↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : SYO098^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:48:57 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.26s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   29 (   8 unt;   0 typ;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  145 (  33 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  156 (  32   ~;  15   |;  11   &;  86   @)
%                                         (   2 <=>;  10  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    9 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   40 (   0 sgn  28   !;  12   ?;  40   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    sTfun: ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    cQ: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    cR: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ( ! [X0: $i] :
        ~ ( cR @ X0 @ X0 )
   => ? [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
        ( ( ( cQ @ X2 @ X1 )
         => ! [X3: $i] : ( cQ @ X3 @ X3 ) )
        & ~ ( cR @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cTHM65) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [X0: $i] :
          ~ ( cR @ X0 @ X0 )
     => ? [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
          ( ( ( cQ @ X2 @ X1 )
           => ! [X3: $i] : ( cQ @ X3 @ X3 ) )
          & ~ ( cR @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f3,plain,
    ~ ( ! [X0: $i] :
          ~ ( cR @ X0 @ X0 )
     => ? [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
          ( ( ( cQ @ X2 @ X1 )
           => ! [X3: $i] : ( cQ @ X3 @ X3 ) )
          & ~ ( cR @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ( ! [X0: $i] :
          ( ( cR @ X0 @ X0 )
         != $true )
     => ? [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
          ( ( ( ( cQ @ X2 @ X1 )
              = $true )
           => ! [X3: $i] :
                ( ( cQ @ X3 @ X3 )
                = $true ) )
          & ( ( cR @ X1 @ X2 )
           != $true ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f3]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ( ! [X0: $i] :
          ( ( cR @ X0 @ X0 )
         != $true )
     => ? [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
          ( ( ( ( cQ @ X2 @ X1 )
              = $true )
           => ! [X3: $i] :
                ( ( cQ @ X3 @ X3 )
                = $true ) )
          & ( ( cR @ X1 @ X2 )
           != $true ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ( ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
        ( ( ? [X3: $i] :
              ( ( cQ @ X3 @ X3 )
             != $true )
          & ( ( cQ @ X2 @ X1 )
            = $true ) )
        | ( ( cR @ X1 @ X2 )
          = $true ) )
    & ! [X0: $i] :
        ( ( cR @ X0 @ X0 )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
        ( ( ? [X2: $i] :
              ( $true
             != ( cQ @ X2 @ X2 ) )
          & ( $true
            = ( cQ @ X1 @ X0 ) ) )
        | ( $true
          = ( cR @ X0 @ X1 ) ) )
    & ! [X3: $i] :
        ( $true
       != ( cR @ X3 @ X3 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f6]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
        ( ( ( $true
           != ( cQ @ sK0 @ sK0 ) )
          & ( $true
            = ( cQ @ X1 @ X0 ) ) )
        | ( $true
          = ( cR @ X0 @ X1 ) ) )
    & ! [X3: $i] :
        ( $true
       != ( cR @ X3 @ X3 ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(X2,sK0)],[f7]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ! [X3: $i] :
      ( $true
     != ( cR @ X3 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( cQ @ X1 @ X0 ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( cR @ X0 @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( cQ @ sK0 @ sK0 ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( cR @ X0 @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

thf(f18,definition,
    ( spl1_2
  <=> ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
        ( $true
        = ( cR @ X0 @ X1 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
        ( $true
        = ( cR @ X0 @ X1 ) )
    | ~ spl1_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f18]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | ~ spl1_2 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f9,f19]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl1_2 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f20]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ~ spl1_2,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f21]) ).

thf(f26,definition,
    ( spl1_3
  <=> ( $true
      = ( cQ @ sK0 @ sK0 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_3])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( cQ @ sK0 @ sK0 ) )
    | spl1_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f26]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    ( spl1_2
    | ~ spl1_3 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f11,f26,f18]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | ( $true
      = ( cR @ sK0 @ sK0 ) )
    | spl1_3 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f28,f10]) ).

thf(f31,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( cR @ sK0 @ sK0 ) )
    | spl1_3 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f30]) ).

thf(f32,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl1_3 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f31,f9]) ).

thf(f33,plain,
    spl1_3,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f32]) ).

cnf(s13,plain,
    ~ spl1_2,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f22]) ).

cnf(s19,plain,
    ( spl1_2
    | ~ spl1_3 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f29]) ).

cnf(s22,plain,
    spl1_3,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f33]) ).

cnf(s23,plain,
    spl1_2,
    inference(rat,[],[s19,s22]) ).

cnf(s24,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rat,[],[s13,s23]) ).

thf(f34,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s24]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYO098^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.07/0.18  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.18  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.18  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.18  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.18  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.18  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.18  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.07/0.18  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 16:31:41 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.18  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.07/0.18  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.07/0.21  Running first-order model finding
% 0.07/0.21  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.26  % (3595180)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.21/0.26  % (3595187)dis+10_161_sil=256000:plsq=on:plsqr=61199697,1048576:gs=on:alpa=true:sac=on:slsq=on:cn=on:random_seed=3885253703:i=88024:add=on:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/88024Mi)
% 0.21/0.26  % (3595187) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-3595180-3595187"...
% 0.21/0.26  % (3595187)...printing done.
% 0.21/0.26  % (3595186)% WARNING: option uhcvi not known.
% 0.21/0.26  % (3595187)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.21/0.26  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.26  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.26  % (3595187)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.26  % (3595187)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.21/0.26  % (3595187)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.21/0.26  % (3595187)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.21/0.26  % (3595187)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.21/0.26  % (3595187)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.26  % (3595187)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.21/0.26  % (3595187)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.21/0.26  % (3595180)Success in time 0.041 s
% 0.21/0.26  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------