↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SYO042^2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:53:14 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.38s 1.28s
% Output   : Refutation 1.38s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   85 (  10 unt;   0 typ;  10 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  470 (  92 equ;   8 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  330 ( 129   ~; 109   |;  20   &;  62   @)
%                                         (  10 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   20 (  16 usr;  16 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0   ^;   0   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(func_def_0,type,
    g: $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    p: ( $o > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_9,type,
    ph1: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(f379,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f26,f35,f40,f45,f62,f71,f111,f122,f129,f161,f274,f321,f362,f378]) ).

thf(f378,plain,
    ( spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_5
    | spl0_9
    | ~ spl0_10 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f377]) ).

thf(f377,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_5
    | spl0_9
    | ~ spl0_10 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f376,f65]) ).

thf(f65,plain,
    ( ( $true != sK2 )
    | spl0_9 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f64]) ).

thf(f64,definition,
    ( spl0_9
  <=> ( $true = sK2 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_9])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f376,plain,
    ( ( $true = sK2 )
    | spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_5
    | ~ spl0_10 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f353,f20]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ( ( y != $true )
    | spl0_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f19]) ).

thf(f19,definition,
    ( spl0_1
  <=> ( y = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f353,plain,
    ( ( y = $true )
    | ( $true = sK2 )
    | ~ spl0_5
    | ~ spl0_10 ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f352]) ).

thf(f352,plain,
    ( ( y != sK2 )
    | ~ spl0_5
    | ~ spl0_10 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f348]) ).

thf(f348,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ( y != sK2 )
    | ~ spl0_5
    | ~ spl0_10 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f39,f70]) ).

thf(f70,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( g @ sK2 ) )
    | ~ spl0_10 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f68]) ).

thf(f68,definition,
    ( spl0_10
  <=> ( $false
      = ( g @ sK2 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_10])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f39,plain,
    ( ( ( g @ y )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl0_5 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f37]) ).

thf(f37,definition,
    ( spl0_5
  <=> ( ( g @ y )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_5])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f362,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_7
    | ~ spl0_10 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f361]) ).

thf(f361,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_7
    | ~ spl0_10 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f347]) ).

thf(f347,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl0_7
    | ~ spl0_10 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f70,f57]) ).

thf(f57,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( g @ sK2 ) )
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f55]) ).

thf(f55,definition,
    ( spl0_7
  <=> ( $true
      = ( g @ sK2 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_7])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f321,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_6
    | ~ spl0_7
    | ~ spl0_9 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f320]) ).

thf(f320,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_6
    | ~ spl0_7
    | ~ spl0_9 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f307,f66]) ).

thf(f66,plain,
    ( ( $true = sK2 )
    | ~ spl0_9 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f64]) ).

thf(f307,plain,
    ( ( $true != sK2 )
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_6
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f292]) ).

thf(f292,plain,
    ( ( $true != sK2 )
    | ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_6
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f57,f152]) ).

thf(f152,plain,
    ( ( ( g @ $true )
      = $false )
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_6 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f44,f21]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ( ( y = $true )
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f19]) ).

thf(f44,plain,
    ( ( ( g @ y )
      = $false )
    | ~ spl0_6 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f42]) ).

thf(f42,definition,
    ( spl0_6
  <=> ( ( g @ y )
      = $false ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_6])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f274,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_3
    | ~ spl0_6
    | spl0_7
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f273]) ).

thf(f273,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_3
    | ~ spl0_6
    | spl0_7
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f232,f44]) ).

thf(f232,plain,
    ( ( ( g @ y )
     != $false )
    | ~ spl0_3
    | spl0_7
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f219]) ).

thf(f219,plain,
    ( ( ( g @ y )
     != $false )
    | ( $true != $true )
    | ~ spl0_3
    | spl0_7
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f136,f30]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( g @ ( g @ y ) ) )
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f28]) ).

thf(f28,definition,
    ( spl0_3
  <=> ( $true
      = ( g @ ( g @ y ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_3])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f136,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( g @ $false ) )
    | spl0_7
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f56,f61]) ).

thf(f61,plain,
    ( ( $false = sK2 )
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f59]) ).

thf(f59,definition,
    ( spl0_8
  <=> ( $false = sK2 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_8])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f56,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( g @ sK2 ) )
    | spl0_7 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f55]) ).

