↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SYO098^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:53:22 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.53s 1.25s
% Output   : Refutation 1.53s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (   4 unt;   0 typ;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  147 (  35 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  160 (  32   ~;  14   |;  11   &;  90   @)
%                                         (   2 <=>;  11  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    8 (   5 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   41 (   0   ^;  28   !;  13   ?;  41   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(func_def_0,type,
    cQ: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    cR: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(f29,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f21,f25,f28]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ~ spl1_1,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f27]) ).

thf(f27,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl1_1 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f26]) ).

thf(f26,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | ~ spl1_1 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f11,f16]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
        ( ( cR @ X1 @ X0 )
        = $true )
    | ~ spl1_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f15]) ).

thf(f15,definition,
    ( spl1_1
  <=> ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
        ( ( cR @ X1 @ X0 )
        = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ! [X3: $i] :
      ( ( cR @ X3 @ X3 )
     != $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
        ( ( ( cR @ X1 @ X0 )
          = $true )
        | ( ( $true
            = ( cQ @ X0 @ X1 ) )
          & ( $true
           != ( cQ @ sK0 @ sK0 ) ) ) )
    & ! [X3: $i] :
        ( ( cR @ X3 @ X3 )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f8,f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ? [X2: $i] :
        ( ( cQ @ X2 @ X2 )
       != $true )
   => ( $true
     != ( cQ @ sK0 @ sK0 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
        ( ( ( cR @ X1 @ X0 )
          = $true )
        | ( ( $true
            = ( cQ @ X0 @ X1 ) )
          & ? [X2: $i] :
              ( ( cQ @ X2 @ X2 )
             != $true ) ) )
    & ! [X3: $i] :
        ( ( cR @ X3 @ X3 )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ( ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
        ( ( ( cR @ X2 @ X1 )
          = $true )
        | ( ( ( cQ @ X1 @ X2 )
            = $true )
          & ? [X3: $i] :
              ( ( cQ @ X3 @ X3 )
             != $true ) ) )
    & ! [X0: $i] :
        ( ( cR @ X0 @ X0 )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ~ ( ! [X0: $i] :
          ( ( cR @ X0 @ X0 )
         != $true )
     => ? [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
          ( ( ( cR @ X2 @ X1 )
           != $true )
          & ( ( ( cQ @ X1 @ X2 )
              = $true )
           => ! [X3: $i] :
                ( ( cQ @ X3 @ X3 )
                = $true ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ( ! [X0: $i] :
          ( ( cR @ X0 @ X0 )
         != $true )
     => ? [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
          ( ( ( ( cQ @ X1 @ X2 )
              = $true )
           => ! [X3: $i] :
                ( ( cQ @ X3 @ X3 )
                = $true ) )
          & ( ( cR @ X2 @ X1 )
           != $true ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ( ! [X0: $i] :
          ~ ( cR @ X0 @ X0 )
     => ? [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
          ( ( ( cQ @ X1 @ X2 )
           => ! [X3: $i] : ( cQ @ X3 @ X3 ) )
          & ~ ( cR @ X2 @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [X0: $i] :
          ~ ( cR @ X0 @ X0 )
     => ? [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
          ( ( ( cQ @ X2 @ X1 )
           => ! [X3: $i] : ( cQ @ X3 @ X3 ) )
          & ~ ( cR @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ( ! [X0: $i] :
        ~ ( cR @ X0 @ X0 )
   => ? [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
        ( ( ( cQ @ X2 @ X1 )
         => ! [X3: $i] : ( cQ @ X3 @ X3 ) )
        & ~ ( cR @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.geQnrpfqye/DTF2THF_11205.p',cTHM65) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    spl1_2,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f24]) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl1_2 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f23,f11]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ( ( ( cR @ sK0 @ sK0 )
      = $true )
    | spl1_2 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f22]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | ( ( cR @ sK0 @ sK0 )
      = $true )
    | spl1_2 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f20,f13]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( cQ @ X0 @ X1 ) )
      | ( ( cR @ X1 @ X0 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( cQ @ sK0 @ sK0 ) )
    | spl1_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f18]) ).

