↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SYO078^5 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 08:08:33 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 3.39s 3.60s
% Output   : Proof 3.39s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : SYO078^5 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Fri Oct  3 14:15:23 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.39/3.60  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.39/3.60  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.39/3.60  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (Or (Or (Iff cP cQ) (Iff cQ cR)) (Iff cP cR))) True
% 3.39/3.60  Clause #1 (by clausification #[0]): Eq (Or (Or (Iff cP cQ) (Iff cQ cR)) (Iff cP cR)) False
% 3.39/3.60  Clause #2 (by clausification #[1]): Eq (Iff cP cR) False
% 3.39/3.60  Clause #3 (by clausification #[1]): Eq (Or (Iff cP cQ) (Iff cQ cR)) False
% 3.39/3.60  Clause #4 (by clausification #[2]): Or (Eq cP False) (Eq cR False)
% 3.39/3.60  Clause #5 (by clausification #[2]): Or (Eq cP True) (Eq cR True)
% 3.39/3.60  Clause #6 (by clausification #[3]): Eq (Iff cQ cR) False
% 3.39/3.60  Clause #7 (by clausification #[3]): Eq (Iff cP cQ) False
% 3.39/3.60  Clause #8 (by clausification #[6]): Or (Eq cQ False) (Eq cR False)
% 3.39/3.60  Clause #9 (by clausification #[6]): Or (Eq cQ True) (Eq cR True)
% 3.39/3.60  Clause #10 (by clausification #[7]): Or (Eq cP False) (Eq cQ False)
% 3.39/3.60  Clause #11 (by clausification #[7]): Or (Eq cP True) (Eq cQ True)
% 3.39/3.60  Clause #12 (by superposition #[11, 4]): Or (Eq cQ True) (Or (Eq True False) (Eq cR False))
% 3.39/3.60  Clause #15 (by clausification #[12]): Or (Eq cQ True) (Eq cR False)
% 3.39/3.60  Clause #17 (by superposition #[15, 9]): Or (Eq cQ True) (Or (Eq cQ True) (Eq False True))
% 3.39/3.60  Clause #18 (by clausification #[17]): Or (Eq cQ True) (Eq cQ True)
% 3.39/3.60  Clause #19 (by eliminate duplicate literals #[18]): Eq cQ True
% 3.39/3.60  Clause #20 (by backward demodulation #[19, 8]): Or (Eq True False) (Eq cR False)
% 3.39/3.60  Clause #22 (by backward demodulation #[19, 10]): Or (Eq cP False) (Eq True False)
% 3.39/3.60  Clause #27 (by clausification #[22]): Eq cP False
% 3.39/3.60  Clause #29 (by backward demodulation #[27, 5]): Or (Eq False True) (Eq cR True)
% 3.39/3.60  Clause #30 (by clausification #[29]): Eq cR True
% 3.39/3.60  Clause #31 (by clausification #[20]): Eq cR False
% 3.39/3.60  Clause #32 (by superposition #[31, 30]): Eq False True
% 3.39/3.60  Clause #33 (by clausification #[32]): False
% 3.39/3.60  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------