↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : SYO224^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:44:02 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.23s 0.31s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   31
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   68 (  12 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  263 (  58 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   33 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  691 (  97   ~; 195   |;  29   &; 360   @)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   23 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   17 (  17   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   11 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   51 (  11   ^;  36   !;   4   ?;  51   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_23,type,
    cJ: $i ).

thf(decl_24,type,
    cLIKE: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_25,type,
    cWRH: $i > $o ).

thf(decl_26,type,
    cW: $i > $o ).

thf(decl_27,type,
    cUNIQUE: $i > $o ).

thf(decl_28,type,
    cS: $i ).

thf(decl_29,type,
    cP: $i ).

thf(decl_30,type,
    esk1_1: ( $i > $o ) > $i ).

thf(cLING1,conjecture,
    ( ( ! [X1: $i] :
          ( ( cUNIQUE @ X1 )
         => ! [X2: $i] :
              ( ( ( cWRH @ X2 )
                & ( cW @ X2 ) )
             => ( X1 = X2 ) ) )
      & ( cUNIQUE @ cS )
      & ( cW @ cS )
      & ( cWRH @ cS ) )
   => ? [X3: $i > $o] :
        ( ( ( X3 @ cP )
        <=> ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS ) )
        & ( ( X3 @ cJ )
        <=> ? [X1: $i] :
              ( ( cUNIQUE @ X1 )
              & ( cW @ X1 )
              & ( cWRH @ X1 )
              & ( cLIKE @ cJ @ X1 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.nr733LacEB/E---3.1_2351021.p',cLING1) ).

thf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( ! [X1: $i] :
            ( ( cUNIQUE @ X1 )
           => ! [X2: $i] :
                ( ( ( cWRH @ X2 )
                  & ( cW @ X2 ) )
               => ( X1 = X2 ) ) )
        & ( cUNIQUE @ cS )
        & ( cW @ cS )
        & ( cWRH @ cS ) )
     => ? [X3: $i > $o] :
          ( ( ( X3 @ cP )
          <=> ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS ) )
          & ( ( X3 @ cJ )
          <=> ? [X1: $i] :
                ( ( cUNIQUE @ X1 )
                & ( cW @ X1 )
                & ( cWRH @ X1 )
                & ( cLIKE @ cJ @ X1 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cLING1]) ).

thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X8: $i,X9: $i,X10: $i > $o,X11: $i] :
      ( ( ~ ( cUNIQUE @ X8 )
        | ~ ( cWRH @ X9 )
        | ~ ( cW @ X9 )
        | ( X8 = X9 ) )
      & ( cUNIQUE @ cS )
      & ( cW @ cS )
      & ( cWRH @ cS )
      & ( ~ ( X10 @ cJ )
        | ~ ( cUNIQUE @ X11 )
        | ~ ( cW @ X11 )
        | ~ ( cWRH @ X11 )
        | ~ ( cLIKE @ cJ @ X11 )
        | ~ ( X10 @ cP )
        | ~ ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS ) )
      & ( ( cUNIQUE @ ( esk1_1 @ X10 ) )
        | ( X10 @ cJ )
        | ~ ( X10 @ cP )
        | ~ ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS ) )
      & ( ( cW @ ( esk1_1 @ X10 ) )
        | ( X10 @ cJ )
        | ~ ( X10 @ cP )
        | ~ ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS ) )
      & ( ( cWRH @ ( esk1_1 @ X10 ) )
        | ( X10 @ cJ )
        | ~ ( X10 @ cP )
        | ~ ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS ) )
      & ( ( cLIKE @ cJ @ ( esk1_1 @ X10 ) )
        | ( X10 @ cJ )
        | ~ ( X10 @ cP )
        | ~ ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS ) )
      & ( ~ ( X10 @ cJ )
        | ~ ( cUNIQUE @ X11 )
        | ~ ( cW @ X11 )
        | ~ ( cWRH @ X11 )
        | ~ ( cLIKE @ cJ @ X11 )
        | ( X10 @ cP )
        | ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS ) )
      & ( ( cUNIQUE @ ( esk1_1 @ X10 ) )
        | ( X10 @ cJ )
        | ( X10 @ cP )
        | ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS ) )
      & ( ( cW @ ( esk1_1 @ X10 ) )
        | ( X10 @ cJ )
        | ( X10 @ cP )
        | ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS ) )
      & ( ( cWRH @ ( esk1_1 @ X10 ) )
        | ( X10 @ cJ )
        | ( X10 @ cP )
        | ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS ) )
      & ( ( cLIKE @ cJ @ ( esk1_1 @ X10 ) )
        | ( X10 @ cJ )
        | ( X10 @ cP )
        | ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS ) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i,X3: $i > $o] :
      ( ~ ( X3 @ cJ )
      | ~ ( cUNIQUE @ X1 )
      | ~ ( cW @ X1 )
      | ~ ( cWRH @ X1 )
      | ~ ( cLIKE @ cJ @ X1 )
      | ~ ( X3 @ cP )
      | ~ ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: $i > $o,X1: $i] :
      ( ( X3 @ cP )
      | ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS )
      | ~ ( X3 @ cJ )
      | ~ ( cUNIQUE @ X1 )
      | ~ ( cW @ X1 )
      | ~ ( cWRH @ X1 )
      | ~ ( cLIKE @ cJ @ X1 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ~ ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS )
      | ~ ( cLIKE @ cJ @ X1 )
      | ~ ( cWRH @ X1 )
      | ~ ( cW @ X1 )
      | ~ ( cUNIQUE @ X1 ) ),
    inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( cJ = cP )
      | ~ ( cLIKE @ cJ @ X1 )
      | ~ ( cWRH @ X1 )
      | ~ ( cW @ X1 )
      | ~ ( cUNIQUE @ X1 ) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]),c_0_4]),c_0_5]) ).

thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: $i > $o] :
      ( ( cLIKE @ cJ @ ( esk1_1 @ X3 ) )
      | ( X3 @ cJ )
      | ( X3 @ cP )
      | ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: $i > $o] :
      ( ( cUNIQUE @ ( esk1_1 @ X3 ) )
      | ( X3 @ cJ )
      | ( X3 @ cP )
      | ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: $i > $o] :
      ( ( cW @ ( esk1_1 @ X3 ) )
      | ( X3 @ cJ )
      | ( X3 @ cP )
      | ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: $i > $o] :
      ( ( cWRH @ ( esk1_1 @ X3 ) )
      | ( X3 @ cJ )
      | ( X3 @ cP )
      | ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( X1 = X2 )
      | ~ ( cUNIQUE @ X1 )
      | ~ ( cWRH @ X2 )
      | ~ ( cW @ X2 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: $i > $o] :
      ( ( cJ = cP )
      | ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS )
      | ( X3 @ cJ )
      | ( X3 @ cP ) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8]),c_0_9]),c_0_10]) ).

thf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( cJ = cP )
      | ( cJ = X1 )
      | ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS )
      | ( cUNIQUE @ cP )
      | ~ ( cWRH @ X1 )
      | ~ ( cW @ X1 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

thf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( cW
      @ ( esk1_1
        @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ~ $true ) )
    | ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS ) ),
    inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

thf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( cWRH
      @ ( esk1_1
        @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ~ $true ) )
    | ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS ) ),
    inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

thf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ( esk1_1
        @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ~ $true )
      = cJ )
    | ( cJ = cP )
    | ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS )
    | ( cUNIQUE @ cP ) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).

thf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( cJ = cP )
    | ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS )
    | ( cUNIQUE @ cP )
    | ( cW @ cJ ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_16]) ).

thf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( cJ = cP )
    | ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS )
    | ( cUNIQUE @ cP )
    | ( cWRH @ cJ ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_16]) ).

thf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( cJ = cP )
      | ( cP = X1 )
      | ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS )
      | ( cW @ cJ )
      | ~ ( cWRH @ X1 )
      | ~ ( cW @ X1 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_17]) ).

