↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SYO037^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:53:11 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.58s 1.30s
% Output   : Refutation 1.58s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (   4 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   29 (  25 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   59 (  15   ~;   6   |;   0   &;  32   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   41 (  41   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    5 (   3 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   35 (   0   ^;  27   !;   8   ?;  35   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(func_def_3,type,
    sK0: ( $i > $o ) > $i ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    inv_sK0_2: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    ph3: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(f18,plain,
    $false,
    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[f16]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ~ ( inv_sK0_2 @ ( sK0 @ X1 ) @ X2 ) )
     != ( X1 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(bool_equality_to_disequality,[status(thm)],[f14]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i > $o] :
      ( ( inv_sK0_2 @ ( sK0 @ X1 ) @ X2 )
      = ( X1 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(argument_congruence,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $o] :
      ( ( inv_sK0_2 @ ( sK0 @ X1 ) )
      = X1 ),
    inference(injectivity,[status(thm)],[f11]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ! [X2: $i > $o,X1: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( sK0 @ X1 )
       != ( sK0 @ X2 ) )
      | ( X1 = X2 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $o,X2: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( sK0 @ X1 )
       != ( sK0 @ X2 ) )
      | ( X1 = X2 ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f8,f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ? [X0: ( $i > $o ) > $i] :
      ! [X1: $i > $o,X2: $i > $o] :
        ( ( ( X0 @ X1 )
         != ( X0 @ X2 ) )
        | ( X1 = X2 ) )
   => ! [X2: $i > $o,X1: $i > $o] :
        ( ( ( sK0 @ X1 )
         != ( sK0 @ X2 ) )
        | ( X1 = X2 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ? [X0: ( $i > $o ) > $i] :
    ! [X1: $i > $o,X2: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( X0 @ X1 )
       != ( X0 @ X2 ) )
      | ( X1 = X2 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ? [X0: ( $i > $o ) > $i] :
    ! [X2: $i > $o,X1: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( X0 @ X1 )
       != ( X0 @ X2 ) )
      | ( X1 = X2 ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ? [X0: ( $i > $o ) > $i] :
    ! [X2: $i > $o,X1: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( X0 @ X1 )
        = ( X0 @ X2 ) )
     => ( X1 = X2 ) ),
    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ~ ? [X0: ( $i > $o ) > $i] :
        ! [X2: $i > $o,X1: $i > $o] :
          ( ( ( X0 @ X1 )
            = ( X0 @ X2 ) )
         => ( X1 = X2 ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ~ ? [X0: ( $i > $o ) > $i] :
        ! [X1: $i > $o,X2: $i > $o] :
          ( ( ( X0 @ X1 )
            = ( X0 @ X2 ) )
         => ( X1 = X2 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ~ ? [X0: ( $i > $o ) > $i] :
        ! [X2: $i > $o,X1: $i > $o] :
          ( ( ( X0 @ X1 )
            = ( X0 @ X2 ) )
         => ( X1 = X2 ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ~ ? [X0: ( $i > $o ) > $i] :
      ! [X2: $i > $o,X1: $i > $o] :
        ( ( ( X0 @ X1 )
          = ( X0 @ X2 ) )
       => ( X1 = X2 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.QAJS5KQnq4/DTF2THF_19983.p',conj) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SYO037^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.17/0.33  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 14:22:21 EST 2026
% 0.17/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.34  Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.19/0.44  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.19/0.44  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.19/0.44  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.44  % File     : SYO037^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.19/0.44  % Domain   : Syntactic
% 0.19/0.44  % Problem  : Injective Cantor theorem
% 0.19/0.44  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.19/0.44  % English  :
% 0.19/0.44  
% 0.19/0.44  % Refs     : [BB05]  Benzmueller & Brown (2005), A Structured Set of Higher
% 0.19/0.44  %          : [Ben09] Benzmueller (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.19/0.44  % Source   : [Ben09]
% 0.19/0.44  % Names    : Example 32 [BB05]
% 0.19/0.44  
% 0.19/0.44  % Status   : ContradictoryAxioms
% 0.19/0.44  % Rating   : 0.56 v9.1.0, 0.50 v9.0.0, 0.70 v8.2.0, 0.85 v8.1.0, 0.82 v7.5.0, 0.71 v7.4.0, 0.67 v7.3.0, 0.89 v7.2.0, 0.88 v7.1.0, 1.00 v3.7.0
% 0.19/0.44  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    1 (   0 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
% 0.19/0.44  %            Number of atoms       :    2 (   2 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.19/0.44  %            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   2 avg)
% 0.19/0.44  %            Number of connectives :    4 (   1   ~;   0   |;   0   &;   2   @)
% 0.19/0.44  %                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.19/0.44  %            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   6 avg)
% 0.19/0.44  %            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
% 0.19/0.44  %            Number of type conns  :    4 (   4   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.19/0.44  %            Number of symbols     :    1 (   0 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 0.19/0.44  %            Number of variables   :    3 (   0   ^;   2   !;   1   ?;   3   :)
% 0.19/0.44  % SPC      : TH0_CAX_EQU_NAR
% 0.19/0.44  
% 0.19/0.44  % Comments : Requires set comprehension, and set instantiation
% 0.19/0.44  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.44  thf(conj,conjecture,
% 0.19/0.44      ~ ? [H: ( $i > $o ) > $i] :
% 0.19/0.44        ! [P: $i > $o,Q: $i > $o] :
% 0.19/0.44          ( ( ( H @ P )
% 0.19/0.44            = ( H @ Q ) )
% 0.19/0.44         => ( P = Q ) ) ).
