↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SYO091^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:42:21 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.09s 0.24s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (   4 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  274 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :  192 (  10 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  393 ( 133   ~; 219   |;  31   &;   0   @)
%                                         (  10 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   38 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    4 (   3 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    6 (   0   ^;   6   !;   0   ?;   6   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_23,type,
    epred1_0: $o ).

thf(decl_24,type,
    epred2_0: $o ).

thf(decl_25,type,
    epred3_0: $o ).

thf(cTHM50Q,conjecture,
    ! [X1: $o,X2: $o,X3: $o] :
      ( ( ( X1
        <=> X2 )
      <=> X3 )
    <=> ( X1
      <=> ( X2
        <=> X3 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.QG4VzDVPea/E---3.1_304714.p',cTHM50Q) ).

thf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1: $o,X2: $o,X3: $o] :
        ( ( ( X1
          <=> X2 )
        <=> X3 )
      <=> ( X1
        <=> ( X2
          <=> X3 ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM50Q]) ).

thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ~ epred2_0
      | ~ epred3_0
      | ~ epred1_0
      | ~ epred1_0
      | ~ epred2_0
      | ~ epred3_0 )
    & ( epred2_0
      | epred3_0
      | ~ epred1_0
      | ~ epred1_0
      | ~ epred2_0
      | ~ epred3_0 )
    & ( ~ epred2_0
      | epred3_0
      | epred1_0
      | ~ epred1_0
      | ~ epred2_0
      | ~ epred3_0 )
    & ( ~ epred3_0
      | epred2_0
      | epred1_0
      | ~ epred1_0
      | ~ epred2_0
      | ~ epred3_0 )
    & ( ~ epred2_0
      | ~ epred3_0
      | ~ epred1_0
      | epred1_0
      | epred2_0
      | ~ epred3_0 )
    & ( epred2_0
      | epred3_0
      | ~ epred1_0
      | epred1_0
      | epred2_0
      | ~ epred3_0 )
    & ( ~ epred2_0
      | epred3_0
      | epred1_0
      | epred1_0
      | epred2_0
      | ~ epred3_0 )
    & ( ~ epred3_0
      | epred2_0
      | epred1_0
      | epred1_0
      | epred2_0
      | ~ epred3_0 )
    & ( ~ epred2_0
      | ~ epred3_0
      | ~ epred1_0
      | ~ epred1_0
      | epred2_0
      | epred3_0 )
    & ( epred2_0
      | epred3_0
      | ~ epred1_0
      | ~ epred1_0
      | epred2_0
      | epred3_0 )
    & ( ~ epred2_0
      | epred3_0
      | epred1_0
      | ~ epred1_0
      | epred2_0
      | epred3_0 )
    & ( ~ epred3_0
      | epred2_0
      | epred1_0
      | ~ epred1_0
      | epred2_0
      | epred3_0 )
    & ( ~ epred2_0
      | ~ epred3_0
      | ~ epred1_0
      | ~ epred2_0
      | epred1_0
      | epred3_0 )
    & ( epred2_0
      | epred3_0
      | ~ epred1_0
      | ~ epred2_0
      | epred1_0
      | epred3_0 )
    & ( ~ epred2_0
      | epred3_0
      | epred1_0
      | ~ epred2_0
      | epred1_0
      | epred3_0 )
    & ( ~ epred3_0
      | epred2_0
      | epred1_0
      | ~ epred2_0
      | epred1_0
      | epred3_0 )
    & ( ~ epred2_0
      | epred3_0
      | ~ epred1_0
      | ~ epred1_0
      | ~ epred2_0
      | epred3_0 )
    & ( ~ epred3_0
      | epred2_0
      | ~ epred1_0
      | ~ epred1_0
      | ~ epred2_0
      | epred3_0 )
    & ( ~ epred2_0
      | ~ epred3_0
      | epred1_0
      | ~ epred1_0
      | ~ epred2_0
      | epred3_0 )
    & ( epred2_0
      | epred3_0
      | epred1_0
      | ~ epred1_0
      | ~ epred2_0
      | epred3_0 )
    & ( ~ epred2_0
      | epred3_0
      | ~ epred1_0
      | epred1_0
      | epred2_0
      | epred3_0 )
    & ( ~ epred3_0
      | epred2_0
      | ~ epred1_0
      | epred1_0
      | epred2_0
      | epred3_0 )
    & ( ~ epred2_0
      | ~ epred3_0
      | epred1_0
      | epred1_0
      | epred2_0
      | epred3_0 )
    & ( epred2_0
      | epred3_0
      | epred1_0
      | epred1_0
      | epred2_0
      | epred3_0 )
    & ( ~ epred2_0
      | epred3_0
      | ~ epred1_0
      | ~ epred1_0
      | epred2_0
      | ~ epred3_0 )
    & ( ~ epred3_0
      | epred2_0
      | ~ epred1_0
      | ~ epred1_0
      | epred2_0
      | ~ epred3_0 )
    & ( ~ epred2_0
      | ~ epred3_0
      | epred1_0
      | ~ epred1_0
      | epred2_0
      | ~ epred3_0 )
    & ( epred2_0
      | epred3_0
      | epred1_0
      | ~ epred1_0
      | epred2_0
      | ~ epred3_0 )
    & ( ~ epred2_0
      | epred3_0
      | ~ epred1_0
      | ~ epred2_0
      | epred1_0
      | ~ epred3_0 )
    & ( ~ epred3_0
      | epred2_0
      | ~ epred1_0
      | ~ epred2_0
      | epred1_0
      | ~ epred3_0 )
    & ( ~ epred2_0
      | ~ epred3_0
      | epred1_0
      | ~ epred2_0
      | epred1_0
      | ~ epred3_0 )
    & ( epred2_0
      | epred3_0
      | epred1_0
      | ~ epred2_0
      | epred1_0
      | ~ epred3_0 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ( epred2_0
    | epred1_0
    | epred1_0
    | epred2_0
    | ~ epred3_0
    | ~ epred3_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( epred2_0
    | epred3_0
    | epred1_0
    | epred1_0
    | epred2_0
    | epred3_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( epred3_0
    | epred1_0
    | epred1_0
    | epred3_0
    | ~ epred2_0
    | ~ epred2_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( epred1_0
    | epred2_0
    | ~ epred3_0 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( epred1_0
    | epred2_0
    | epred3_0 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( epred1_0
    | epred1_0
    | ~ epred2_0
    | ~ epred3_0
    | ~ epred2_0
    | ~ epred3_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( epred1_0
    | epred3_0
    | ~ epred2_0 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