thf(f161,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_5
    | ~ spl0_6 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f160]) ).

thf(f160,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_5
    | ~ spl0_6 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f155]) ).

thf(f155,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl0_5
    | ~ spl0_6 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f39,f44]) ).

thf(f129,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_8
    | ~ spl0_9 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f128]) ).

thf(f128,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_8
    | ~ spl0_9 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f125]) ).

thf(f125,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl0_8
    | ~ spl0_9 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f66,f61]) ).

thf(f122,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f121]) ).

thf(f121,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f118]) ).

thf(f118,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f34,f21]) ).

thf(f34,plain,
    ( ( y = $false )
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f32]) ).

thf(f32,definition,
    ( spl0_4
  <=> ( y = $false ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_4])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f111,plain,
    ( spl0_8
    | spl0_6
    | ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f94,f55,f23,f42,f59]) ).

thf(f23,definition,
    ( spl0_2
  <=> ( $false
      = ( g @ ( g @ y ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f94,plain,
    ( ( $false = sK2 )
    | ( ( g @ y )
      = $false )
    | ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f92]) ).

thf(f92,plain,
    ( ( ( g @ y )
     != sK2 )
    | ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f84]) ).

thf(f84,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ( ( g @ y )
     != sK2 )
    | ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f57,f25]) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( g @ ( g @ y ) ) )
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f23]) ).

thf(f71,plain,
    ( spl0_9
    | spl0_10 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f52,f68,f64]) ).

thf(f52,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( g @ sK2 ) )
    | ( $true = sK2 ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f51]) ).

thf(f51,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( g @ sK2 ) )
    | ( ( ~ sK2 ) = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f49]) ).

thf(f49,plain,
    ( ( ~ sK2 )
   != ( g @ sK2 ) ),
    inference(negative_extensionality,[status(thm)],[f48]) ).

thf(f48,plain,
    g != (~),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f47]) ).

thf(f47,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | ( g != (~) ) ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f10,f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ( ( p @ g )
    = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ( ( x != y )
    & ( ( p @ (~) )
     != $true )
    & ( y
      = ( g @ x ) )
    & ( x
      = ( g @ y ) )
    & ( ( p @ g )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ~ ( ( y
          = ( g @ x ) )
        & ( ( p @ (~) )
         != $true )
        & ( x
          = ( g @ y ) )
        & ( ( p @ g )
          = $true )
        & ( x != y ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ~ ( ( y
          = ( g @ x ) )
        & ~ ( p @ (~) )
        & ( x
          = ( g @ y ) )
        & ( p @ g )
        & ( x != y ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ~ ( ( y
          = ( g @ x ) )
        & ~ ( p @ (~) )
        & ( x
          = ( g @ y ) )
        & ( p @ g )
        & ( x != y ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ~ ( ( y
        = ( g @ x ) )
      & ~ ( p @ (~) )
      & ( x
        = ( g @ y ) )
      & ( p @ g )
      & ( x != y ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.OdM5MyNYJv/DTF2THF_1886.p',4) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ( p @ (~) )
   != $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

thf(f62,plain,
    ( spl0_7
    | spl0_8 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f53,f59,f55]) ).

thf(f53,plain,
    ( ( $false = sK2 )
    | ( $true
      = ( g @ sK2 ) ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f50]) ).

thf(f50,plain,
    ( ( $true = ( ~ sK2 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( g @ sK2 ) ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f49]) ).

thf(f45,plain,
    ( spl0_4
    | spl0_6 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f15,f42,f32]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ( ( ( g @ y )
      = $false )
    | ( y = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f13]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( y
   != ( g @ y ) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[status(thm)],[f11,f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ( x
    = ( g @ y ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    x != y,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

thf(f40,plain,
    ( spl0_1
    | spl0_5 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f14,f37,f19]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( ( ( g @ y )
      = $true )
    | ( y = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f13]) ).