% 0.19/0.44  
% 0.19/0.44  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.44  ------------------------
% 1.46/1.26  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.46/1.26  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.46/1.26  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 14:22:22 EST 2026
% 1.46/1.26  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.46/1.26  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.46/1.26  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.46/1.26  
% 1.46/1.26  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.QAJS5KQnq4/DTF2DTF19983.p
% See solution above
% 1.46/1.26  ------------------------
% 1.46/1.27  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.46/1.27  thf(conj,conjecture,
% 1.46/1.27      ~ ? [H: ( $i > $o ) > $i] :
% 1.46/1.27        ! [P: $i > $o,Q: $i > $o] :
% 1.46/1.27          ( ( ( H @ P )
% 1.46/1.27            = ( H @ Q ) )
% 1.46/1.27         => ( P = Q ) ) ).
% 1.46/1.27  ------------------------
% 1.46/1.29  % (20269)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_19983 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 1.46/1.29  % (20269)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.46/1.29  % (20269)------------------------------
% 1.46/1.29  % (20269)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.46/1.29  % (20269)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.46/1.29  
% 1.46/1.29  
% 1.46/1.29  % (20269)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.46/1.29  % (20269)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 1.46/1.29  % (20269)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 1.46/1.29  % (20269)------------------------------
% 1.46/1.29  % (20269)------------------------------
% 1.46/1.29  % (20268)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_19983 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 1.46/1.29  % (20265)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_19983 for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 1.46/1.29  % (20266)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_19983 for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 1.46/1.29  % (20267)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_19983 for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 1.46/1.30  % (20270)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_19983 for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 1.46/1.30  % (20271)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_19983 for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 1.46/1.30  % (20265)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.46/1.30  % (20265)------------------------------
% 1.46/1.30  % (20265)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.46/1.30  % (20265)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.46/1.30  
% 1.46/1.30  
% 1.46/1.30  % (20265)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 1.46/1.30  % (20265)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.46/1.30  % (20265)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 1.46/1.30  % (20265)------------------------------
% 1.46/1.30  % (20265)------------------------------
% 1.46/1.30  % (20268)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.46/1.30  % (20268)------------------------------
% 1.46/1.30  % (20268)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.46/1.30  % (20268)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.46/1.30  % (20268)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.46/1.30  
% 1.46/1.30  % (20268)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.46/1.30  % (20268)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 1.46/1.30  % (20268)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 1.46/1.30  % (20268)------------------------------
% 1.46/1.30  % (20268)------------------------------
% 1.46/1.30  % (20266)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.46/1.30  % (20266)------------------------------
% 1.46/1.30  % (20266)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.46/1.30  % (20266)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.46/1.30  
% 1.46/1.30  
% 1.46/1.30  % (20266)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 1.46/1.30  % (20266)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.46/1.30  % (20266)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 1.46/1.30  % (20266)------------------------------
% 1.46/1.30  % (20266)------------------------------
% 1.46/1.30  % (20267)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.46/1.30  % (20267)------------------------------
% 1.46/1.30  % (20267)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.46/1.30  % (20267)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.46/1.30  
% 1.46/1.30  
% 1.46/1.30  % (20267)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 1.46/1.30  % (20267)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.46/1.30  % (20267)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 1.46/1.30  % (20267)------------------------------
% 1.46/1.30  % (20267)------------------------------
% 1.46/1.30  % (20270)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.46/1.30  % (20270)------------------------------
% 1.46/1.30  % (20270)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.46/1.30  % (20270)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.46/1.30  
% 1.46/1.30  
% 1.46/1.30  % (20270)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 1.46/1.30  % (20270)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.46/1.30  % (20270)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 1.46/1.30  % (20270)------------------------------
% 1.46/1.30  % (20270)------------------------------
% 1.58/1.30  % (20271)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.58/1.30  % (20271)------------------------------
% 1.58/1.30  % (20271)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.58/1.30  % (20271)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.58/1.30  
% 1.58/1.30  
% 1.58/1.30  % (20271)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 1.58/1.30  % (20271)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.58/1.30  % (20271)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 1.58/1.30  % (20271)------------------------------
% 1.58/1.30  % (20271)------------------------------
% 1.58/1.30  % (20272)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_19983 for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 1.58/1.30  % (20272)First to succeed.
