↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SYO037^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:45:04 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 8.87s 3.94s
% Output   : Refutation 8.87s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (   8 unt;   0 typ;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   34 (  22 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   70 (  15   ~;   5   |;   0   &;  45   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   35 (  35   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    5 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   33 (   2   ^;  24   !;   5   ?;  33   :)
%                                         (   0  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   2  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(sk1_decl,type,
    sk1: ( $i > $o ) > $i ).

thf(sk2_decl,type,
    sk2: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(sk1_def,definition,
    ( sk1
    = ( @+[A: ( $i > $o ) > $i] :
        ! [B: $i > $o,C: $i > $o] :
          ( ( ( A @ B )
            = ( A @ C ) )
         => ( B = C ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk2_def,definition,
    ( sk2
    = ( @+[A: $i > $i > $o] :
        ! [B: $i > $o] :
          ( ( A @ ( sk1 @ B ) )
          = B ) ) ) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ~ ? [A: ( $i > $o ) > $i] :
      ! [B: $i > $o,C: $i > $o] :
        ( ( ( A @ B )
          = ( A @ C ) )
       => ( B = C ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ~ ? [A: ( $i > $o ) > $i] :
        ! [B: $i > $o,C: $i > $o] :
          ( ( ( A @ B )
            = ( A @ C ) )
         => ( B = C ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ~ ~ ? [A: ( $i > $o ) > $i] :
        ! [B: $i > $o,C: $i > $o] :
          ( ( ( A @ B )
            = ( A @ C ) )
         => ( B = C ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ? [A: ( $i > $o ) > $i] :
    ! [B: $i > $o,C: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( A @ B )
        = ( A @ C ) )
     => ( B = C ) ),
    inference(polarity_switch,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ! [B: $i > $o,A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( sk1 @ A )
       != ( sk1 @ B ) )
      | ( A = B ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[4]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    ! [B: $i > $o,A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( sk1 @ A )
       != ( sk1 @ B ) )
      | ( A = B ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ? [A: $i > $i > $o] :
    ! [B: $i > $o] :
      ( ( A @ ( sk1 @ B ) )
      = B ),
    inference(detectInverse,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( sk2 @ ( sk1 @ A ) )
      = A ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[7]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( sk2 @ ( sk1 @ A ) )
      = A ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( sk2 @ ( sk1 @ A ) @ B )
      = ( A @ B ) ),
    inference(func_ext,[status(esa)],[9]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i > $o] :
      ( ~ ( sk2 @ ( sk1 @ A ) @ B )
      | ( A @ B ) ),
    inference(bool_ext,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(31,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i > $o] :
      ( ~ ( sk2 @ ( sk1 @ A ) @ B )
      | ( ( A @ B )
       != ( ~ ( sk2 @ ( sk1 @ A ) @ B ) ) )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(eqfactor_ordered,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(38,plain,
    ~ ( sk2
      @ ( sk1
        @ ^ [A: $i] :
            ~ ( sk2 @ A @ A ) )
      @ ( sk1
        @ ^ [A: $i] :
            ~ ( sk2 @ A @ A ) ) ),
    inference(pre_uni,[status(thm)],[31:[bind(A,$thf( ^ [C: $i] : ~ ( sk2 @ C @ C ) )),bind(B,$thf( sk1 @ ^ [C: $i] : ~ ( sk2 @ C @ C ) ))]]) ).

thf(109,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[10,6,38,9,3,11]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYO037^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.13/0.27  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.27  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.27  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.27  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.27  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.27  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.27  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.27  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 16:26:07 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.27  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.28  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.39/1.10  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.81/1.37  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (261ms). 
% 1.81/1.39  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.59/1.84  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.59/1.85  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.85/1.95  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.85/2.00  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.85/2.00  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.85/2.01  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.85/2.02  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 8.87/3.94  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 8.87/3.94  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 8.87/3.94  % Time passed: 3454ms (effective reasoning time: 2540ms)
% 8.87/3.94  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 8.87/3.94  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 8.87/3.94  % No. of inferences in proof: 14
% 8.87/3.94  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 3454 ms resp. 2540 ms w/o parsing
% 8.87/4.00  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 8.87/4.00  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------