thf(f35,plain,
    ( spl0_3
    | spl0_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f17,f32,f28]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ( ( y = $false )
    | ( $true
      = ( g @ ( g @ y ) ) ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( y
    = ( g @ ( g @ y ) ) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[status(thm)],[f9,f8]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( y
    = ( g @ x ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

thf(f26,plain,
    ( spl0_1
    | spl0_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f16,f23,f19]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( g @ ( g @ y ) ) )
    | ( y = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09  % Problem  : SYO042^2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.10  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.11/0.29  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.29  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.29  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.29  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.29  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.29  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 14:21:53 EST 2026
% 0.11/0.29  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.29  Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.16/0.39  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.16/0.39  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.16/0.39  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.39  % File     : SYO042^2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.16/0.39  % Domain   : Syntactic
% 0.16/0.39  % Problem  : Unsatisfiable basic formula 4
% 0.16/0.39  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.16/0.39  %            Theorem formulation : As a conjecture rather than UNS set.
% 0.16/0.39  % English  : Negation is the unique function g such that g x = y and g y = x
% 0.16/0.39  %            for x,y:o distinct.
% 0.16/0.39  
% 0.16/0.39  % Refs     : [BS09a] Brown E. & Smolka (2009), Terminating Tableaux for the
% 0.16/0.39  %          : [BS09b] Brown E. & Smolka (2009), Extended First-Order Logic
% 0.16/0.39  %          : [Bro09] Brown E. (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.16/0.39  % Source   : [BS09a]
% 0.16/0.39  % Names    : basic4 [Bro09]
% 0.16/0.39  
% 0.16/0.39  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.16/0.39  % Rating   : 0.11 v9.1.0, 0.12 v9.0.0, 0.20 v8.2.0, 0.38 v8.1.0, 0.36 v7.5.0, 0.29 v7.4.0, 0.33 v7.2.0, 0.25 v7.0.0, 0.29 v6.4.0, 0.33 v6.3.0, 0.40 v6.2.0, 0.57 v6.1.0, 0.43 v5.5.0, 0.33 v5.4.0, 0.60 v5.1.0, 0.80 v5.0.0, 0.60 v4.1.0
% 0.16/0.39  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    5 (   0 unt;   4 typ;   0 def)
% 0.16/0.39  %            Number of atoms       :   15 (   3 equ;   1 cnn)
% 0.16/0.39  %            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (  15 avg)
% 0.16/0.39  %            Number of connectives :   12 (   4   ~;   0   |;   4   &;   4   @)
% 0.16/0.39  %                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.16/0.39  %            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   8 avg)
% 0.16/0.39  %            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
% 0.16/0.39  %            Number of type conns  :    3 (   3   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.16/0.39  %            Number of symbols     :    6 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.16/0.39  %            Number of variables   :    0 (   0   ^;   0   !;   0   ?;   0   :)
% 0.16/0.39  % SPC      : TH0_THM_EQU_NAR
% 0.16/0.39  
% 0.16/0.39  % Comments : The fragment of simple type theory that restricts equations to 
% 0.16/0.39  %            base types and disallows lambda abstraction and quantification is
% 0.16/0.39  %            decidable. This is an example.
% 0.16/0.39  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.39  thf(g,type,
% 0.16/0.39      g: $o > $o ).
% 0.16/0.39  
% 0.16/0.39  thf(p,type,
% 0.16/0.39      p: ( $o > $o ) > $o ).
% 0.16/0.39  
% 0.16/0.39  thf(x,type,
% 0.16/0.39      x: $o ).
% 0.16/0.39  
% 0.16/0.39  thf(y,type,
% 0.16/0.39      y: $o ).
% 0.16/0.39  
% 0.16/0.39  thf(4,conjecture,
% 0.16/0.39      ~ ( ( x != y )
% 0.16/0.39        & ( ( g @ x )
% 0.16/0.39          = y )
% 0.16/0.39        & ( ( g @ y )
% 0.16/0.39          = x )
% 0.16/0.39        & ( p @ g )
% 0.16/0.39        & ~ ( p @ (~) ) ) ).
% 0.16/0.39  
% 0.16/0.39  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.39  ------------------------
% 1.38/1.24  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.38/1.24  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.38/1.24  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 14:21:54 EST 2026
% 1.38/1.24  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.38/1.24  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.38/1.24  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.38/1.24  
% 1.38/1.24  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.OdM5MyNYJv/DTF2DTF1886.p
% See solution above
% 1.38/1.24  ------------------------
% 1.38/1.25  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.38/1.25  thf(g,type,
% 1.38/1.25      g: $o > $o ).
% 1.38/1.25  
% 1.38/1.25  thf(p,type,
% 1.38/1.25      p: ( $o > $o ) > $o ).
% 1.38/1.25  
% 1.38/1.25  thf(x,type,
% 1.38/1.25      x: $o ).
% 1.38/1.25  
% 1.38/1.25  thf(y,type,
% 1.38/1.25      y: $o ).
% 1.38/1.25  
% 1.38/1.25  thf(4,conjecture,
% 1.38/1.25      ~ ( ( x != y )
% 1.38/1.25        & ( ( g @ x )
% 1.38/1.25          = y )
% 1.38/1.25        & ( ( g @ y )
% 1.38/1.25          = x )
% 1.38/1.25        & ( p @ g )
% 1.38/1.25        & ~ ( p @ (~) ) ) ).
% 1.38/1.25  ------------------------
% 1.38/1.27  % (1994)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_1886 for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 1.38/1.27  % (1990)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_1886 for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 1.38/1.27  % (1989)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_1886 for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 1.38/1.27  % (1991)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_1886 for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 1.38/1.27  % (1995)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_1886 for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 1.38/1.27  % (1992)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_1886 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 1.38/1.27  % (1993)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_1886 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 1.38/1.27  % (1992)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.38/1.27  % (1992)------------------------------
% 1.38/1.27  % (1992)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.38/1.27  % (1992)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.38/1.27  % (1992)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.38/1.27  % (1993)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.38/1.27  % (1993)------------------------------
