↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SYO040^2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:53:13 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.51s 1.23s
% Output   : Refutation 1.51s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   73 (   6 unt;   0 typ;   9 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  395 (  61 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  335 ( 121   ~; 120   |;   0   &;  85   @)
%                                         (   9 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   16 (  13 usr;  12 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0   ^;   0   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(func_def_0,type,
    f: $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    h: $o > $i ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    ph1: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(f174,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f17,f26,f30,f64,f65,f66,f71,f73,f75,f78,f103,f113,f130,f134,f162]) ).

thf(f162,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_4
    | spl0_6
    | spl0_9 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f161]) ).

thf(f161,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_4
    | spl0_6
    | spl0_9 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f160,f69]) ).

thf(f69,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( f @ $true ) )
    | spl0_9 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f68]) ).

thf(f68,definition,
    ( spl0_9
  <=> ( $true
      = ( f @ $true ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_9])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f160,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( f @ $true ) )
    | ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_4
    | spl0_6 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f158,f52]) ).

thf(f52,plain,
    ( ( x != $true )
    | spl0_6 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f51]) ).

thf(f51,definition,
    ( spl0_6
  <=> ( x = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_6])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f158,plain,
    ( ( x = $true )
    | ( $true
      = ( f @ $true ) )
    | ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f157]) ).

thf(f157,plain,
    ( ( x
     != ( f @ $true ) )
    | ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f150]) ).

thf(f150,plain,
    ( ( $false = $true )
    | ( x
     != ( f @ $true ) )
    | ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f16,f126]) ).

thf(f126,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( f @ ( f @ $true ) ) )
    | ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(backward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f25,f16]) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) )
      = $false )
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f23]) ).

thf(f23,definition,
    ( spl0_4
  <=> ( ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) )
      = $false ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_4])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ x )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f14]) ).

thf(f14,definition,
    ( spl0_2
  <=> ( ( f @ x )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f134,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_6
    | ~ spl0_2
    | spl0_9 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f133,f68,f14,f51]) ).

thf(f133,plain,
    ( ( x != $true )
    | ~ spl0_2
    | spl0_9 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f132]) ).

thf(f132,plain,
    ( ( x != $true )
    | ( $true != $true )
    | ~ spl0_2
    | spl0_9 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f69,f16]) ).

thf(f130,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_4
    | ~ spl0_9 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f129]) ).

thf(f129,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_4
    | ~ spl0_9 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f128]) ).

thf(f128,plain,
    ( ( $false = $true )
    | ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_4
    | ~ spl0_9 ),
    inference(backward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f70,f127]) ).

thf(f127,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( f @ $true ) )
    | ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_4
    | ~ spl0_9 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f126,f70]) ).

thf(f70,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( f @ $true ) )
    | ~ spl0_9 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f68]) ).

thf(f113,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_6
    | ~ spl0_9 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f112]) ).

thf(f112,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_6
    | ~ spl0_9 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f111]) ).

thf(f111,plain,
    ( ( ( h @ $true )
     != ( h @ $true ) )
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_6
    | ~ spl0_9 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f106,f70]) ).

thf(f106,plain,
    ( ( ( h @ ( f @ $true ) )
     != ( h @ $true ) )
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_6 ),
    inference(backward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f100,f53]) ).

thf(f53,plain,
    ( ( x = $true )
    | ~ spl0_6 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f51]) ).

thf(f100,plain,
    ( ( ( h @ ( f @ x ) )
     != ( h @ $true ) )
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(backward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f5,f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

thf(f10,definition,
    ( spl0_1
  <=> ( ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ( ( h @ ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) ) )
   != ( h @ ( f @ x ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ( ( h @ ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) ) )
   != ( h @ ( f @ x ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( h @ ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) ) )
   != ( h @ ( f @ x ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ( ( h @ ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) ) )
    = ( h @ ( f @ x ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KDrLZYz61F/DTF2THF_19699.p',2) ).

thf(f103,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f102]) ).

thf(f102,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f101]) ).

thf(f101,plain,
    ( ( $false = $true )
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(backward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f12,f25]) ).

thf(f78,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_5
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f77]) ).

thf(f77,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_5
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f76]) ).