thf(f18,definition,
    ( spl1_2
  <=> ( $true
      = ( cQ @ sK0 @ sK0 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ( spl1_1
    | ~ spl1_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f12,f18,f15]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( cQ @ sK0 @ sK0 ) )
      | ( ( cR @ X1 @ X0 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SYO098^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.15/0.34  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 14:24:27 EST 2026
% 0.15/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.34  Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.30/0.46  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.30/0.46  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.30/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.30/0.46  % File     : SYO098^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.30/0.46  % Domain   : Syntactic
% 0.30/0.46  % Problem  : TPS problem THM65
% 0.30/0.46  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.30/0.46  % English  :
% 0.30/0.46  
% 0.30/0.46  % Refs     : [Bro09] Brown (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.30/0.46  % Source   : [Bro09]
% 0.30/0.46  % Names    : tps_0289 [Bro09]
% 0.30/0.46  %          : THM65 [TPS]
% 0.30/0.46  
% 0.30/0.46  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.30/0.46  % Rating   : 0.08 v9.1.0, 0.12 v9.0.0, 0.08 v8.2.0, 0.09 v8.1.0, 0.08 v7.4.0, 0.11 v7.3.0, 0.10 v7.2.0, 0.12 v7.1.0, 0.14 v7.0.0, 0.12 v6.4.0, 0.14 v6.3.0, 0.17 v6.0.0, 0.00 v4.0.0
% 0.30/0.46  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    3 (   0 unt;   2 typ;   0 def)
% 0.30/0.46  %            Number of atoms       :    4 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.30/0.46  %            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   4 avg)
% 0.30/0.46  %            Number of connectives :   13 (   2   ~;   0   |;   1   &;   8   @)
% 0.30/0.46  %                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.30/0.46  %            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   9 avg)
% 0.30/0.46  %            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
% 0.30/0.46  %            Number of type conns  :    4 (   4   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.30/0.46  %            Number of symbols     :    2 (   2 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 0.30/0.46  %            Number of variables   :    4 (   0   ^;   2   !;   2   ?;   4   :)
% 0.30/0.46  % SPC      : TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR
% 0.30/0.46  
% 0.30/0.46  % Comments : This problem is from the TPS library. Copyright (c) 2009 The TPS
% 0.30/0.46  %            project in the Department of Mathematical Sciences at Carnegie
% 0.30/0.46  %            Mellon University. Distributed under the Creative Commons copyleft
% 0.30/0.46  %            license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
% 0.30/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.30/0.46  thf(cQ,type,
% 0.30/0.46      cQ: $i > $i > $o ).
% 0.30/0.46  
% 0.30/0.46  thf(cR,type,
% 0.30/0.46      cR: $i > $i > $o ).
% 0.30/0.46  
% 0.30/0.46  thf(cTHM65,conjecture,
% 0.30/0.46      ( ! [W: $i] :
% 0.30/0.46          ~ ( cR @ W @ W )
% 0.30/0.46     => ? [X: $i,Y: $i] :
% 0.30/0.46          ( ~ ( cR @ X @ Y )
% 0.30/0.46          & ( ( cQ @ Y @ X )
% 0.30/0.46           => ! [Z: $i] : ( cQ @ Z @ Z ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.30/0.46  
% 0.30/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.30/0.46  ------------------------
% 1.53/1.22  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.53/1.22  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.53/1.22  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 14:24:27 EST 2026
% 1.53/1.22  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.53/1.22  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.53/1.22  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.53/1.22  
% 1.53/1.22  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.geQnrpfqye/DTF2DTF11205.p
% See solution above
% 1.53/1.22  ------------------------
% 1.53/1.23  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.53/1.23  thf(cQ,type,
% 1.53/1.23      cQ: $i > $i > $o ).
% 1.53/1.23  
% 1.53/1.23  thf(cR,type,
% 1.53/1.23      cR: $i > $i > $o ).
% 1.53/1.23  
% 1.53/1.23  thf(cTHM65,conjecture,
% 1.53/1.23      ( ! [W: $i] :
% 1.53/1.23          ~ ( cR @ W @ W )
% 1.53/1.23     => ? [X: $i,Y: $i] :
% 1.53/1.23          ( ~ ( cR @ X @ Y )
% 1.53/1.23          & ( ( cQ @ Y @ X )
% 1.53/1.23           => ! [Z: $i] : ( cQ @ Z @ Z ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.53/1.23  ------------------------
% 1.53/1.24  % (11393)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_11205 for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 1.53/1.24  % (11399)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_11205 for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 1.53/1.24  % (11393)First to succeed.
% 1.53/1.24  % (11399)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.53/1.25  % (11393)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.53/1.25  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_11205
% 1.53/1.25  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_11205
% 1.53/1.25  thf(func_def_0, type, cQ: $i > $i > $o).
% 1.53/1.25  thf(func_def_1, type, cR: $i > $i > $o).
% 1.53/1.25  thf(f29,plain,(
% 1.53/1.25    $false),
% 1.53/1.25    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f21,f25,f28])).
% 1.53/1.25  thf(f28,plain,(
% 1.53/1.25    ~spl1_1),
% 1.53/1.25    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f27])).
% 1.53/1.25  thf(f27,plain,(
% 1.53/1.25    $false | ~spl1_1),
% 1.53/1.25    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f26])).
% 1.53/1.25  thf(f26,plain,(
% 1.53/1.25    ($true != $true) | ~spl1_1),
% 1.53/1.25    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f11,f16])).
% 1.53/1.25  thf(f16,plain,(
% 1.53/1.25    ( ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((cR @ X1 @ X0) = $true)) ) | ~spl1_1),
% 1.53/1.25    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f15])).
% 1.53/1.25  thf(f15,definition,(
% 1.53/1.25    spl1_1 <=> ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : ((cR @ X1 @ X0) = $true)),
% 1.53/1.25    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_1])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.53/1.25  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.53/1.25    ( ! [X3 : $i] : (((cR @ X3 @ X3) != $true)) )),
% 1.53/1.25    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.53/1.25  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.53/1.25    ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((cR @ X1 @ X0) = $true) | (($true = (cQ @ X0 @ X1)) & ($true != (cQ @ sK0 @ sK0)))) & ! [X3 : $i] : ((cR @ X3 @ X3) != $true)),
% 1.53/1.25    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f8,f9])).
