↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SYO220^5 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 08:08:46 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 3.50s 3.68s
% Output   : Proof 3.50s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : SYO220^5 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.13/0.13  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Fri Oct  3 13:29:08 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.50/3.68  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.50/3.68  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.50/3.68  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (∀ (X Y : Iota), Eq X Y → ∀ (R : Iota → Iota → Prop), (∀ (Z : Iota), R Z Z) → R X Y)) True
% 3.50/3.68  Clause #1 (by clausification #[0]): Eq (∀ (X Y : Iota), Eq X Y → ∀ (R : Iota → Iota → Prop), (∀ (Z : Iota), R Z Z) → R X Y) False
% 3.50/3.68  Clause #2 (by clausification #[1]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 3.50/3.68    Eq (Not (∀ (Y : Iota), Eq (skS.0 0 a) Y → ∀ (R : Iota → Iota → Prop), (∀ (Z : Iota), R Z Z) → R (skS.0 0 a) Y)) True
% 3.50/3.68  Clause #3 (by clausification #[2]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 3.50/3.68    Eq (∀ (Y : Iota), Eq (skS.0 0 a) Y → ∀ (R : Iota → Iota → Prop), (∀ (Z : Iota), R Z Z) → R (skS.0 0 a) Y) False
% 3.50/3.68  Clause #4 (by clausification #[3]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 3.50/3.68    Eq
% 3.50/3.68      (Not
% 3.50/3.68        (Eq (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 1 a a_1) →
% 3.50/3.68          ∀ (R : Iota → Iota → Prop), (∀ (Z : Iota), R Z Z) → R (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 1 a a_1)))
% 3.50/3.68      True
% 3.50/3.68  Clause #5 (by clausification #[4]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 3.50/3.68    Eq
% 3.50/3.68      (Eq (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 1 a a_1) → ∀ (R : Iota → Iota → Prop), (∀ (Z : Iota), R Z Z) → R (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 1 a a_1))
% 3.50/3.68      False
% 3.50/3.68  Clause #6 (by clausification #[5]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (Eq (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 1 a a_1)) True
% 3.50/3.68  Clause #7 (by clausification #[5]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (∀ (R : Iota → Iota → Prop), (∀ (Z : Iota), R Z Z) → R (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 1 a a_1)) False
% 3.50/3.68  Clause #8 (by clausification #[6]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 1 a a_1)
% 3.50/3.68  Clause #9 (by clausification #[7]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota) (a_2 : Iota → Iota → Prop),
% 3.50/3.68    Eq (Not ((∀ (Z : Iota), skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2 Z Z) → skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2 (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 1 a a_1))) True
% 3.50/3.68  Clause #10 (by clausification #[9]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota) (a_2 : Iota → Iota → Prop),
% 3.50/3.68    Eq ((∀ (Z : Iota), skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2 Z Z) → skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2 (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 1 a a_1)) False
% 3.50/3.68  Clause #11 (by clausification #[10]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota) (a_2 : Iota → Iota → Prop), Eq (∀ (Z : Iota), skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2 Z Z) True
% 3.50/3.68  Clause #12 (by clausification #[10]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota) (a_2 : Iota → Iota → Prop), Eq (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2 (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 1 a a_1)) False
% 3.50/3.68  Clause #13 (by clausification #[11]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota) (a_2 : Iota → Iota → Prop) (a_3 : Iota), Eq (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2 a_3 a_3) True
% 3.50/3.68  Clause #14 (by forward demodulation #[12, 8]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota) (a_2 : Iota → Iota → Prop), Eq (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2 (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 0 a)) False
% 3.50/3.68  Clause #15 (by superposition #[14, 13]): Eq False True
% 3.50/3.68  Clause #16 (by clausification #[15]): False
% 3.50/3.68  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------