% 1.58/1.30  % (20272)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.58/1.30  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_19983
% 1.58/1.30  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_19983
% 1.58/1.30  thf(func_def_3, type, sK0: ($i > $o) > $i).
% 1.58/1.30  thf(func_def_5, type, inv_sK0_2: $i > $i > $o).
% 1.58/1.30  thf(func_def_6, type, ph3: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 1.58/1.30  thf(f18,plain,(
% 1.58/1.30    $false),
% 1.58/1.30    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[f16])).
% 1.58/1.30  thf(f16,plain,(
% 1.58/1.30    ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i > $o] : (((~ (inv_sK0_2 @ (sK0 @ X1) @ X2)) != (X1 @ X2))) )),
% 1.58/1.30    inference(bool_equality_to_disequality,[status(thm)],[f14])).
% 1.58/1.30  thf(f14,plain,(
% 1.58/1.30    ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i > $o] : (((inv_sK0_2 @ (sK0 @ X1) @ X2) = (X1 @ X2))) )),
% 1.58/1.30    inference(argument_congruence,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.58/1.30  thf(f12,plain,(
% 1.58/1.30    ( ! [X1 : $i > $o] : (((inv_sK0_2 @ (sK0 @ X1)) = X1)) )),
% 1.58/1.30    inference(injectivity,[status(thm)],[f11])).
% 1.58/1.30  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.58/1.30    ( ! [X2 : $i > $o,X1 : $i > $o] : (((sK0 @ X1) != (sK0 @ X2)) | (X1 = X2)) )),
% 1.58/1.30    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.58/1.30  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.58/1.30    ! [X1 : $i > $o,X2 : $i > $o] : (((sK0 @ X1) != (sK0 @ X2)) | (X1 = X2))),
% 1.58/1.30    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f8,f9])).
% 1.58/1.30  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.58/1.30    ? [X0 : ($i > $o) > $i] : ! [X1 : $i > $o,X2 : $i > $o] : (((X0 @ X1) != (X0 @ X2)) | (X1 = X2)) => ! [X2 : $i > $o,X1 : $i > $o] : (((sK0 @ X1) != (sK0 @ X2)) | (X1 = X2))),
% 1.58/1.30    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.58/1.30  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.58/1.30    ? [X0 : ($i > $o) > $i] : ! [X1 : $i > $o,X2 : $i > $o] : (((X0 @ X1) != (X0 @ X2)) | (X1 = X2))),
% 1.58/1.30    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f7])).
% 1.58/1.30  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.58/1.30    ? [X0 : ($i > $o) > $i] : ! [X2 : $i > $o,X1 : $i > $o] : (((X0 @ X1) != (X0 @ X2)) | (X1 = X2))),
% 1.58/1.30    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6])).
% 1.58/1.30  thf(f6,plain,(
% 1.58/1.30    ? [X0 : ($i > $o) > $i] : ! [X2 : $i > $o,X1 : $i > $o] : (((X0 @ X1) = (X0 @ X2)) => (X1 = X2))),
% 1.58/1.30    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.58/1.30  thf(f5,plain,(
% 1.58/1.30    ~~? [X0 : ($i > $o) > $i] : ! [X2 : $i > $o,X1 : $i > $o] : (((X0 @ X1) = (X0 @ X2)) => (X1 = X2))),
% 1.58/1.30    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4])).
% 1.58/1.30  thf(f4,plain,(
% 1.58/1.30    ~~? [X0 : ($i > $o) > $i] : ! [X1 : $i > $o,X2 : $i > $o] : (((X0 @ X1) = (X0 @ X2)) => (X1 = X2))),
% 1.58/1.30    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.58/1.30  thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.58/1.30    ~~? [X0 : ($i > $o) > $i] : ! [X2 : $i > $o,X1 : $i > $o] : (((X0 @ X1) = (X0 @ X2)) => (X1 = X2))),
% 1.58/1.30    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1])).
% 1.58/1.30  thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 1.58/1.30    ~? [X0 : ($i > $o) > $i] : ! [X2 : $i > $o,X1 : $i > $o] : (((X0 @ X1) = (X0 @ X2)) => (X1 = X2))),
% 1.58/1.30    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.QAJS5KQnq4/DTF2THF_19983.p',conj)).
% 1.58/1.30  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_19983
% 1.58/1.30  % (20272)------------------------------
% 1.58/1.30  % (20272)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.58/1.30  % (20272)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.58/1.30  
% 1.58/1.30  % (20272)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.58/1.30  % (20272)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 1.58/1.30  % (20272)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.58/1.30  % (20272)------------------------------
% 1.58/1.30  % (20272)------------------------------
% 1.58/1.30  % (20264)Success in time 0.02 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------