% 1.53/1.25  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.53/1.25    ? [X2 : $i] : ((cQ @ X2 @ X2) != $true) => ($true != (cQ @ sK0 @ sK0))),
% 1.53/1.25    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.53/1.25  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.53/1.25    ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((cR @ X1 @ X0) = $true) | (($true = (cQ @ X0 @ X1)) & ? [X2 : $i] : ((cQ @ X2 @ X2) != $true))) & ! [X3 : $i] : ((cR @ X3 @ X3) != $true)),
% 1.53/1.25    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f7])).
% 1.53/1.25  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.53/1.25    ! [X1 : $i,X2 : $i] : (((cR @ X2 @ X1) = $true) | (((cQ @ X1 @ X2) = $true) & ? [X3 : $i] : ((cQ @ X3 @ X3) != $true))) & ! [X0 : $i] : ((cR @ X0 @ X0) != $true)),
% 1.53/1.25    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6])).
% 1.53/1.25  thf(f6,plain,(
% 1.53/1.25    ~(! [X0 : $i] : ((cR @ X0 @ X0) != $true) => ? [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((cR @ X2 @ X1) != $true) & (((cQ @ X1 @ X2) = $true) => ! [X3 : $i] : ((cQ @ X3 @ X3) = $true))))),
% 1.53/1.25    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.53/1.25  thf(f5,plain,(
% 1.53/1.25    ~(! [X0 : $i] : ~((cR @ X0 @ X0) = $true) => ? [X1 : $i,X2 : $i] : ((((cQ @ X1 @ X2) = $true) => ! [X3 : $i] : ((cQ @ X3 @ X3) = $true)) & ~((cR @ X2 @ X1) = $true)))),
% 1.53/1.25    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4])).
% 1.53/1.25  thf(f4,plain,(
% 1.53/1.25    ~(! [X0 : $i] : ~(cR @ X0 @ X0) => ? [X1 : $i,X2 : $i] : (((cQ @ X1 @ X2) => ! [X3 : $i] : (cQ @ X3 @ X3)) & ~(cR @ X2 @ X1)))),
% 1.53/1.25    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.53/1.25  thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.53/1.25    ~(! [X0 : $i] : ~(cR @ X0 @ X0) => ? [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((cQ @ X2 @ X1) => ! [X3 : $i] : (cQ @ X3 @ X3)) & ~(cR @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 1.53/1.25    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1])).
% 1.53/1.25  thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 1.53/1.25    ! [X0 : $i] : ~(cR @ X0 @ X0) => ? [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((cQ @ X2 @ X1) => ! [X3 : $i] : (cQ @ X3 @ X3)) & ~(cR @ X1 @ X2))),
% 1.53/1.25    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.geQnrpfqye/DTF2THF_11205.p',cTHM65)).
% 1.53/1.25  thf(f25,plain,(
% 1.53/1.25    spl1_2),
% 1.53/1.25    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f24])).
% 1.53/1.25  thf(f24,plain,(
% 1.53/1.25    $false | spl1_2),
% 1.53/1.25    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f23,f11])).
% 1.53/1.25  thf(f23,plain,(
% 1.53/1.25    ((cR @ sK0 @ sK0) = $true) | spl1_2),
% 1.53/1.25    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f22])).
% 1.53/1.25  thf(f22,plain,(
% 1.53/1.25    ($true != $true) | ((cR @ sK0 @ sK0) = $true) | spl1_2),
% 1.53/1.25    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f20,f13])).
% 1.53/1.25  thf(f13,plain,(
% 1.53/1.25    ( ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($true = (cQ @ X0 @ X1)) | ((cR @ X1 @ X0) = $true)) )),
% 1.53/1.25    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.53/1.25  thf(f20,plain,(
% 1.53/1.25    ($true != (cQ @ sK0 @ sK0)) | spl1_2),
% 1.53/1.25    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f18])).
% 1.53/1.25  thf(f18,definition,(
% 1.53/1.25    spl1_2 <=> ($true = (cQ @ sK0 @ sK0))),
% 1.53/1.25    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_2])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.53/1.25  thf(f21,plain,(
% 1.53/1.25    spl1_1 | ~spl1_2),
% 1.53/1.25    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f12,f18,f15])).
% 1.53/1.25  thf(f12,plain,(
% 1.53/1.25    ( ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($true != (cQ @ sK0 @ sK0)) | ((cR @ X1 @ X0) = $true)) )),
% 1.53/1.25    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.53/1.25  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_11205
% 1.53/1.25  % (11393)------------------------------
% 1.53/1.25  % (11393)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.53/1.25  % (11393)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.53/1.25  
% 1.53/1.25  % (11393)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.53/1.25  % (11393)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.53/1.25  % (11393)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 1.53/1.25  % (11393)------------------------------
% 1.53/1.25  % (11393)------------------------------
% 1.53/1.25  % (11392)Success in time 0.004 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------