↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SYO068^4.005 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:45:09 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.94s 2.01s
% Output   : Refutation 4.29s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SYO068^4.005 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.08/0.21  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.21  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.21  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.21  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.21  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.21  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.21  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.21  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 16:31:14 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.21  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.21  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.64/0.50  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.06/0.66  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (161ms). 
% 1.06/0.67  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.80/1.08  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.80/1.09  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.18/1.22  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 8 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.18/1.26  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 8 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.18/1.27  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.18/1.27  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.18/1.28  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.94/2.00  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 3.94/2.00  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.94/2.00  % Time passed: 1713ms (effective reasoning time: 1325ms)
% 3.94/2.01  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.94/2.01  % Axioms used in derivation (8): axiom6, axiom2, axiom5, trans_axiom, axiom1, axiom4, refl_axiom, axiom3
% 3.94/2.01  % No. of inferences in proof: 20
% 3.94/2.01  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1713 ms resp. 1325 ms w/o parsing
% 4.29/2.08  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.29/2.08  thf(irel_decl, type, irel: ($i > ($i > $o))).
% 4.29/2.08  thf(mnot_decl, type, mnot: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o))).
% 4.29/2.08  thf(mor_decl, type, mor: (($i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o)))).
% 4.29/2.08  thf(mimplies_decl, type, mimplies: (($i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o)))).
% 4.29/2.08  thf(mbox_s4_decl, type, mbox_s4: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o))).
% 4.29/2.08  thf(iatom_decl, type, iatom: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o))).
% 4.29/2.08  thf(iimplies_decl, type, iimplies: (($i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o)))).
% 4.29/2.08  thf(ivalid_decl, type, ivalid: (($i > $o) > $o)).
% 4.29/2.08  thf(p0_decl, type, p0: ($i > $o)).
% 4.29/2.08  thf(p1_decl, type, p1: ($i > $o)).
% 4.29/2.08  thf(p2_decl, type, p2: ($i > $o)).
% 4.29/2.08  thf(p3_decl, type, p3: ($i > $o)).
% 4.29/2.08  thf(p4_decl, type, p4: ($i > $o)).
% 4.29/2.08  thf(p5_decl, type, p5: ($i > $o)).
% 4.29/2.08  thf(mnot_def, definition, mnot = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:$i]: ~ (A @ B)) ).
% 4.29/2.08  thf(mor_def, definition, mor = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:($i > $o),C:$i]: ((A @ C) | (B @ C))) ).
% 4.29/2.08  thf(mimplies_def, definition, mimplies = (^ [A:($i > $o)]: (mor @ (mnot @ A))) ).
% 4.29/2.08  thf(mbox_s4_def, definition, mbox_s4 = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:$i]: ! [C:$i]: ((irel @ B @ C) => (A @ C))) ).
% 4.29/2.08  thf(iatom_def, definition, iatom = (^ [A:($i > $o)]: (A)) ).
% 4.29/2.08  thf(iimplies_def, definition, iimplies = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:($i > $o)]: (mimplies @ (mbox_s4 @ A) @ (mbox_s4 @ B))) ).
% 4.29/2.08  thf(ivalid_def, definition, ivalid = ((!) @ $i) ).
% 4.29/2.08  thf(3,axiom,((! [A:$i]: (irel @ A @ A))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',refl_axiom)).
% 4.29/2.08  thf(13,plain,((! [A:$i]: (irel @ A @ A))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3])).
% 4.29/2.08  thf(5,axiom,((ivalid @ (iatom @ p5))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom1)).
% 4.29/2.08  thf(17,plain,((! [A:$i]: (p5 @ A))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5])).
% 4.29/2.08  thf(8,axiom,((ivalid @ (iimplies @ (iatom @ p3) @ (iimplies @ (iatom @ p3) @ (iatom @ p2))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom4)).
% 4.29/2.08  thf(31,plain,((! [A:$i]: (~ (! [B:$i]: ((irel @ A @ B) => (p3 @ B))) | ! [B:$i]: ((irel @ A @ B) => (~ (! [C:$i]: ((irel @ B @ C) => (p3 @ C))) | ! [C:$i]: ((irel @ B @ C) => (p2 @ C))))))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8])).
% 4.29/2.08  thf(6,axiom,((ivalid @ (iimplies @ (iatom @ p1) @ (iimplies @ (iatom @ p1) @ (iatom @ p0))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom2)).
% 4.29/2.08  thf(19,plain,((! [A:$i]: (~ (! [B:$i]: ((irel @ A @ B) => (p1 @ B))) | ! [B:$i]: ((irel @ A @ B) => (~ (! [C:$i]: ((irel @ B @ C) => (p1 @ C))) | ! [C:$i]: ((irel @ B @ C) => (p0 @ C))))))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6])).
% 4.29/2.08  thf(4,axiom,((! [A:$i,B:$i,C:$i]: (((irel @ A @ B) & (irel @ B @ C)) => (irel @ A @ C)))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',trans_axiom)).
% 4.29/2.08  thf(15,plain,((! [A:$i,B:$i,C:$i]: (((irel @ A @ B) & (irel @ B @ C)) => (irel @ A @ C)))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4])).
% 4.29/2.08  thf(9,axiom,((ivalid @ (iimplies @ (iatom @ p4) @ (iimplies @ (iatom @ p4) @ (iatom @ p3))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom5)).
% 4.29/2.08  thf(37,plain,((! [A:$i]: (~ (! [B:$i]: ((irel @ A @ B) => (p4 @ B))) | ! [B:$i]: ((irel @ A @ B) => (~ (! [C:$i]: ((irel @ B @ C) => (p4 @ C))) | ! [C:$i]: ((irel @ B @ C) => (p3 @ C))))))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9])).
% 4.29/2.08  thf(7,axiom,((ivalid @ (iimplies @ (iatom @ p2) @ (iimplies @ (iatom @ p2) @ (iatom @ p1))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom3)).
% 4.29/2.08  thf(25,plain,((! [A:$i]: (~ (! [B:$i]: ((irel @ A @ B) => (p2 @ B))) | ! [B:$i]: ((irel @ A @ B) => (~ (! [C:$i]: ((irel @ B @ C) => (p2 @ C))) | ! [C:$i]: ((irel @ B @ C) => (p1 @ C))))))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7])).
% 4.29/2.08  thf(1,conjecture,((ivalid @ (iatom @ p0))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con)).
% 4.29/2.08  thf(2,negated_conjecture,((~ (ivalid @ (iatom @ p0)))),inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1])).
% 4.29/2.08  thf(11,plain,((~ (! [A:$i]: (p0 @ A)))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2])).
% 4.29/2.08  thf(10,axiom,((ivalid @ (iimplies @ (iatom @ p5) @ (iimplies @ (iatom @ p5) @ (iatom @ p4))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom6)).
% 4.29/2.08  thf(43,plain,((! [A:$i]: (~ (! [B:$i]: ((irel @ A @ B) => (p5 @ B))) | ! [B:$i]: ((irel @ A @ B) => (~ (! [C:$i]: ((irel @ B @ C) => (p5 @ C))) | ! [C:$i]: ((irel @ B @ C) => (p4 @ C))))))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10])).
% 4.29/2.08  thf(49,plain,(($false)),inference(e,[status(thm)],[13,17,31,19,15,37,25,11,43])).
% 4.29/2.08  % SZS output end Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.29/2.08  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------