%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : cocATP---0.2.0 % Problem : SYO032^1 : TPTP v7.5.0. Released v3.7.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % Computer : n016.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 0s % DateTime : Tue Mar 29 00:50:26 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 0.55s 0.74s % Output : Proof 0.55s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.03/0.11 % Problem : SYO032^1 : TPTP v7.5.0. Released v3.7.0. % 0.03/0.11 % Command : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu % 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.11/0.32 % CPUModel : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.11/0.32 % RAMPerCPU : 8042.1875MB % 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Fri Mar 11 04:11:59 EST 2022 % 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime : % 0.11/0.33 ModuleCmd_Load.c(213):ERROR:105: Unable to locate a modulefile for 'python/python27' % 0.11/0.33 Python 2.7.5 % 0.55/0.74 Using paths ['/home/cristobal/cocATP/CASC/TPTP/', '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/', '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/'] % 0.55/0.74 FOF formula ((ex (Prop->(Prop->Prop))) (fun (D:(Prop->(Prop->Prop)))=> (forall (P:Prop) (Q:Prop), ((iff ((D P) Q)) ((or P) Q))))) of role conjecture named conj % 0.55/0.74 Conjecture to prove = ((ex (Prop->(Prop->Prop))) (fun (D:(Prop->(Prop->Prop)))=> (forall (P:Prop) (Q:Prop), ((iff ((D P) Q)) ((or P) Q))))):Prop % 0.55/0.74 We need to prove ['((ex (Prop->(Prop->Prop))) (fun (D:(Prop->(Prop->Prop)))=> (forall (P:Prop) (Q:Prop), ((iff ((D P) Q)) ((or P) Q)))))'] % 0.55/0.74 Trying to prove ((ex (Prop->(Prop->Prop))) (fun (D:(Prop->(Prop->Prop)))=> (forall (P:Prop) (Q:Prop), ((iff ((D P) Q)) ((or P) Q))))) % 0.55/0.74 Found iff_refl0:=(iff_refl ((x P) Q)):((iff ((x P) Q)) ((x P) Q)) % 0.55/0.74 Found (iff_refl ((x P) Q)) as proof of ((iff ((x P) Q)) ((or P) Q)) % 0.55/0.74 Found (iff_refl ((x P) Q)) as proof of ((iff ((x P) Q)) ((or P) Q)) % 0.55/0.74 Found (fun (Q:Prop)=> (iff_refl ((x P) Q))) as proof of ((iff ((x P) Q)) ((or P) Q)) % 0.55/0.74 Found (fun (P:Prop) (Q:Prop)=> (iff_refl ((x P) Q))) as proof of (forall (Q:Prop), ((iff ((x P) Q)) ((or P) Q))) % 0.55/0.74 Found (fun (P:Prop) (Q:Prop)=> (iff_refl ((x P) Q))) as proof of (forall (P:Prop) (Q:Prop), ((iff ((x P) Q)) ((or P) Q))) % 0.55/0.74 Found (ex_intro000 (fun (P:Prop) (Q:Prop)=> (iff_refl ((x P) Q)))) as proof of ((ex (Prop->(Prop->Prop))) (fun (D:(Prop->(Prop->Prop)))=> (forall (P:Prop) (Q:Prop), ((iff ((D P) Q)) ((or P) Q))))) % 0.55/0.74 Found ((ex_intro00 or) (fun (P:Prop) (Q:Prop)=> (iff_refl ((or P) Q)))) as proof of ((ex (Prop->(Prop->Prop))) (fun (D:(Prop->(Prop->Prop)))=> (forall (P:Prop) (Q:Prop), ((iff ((D P) Q)) ((or P) Q))))) % 0.55/0.74 Found (((ex_intro0 (fun (D:(Prop->(Prop->Prop)))=> (forall (P:Prop) (Q:Prop), ((iff ((D P) Q)) ((or P) Q))))) or) (fun (P:Prop) (Q:Prop)=> (iff_refl ((or P) Q)))) as proof of ((ex (Prop->(Prop->Prop))) (fun (D:(Prop->(Prop->Prop)))=> (forall (P:Prop) (Q:Prop), ((iff ((D P) Q)) ((or P) Q))))) % 0.55/0.74 Found ((((ex_intro (Prop->(Prop->Prop))) (fun (D:(Prop->(Prop->Prop)))=> (forall (P:Prop) (Q:Prop), ((iff ((D P) Q)) ((or P) Q))))) or) (fun (P:Prop) (Q:Prop)=> (iff_refl ((or P) Q)))) as proof of ((ex (Prop->(Prop->Prop))) (fun (D:(Prop->(Prop->Prop)))=> (forall (P:Prop) (Q:Prop), ((iff ((D P) Q)) ((or P) Q))))) % 0.55/0.74 Found ((((ex_intro (Prop->(Prop->Prop))) (fun (D:(Prop->(Prop->Prop)))=> (forall (P:Prop) (Q:Prop), ((iff ((D P) Q)) ((or P) Q))))) or) (fun (P:Prop) (Q:Prop)=> (iff_refl ((or P) Q)))) as proof of ((ex (Prop->(Prop->Prop))) (fun (D:(Prop->(Prop->Prop)))=> (forall (P:Prop) (Q:Prop), ((iff ((D P) Q)) ((or P) Q))))) % 0.55/0.74 Got proof ((((ex_intro (Prop->(Prop->Prop))) (fun (D:(Prop->(Prop->Prop)))=> (forall (P:Prop) (Q:Prop), ((iff ((D P) Q)) ((or P) Q))))) or) (fun (P:Prop) (Q:Prop)=> (iff_refl ((or P) Q)))) % 0.55/0.74 Time elapsed = 0.139439s % 0.55/0.74 node=27 cost=145.000000 depth=9 % 0.55/0.74 :::::::::::::::::::::: % 0.55/0.74 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.55/0.74 % SZS output start Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.55/0.74 ((((ex_intro (Prop->(Prop->Prop))) (fun (D:(Prop->(Prop->Prop)))=> (forall (P:Prop) (Q:Prop), ((iff ((D P) Q)) ((or P) Q))))) or) (fun (P:Prop) (Q:Prop)=> (iff_refl ((or P) Q)))) % 0.55/0.74 % SZS output end Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p %------------------------------------------------------------------------------