%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : cocATP---0.2.0 % Problem : SYO188^5 : TPTP v7.5.0. Released v4.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % Computer : n022.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 0s % DateTime : Tue Mar 29 00:50:52 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 0.61s 0.76s % Output : Proof 0.61s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SYO188^5 : TPTP v7.5.0. Released v4.0.0. % 0.03/0.12 % Command : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPUModel : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.33 % RAMPerCPU : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Mar 11 17:26:57 EST 2022 % 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.12/0.34 ModuleCmd_Load.c(213):ERROR:105: Unable to locate a modulefile for 'python/python27' % 0.12/0.34 Python 2.7.5 % 0.61/0.76 Using paths ['/home/cristobal/cocATP/CASC/TPTP/', '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/', '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/'] % 0.61/0.76 FOF formula ((ex ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) (fun (Xq:((Prop->Prop)->Prop))=> (forall (Xp:(Prop->Prop)), (Xq Xp)))) of role conjecture named cCT19 % 0.61/0.76 Conjecture to prove = ((ex ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) (fun (Xq:((Prop->Prop)->Prop))=> (forall (Xp:(Prop->Prop)), (Xq Xp)))):Prop % 0.61/0.76 We need to prove ['((ex ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) (fun (Xq:((Prop->Prop)->Prop))=> (forall (Xp:(Prop->Prop)), (Xq Xp))))'] % 0.61/0.76 Trying to prove ((ex ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) (fun (Xq:((Prop->Prop)->Prop))=> (forall (Xp:(Prop->Prop)), (Xq Xp)))) % 0.61/0.76 Found ex_intro0000:=(ex_intro000 ex_intro0):((ex Prop) (fun (y:Prop)=> y)) % 0.61/0.76 Found (ex_intro000 ex_intro0) as proof of ((ex Prop) (fun (y:Prop)=> y)) % 0.61/0.76 Found ((ex_intro00 (forall (P:(Prop->Prop)) (x:Prop), ((P x)->((ex Prop) P)))) ex_intro0) as proof of ((ex Prop) (fun (y:Prop)=> y)) % 0.61/0.76 Found (((ex_intro0 (fun (y:Prop)=> y)) (forall (P:(Prop->Prop)) (x:Prop), ((P x)->((ex Prop) P)))) ex_intro0) as proof of ((ex Prop) (fun (y:Prop)=> y)) % 0.61/0.76 Found ((((ex_intro Prop) (fun (y:Prop)=> y)) (forall (P:(Prop->Prop)) (x:Prop), ((P x)->((ex Prop) P)))) (ex_intro Prop)) as proof of ((ex Prop) (fun (y:Prop)=> y)) % 0.61/0.76 Found (fun (x:(Prop->Prop))=> ((((ex_intro Prop) (fun (y:Prop)=> y)) (forall (P:(Prop->Prop)) (x:Prop), ((P x)->((ex Prop) P)))) (ex_intro Prop))) as proof of ((ex Prop) (fun (y:Prop)=> y)) % 0.61/0.76 Found (fun (x:(Prop->Prop))=> ((((ex_intro Prop) (fun (y:Prop)=> y)) (forall (P:(Prop->Prop)) (x:Prop), ((P x)->((ex Prop) P)))) (ex_intro Prop))) as proof of ((Prop->Prop)->((ex Prop) (fun (y:Prop)=> y))) % 0.61/0.76 Found (choice000 (fun (x:(Prop->Prop))=> ((((ex_intro Prop) (fun (y:Prop)=> y)) (forall (P:(Prop->Prop)) (x:Prop), ((P x)->((ex Prop) P)))) (ex_intro Prop)))) as proof of ((ex ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) (fun (Xq:((Prop->Prop)->Prop))=> (forall (Xp:(Prop->Prop)), (Xq Xp)))) % 0.61/0.76 Found ((choice00 (fun (x3:(Prop->Prop)) (x20:Prop)=> x20)) (fun (x:(Prop->Prop))=> ((((ex_intro Prop) (fun (y:Prop)=> y)) (forall (P:(Prop->Prop)) (x:Prop), ((P x)->((ex Prop) P)))) (ex_intro Prop)))) as proof of ((ex ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) (fun (Xq:((Prop->Prop)->Prop))=> (forall (Xp:(Prop->Prop)), (Xq Xp)))) % 0.61/0.76 Found (((choice0 Prop) (fun (x3:(Prop->Prop)) (x20:Prop)=> x20)) (fun (x:(Prop->Prop))=> ((((ex_intro Prop) (fun (y:Prop)=> y)) (forall (P:(Prop->Prop)) (x:Prop), ((P x)->((ex Prop) P)))) (ex_intro Prop)))) as proof of ((ex ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) (fun (Xq:((Prop->Prop)->Prop))=> (forall (Xp:(Prop->Prop)), (Xq Xp)))) % 0.61/0.76 Found ((((choice (Prop->Prop)) Prop) (fun (x3:(Prop->Prop)) (x20:Prop)=> x20)) (fun (x:(Prop->Prop))=> ((((ex_intro Prop) (fun (y:Prop)=> y)) (forall (P:(Prop->Prop)) (x:Prop), ((P x)->((ex Prop) P)))) (ex_intro Prop)))) as proof of ((ex ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) (fun (Xq:((Prop->Prop)->Prop))=> (forall (Xp:(Prop->Prop)), (Xq Xp)))) % 0.61/0.76 Found ((((choice (Prop->Prop)) Prop) (fun (x3:(Prop->Prop)) (x20:Prop)=> x20)) (fun (x:(Prop->Prop))=> ((((ex_intro Prop) (fun (y:Prop)=> y)) (forall (P:(Prop->Prop)) (x:Prop), ((P x)->((ex Prop) P)))) (ex_intro Prop)))) as proof of ((ex ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) (fun (Xq:((Prop->Prop)->Prop))=> (forall (Xp:(Prop->Prop)), (Xq Xp)))) % 0.61/0.76 Got proof ((((choice (Prop->Prop)) Prop) (fun (x3:(Prop->Prop)) (x20:Prop)=> x20)) (fun (x:(Prop->Prop))=> ((((ex_intro Prop) (fun (y:Prop)=> y)) (forall (P:(Prop->Prop)) (x:Prop), ((P x)->((ex Prop) P)))) (ex_intro Prop)))) % 0.61/0.76 Time elapsed = 0.156317s % 0.61/0.76 node=47 cost=473.000000 depth=10 % 0.61/0.76 :::::::::::::::::::::: % 0.61/0.76 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.61/0.76 % SZS output start Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.61/0.76 ((((choice (Prop->Prop)) Prop) (fun (x3:(Prop->Prop)) (x20:Prop)=> x20)) (fun (x:(Prop->Prop))=> ((((ex_intro Prop) (fun (y:Prop)=> y)) (forall (P:(Prop->Prop)) (x:Prop), ((P x)->((ex Prop) P)))) (ex_intro Prop)))) % 0.61/0.76 % SZS output end Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p %------------------------------------------------------------------------------