thf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( cJ = cP )
      | ( cP = X1 )
      | ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS )
      | ( cWRH @ cJ )
      | ~ ( cWRH @ X1 )
      | ~ ( cW @ X1 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_18]) ).

thf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( cJ = cP )
    | ( cLIKE @ cJ @ cP )
    | ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS )
    | ~ ( cWRH @ cJ )
    | ~ ( cW @ cJ )
    | ~ ( cUNIQUE @ cJ ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_12]) ).

thf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ( esk1_1
        @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ~ $true )
      = cP )
    | ( cJ = cP )
    | ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS )
    | ( cW @ cJ ) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).

thf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ( esk1_1
        @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ~ $true )
      = cP )
    | ( cJ = cP )
    | ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS )
    | ( cWRH @ cJ ) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).

thf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( cJ = cP )
    | ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS )
    | ( cLIKE @ cJ @ cP )
    | ~ ( cWRH @ cJ )
    | ~ ( cW @ cJ ) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_12]),c_0_11]) ).

thf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( cJ = cP )
    | ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS )
    | ( cLIKE @ cJ @ cP )
    | ( cW @ cJ ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_22]) ).

thf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( cJ = cP )
    | ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS )
    | ( cLIKE @ cJ @ cP )
    | ( cWRH @ cJ ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_23]) ).

thf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( cJ = cP )
    | ( cLIKE @ cJ @ cP )
    | ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS ) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26]) ).

thf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( cJ = cP )
    | ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS )
    | ( cLIKE @ cJ @ cJ )
    | ( cUNIQUE @ cP ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_16]) ).

thf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( cJ = cP )
    | ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS )
    | ~ ( cWRH @ cP )
    | ~ ( cW @ cP )
    | ~ ( cUNIQUE @ cP ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_27]) ).

thf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( cJ = cP )
    | ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS )
    | ( cW @ cJ )
    | ( cWRH @ cP ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_22]) ).

thf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( cJ = cP )
    | ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS )
    | ( cWRH @ cJ )
    | ( cW @ cP ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_23]) ).

thf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( cJ = cP )
      | ( cP = X1 )
      | ( cLIKE @ cJ @ cJ )
      | ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS )
      | ~ ( cWRH @ X1 )
      | ~ ( cW @ X1 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_28]) ).

thf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( cJ = cP )
    | ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS )
    | ( cW @ cJ ) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_17]),c_0_12]),c_0_30]) ).

thf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( cJ = cP )
    | ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS )
    | ( cWRH @ cJ ) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_18]),c_0_31]),c_0_12]) ).

thf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( cJ = cP )
    | ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS )
    | ( cLIKE @ cJ @ cJ ) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_34]) ).

thf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( cJ = cP )
    | ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS )
    | ~ ( cUNIQUE @ cJ ) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_35]),c_0_33]),c_0_34]) ).

thf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( cJ = cP )
    | ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS )
    | ( cUNIQUE @ cP ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_12]) ).

thf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: $i > $o] :
      ( ( cW @ ( esk1_1 @ X3 ) )
      | ( X3 @ cJ )
      | ~ ( X3 @ cP )
      | ~ ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( cJ = cP )
      | ( cP = X1 )
      | ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS )
      | ~ ( cWRH @ X1 )
      | ~ ( cW @ X1 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_37]) ).

thf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: $i > $o] :
      ( ( cWRH @ ( esk1_1 @ X3 ) )
      | ( X3 @ cJ )
      | ~ ( X3 @ cP )
      | ~ ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    cUNIQUE @ cS,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( cJ = cP )
    | ( cW
      @ ( esk1_1
        @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( Z0 != cJ ) ) )
    | ~ ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS ) ),
    inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]),c_0_38]) ).

thf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( cJ = cP )
    | ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS ) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_33]),c_0_34]) ).

thf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( cJ = cP )
    | ( cWRH
      @ ( esk1_1
        @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( Z0 != cJ ) ) )
    | ~ ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS ) ),
    inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]),c_0_40]) ).