thf(f76,plain,
    ( ( $false = $true )
    | ~ spl0_5
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(backward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f49,f62]) ).

thf(f62,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( f @ $false ) )
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f60]) ).

thf(f60,definition,
    ( spl0_8
  <=> ( $false
      = ( f @ $false ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_8])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f49,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( f @ $false ) )
    | ~ spl0_5 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f47]) ).

thf(f47,definition,
    ( spl0_5
  <=> ( $true
      = ( f @ $false ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_5])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f75,plain,
    ( spl0_9
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_3
    | ~ spl0_5 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f74,f47,f19,f10,f68]) ).

thf(f19,definition,
    ( spl0_3
  <=> ( ( f @ x )
      = $false ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_3])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f74,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( f @ $true ) )
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_3
    | ~ spl0_5 ),
    inference(backward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f31,f49]) ).

thf(f31,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( f @ ( f @ $false ) ) )
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f12,f21]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ x )
      = $false )
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f19]) ).

thf(f73,plain,
    ( spl0_8
    | ~ spl0_3
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f72,f56,f19,f60]) ).

thf(f56,definition,
    ( spl0_7
  <=> ( x = $false ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_7])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f72,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( f @ $false ) )
    | ~ spl0_3
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(backward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f21,f58]) ).

thf(f58,plain,
    ( ( x = $false )
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f56]) ).

thf(f71,plain,
    ( spl0_9
    | ~ spl0_8
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f36,f19,f10,f60,f68]) ).

thf(f36,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( f @ $true ) )
    | ( $false
     != ( f @ $false ) )
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f31,f31]) ).

thf(f66,plain,
    ( spl0_7
    | spl0_8
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f42,f19,f10,f60,f56]) ).

thf(f42,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( f @ $false ) )
    | ( x = $false )
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f40]) ).

thf(f40,plain,
    ( ( x
     != ( f @ $false ) )
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f39]) ).

thf(f39,plain,
    ( ( x
     != ( f @ $false ) )
    | ( $false = $true )
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f21,f31]) ).

thf(f65,plain,
    ( spl0_6
    | spl0_5
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f41,f19,f10,f47,f51]) ).

thf(f41,plain,
    ( ( x = $true )
    | ( $true
      = ( f @ $false ) )
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f40]) ).

thf(f64,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_7
    | spl0_5
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f37,f19,f10,f47,f56]) ).

thf(f37,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( f @ $false ) )
    | ( x != $false )
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f31,f21]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f29]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f28]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ( ( $false = $true )
    | ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(backward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f16,f21]) ).

