)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.29/1.16  % (14139)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 1.29/1.16  % (14139)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 1.29/1.16  % (14139)------------------------------
% 1.29/1.16  % (14139)------------------------------
% 1.29/1.16  % (14138)First to succeed.
% 1.29/1.17  % (14138)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.29/1.17  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_14039
% 1.29/1.17  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_14039
% 1.29/1.17  thf(func_def_0, type, leibeq: $o > $o > $o).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(func_def_2, type, h: $o > $o).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(func_def_12, type, sK1: $o > $o).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(func_def_14, type, ph2: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(func_def_16, type, sK3: $o > $o).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(func_def_17, type, sK4: $o > $o).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(func_def_18, type, sK5: $o > $o).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(func_def_19, type, sK6: $o > $o).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(func_def_20, type, sK7: $o > $o).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(func_def_21, type, sK8: $o > $o).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(func_def_22, type, sK9: $o > $o).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f533,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    $false),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f44,f78,f142,f145,f160,f200,f303,f392,f397,f433,f457,f459,f477,f532])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f532,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    spl0_6 | spl0_1 | ~spl0_2),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f500,f31,f27,f56])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f56,definition,(
% 1.29/1.17    spl0_6 <=> ! [X1 : $o > $o] : (((X1 @ (h @ $true)) = $false) | ((X1 @ (h @ $false)) = $true))),
% 1.29/1.17    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_6])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f27,definition,(
% 1.29/1.17    spl0_1 <=> ((h @ $false) = $true)),
% 1.29/1.17    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f31,definition,(
% 1.29/1.17    spl0_2 <=> ((h @ (!! @ ($o > $o) @ (^[Y0 : $o > $o]: ((Y0 @ (h @ $true)) => (Y0 @ (h @ $false)))))) = $true)),
% 1.29/1.17    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f500,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ( ! [X1 : $o > $o] : (((X1 @ (h @ $true)) = $false) | ((X1 @ (h @ $false)) = $true)) ) | (spl0_1 | ~spl0_2)),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f499])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f499,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ( ! [X1 : $o > $o] : ((((X1 @ (h @ $true)) => (X1 @ (h @ $false))) = $true)) ) | (spl0_1 | ~spl0_2)),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f498])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f498,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ( ! [X1 : $o > $o] : ((((^[Y0 : $o > $o]: ((Y0 @ (h @ $true)) => (Y0 @ (h @ $false)))) @ X1) = $true)) ) | (spl0_1 | ~spl0_2)),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(pi_clausification,[status(thm)],[f497])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f497,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ($false != (!! @ ($o > $o) @ (^[Y0 : $o > $o]: ((Y0 @ (h @ $true)) => (Y0 @ (h @ $false)))))) | (spl0_1 | ~spl0_2)),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f485])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f485,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ($true != $true) | ($false != (!! @ ($o > $o) @ (^[Y0 : $o > $o]: ((Y0 @ (h @ $true)) => (Y0 @ (h @ $false)))))) | (spl0_1 | ~spl0_2)),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f28,f33])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f33,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ((h @ (!! @ ($o > $o) @ (^[Y0 : $o > $o]: ((Y0 @ (h @ $true)) => (Y0 @ (h @ $false)))))) = $true) | ~spl0_2),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f31])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f28,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ((h @ $false) != $true) | spl0_1),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f27])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f477,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ~spl0_2 | spl0_10),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f476])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f476,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    $false | (~spl0_2 | spl0_10)),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f475,f33])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f475,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ((h @ (!! @ ($o > $o) @ (^[Y0 : $o > $o]: ((Y0 @ (h @ $true)) => (Y0 @ (h @ $false)))))) != $true) | spl0_10),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f472])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f472,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ((h @ (!! @ ($o > $o) @ (^[Y0 : $o > $o]: ((Y0 @ (h @ $true)) => (Y0 @ (h @ $false)))))) != $true) | ($true != $true) | spl0_10),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f283,f17])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f17,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ((sK1 @ (h @ (!! @ ($o > $o) @ (^[Y0 : $o > $o]: ((Y0 @ (h @ $true)) => (Y0 @ (h @ $false))))))) = $true)),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f15])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f15,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ($false = ((sK1 @ (h @ (!! @ ($o > $o) @ (^[Y0 : $o > $o]: ((Y0 @ (h @ $true)) => (Y0 @ (h @ $false))))))) => (sK1 @ (h @ $false))))),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f14])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f14,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    (((^[Y0 : $o > $o]: ((Y0 @ (h @ (!! @ ($o > $o) @ (^[Y1 : $o > $o]: ((Y1 @ (h @ $true)) => (Y1 @ (h @ $false))))))) => (Y0 @ (h @ $false)))) @ sK1) = $false)),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(sigma_clausification,[status(thm)],[f13])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f13,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ((!! @ ($o > $o) @ (^[Y0 : $o > $o]: ((Y0 @ (h @ (!! @ ($o > $o) @ (^[Y1 : $o > $o]: ((Y1 @ (h @ $true)) => (Y1 @ (h @ $false))))))) => (Y0 @ (h @ $false))))) != $true)),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f12,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ($true != ((^[Y0 : $o]: ((^[Y1 : $o]: (!! @ ($o > $o) @ (^[Y2 : $o > $o]: ((Y2 @ Y0) => (Y2 @ Y1))))))) @ (h @ ((^[Y0 : $o]: ((^[Y1 : $o]: (!! @ ($o > $o) @ (^[Y2 : $o > $o]: ((Y2 @ Y0) => (Y2 @ Y1))))))) @ (h @ $true) @ (h @ $false))) @ (h @ $false)))),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(definition_unfolding,[status(thm)],[f11,f10,f10])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    (leibeq = (^[Y0 : $o]: ((^[Y1 : $o]: (!! @ ($o > $o) @ (^[Y2 : $o > $o]: ((Y2 @ Y0) => (Y2 @ Y1))))))))),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f8])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    (leibeq = (^[Y0 : $o]: ((^[Y1 : $o]: (!! @ ($o > $o) @ (^[Y2 : $o > $o]: ((Y2 @ Y0) => (Y2 @ Y1))))))))),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f7])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ((^[X0 : $o, X1 : $o] : (! [X2 : $o > $o] : ((X2 @ X0) => (X2 @ X1)))) = leibeq)),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f1])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f1,axiom,(
