↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SYO020^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:45:02 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 2.90s 1.75s
% Output   : Refutation 3.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (  11 unt;   0 typ;   4 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   69 (   8 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  115 (  51   ~;  20   |;  17   &;  22   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    5 (   5   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    7 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   2   ^;  11   !;   0   ?;  16   :)
%                                         (   0  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   3  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(leibeq_decl,type,
    leibeq: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(sk1_decl,type,
    sk1: $o ).

thf(sk2_decl,type,
    sk2: $o ).

thf(sk3_decl,type,
    sk3: $o > $o ).

thf(leibeq_def,definition,
    ( leibeq
    = ( ^ [A: $o,B: $o] :
        ! [C: $o > $o] :
          ( ( C @ A )
         => ( C @ B ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk1_def,definition,
    ( sk1
    = ( @+[A: $o] :
          ~ ! [B: $o,C: $o > $o] :
              ( ( C
                @ ( A
                  & B ) )
             => ( C
                @ ~ ( ~ A
                    | ~ B ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk2_def,definition,
    ( sk2
    = ( @+[A: $o] :
          ~ ! [B: $o > $o] :
              ( ( B
                @ ( sk1
                  & A ) )
             => ( B
                @ ~ ( ~ sk1
                    | ~ A ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk3_def,definition,
    ( sk3
    = ( @+[A: $o > $o] :
          ~ ( ( A
              @ ( sk1
                & sk2 ) )
           => ( A
              @ ~ ( ~ sk1
                  | ~ sk2 ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ! [A: $o,B: $o] :
      ( leibeq
      @ ( A
        & B )
      @ ~ ( ~ A
          | ~ B ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: $o,B: $o] :
        ( leibeq
        @ ( A
          & B )
        @ ~ ( ~ A
            | ~ B ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ~ ! [A: $o,B: $o,C: $o > $o] :
        ( ( C
          @ ( A
            & B ) )
       => ( C
          @ ~ ( ~ A
              | ~ B ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ( ( sk3
      @ ( sk1
        & sk2 ) )
    & ~ ( sk3
        @ ~ ( ~ sk1
            | ~ sk2 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[3]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ( sk3
    @ ( sk1
      & sk2 ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    ~ ( sk3
      @ ~ ( ~ sk1
          | ~ sk2 ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ( ~ $true
    | ( ( sk3
        @ ( sk1
          & sk2 ) )
     != ( sk3
        @ ~ ( ~ sk1
            | ~ sk2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[5,6]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ( ( sk3
      @ ( sk1
        & sk2 ) )
   != ( sk3
      @ ~ ( ~ sk1
          | ~ sk2 ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ( ( sk1
      & sk2 )
   != ( ~ ( ~ sk1
          | ~ sk2 ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ( ( sk1
      & sk2 )
    | ~ ( ~ sk1
        | ~ sk2 ) ),
    inference(bool_ext,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(14,plain,
    ( ( sk1
      | sk1 )
    & ( sk1
      | sk2 )
    & ( sk2
      | sk1 )
    & ( sk2
      | sk2 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[11]) ).

thf(15,plain,
    ( sk1
    | sk1 ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(18,plain,
    sk1,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(24,plain,
    ( ( $true
      & sk2 )
   != ( ~ ( ~ $true
          | ~ sk2 ) ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[9,18]) ).

thf(25,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[24]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYO020^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.11/0.20  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.20  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.20  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.20  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.20  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.20  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.20  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.20  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 16:23:09 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.20  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.20  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.64/0.51  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 0.89/0.62  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (109ms). 
% 1.02/0.63  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.59/1.04  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.59/1.05  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.73/1.14  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 1.73/1.17  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 1.73/1.17  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 1.73/1.17  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 1.73/1.18  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 2.90/1.75  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 2.90/1.75  % Time passed: 1460ms (effective reasoning time: 1108ms)
% 2.90/1.75  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 2.90/1.75  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 2.90/1.75  % No. of inferences in proof: 15
% 2.90/1.75  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1460 ms resp. 1108 ms w/o parsing
% 3.16/1.80  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.16/1.80  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------