thf(f26,plain,
    ( spl0_3
    | spl0_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f8,f23,f19]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ x )
      = $false )
    | ( ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ( ( f @ x )
   != ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) ) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ( spl0_1
    | spl0_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f7,f14,f10]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( f @ x )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : SYO040^2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.16/0.33  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 14:22:27 EST 2026
% 0.16/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.33  Running /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.19/0.44  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.19/0.44  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.19/0.44  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.44  % File     : SYO040^2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.19/0.44  % Domain   : Syntactic
% 0.19/0.44  % Problem  : Unsatisfiable basic formula 2
% 0.19/0.44  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.19/0.44  %            Theorem formulation : As a conjecture rather than UNS set.
% 0.19/0.44  % English  : Variant of the Kaminski equation.
% 0.19/0.44  
% 0.19/0.44  % Refs     : [BS09a] Brown E. & Smolka (2009), Terminating Tableaux for the
% 0.19/0.44  %          : [BS09b] Brown E. & Smolka (2009), Extended First-Order Logic
% 0.19/0.44  %          : [Bro09] Brown E. (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.19/0.44  % Source   : [BS09a]
% 0.19/0.44  % Names    : basic2 [Bro09]
% 0.19/0.44  
% 0.19/0.44  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.19/0.44  % Rating   : 0.00 v9.0.0, 0.10 v8.2.0, 0.08 v8.1.0, 0.09 v7.5.0, 0.14 v7.4.0, 0.22 v7.2.0, 0.12 v7.1.0, 0.25 v7.0.0, 0.29 v6.4.0, 0.33 v6.3.0, 0.40 v6.2.0, 0.43 v6.0.0, 0.57 v5.5.0, 0.50 v5.4.0, 0.60 v4.1.0
% 0.19/0.44  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    4 (   1 unt;   3 typ;   0 def)
% 0.19/0.44  %            Number of atoms       :    7 (   1 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.19/0.44  %            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   7 avg)
% 0.19/0.44  %            Number of connectives :    6 (   0   ~;   0   |;   0   &;   6   @)
% 0.19/0.44  %                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.19/0.44  %            Maximal formula depth :    1 (   1 avg)
% 0.19/0.44  %            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
% 0.19/0.44  %            Number of type conns  :    2 (   2   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.19/0.44  %            Number of symbols     :    4 (   3 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.19/0.44  %            Number of variables   :    0 (   0   ^;   0   !;   0   ?;   0   :)
% 0.19/0.44  % SPC      : TH0_THM_EQU_NAR
% 0.19/0.44  
% 0.19/0.44  % Comments : The fragment of simple type theory that restricts equations to 
% 0.19/0.44  %            base types and disallows lambda abstraction and quantification is
% 0.19/0.44  %            decidable. This is an example.
% 0.19/0.44  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.44  thf(f,type,
% 0.19/0.44      f: $o > $o ).
% 0.19/0.44  
% 0.19/0.44  thf(h,type,
% 0.19/0.44      h: $o > $i ).
% 0.19/0.44  
% 0.19/0.44  thf(x,type,
% 0.19/0.44      x: $o ).
% 0.19/0.44  
% 0.19/0.44  thf(2,conjecture,
% 0.19/0.44      ( ( h @ ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) ) )
% 0.19/0.44      = ( h @ ( f @ x ) ) ) ).
% 0.19/0.44  
% 0.19/0.44  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.44  ------------------------
% 1.38/1.19  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.38/1.20  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.38/1.20  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 14:22:28 EST 2026
% 1.38/1.20  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.38/1.20  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.38/1.20  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.38/1.20  
% 1.38/1.20  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KDrLZYz61F/DTF2DTF19699.p
% See solution above
% 1.38/1.20  ------------------------
% 1.51/1.21  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.51/1.21  thf(f,type,
% 1.51/1.21      f: $o > $o ).
% 1.51/1.21  
% 1.51/1.21  thf(h,type,
% 1.51/1.21      h: $o > $i ).
% 1.51/1.21  
% 1.51/1.21  thf(x,type,
% 1.51/1.21      x: $o ).
% 1.51/1.21  
% 1.51/1.21  thf(2,conjecture,
% 1.51/1.21      ( ( h @ ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) ) )
% 1.51/1.21      = ( h @ ( f @ x ) ) ) ).
% 1.51/1.21  ------------------------
% 1.51/1.22  % (19842)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_19699 for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 1.51/1.22  % (19845)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_19699 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 1.51/1.22  % (19845)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.51/1.22  % (19845)------------------------------
% 1.51/1.22  % (19845)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.51/1.22  % (19845)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.51/1.22  
% 1.51/1.22  
% 1.51/1.22  % (19845)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 1.51/1.22  % (19845)Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 1.51/1.22  % (19845)------------------------------
% 1.51/1.22  % (19845)------------------------------
% 1.51/1.22  % (19847)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_19699 for (2999ds/275Mi)
% 1.51/1.22  % (19847)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.51/1.22  % (19847)------------------------------
% 1.51/1.22  % (19847)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.51/1.22  % (19847)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.51/1.22  
% 1.51/1.22  
% 1.51/1.22  % (19847)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 1.51/1.22  % (19847)Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 1.51/1.22  % (19847)------------------------------
% 1.51/1.22  % (19847)------------------------------
% 1.51/1.22  % (19848)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_19699 for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 1.51/1.23  % (19848)First to succeed.
% 1.51/1.23  % (19848)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.51/1.23  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_19699
% 1.51/1.23  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_19699
% 1.51/1.23  thf(func_def_0, type, f: $o > $o).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(func_def_1, type, h: $o > $i).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(func_def_7, type, ph1: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f174,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    $false),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f17,f26,f30,f64,f65,f66,f71,f73,f75,f78,f103,f113,f130,f134,f162])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f162,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    ~spl0_2 | ~spl0_4 | spl0_6 | spl0_9),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f161])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f161,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    $false | (~spl0_2 | ~spl0_4 | spl0_6 | spl0_9)),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f160,f69])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f69,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    ($true != (f @ $true)) | spl0_9),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f68])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f68,definition,(
