%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SYO025^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:42:09 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.21s 0.26s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 11 ( 5 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 29 ( 2 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 12 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 43 ( 21 ~; 16 |; 5 &; 0 @)
% ( 1 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 3 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 5 ( 2 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 4 ^; 2 !; 0 ?; 6 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_23,type,
epred1_0: $o ).
thf(decl_24,type,
epred2_0: $o ).
thf(conj,conjecture,
( $and
= ( ^ [X1: $o,X2: $o] :
~ ( ~ X1
| ~ X2 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.mV2SD7buCg/E---3.1_1245723.p',conj) ).
thf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
( $and
!= ( ^ [X1: $o,X2: $o] :
~ ( ~ X1
| ~ X2 ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj]) ).
thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X3: $o,X4: $o] :
( ( X3
& X4 )
<=> ~ ( ~ X3
| ~ X4 ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])]) ).
thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( ( ~ epred1_0
| ~ epred2_0
| ~ epred1_0
| ~ epred2_0 )
& ( epred1_0
| epred1_0 )
& ( epred2_0
| epred1_0 )
& ( epred1_0
| epred2_0 )
& ( epred2_0
| epred2_0 ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( ~ epred1_0
| ~ epred2_0
| ~ epred1_0
| ~ epred2_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( epred1_0
| epred1_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( epred2_0
| epred2_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( ~ epred1_0
| ~ epred2_0 ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
epred1_0,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
epred2_0,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
thf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SYO025^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.06/0.19 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.06/0.19 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.06/0.19 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.06/0.19 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.06/0.19 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.06/0.19 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.06/0.19 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.06/0.19 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 16:23:23 UTC 2026
% 0.06/0.19 % CPUTime :
% 0.06/0.19 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.06/0.23 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.06/0.25 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.mV2SD7buCg/E---3.1_1245723.p
% 0.21/0.26 % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.21/0.26 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSN.
% 0.21/0.26 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.26 % Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.26 % Starting post_as_ho10 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.26 % Starting new_bool_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.26 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.26 % post_as_ho10 with pid 1245737 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.26 % Result found by post_as_ho10
% 0.21/0.26 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSN.
% 0.21/0.26 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.26 % Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.26 % Starting post_as_ho10 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.26 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.21/0.26 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.26 % Search class: HGHNF-FFSS00-SSSFFFNN
% 0.21/0.26 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.26 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.26 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1245743 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.26 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.21/0.26 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSN.
% 0.21/0.26 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.26 % Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.26 % Starting post_as_ho10 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.26 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.21/0.26 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.26 % Search class: HGHNF-FFSS00-SSSFFFNN
% 0.21/0.26 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.26 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.26 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.26
% 0.21/0.26 % Proof found!
% 0.21/0.26 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.26 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.26 % Parsed axioms : 1
% 0.21/0.26 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.21/0.26 % Initial clauses : 5
% 0.21/0.26 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.21/0.26 % Initial clauses in saturation : 5
% 0.21/0.26 % Processed clauses : 5
% 0.21/0.26 % ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.21/0.26 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.26 % ...remaining for further processing : 2
% 0.21/0.26 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.21/0.26 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.26 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.26 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.21/0.26 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.26 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.21/0.26 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.26 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/0.26 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Total rewrite steps : 6
% 0.21/0.27 % ...of those cached : 4
% 0.21/0.27 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.27 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.27 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.27 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.27 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.27 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.27 % Current number of processed clauses : 2
% 0.21/0.27 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.21/0.27 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.27 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.27 % Termbank termtop insertions : 304
% 0.21/0.27 % Search garbage collected termcells : 80
% 0.21/0.27
% 0.21/0.27 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.27 % User time : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.27 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.27 % Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.27 % Maximum resident set size: 3572 pages
% 0.21/0.27
% 0.21/0.27 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.27 % User time : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.27 % System time : 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.27 % Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.21/0.27 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.21/0.27 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------