% 1.29/1.17    ((^[X0 : $o, X1 : $o] : (! [X2 : $o > $o] : ((X2 @ X0) => (X2 @ X1)))) = leibeq)),
% 1.29/1.17    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Ef6o0l781v/DTF2THF_14039.p',leibeq)).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ((leibeq @ (h @ (leibeq @ (h @ $true) @ (h @ $false))) @ (h @ $false)) != $true)),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ((leibeq @ (h @ (leibeq @ (h @ $true) @ (h @ $false))) @ (h @ $false)) != $true)),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f6])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f6,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ~((leibeq @ (h @ (leibeq @ (h @ $true) @ (h @ $false))) @ (h @ $false)) = $true)),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f5,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ~(leibeq @ (h @ (leibeq @ (h @ $true) @ (h @ $false))) @ (h @ $false))),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f3])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f3,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.29/1.17    ~(leibeq @ (h @ (leibeq @ (h @ $true) @ (h @ $false))) @ (h @ $false))),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f2])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f2,conjecture,(
% 1.29/1.17    (leibeq @ (h @ (leibeq @ (h @ $true) @ (h @ $false))) @ (h @ $false))),
% 1.29/1.17    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Ef6o0l781v/DTF2THF_14039.p',conj)).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f283,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ((sK1 @ $true) != $true) | spl0_10),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f282])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f282,definition,(
% 1.29/1.17    spl0_10 <=> ((sK1 @ $true) = $true)),
% 1.29/1.17    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_10])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f459,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    spl0_6 | ~spl0_1 | spl0_10),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f458,f282,f27,f56])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f458,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ( ! [X1 : $o > $o] : (((X1 @ (h @ $true)) = $false) | ((X1 @ (h @ $false)) = $true)) ) | (~spl0_1 | spl0_10)),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f205,f283])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f205,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ( ! [X1 : $o > $o] : (((X1 @ (h @ $true)) = $false) | ((sK1 @ $true) = $true) | ((X1 @ (h @ $false)) = $true)) ) | ~spl0_1),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f204])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f204,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ( ! [X1 : $o > $o] : (((sK1 @ $true) = $true) | (((X1 @ (h @ $true)) => (X1 @ (h @ $false))) = $true)) ) | ~spl0_1),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f203])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f203,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ( ! [X1 : $o > $o] : (((sK1 @ $true) = $true) | (((^[Y0 : $o > $o]: ((Y0 @ (h @ $true)) => (Y0 @ (h @ $false)))) @ X1) = $true)) ) | ~spl0_1),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(pi_clausification,[status(thm)],[f202])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f202,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ((sK1 @ $true) = $true) | ($false != (!! @ ($o > $o) @ (^[Y0 : $o > $o]: ((Y0 @ (h @ $true)) => (Y0 @ (h @ $false)))))) | ~spl0_1),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f17,f29])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f29,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ((h @ $false) = $true) | ~spl0_1),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f27])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f457,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ~spl0_1 | ~spl0_10),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f456])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f456,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    $false | (~spl0_1 | ~spl0_10)),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f448,f29])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f448,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ((h @ $false) != $true) | ~spl0_10),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f438])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f438,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ((h @ $false) != $true) | ($true = $false) | ~spl0_10),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f284,f16])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f16,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ($false = (sK1 @ (h @ $false)))),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f15])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f284,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ((sK1 @ $true) = $true) | ~spl0_10),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f282])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f433,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ~spl0_1 | spl0_3 | ~spl0_6 | ~spl0_14 | ~spl0_15),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f432])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f432,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    $false | (~spl0_1 | spl0_3 | ~spl0_6 | ~spl0_14 | ~spl0_15)),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f422,f370])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f370,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ((h @ $true) = $true) | (spl0_3 | ~spl0_6)),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f363,f37])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f37,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ((h @ $false) != $false) | spl0_3),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f36])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f36,definition,(
% 1.29/1.17    spl0_3 <=> ((h @ $false) = $false)),