% 1.38/1.27  % (1993)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.38/1.27  
% 1.38/1.27  % (1992)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.38/1.27  % (1992)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.38/1.27  % (1992)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.38/1.27  % (1992)------------------------------
% 1.38/1.27  % (1992)------------------------------
% 1.38/1.27  % (1993)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.38/1.27  % (1993)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.38/1.27  
% 1.38/1.27  % (1993)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.38/1.27  % (1993)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.38/1.27  % (1994)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.38/1.27  % (1994)------------------------------
% 1.38/1.27  % (1994)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.38/1.27  % (1994)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.38/1.27  
% 1.38/1.27  
% 1.38/1.27  % (1994)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.38/1.27  % (1994)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.38/1.27  % (1994)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.38/1.27  % (1994)------------------------------
% 1.38/1.27  % (1994)------------------------------
% 1.38/1.27  % (1993)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.38/1.27  % (1993)------------------------------
% 1.38/1.27  % (1993)------------------------------
% 1.38/1.27  % (1991)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.38/1.27  % (1991)------------------------------
% 1.38/1.27  % (1991)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.38/1.27  % (1991)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.38/1.27  
% 1.38/1.27  
% 1.38/1.27  % (1991)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.38/1.27  % (1990)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.38/1.27  % (1990)------------------------------
% 1.38/1.27  % (1990)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.38/1.27  % (1990)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.38/1.27  
% 1.38/1.27  
% 1.38/1.27  % (1990)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.38/1.27  % (1990)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.38/1.27  % (1990)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.38/1.27  % (1990)------------------------------
% 1.38/1.27  % (1990)------------------------------
% 1.38/1.27  % (1991)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.38/1.27  % (1991)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.38/1.27  % (1991)------------------------------
% 1.38/1.27  % (1991)------------------------------
% 1.38/1.27  % (1995)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.38/1.27  % (1995)------------------------------
% 1.38/1.27  % (1995)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.38/1.27  % (1995)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.38/1.27  
% 1.38/1.27  
% 1.38/1.27  % (1995)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.38/1.27  % (1995)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.38/1.27  % (1995)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.38/1.27  % (1995)------------------------------
% 1.38/1.27  % (1995)------------------------------
% 1.38/1.28  % (1989)First to succeed.
% 1.38/1.28  % (1989)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.38/1.28  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_1886
% 1.38/1.28  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_1886
% 1.38/1.28  thf(func_def_0, type, g: $o > $o).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(func_def_1, type, p: ($o > $o) > $o).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(func_def_9, type, ph1: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f379,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    $false),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f26,f35,f40,f45,f62,f71,f111,f122,f129,f161,f274,f321,f362,f378])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f378,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    spl0_1 | ~spl0_5 | spl0_9 | ~spl0_10),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f377])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f377,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    $false | (spl0_1 | ~spl0_5 | spl0_9 | ~spl0_10)),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f376,f65])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f65,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    ($true != sK2) | spl0_9),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f64])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f64,definition,(
% 1.38/1.28    spl0_9 <=> ($true = sK2)),
% 1.38/1.28    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_9])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f376,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    ($true = sK2) | (spl0_1 | ~spl0_5 | ~spl0_10)),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f353,f20])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f20,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    (y != $true) | spl0_1),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f19])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f19,definition,(
% 1.38/1.28    spl0_1 <=> (y = $true)),
% 1.38/1.28    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f353,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    (y = $true) | ($true = sK2) | (~spl0_5 | ~spl0_10)),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f352])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f352,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    (y != sK2) | (~spl0_5 | ~spl0_10)),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f348])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f348,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    ($true = $false) | (y != sK2) | (~spl0_5 | ~spl0_10)),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f39,f70])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f70,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    ($false = (g @ sK2)) | ~spl0_10),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f68])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f68,definition,(
% 1.38/1.28    spl0_10 <=> ($false = (g @ sK2))),
% 1.38/1.28    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_10])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f39,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    ((g @ y) = $true) | ~spl0_5),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f37])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f37,definition,(
% 1.38/1.28    spl0_5 <=> ((g @ y) = $true)),