% 1.51/1.23    spl0_9 <=> ($true = (f @ $true))),
% 1.51/1.23    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_9])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f160,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    ($true = (f @ $true)) | (~spl0_2 | ~spl0_4 | spl0_6)),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f158,f52])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f52,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    (x != $true) | spl0_6),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f51])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f51,definition,(
% 1.51/1.23    spl0_6 <=> (x = $true)),
% 1.51/1.23    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_6])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f158,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    (x = $true) | ($true = (f @ $true)) | (~spl0_2 | ~spl0_4)),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f157])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f157,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    (x != (f @ $true)) | (~spl0_2 | ~spl0_4)),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f150])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f150,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    ($false = $true) | (x != (f @ $true)) | (~spl0_2 | ~spl0_4)),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f16,f126])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f126,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    ($false = (f @ (f @ $true))) | (~spl0_2 | ~spl0_4)),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(backward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f25,f16])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f25,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    ((f @ (f @ (f @ x))) = $false) | ~spl0_4),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f23])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f23,definition,(
% 1.51/1.23    spl0_4 <=> ((f @ (f @ (f @ x))) = $false)),
% 1.51/1.23    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_4])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f16,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    ((f @ x) = $true) | ~spl0_2),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f14])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f14,definition,(
% 1.51/1.23    spl0_2 <=> ((f @ x) = $true)),
% 1.51/1.23    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f134,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    ~spl0_6 | ~spl0_2 | spl0_9),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f133,f68,f14,f51])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f133,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    (x != $true) | (~spl0_2 | spl0_9)),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f132])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f132,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    (x != $true) | ($true != $true) | (~spl0_2 | spl0_9)),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f69,f16])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f130,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    ~spl0_2 | ~spl0_4 | ~spl0_9),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f129])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f129,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    $false | (~spl0_2 | ~spl0_4 | ~spl0_9)),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f128])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f128,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    ($false = $true) | (~spl0_2 | ~spl0_4 | ~spl0_9)),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(backward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f70,f127])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f127,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    ($false = (f @ $true)) | (~spl0_2 | ~spl0_4 | ~spl0_9)),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(forward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f126,f70])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f70,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    ($true = (f @ $true)) | ~spl0_9),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f68])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f113,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    ~spl0_1 | ~spl0_6 | ~spl0_9),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f112])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f112,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    $false | (~spl0_1 | ~spl0_6 | ~spl0_9)),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f111])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f111,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    ((h @ $true) != (h @ $true)) | (~spl0_1 | ~spl0_6 | ~spl0_9)),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(forward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f106,f70])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f106,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    ((h @ (f @ $true)) != (h @ $true)) | (~spl0_1 | ~spl0_6)),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(backward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f100,f53])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f53,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    (x = $true) | ~spl0_6),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f51])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f100,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    ((h @ (f @ x)) != (h @ $true)) | ~spl0_1),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(backward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f5,f12])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f12,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    ((f @ (f @ (f @ x))) = $true) | ~spl0_1),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f10,definition,(
% 1.51/1.23    spl0_1 <=> ((f @ (f @ (f @ x))) = $true)),
% 1.51/1.23    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f5,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    ((h @ (f @ (f @ (f @ x)))) != (h @ (f @ x)))),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f4])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f4,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    ((h @ (f @ (f @ (f @ x)))) != (h @ (f @ x)))),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.51/1.23    ~((h @ (f @ (f @ (f @ x)))) = (h @ (f @ x)))),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 1.51/1.23    ((h @ (f @ (f @ (f @ x)))) = (h @ (f @ x)))),
% 1.51/1.23    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KDrLZYz61F/DTF2THF_19699.p',2)).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f103,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    ~spl0_1 | ~spl0_4),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f102])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f102,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    $false | (~spl0_1 | ~spl0_4)),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f101])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f101,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    ($false = $true) | (~spl0_1 | ~spl0_4)),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(backward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f12,f25])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f78,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    ~spl0_5 | ~spl0_8),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f77])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f77,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    $false | (~spl0_5 | ~spl0_8)),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f76])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f76,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    ($false = $true) | (~spl0_5 | ~spl0_8)),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(backward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f49,f62])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f62,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    ($false = (f @ $false)) | ~spl0_8),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f60])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f60,definition,(