thf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: $i > $o] :
      ( ( cLIKE @ cJ @ ( esk1_1 @ X3 ) )
      | ( X3 @ cJ )
      | ~ ( X3 @ cP )
      | ~ ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( cS = X1 )
      | ~ ( cWRH @ X1 )
      | ~ ( cW @ X1 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_41]) ).

thf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( cJ = cP )
    | ( cW
      @ ( esk1_1
        @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( Z0 != cJ ) ) ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43]) ).

thf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( cJ = cP )
    | ( cWRH
      @ ( esk1_1
        @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( Z0 != cJ ) ) ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_43]) ).

thf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( cJ = cP )
    | ( cLIKE @ cJ
      @ ( esk1_1
        @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( Z0 != cJ ) ) ) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]),c_0_45]),c_0_43]) ).

thf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ( esk1_1
        @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( Z0 != cJ ) )
      = cS )
    | ( cJ = cP ) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_47]),c_0_48]) ).

thf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( esk1_1 @ X3 )
        = cS )
      | ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS )
      | ( X3 @ cJ )
      | ( X3 @ cP ) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_9]),c_0_10]) ).

thf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( cJ = cP )
    | ( cLIKE @ cJ @ cS ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_50]) ).

thf(c_0_53,negated_conjecture,
    cWRH @ cS,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
    cW @ cS,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: $i > $o] :
      ( ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS )
      | ( cLIKE @ cJ @ cS )
      | ( X3 @ cJ )
      | ( X3 @ cP ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_51]) ).

thf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
    cJ = cP,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_52]),c_0_53]),c_0_54]),c_0_41])]) ).

thf(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: $i > $o] :
      ( ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS )
      | ( X3 @ cP ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_56]),c_0_56])]) ).

thf(c_0_58,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ~ ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS )
      | ~ ( cLIKE @ cP @ X1 )
      | ~ ( cWRH @ X1 )
      | ~ ( cW @ X1 )
      | ~ ( cUNIQUE @ X1 ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_56]) ).

thf(c_0_59,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( cS = cP )
    | ( cLIKE @ cP @ cS ) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_57]),c_0_57]) ).

thf(c_0_60,negated_conjecture,
    cS = cP,
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_58,c_0_59]),c_0_53]),c_0_54]),c_0_41])]),c_0_59]) ).

thf(c_0_61,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: $i > $o] :
      ( ( cLIKE @ cP @ cP )
      | ( X3 @ cP ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_60]) ).

thf(c_0_62,negated_conjecture,
    cLIKE @ cP @ cP,
    inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_61]) ).

thf(c_0_63,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ~ ( cLIKE @ cP @ X1 )
      | ~ ( cWRH @ X1 )
      | ~ ( cW @ X1 )
      | ~ ( cUNIQUE @ X1 ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_58,c_0_60]),c_0_62])]) ).

thf(c_0_64,negated_conjecture,
    cWRH @ cP,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_60]) ).

thf(c_0_65,negated_conjecture,
    cW @ cP,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_60]) ).

thf(c_0_66,negated_conjecture,
    cUNIQUE @ cP,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_60]) ).