% 1.38/1.28    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_5])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f362,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    ~spl0_7 | ~spl0_10),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f361])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f361,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    $false | (~spl0_7 | ~spl0_10)),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f347])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f347,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    ($true = $false) | (~spl0_7 | ~spl0_10)),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f70,f57])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f57,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    ($true = (g @ sK2)) | ~spl0_7),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f55])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f55,definition,(
% 1.38/1.28    spl0_7 <=> ($true = (g @ sK2))),
% 1.38/1.28    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_7])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f321,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    ~spl0_1 | ~spl0_6 | ~spl0_7 | ~spl0_9),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f320])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f320,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    $false | (~spl0_1 | ~spl0_6 | ~spl0_7 | ~spl0_9)),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f307,f66])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f66,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    ($true = sK2) | ~spl0_9),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f64])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f307,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    ($true != sK2) | (~spl0_1 | ~spl0_6 | ~spl0_7)),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f292])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f292,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    ($true != sK2) | ($true = $false) | (~spl0_1 | ~spl0_6 | ~spl0_7)),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f57,f152])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f152,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    ((g @ $true) = $false) | (~spl0_1 | ~spl0_6)),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f44,f21])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f21,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    (y = $true) | ~spl0_1),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f19])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f44,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    ((g @ y) = $false) | ~spl0_6),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f42])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f42,definition,(
% 1.38/1.28    spl0_6 <=> ((g @ y) = $false)),
% 1.38/1.28    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_6])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f274,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    ~spl0_3 | ~spl0_6 | spl0_7 | ~spl0_8),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f273])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f273,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    $false | (~spl0_3 | ~spl0_6 | spl0_7 | ~spl0_8)),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f232,f44])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f232,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    ((g @ y) != $false) | (~spl0_3 | spl0_7 | ~spl0_8)),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f219])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f219,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    ((g @ y) != $false) | ($true != $true) | (~spl0_3 | spl0_7 | ~spl0_8)),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f136,f30])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f30,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    ($true = (g @ (g @ y))) | ~spl0_3),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f28])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f28,definition,(
% 1.38/1.28    spl0_3 <=> ($true = (g @ (g @ y)))),
% 1.38/1.28    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_3])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f136,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    ($true != (g @ $false)) | (spl0_7 | ~spl0_8)),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f56,f61])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f61,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    ($false = sK2) | ~spl0_8),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f59])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f59,definition,(
% 1.38/1.28    spl0_8 <=> ($false = sK2)),
% 1.38/1.28    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_8])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f56,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    ($true != (g @ sK2)) | spl0_7),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f55])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f161,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    ~spl0_5 | ~spl0_6),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f160])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f160,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    $false | (~spl0_5 | ~spl0_6)),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f155])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f155,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    ($true = $false) | (~spl0_5 | ~spl0_6)),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f39,f44])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f129,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    ~spl0_8 | ~spl0_9),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f128])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f128,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    $false | (~spl0_8 | ~spl0_9)),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f125])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f125,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    ($true = $false) | (~spl0_8 | ~spl0_9)),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f66,f61])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f122,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    ~spl0_1 | ~spl0_4),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f121])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f121,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    $false | (~spl0_1 | ~spl0_4)),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f118])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f118,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    ($true = $false) | (~spl0_1 | ~spl0_4)),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f34,f21])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f34,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    (y = $false) | ~spl0_4),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f32])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f32,definition,(
% 1.38/1.28    spl0_4 <=> (y = $false)),