% 1.51/1.23    spl0_8 <=> ($false = (f @ $false))),
% 1.51/1.23    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_8])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f49,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    ($true = (f @ $false)) | ~spl0_5),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f47])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f47,definition,(
% 1.51/1.23    spl0_5 <=> ($true = (f @ $false))),
% 1.51/1.23    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_5])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f75,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    spl0_9 | ~spl0_1 | ~spl0_3 | ~spl0_5),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f74,f47,f19,f10,f68])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f19,definition,(
% 1.51/1.23    spl0_3 <=> ((f @ x) = $false)),
% 1.51/1.23    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_3])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f74,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    ($true = (f @ $true)) | (~spl0_1 | ~spl0_3 | ~spl0_5)),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(backward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f31,f49])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f31,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    ($true = (f @ (f @ $false))) | (~spl0_1 | ~spl0_3)),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(forward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f12,f21])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f21,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    ((f @ x) = $false) | ~spl0_3),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f19])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f73,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    spl0_8 | ~spl0_3 | ~spl0_7),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f72,f56,f19,f60])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f56,definition,(
% 1.51/1.23    spl0_7 <=> (x = $false)),
% 1.51/1.23    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_7])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f72,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    ($false = (f @ $false)) | (~spl0_3 | ~spl0_7)),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(backward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f21,f58])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f58,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    (x = $false) | ~spl0_7),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f56])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f71,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    spl0_9 | ~spl0_8 | ~spl0_1 | ~spl0_3),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f36,f19,f10,f60,f68])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f36,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    ($true = (f @ $true)) | ($false != (f @ $false)) | (~spl0_1 | ~spl0_3)),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f31,f31])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f66,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    spl0_7 | spl0_8 | ~spl0_1 | ~spl0_3),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f42,f19,f10,f60,f56])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f42,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    ($false = (f @ $false)) | (x = $false) | (~spl0_1 | ~spl0_3)),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f40])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f40,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    (x != (f @ $false)) | (~spl0_1 | ~spl0_3)),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f39])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f39,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    (x != (f @ $false)) | ($false = $true) | (~spl0_1 | ~spl0_3)),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f21,f31])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f65,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    spl0_6 | spl0_5 | ~spl0_1 | ~spl0_3),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f41,f19,f10,f47,f51])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f41,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    (x = $true) | ($true = (f @ $false)) | (~spl0_1 | ~spl0_3)),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f40])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f64,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    ~spl0_7 | spl0_5 | ~spl0_1 | ~spl0_3),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f37,f19,f10,f47,f56])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f37,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    ($true = (f @ $false)) | (x != $false) | (~spl0_1 | ~spl0_3)),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f31,f21])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f30,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    ~spl0_2 | ~spl0_3),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f29])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f29,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    $false | (~spl0_2 | ~spl0_3)),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f28])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f28,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    ($false = $true) | (~spl0_2 | ~spl0_3)),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(backward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f16,f21])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f26,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    spl0_3 | spl0_4),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f8,f23,f19])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    ((f @ x) = $false) | ((f @ (f @ (f @ x))) = $false)),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f6])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f6,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    ((f @ x) != (f @ (f @ (f @ x))))),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f17,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    spl0_1 | spl0_2),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f7,f14,f10])).
% 1.51/1.23  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.51/1.23    ((f @ (f @ (f @ x))) = $true) | ((f @ x) = $true)),
% 1.51/1.23    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f6])).
% 1.51/1.23  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_19699
% 1.51/1.23  % (19848)------------------------------
% 1.51/1.23  % (19848)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.51/1.23  % (19848)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.51/1.23  
% 1.51/1.23  % (19848)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.51/1.23  % (19848)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 1.51/1.23  % (19848)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
% 1.51/1.23  % (19848)------------------------------
% 1.51/1.23  % (19848)------------------------------
% 1.51/1.23  % (19841)Success in time 0.017 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------