%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : cocATP---0.2.0 % Problem : SYO197^5 : TPTP v7.5.0. Released v4.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % Computer : n016.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 0s % DateTime : Tue Mar 29 00:50:53 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 0.47s 0.65s % Output : Proof 0.47s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.06/0.11 % Problem : SYO197^5 : TPTP v7.5.0. Released v4.0.0. % 0.06/0.11 % Command : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.12/0.32 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.32 % CPUModel : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.32 % RAMPerCPU : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.32 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.32 % DateTime : Fri Mar 11 18:06:14 EST 2022 % 0.12/0.32 % CPUTime : % 0.12/0.33 ModuleCmd_Load.c(213):ERROR:105: Unable to locate a modulefile for 'python/python27' % 0.12/0.34 Python 2.7.5 % 0.47/0.65 Using paths ['/home/cristobal/cocATP/CASC/TPTP/', '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/', '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/'] % 0.47/0.65 FOF formula ((ex Prop) (fun (Xy:Prop)=> (forall (Xz:Prop), ((ex Prop) (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx)))))) of role conjecture named cCT18 % 0.47/0.65 Conjecture to prove = ((ex Prop) (fun (Xy:Prop)=> (forall (Xz:Prop), ((ex Prop) (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx)))))):Prop % 0.47/0.65 We need to prove ['((ex Prop) (fun (Xy:Prop)=> (forall (Xz:Prop), ((ex Prop) (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx))))))'] % 0.47/0.65 Trying to prove ((ex Prop) (fun (Xy:Prop)=> (forall (Xz:Prop), ((ex Prop) (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx)))))) % 0.47/0.65 Found False:Prop % 0.47/0.65 Found False as proof of Prop % 0.47/0.65 Found x0:Xz % 0.47/0.65 Instantiate: x:=Xz:Prop % 0.47/0.65 Found (fun (x0:Xz)=> x0) as proof of x % 0.47/0.65 Found (fun (x0:Xz)=> x0) as proof of (Xz->x) % 0.47/0.65 Found (ex_intro010 (fun (x0:Xz)=> x0)) as proof of ((ex Prop) (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx))) % 0.47/0.65 Found ((ex_intro01 Xz) (fun (x0:Xz)=> x0)) as proof of ((ex Prop) (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx))) % 0.47/0.65 Found (((ex_intro0 (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx))) Xz) (fun (x0:Xz)=> x0)) as proof of ((ex Prop) (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx))) % 0.47/0.65 Found (fun (Xz:Prop)=> (((ex_intro0 (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx))) Xz) (fun (x0:Xz)=> x0))) as proof of ((ex Prop) (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx))) % 0.47/0.65 Found (fun (Xz:Prop)=> (((ex_intro0 (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx))) Xz) (fun (x0:Xz)=> x0))) as proof of (forall (Xz:Prop), ((ex Prop) (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx)))) % 0.47/0.65 Found ((ex_intro00 False) (fun (Xz:Prop)=> (((ex_intro0 (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx))) Xz) (fun (x0:Xz)=> x0)))) as proof of ((ex Prop) (fun (Xy:Prop)=> (forall (Xz:Prop), ((ex Prop) (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx)))))) % 0.47/0.65 Found (((ex_intro0 (fun (Xy:Prop)=> (forall (Xz:Prop), ((ex Prop) (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx)))))) False) (fun (Xz:Prop)=> (((ex_intro0 (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx))) Xz) (fun (x0:Xz)=> x0)))) as proof of ((ex Prop) (fun (Xy:Prop)=> (forall (Xz:Prop), ((ex Prop) (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx)))))) % 0.47/0.65 Found ((((ex_intro Prop) (fun (Xy:Prop)=> (forall (Xz:Prop), ((ex Prop) (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx)))))) False) (fun (Xz:Prop)=> ((((ex_intro Prop) (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx))) Xz) (fun (x0:Xz)=> x0)))) as proof of ((ex Prop) (fun (Xy:Prop)=> (forall (Xz:Prop), ((ex Prop) (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx)))))) % 0.47/0.65 Found ((((ex_intro Prop) (fun (Xy:Prop)=> (forall (Xz:Prop), ((ex Prop) (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx)))))) False) (fun (Xz:Prop)=> ((((ex_intro Prop) (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx))) Xz) (fun (x0:Xz)=> x0)))) as proof of ((ex Prop) (fun (Xy:Prop)=> (forall (Xz:Prop), ((ex Prop) (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx)))))) % 0.47/0.65 Got proof ((((ex_intro Prop) (fun (Xy:Prop)=> (forall (Xz:Prop), ((ex Prop) (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx)))))) False) (fun (Xz:Prop)=> ((((ex_intro Prop) (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx))) Xz) (fun (x0:Xz)=> x0)))) % 0.47/0.65 Time elapsed = 0.049142s % 0.47/0.65 node=11 cost=325.000000 depth=10 % 0.47/0.65 :::::::::::::::::::::: % 0.47/0.65 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.47/0.65 % SZS output start Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.47/0.65 ((((ex_intro Prop) (fun (Xy:Prop)=> (forall (Xz:Prop), ((ex Prop) (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx)))))) False) (fun (Xz:Prop)=> ((((ex_intro Prop) (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx))) Xz) (fun (x0:Xz)=> x0)))) % 0.47/0.65 % SZS output end Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p %------------------------------------------------------------------------------