% 1.38/1.28    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_4])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f111,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    spl0_8 | spl0_6 | ~spl0_2 | ~spl0_7),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f94,f55,f23,f42,f59])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f23,definition,(
% 1.38/1.28    spl0_2 <=> ($false = (g @ (g @ y)))),
% 1.38/1.28    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f94,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    ($false = sK2) | ((g @ y) = $false) | (~spl0_2 | ~spl0_7)),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f92])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f92,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    ((g @ y) != sK2) | (~spl0_2 | ~spl0_7)),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f84])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f84,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    ($true = $false) | ((g @ y) != sK2) | (~spl0_2 | ~spl0_7)),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f57,f25])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f25,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    ($false = (g @ (g @ y))) | ~spl0_2),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f23])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f71,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    spl0_9 | spl0_10),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f52,f68,f64])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f52,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    ($false = (g @ sK2)) | ($true = sK2)),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f51])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f51,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    ($false = (g @ sK2)) | ((~ sK2) = $false)),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f49])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f49,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    ((~ sK2) != (g @ sK2))),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(negative_extensionality,[status(thm)],[f48])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f48,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    (g != ~)),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f47])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f47,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    ($true != $true) | (g != ~)),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f10,f7])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    ((p @ g) = $true)),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f6,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    (x != y) & ((p @ ~) != $true) & (y = (g @ x)) & (x = (g @ y)) & ((p @ g) = $true)),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f5,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    ~~((y = (g @ x)) & ~((p @ ~) = $true) & (x = (g @ y)) & ((p @ g) = $true) & (x != y))),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f4,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    ~~((y = (g @ x)) & ~(p @ ~) & (x = (g @ y)) & (p @ g) & (x != y))),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.38/1.28    ~~((y = (g @ x)) & ~(p @ ~) & (x = (g @ y)) & (p @ g) & (x != y))),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 1.38/1.28    ~((y = (g @ x)) & ~(p @ ~) & (x = (g @ y)) & (p @ g) & (x != y))),
% 1.38/1.28    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.OdM5MyNYJv/DTF2THF_1886.p',4)).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    ((p @ ~) != $true)),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f62,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    spl0_7 | spl0_8),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f53,f59,f55])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f53,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    ($false = sK2) | ($true = (g @ sK2))),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f50])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f50,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    ($true = (~ sK2)) | ($true = (g @ sK2))),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f49])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f45,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    spl0_4 | spl0_6),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f15,f42,f32])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f15,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    ((g @ y) = $false) | (y = $false)),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f13])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f13,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    (y != (g @ y))),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(definition_unfolding,[status(thm)],[f11,f8])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    (x = (g @ y))),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    (x != y)),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f40,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    spl0_1 | spl0_5),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f14,f37,f19])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f14,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    ((g @ y) = $true) | (y = $true)),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f13])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f35,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    spl0_3 | spl0_4),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f17,f32,f28])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f17,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    (y = $false) | ($true = (g @ (g @ y)))),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f12,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    (y = (g @ (g @ y)))),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(definition_unfolding,[status(thm)],[f9,f8])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    (y = (g @ x))),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f26,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    spl0_1 | spl0_2),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f16,f23,f19])).
% 1.38/1.28  thf(f16,plain,(
% 1.38/1.28    ($false = (g @ (g @ y))) | (y = $true)),
% 1.38/1.28    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.38/1.28  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_1886
% 1.38/1.28  % (1989)------------------------------
% 1.38/1.28  % (1989)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.38/1.28  % (1989)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.38/1.28  
% 1.38/1.28  % (1989)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 1.38/1.28  % (1989)Time elapsed: 0.011 s
% 1.38/1.28  % (1989)Instructions burned: 14 (million)
% 1.38/1.28  % (1989)------------------------------
% 1.38/1.28  % (1989)------------------------------
% 1.38/1.28  % (1988)Success in time 0.024 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------