% 1.29/1.17    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_3])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f363,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ((h @ $false) = $false) | ((h @ $true) = $true) | ~spl0_6),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f304])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f304,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ((h @ $false) = (h @ $true)) | ~spl0_6),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(leibniz_equality_elimination,[status(thm)],[f57])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f57,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ( ! [X1 : $o > $o] : (((X1 @ (h @ $true)) = $false) | ((X1 @ (h @ $false)) = $true)) ) | ~spl0_6),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f56])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f422,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ((h @ $true) != $true) | (~spl0_1 | ~spl0_14 | ~spl0_15)),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f408])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f408,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ((h @ $true) != $true) | ($true = $false) | (~spl0_1 | ~spl0_14 | ~spl0_15)),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f396,f399])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f399,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ((sK5 @ $true) = $false) | (~spl0_1 | ~spl0_14)),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f391,f29])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f391,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ($false = (sK5 @ (h @ $false))) | ~spl0_14),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f389])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f389,definition,(
% 1.29/1.17    spl0_14 <=> ($false = (sK5 @ (h @ $false)))),
% 1.29/1.17    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_14])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f396,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ((sK5 @ (h @ $true)) = $true) | ~spl0_15),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f394])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f394,definition,(
% 1.29/1.17    spl0_15 <=> ((sK5 @ (h @ $true)) = $true)),
% 1.29/1.17    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_15])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f397,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    spl0_15 | spl0_10 | spl0_3 | ~spl0_6),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f387,f56,f36,f282,f394])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f387,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ((sK1 @ $true) = $true) | ((sK5 @ (h @ $true)) = $true) | (spl0_3 | ~spl0_6)),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f385])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f385,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ((sK1 @ $true) = $true) | (((sK5 @ (h @ $true)) => (sK5 @ (h @ $false))) = $false) | (spl0_3 | ~spl0_6)),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f384])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f384,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ((sK1 @ $true) = $true) | (((^[Y0 : $o > $o]: ((Y0 @ (h @ $true)) => (Y0 @ (h @ $false)))) @ sK5) = $false) | (spl0_3 | ~spl0_6)),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(sigma_clausification,[status(thm)],[f374])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f374,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ((sK1 @ $true) = $true) | ($true != (!! @ ($o > $o) @ (^[Y0 : $o > $o]: ((Y0 @ (h @ $true)) => (Y0 @ (h @ $false)))))) | (spl0_3 | ~spl0_6)),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f17,f370])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f392,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    spl0_10 | spl0_14 | spl0_3 | ~spl0_6),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f386,f56,f36,f389,f282])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f386,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ($false = (sK5 @ (h @ $false))) | ((sK1 @ $true) = $true) | (spl0_3 | ~spl0_6)),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f385])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f303,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    spl0_3 | ~spl0_8),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f302])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f302,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    $false | (spl0_3 | ~spl0_8)),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f233,f37])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f233,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ((h @ $false) = $false) | ~spl0_8),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(leibniz_equality_elimination,[status(thm)],[f141])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f141,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ( ! [X0 : $o > $o] : (((X0 @ (h @ $false)) = $true) | ((X0 @ $false) = $false)) ) | ~spl0_8),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f140])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f140,definition,(
% 1.29/1.17    spl0_8 <=> ! [X0 : $o > $o] : (((X0 @ $false) = $false) | ((X0 @ (h @ $false)) = $true))),
% 1.29/1.17    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_8])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f200,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ~spl0_3 | spl0_5 | ~spl0_7),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f199])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f199,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    $false | (~spl0_3 | spl0_5 | ~spl0_7)),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f188,f137])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f137,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ((h @ $true) = $false) | ~spl0_7),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f135])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f135,definition,(
% 1.29/1.17    spl0_7 <=> ((h @ $true) = $false)),
% 1.29/1.17    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_7])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f188,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ((h @ $true) != $false) | (~spl0_3 | spl0_5 | ~spl0_7)),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f184])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f184,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ($true = $false) | ((h @ $true) != $false) | (~spl0_3 | spl0_5 | ~spl0_7)),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f179,f181])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f181,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ((sK3 @ $false) = $false) | (~spl0_3 | spl0_5 | ~spl0_7)),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f178,f38])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f38,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ((h @ $false) = $false) | ~spl0_3),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f36])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f178,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ((sK3 @ (h @ $false)) = $false) | (spl0_5 | ~spl0_7)),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f176,f53])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f53,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ((sK1 @ $false) != $true) | spl0_5),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f52])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f52,definition,(
