↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SYO035^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:45:03 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 4.60s 2.78s
% Output   : Refutation 4.90s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (  13 unt;   0 typ;   5 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   62 (  45 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   78 (  17   ~;   7   |;   2   &;  38   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  14  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   19 (  19   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    9 (   5 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   51 (  28   ^;  20   !;   0   ?;  51   :)
%                                         (   0  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   3  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(leibeq1_decl,type,
    leibeq1: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(leibeq2_decl,type,
    leibeq2: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(sk1_decl,type,
    sk1: $i ).

thf(sk2_decl,type,
    sk2: $i ).

thf(sk3_decl,type,
    sk3: $i > $o ).

thf(leibeq1_def,definition,
    ( leibeq1
    = ( ^ [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ! [C: $i > $o] :
          ( ( C @ A )
         => ( C @ B ) ) ) ) ).

thf(leibeq2_def,definition,
    ( leibeq2
    = ( ^ [A: $i > $o,B: $i > $o] :
        ! [C: ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
          ( ( C @ A )
         => ( C @ B ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk1_def,definition,
    ( sk1
    = ( @+[A: $i] :
          ~ ! [B: $i] :
              ( ! [C: ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
                  ( ( C
                    @ ^ [D: $i] : ( D = A ) )
                 => ( C
                    @ ^ [D: $i] : ( D = B ) ) )
             => ! [C: $i > $o] :
                  ( ( C @ A )
                 => ( C @ B ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk2_def,definition,
    ( sk2
    = ( @+[A: $i] :
          ~ ( ! [B: ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
                ( ( B
                  @ ^ [C: $i] : ( C = sk1 ) )
               => ( B
                  @ ^ [C: $i] : ( C = A ) ) )
           => ! [B: $i > $o] :
                ( ( B @ sk1 )
               => ( B @ A ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk3_def,definition,
    ( sk3
    = ( @+[A: $i > $o] :
          ~ ( ( A @ sk1 )
           => ( A @ sk2 ) ) ) ) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( leibeq2
        @ ^ [C: $i] : ( C = A )
        @ ^ [C: $i] : ( C = B ) )
     => ( leibeq1 @ A @ B ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( leibeq2
          @ ^ [C: $i] : ( C = A )
          @ ^ [C: $i] : ( C = B ) )
       => ( leibeq1 @ A @ B ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ! [C: ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
            ( ( C
              @ ^ [D: $i] : ( D = A ) )
           => ( C
              @ ^ [D: $i] : ( D = B ) ) )
       => ! [C: $i > $o] :
            ( ( C @ A )
           => ( C @ B ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ! [A: ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
      ( ( ~ ( A
            @ ^ [B: $i] : ( B = sk1 ) )
        | ( A
          @ ^ [B: $i] : ( B = sk2 ) ) )
      & ( sk3 @ sk1 )
      & ~ ( sk3 @ sk2 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[3]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ! [A: ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
      ( ~ ( A
          @ ^ [B: $i] : ( B = sk1 ) )
      | ( A
        @ ^ [B: $i] : ( B = sk2 ) ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ( ( ( ^ [A: $i] : ( A = sk1 ) )
     != ( ^ [A: $i] : ( A = sk1 ) ) )
    | ( ( ^ [A: $i] : ( A = sk1 ) )
      = ( ^ [A: $i] : ( A = sk2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(replace_leibeq,[status(thm)],[5:[bind(A,$thf( (=) @ ( $i > $o ) @ ^ [B: $i] : ( B = sk1 ) ))]]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ( ( ( ^ [A: $i] : ( A = sk1 ) )
     != ( ^ [A: $i] : ( A = sk1 ) ) )
    | ( ( ^ [A: $i] : ( A = sk2 ) )
      = ( ^ [A: $i] : ( A = sk1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ( ( ^ [A: $i] : ( A = sk2 ) )
    = ( ^ [A: $i] : ( A = sk1 ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(14,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A = sk2 )
      = ( A = sk1 ) ),
    inference(func_ext,[status(esa)],[10]) ).

thf(18,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A != sk2 )
      | ( A = sk1 ) ),
    inference(bool_ext,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(20,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A != sk2 )
      | ( A = sk1 ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[18]) ).

thf(22,plain,
    sk2 = sk1,
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[20:[bind(A,$thf( sk2 ))]]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    sk3 @ sk1,
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ~ ( sk3 @ sk2 ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ( ~ $true
    | ( ( sk3 @ sk2 )
     != ( sk3 @ sk1 ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[6,7]) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ( ( sk3 @ sk2 )
   != ( sk3 @ sk1 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    sk2 != sk1,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(24,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simplifyReflect,[status(thm)],[22,13]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYO035^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.10/0.20  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.20  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.20  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.20  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.20  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.20  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.20  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.20  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 16:18:52 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.20  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.20  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.14/0.91  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.40/1.13  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (216ms). 
% 1.57/1.15  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.27/1.61  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.27/1.62  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.46/1.73  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.46/1.77  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.46/1.77  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.46/1.78  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.46/1.79  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 4.60/2.77  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 4.60/2.77  % Time passed: 2425ms (effective reasoning time: 1614ms)
% 4.60/2.77  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 4.60/2.77  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 4.60/2.77  % No. of inferences in proof: 18
% 4.60/2.78  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2425 ms resp. 1614 ms w/o parsing
% 4.90/2.84  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.90/2.84  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------