thf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( epred2_0
    | epred1_0 ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( epred2_0
    | epred3_0
    | epred2_0
    | epred3_0
    | ~ epred1_0
    | ~ epred1_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( epred2_0
    | epred2_0
    | ~ epred3_0
    | ~ epred1_0
    | ~ epred1_0
    | ~ epred3_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( epred1_0
    | ~ epred2_0
    | ~ epred3_0 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( epred3_0
    | epred1_0 ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

thf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( epred2_0
    | epred3_0
    | ~ epred1_0 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

thf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( epred3_0
    | epred3_0
    | ~ epred2_0
    | ~ epred1_0
    | ~ epred1_0
    | ~ epred2_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( epred2_0
    | ~ epred1_0
    | ~ epred3_0 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

thf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    epred1_0,
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_10]) ).

thf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( epred3_0
    | epred2_0 ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_10]) ).

thf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ epred2_0
    | ~ epred3_0
    | ~ epred1_0
    | ~ epred1_0
    | ~ epred2_0
    | ~ epred3_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( epred3_0
    | ~ epred1_0
    | ~ epred2_0 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

thf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    epred2_0,
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18])]),c_0_19]) ).

thf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ epred1_0
    | ~ epred2_0
    | ~ epred3_0 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

thf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    epred3_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_18]),c_0_22])]) ).

thf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_18]),c_0_22]),c_0_24])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYO091^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.17  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.17  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.17  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.17  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.17  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.17  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.17  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.17  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 16:33:31 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.17  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.17  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.21  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.22  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.QG4VzDVPea/E---3.1_304714.p
% 0.09/0.24  % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.09/0.24  % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.09/0.24  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.24  % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.09/0.24  % Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.24  % Starting sh4l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.24  % Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_rwall with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.24  % ho_unfolding_6 with pid 304744 completed with status 0
% 0.09/0.24  % Result found by ho_unfolding_6
% 0.09/0.24  % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.09/0.24  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.24  % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.09/0.24  % Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.24  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.09/0.24  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.09/0.24  % Search class: HGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.09/0.24  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.09/0.24  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.24  % SubtermCWHack with pid 304748 completed with status 0
% 0.09/0.24  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.09/0.24  % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.09/0.24  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.24  % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.09/0.24  % Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.24  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.09/0.24  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.09/0.24  % Search class: HGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.09/0.24  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.09/0.24  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.24  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.09/0.24  
% 0.09/0.24  % Proof found!
% 0.09/0.24  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.09/0.24  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.09/0.24  % Parsed axioms                        : 1
% 0.09/0.24  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.09/0.24  % Initial clauses                      : 32
% 0.09/0.24  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 24
% 0.09/0.24  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 8
% 0.09/0.24  % Processed clauses                    : 8
% 0.09/0.24  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.09/0.24  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.09/0.24  % ...remaining for further processing  : 7
% 0.09/0.24  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.09/0.24  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.09/0.24  % Backward-subsumed                    : 3
% 0.09/0.24  % Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.09/0.24  % Generated clauses                    : 0
% 0.09/0.24  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.09/0.24  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.09/0.24  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 6
% 0.09/0.24  % Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.09/0.24  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.09/0.24  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.09/0.24  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.09/0.24  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.09/0.24  % Total rewrite steps                  : 7
% 0.09/0.24  % ...of those cached                   : 4
% 0.09/0.24  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.09/0.24  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.09/0.24  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.09/0.24  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.09/0.24  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.09/0.24  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.09/0.24  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.09/0.24  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.09/0.24  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.09/0.24  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.09/0.24  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.09/0.24  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.09/0.24  % Current number of processed clauses  : 3
% 0.09/0.24  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3
% 0.09/0.24  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.09/0.24  %    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.09/0.24  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.09/0.24  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.09/0.24  % ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.09/0.24  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.09/0.24  % Current number of archived clauses   : 4
% 0.09/0.24  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 7
% 0.09/0.24  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 0.09/0.24  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 7
% 0.09/0.24  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.09/0.24  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.09/0.24  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.09/0.24  % BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.09/0.24  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.09/0.24  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.09/0.24  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 1719
% 0.09/0.24  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 348
% 0.09/0.24  
% 0.09/0.24  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.09/0.24  % User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.09/0.24  % System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.09/0.24  % Total time               : 0.005 s
% 0.09/0.24  % Maximum resident set size: 3624 pages
% 0.09/0.24  
% 0.09/0.24  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.09/0.24  % User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.09/0.24  % System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.09/0.24  % Total time               : 0.011 s
% 0.09/0.24  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.09/0.24  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------