% 1.29/1.17    spl0_5 <=> ((sK1 @ $false) = $true)),
% 1.29/1.17    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_5])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f176,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ((sK1 @ $false) = $true) | ((sK3 @ (h @ $false)) = $false) | ~spl0_7),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f175])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f175,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ((sK1 @ $false) = $true) | ($false = ((sK3 @ (h @ $true)) => (sK3 @ (h @ $false)))) | ~spl0_7),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f174])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f174,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    (((^[Y0 : $o > $o]: ((Y0 @ (h @ $true)) => (Y0 @ (h @ $false)))) @ sK3) = $false) | ((sK1 @ $false) = $true) | ~spl0_7),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(sigma_clausification,[status(thm)],[f171])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f171,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ($true != (!! @ ($o > $o) @ (^[Y0 : $o > $o]: ((Y0 @ (h @ $true)) => (Y0 @ (h @ $false)))))) | ((sK1 @ $false) = $true) | ~spl0_7),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f17,f137])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f179,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ($true = (sK3 @ (h @ $true))) | (spl0_5 | ~spl0_7)),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f177,f53])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f177,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ($true = (sK3 @ (h @ $true))) | ((sK1 @ $false) = $true) | ~spl0_7),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f175])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f160,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ~spl0_1 | ~spl0_3),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f159])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f159,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    $false | (~spl0_1 | ~spl0_3)),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f153])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f153,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ($true = $false) | (~spl0_1 | ~spl0_3)),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f38,f29])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f145,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    spl0_7 | spl0_1 | ~spl0_6),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f110,f56,f27,f135])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f110,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ((h @ $true) = $false) | ((h @ $false) = $true) | ~spl0_6),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f83])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f83,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ((h @ $false) = (h @ $true)) | ~spl0_6),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(leibniz_equality_elimination,[status(thm)],[f57])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f142,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    spl0_1 | spl0_8 | ~spl0_6),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f129,f56,f140,f27])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f129,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ( ! [X0 : $o > $o] : (((h @ $false) = $true) | ((X0 @ $false) = $false) | ((X0 @ (h @ $false)) = $true)) ) | ~spl0_6),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f91])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f91,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ( ! [X0 : $o > $o] : (($true = ((^[Y0 : $o]: (Y0)) @ (h @ $false))) | ((X0 @ (h @ $false)) = $true) | ((X0 @ $false) = $false)) ) | ~spl0_6),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f57,f57])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f78,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ~spl0_3 | ~spl0_5),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f77])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f77,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    $false | (~spl0_3 | ~spl0_5)),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f71,f38])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f71,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ((h @ $false) != $false) | ~spl0_5),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f68])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f68,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ($true = $false) | ((h @ $false) != $false) | ~spl0_5),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f16,f54])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f54,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ((sK1 @ $false) = $true) | ~spl0_5),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f52])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f44,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    spl0_1 | spl0_2),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f21,f31,f27])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f21,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ((h @ $false) = $true) | ((h @ (!! @ ($o > $o) @ (^[Y0 : $o > $o]: ((Y0 @ (h @ $true)) => (Y0 @ (h @ $false)))))) = $true)),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f20])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f20,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ((h @ (!! @ ($o > $o) @ (^[Y0 : $o > $o]: ((Y0 @ (h @ $true)) => (Y0 @ (h @ $false)))))) != (h @ $false))),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f18])).
% 1.29/1.17  thf(f18,plain,(
% 1.29/1.17    ($true = $false) | ((h @ (!! @ ($o > $o) @ (^[Y0 : $o > $o]: ((Y0 @ (h @ $true)) => (Y0 @ (h @ $false)))))) != (h @ $false))),
% 1.29/1.17    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f17,f16])).
% 1.29/1.17  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_14039
% 1.29/1.17  % (14138)------------------------------
% 1.29/1.17  % (14138)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.29/1.17  % (14138)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.29/1.17  
% 1.29/1.17  % (14138)Memory used [KB]: 5884
% 1.29/1.17  % (14138)Time elapsed: 0.017 s
% 1.29/1.17  % (14138)Instructions burned: 41 (million)
% 1.29/1.17  % (14138)------------------------------
% 1.29/1.17  % (14138)------------------------------
% 1.29/1.17  % (14137)Success in time 0.013 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------