↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SYO060^4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:45:07 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.78s 2.20s
% Output   : Refutation 3.78s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYO060^4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.09  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.10/0.22  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.22  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.22  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.22  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.22  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.22  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.22  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.22  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 16:25:36 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.22  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.22  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.02/0.80  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.49/1.04  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (233ms). 
% 1.49/1.06  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.04/1.46  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.04/1.47  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.47/1.61  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 3 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.47/1.64  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 3 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.47/1.65  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.47/1.65  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.47/1.66  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.78/2.20  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 3.78/2.20  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.78/2.20  % Time passed: 1837ms (effective reasoning time: 1139ms)
% 3.78/2.20  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.78/2.20  % Axioms used in derivation (3): refl_axiom, trans_axiom, axiom1
% 3.78/2.20  % No. of inferences in proof: 10
% 3.78/2.20  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1837 ms resp. 1139 ms w/o parsing
% 3.78/2.26  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.78/2.26  thf(irel_decl, type, irel: ($i > ($i > $o))).
% 3.78/2.26  thf(mnot_decl, type, mnot: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o))).
% 3.78/2.26  thf(mor_decl, type, mor: (($i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o)))).
% 3.78/2.26  thf(mbox_s4_decl, type, mbox_s4: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o))).
% 3.78/2.26  thf(iatom_decl, type, iatom: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o))).
% 3.78/2.26  thf(inot_decl, type, inot: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o))).
% 3.78/2.26  thf(ior_decl, type, ior: (($i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o)))).
% 3.78/2.26  thf(ivalid_decl, type, ivalid: (($i > $o) > $o)).
% 3.78/2.26  thf(a_decl, type, a: ($i > $o)).
% 3.78/2.26  thf(b_decl, type, b: ($i > $o)).
% 3.78/2.26  thf(mnot_def, definition, mnot = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:$i]: ~ (A @ B)) ).
% 3.78/2.26  thf(mor_def, definition, mor = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:($i > $o),C:$i]: ((A @ C) | (B @ C))) ).
% 3.78/2.26  thf(mbox_s4_def, definition, mbox_s4 = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:$i]: ! [C:$i]: ((irel @ B @ C) => (A @ C))) ).
% 3.78/2.26  thf(iatom_def, definition, iatom = (^ [A:($i > $o)]: (A)) ).
% 3.78/2.26  thf(inot_def, definition, inot = (^ [A:($i > $o)]: (mnot @ (mbox_s4 @ A))) ).
% 3.78/2.26  thf(ior_def, definition, ior = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:($i > $o)]: (mor @ (mbox_s4 @ A) @ (mbox_s4 @ B))) ).
% 3.78/2.26  thf(ivalid_def, definition, ivalid = ((!) @ $i) ).
% 3.78/2.26  thf(1,conjecture,((ivalid @ (ior @ (inot @ (iatom @ b)) @ (inot @ (iatom @ a))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con)).
% 3.78/2.26  thf(2,negated_conjecture,((~ (ivalid @ (ior @ (inot @ (iatom @ b)) @ (inot @ (iatom @ a)))))),inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1])).
% 3.78/2.26  thf(6,plain,((~ (! [A:$i]: (! [B:$i]: ((irel @ A @ B) => (~ (! [C:$i]: ((irel @ B @ C) => (b @ C))))) | ! [B:$i]: ((irel @ A @ B) => (~ (! [C:$i]: ((irel @ B @ C) => (a @ C))))))))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2])).
% 3.78/2.26  thf(3,axiom,((! [A:$i]: (irel @ A @ A))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',refl_axiom)).
% 3.78/2.26  thf(13,plain,((! [A:$i]: (irel @ A @ A))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3])).
% 3.78/2.26  thf(4,axiom,((! [A:$i,B:$i,C:$i]: (((irel @ A @ B) & (irel @ B @ C)) => (irel @ A @ C)))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',trans_axiom)).
% 3.78/2.26  thf(15,plain,((! [A:$i,B:$i,C:$i]: (((irel @ A @ B) & (irel @ B @ C)) => (irel @ A @ C)))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4])).
% 3.78/2.26  thf(5,axiom,((ivalid @ (ior @ (inot @ (iatom @ a)) @ (inot @ (iatom @ b))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom1)).
% 3.78/2.26  thf(17,plain,((! [A:$i]: (! [B:$i]: ((irel @ A @ B) => (~ (! [C:$i]: ((irel @ B @ C) => (a @ C))))) | ! [B:$i]: ((irel @ A @ B) => (~ (! [C:$i]: ((irel @ B @ C) => (b @ C)))))))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5])).
% 3.78/2.26  thf(23,plain,(($false)),inference(e,[status(thm)],[6,13,15,17])).
% 3.78/2.26  % SZS output end Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.78/2.26  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------