thf(c_0_67,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_63,c_0_62]),c_0_64]),c_0_65]),c_0_66])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYO224^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.07/0.18  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.18  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.18  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.18  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.18  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.18  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.18  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.07/0.18  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 16:39:36 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.18  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.07/0.18  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.07/0.23  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.07/0.24  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.nr733LacEB/E---3.1_2351021.p
% 0.23/0.31  % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.23/0.31  % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
% 0.23/0.31  % Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.31  % Starting post_as_ho12 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.31  % Starting new_bool_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.31  % Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.31  % Starting post_as_ho4 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.31  % Starting post_as_ho2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.31  % Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.31  % Starting full_lambda_10 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.31  % Starting new_ho_8 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.31  % ehoh_best2_full_lfho with pid 2351057 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.31  % Result found by ehoh_best2_full_lfho
% 0.23/0.31  % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
% 0.23/0.31  % Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.31  % Starting post_as_ho12 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.31  % Starting new_bool_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.31  % Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.31  % Starting post_as_ho4 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.31  % Starting post_as_ho2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.31  % Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.31  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.23/0.31  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.23/0.31  % Search class: HGHSF-FFSS11-SSSFFMBN
% 0.23/0.31  % partial match(1): HGHSF-FFSF11-SSSFFMBN
% 0.23/0.31  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.31  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.31  % SubtermCWHack with pid 2351062 completed with status 10
% 0.23/0.31  % Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 31s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.31  % ehoh_best2_full_lfho with pid 2351075 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.31  % Result found by ehoh_best2_full_lfho
% 0.23/0.31  % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
% 0.23/0.31  % Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.31  % Starting post_as_ho12 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.31  % Starting new_bool_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.31  % Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.31  % Starting post_as_ho4 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.31  % Starting post_as_ho2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.31  % Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.31  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.23/0.31  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.23/0.31  % Search class: HGHSF-FFSS11-SSSFFMBN
% 0.23/0.31  % partial match(1): HGHSF-FFSF11-SSSFFMBN
% 0.23/0.31  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.31  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.31  % SubtermCWHack with pid 2351062 completed with status 10
% 0.23/0.31  % Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 31s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.31  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.23/0.31  
% 0.23/0.31  % Proof found!
% 0.23/0.31  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/0.31  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.31  % Parsed axioms                        : 8
% 0.23/0.31  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.23/0.31  % Initial clauses                      : 21
% 0.23/0.31  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 7
% 0.23/0.31  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 14
% 0.23/0.31  % Processed clauses                    : 156
% 0.23/0.31  % ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 0.23/0.31  % ...subsumed                          : 37
% 0.23/0.31  % ...remaining for further processing  : 117
% 0.23/0.31  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 16
% 0.23/0.31  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.23/0.31  % Backward-subsumed                    : 56
% 0.23/0.31  % Backward-rewritten                   : 48
% 0.23/0.31  % Generated clauses                    : 454
% 0.23/0.31  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 356
% 0.23/0.31  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.23/0.31  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 33
% 0.23/0.31  % Paramodulations                      : 340
% 0.23/0.31  % Factorizations                       : 2
% 0.23/0.31  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.23/0.31  % Equation resolutions                 : 18
% 0.23/0.31  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.23/0.31  % Total rewrite steps                  : 150
% 0.23/0.31  % ...of those cached                   : 141
% 0.23/0.31  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.23/0.31  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.23/0.31  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.23/0.31  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.23/0.31  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.23/0.31  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.23/0.31  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.23/0.31  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.23/0.31  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.23/0.31  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.23/0.31  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.23/0.31  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.23/0.31  % Current number of processed clauses  : 9
% 0.23/0.31  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 6
% 0.23/0.31  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/0.31  %    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.23/0.31  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 3
% 0.23/0.31  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 163
% 0.23/0.31  % ...number of literals in the above   : 870
% 0.23/0.31  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.23/0.31  % Current number of archived clauses   : 108
% 0.23/0.31  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 539
% 0.23/0.31  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 217
% 0.23/0.31  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 125
% 0.23/0.31  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.23/0.31  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.23/0.31  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 3
% 0.23/0.31  % BW rewrite match successes           : 3
% 0.23/0.31  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.23/0.31  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.23/0.31  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 10522
% 0.23/0.31  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 298
% 0.23/0.31  
% 0.23/0.31  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.31  % User time                : 0.030 s
% 0.23/0.31  % System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.23/0.31  % Total time               : 0.033 s
% 0.23/0.31  % Maximum resident set size: 3636 pages
% 0.23/0.31  
% 0.23/0.31  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.31  % User time                : 0.032 s
% 0.23/0.31  % System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.23/0.31  % Total time               : 0.038 s
% 0.23/0.31  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.23/0.31  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------