%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem : SYO210^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v9.2.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Feb 28 09:54:02 AM UTC 2026
% Result : CounterSatisfiable 1.80s 1.53s
% Output : Saturation 1.80s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Derivation
% Derivation depth : 0
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 1 ( 1 unt; 0 nHn; 1 RR)
% Number of literals : 1 ( 1 equ; 1 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 0 ( 0 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 0 usr; 2 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(u3,axiom,
$true != $false ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : SYO210^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v9.2.1.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.17/0.34 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Feb 25 06:19:21 EST 2026
% 0.17/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.34 Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.21/0.45 ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.21/0.45 thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.21/0.45 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.45 % File : SYO210^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v9.2.1.
% 0.21/0.45 % Domain : Syntactic
% 0.21/0.45 % Problem : TPS problem from BASIC-HO-PROP-THMS
% 0.21/0.45 % Version : Especial.
% 0.21/0.45 % English :
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 % Refs : [Bro09] Brown (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.21/0.45 % Source : [Bro09]
% 0.21/0.45 % Names : tps_0599 [Bro09]
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 % Status : CounterSatisfiable
% 0.21/0.45 % Rating : ? v9.2.1
% 0.21/0.45 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 1 ( 1 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% 0.21/0.45 % Number of atoms : 1 ( 1 equ; 0 cnn)
% 0.21/0.45 % Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% 0.21/0.45 % Number of connectives : 1 ( 1 ~; 0 |; 0 &; 0 @)
% 0.21/0.45 % ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% 0.21/0.45 % Maximal formula depth : 2 ( 2 avg)
% 0.21/0.45 % Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% 0.21/0.45 % Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% 0.21/0.45 % Number of symbols : 1 ( 0 usr; 0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 0.21/0.45 % Number of variables : 1 ( 0 ^; 0 !; 1 ?; 1 :)
% 0.21/0.45 % SPC : TH0_CSA_EQU_NAR
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 % Comments : This problem is from the TPS library. Copyright (c) 2009 The TPS
% 0.21/0.45 % project in the Department of Mathematical Sciences at Carnegie
% 0.21/0.45 % Mellon University. Distributed under the Creative Commons copyleft
% 0.21/0.45 % license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
% 0.21/0.45 % Bugfixes : Added ()s around negated sides of equations.
% 0.21/0.45 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.45 thf(cCT6,conjecture,
% 0.21/0.45 ? [Xx: $o] :
% 0.21/0.45 ( Xx = ( ~ Xx ) ) ).
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.45 ------------------------
% 1.62/1.49 ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.62/1.50 %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.62/1.50 %%% Generated on Wed Feb 25 06:19:22 EST 2026
% 1.62/1.50 %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.62/1.50 %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.62/1.50 %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.62/1.50
% 1.62/1.50 % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.O6gF7EO4Bg/DTF2DTF19062.p
% See solution above
% 1.62/1.50 ------------------------
% 1.80/1.50 ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.80/1.51 thf(cCT6,conjecture,
% 1.80/1.51 ? [Xx: $o] :
% 1.80/1.51 ( Xx = ~ Xx ) ).
% 1.80/1.51 ------------------------
% 1.80/1.53 % (19164)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_19062 for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 1.80/1.53 % (19165)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_19062 for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 1.80/1.53 % (19161)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_19062 for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 1.80/1.53 % (19163)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_19062 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 1.80/1.53 % (19159)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_19062 for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 1.80/1.53 % (19162)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_19062 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 1.80/1.53 % (19160)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_19062 for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 1.80/1.53 % (19164)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.80/1.53 % (19164)------------------------------
% 1.80/1.53 % (19164)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.80/1.53 % (19164)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.80/1.53
% 1.80/1.53
% 1.80/1.53 % (19161)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.80/1.53 % (19161)------------------------------
% 1.80/1.53 % (19161)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.80/1.53 % (19163)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.80/1.53 % (19163)------------------------------
% 1.80/1.53 % (19163)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.80/1.53 % (19164)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 1.80/1.53 % (19163)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.80/1.53
% 1.80/1.53 % (19164)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 1.80/1.53
% 1.80/1.53 % (19164)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 1.80/1.53 % (19163)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 1.80/1.53 % (19164)------------------------------
% 1.80/1.53 % (19164)------------------------------
% 1.80/1.53 % (19163)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 1.80/1.53 % (19163)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 1.80/1.53 % (19163)------------------------------
% 1.80/1.53 % (19163)------------------------------
% 1.80/1.53 % (19160)First to succeed.
% 1.80/1.53 % (19161)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.80/1.53
% 1.80/1.53
% 1.80/1.53 % (19161)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 1.80/1.53 % (19161)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 1.80/1.53 % (19161)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 1.80/1.53 % (19161)------------------------------
% 1.80/1.53 % (19161)------------------------------
% 1.80/1.53 % (19162)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.80/1.53 % (19162)------------------------------
% 1.80/1.53 % (19162)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.80/1.53 % (19162)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.80/1.53 % (19162)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.80/1.53
% 1.80/1.53 % (19162)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.80/1.53 % (19162)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.80/1.53 % (19162)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.80/1.53 % (19162)------------------------------
% 1.80/1.53 % (19162)------------------------------
% 1.80/1.53 % SZS status CounterSatisfiable for DTF2THF_19062
% 1.80/1.53 % (19160)# SZS output start Saturation.
% 1.80/1.53 cnf(u3,axiom,
% 1.80/1.53 ($true != $false)).
% 1.80/1.53
% 1.80/1.53 % (19160)# SZS output end Saturation.
% 1.80/1.53 % (19160)------------------------------
% 1.80/1.53 % (19160)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.80/1.53 % (19160)Termination reason: Satisfiable
% 1.80/1.53
% 1.80/1.53 % (19160)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 1.80/1.53 % (19160)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 1.80/1.53 % (19160)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 1.80/1.53 % (19160)------------------------------
% 1.80/1.53 % (19160)------------------------------
% 1.80/1.53 % (19158)Success in time 0.018 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------