↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SYO225^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:45:26 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 4.55s 2.45s
% Output   : Refutation 4.55s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    4 (   1 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   10 (   9 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  302 (   2   ~;   0   |;  57   &; 204   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  39  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   30 (  21 avg)
%            Number of types       :    4 (   3 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   49 (  49   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    2 (   0 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   93 (   0   ^;  93   !;   0   ?;  93   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(g_type,type,
    g: $tType ).

thf(b_type,type,
    b: $tType ).

thf(a_type,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ! [A: g > b,B: b > a,C: g > $o,D: g > g > g,E: b > $o,F: b > b > b,G: g > b,H: b > a,I: g > $o,J: g > g > g,K: b > $o,L: b > b > b,M: a > $o,N: a > a > a] :
      ( ( ! [O: g,P: g] :
            ( ( ( I @ O )
              & ( I @ P ) )
           => ( I @ ( J @ O @ P ) ) )
        & ! [O: g] :
            ( ( I @ O )
           => ( K @ ( G @ O ) ) )
        & ! [O: g] :
            ( ( I @ O )
           => ( K @ ( G @ O ) ) )
        & ! [O: g] :
            ( ( I @ O )
           => ( K @ ( G @ O ) ) )
        & ! [O: g,P: g] :
            ( ( ( I @ O )
              & ( I @ P ) )
           => ( ( G @ ( J @ O @ P ) )
              = ( L @ ( G @ O ) @ ( G @ P ) ) ) )
        & ! [O: a,P: a] :
            ( ( ( M @ O )
              & ( M @ P ) )
           => ( M @ ( N @ O @ P ) ) )
        & ! [O: b] :
            ( ( K @ O )
           => ( M @ ( H @ O ) ) )
        & ! [O: b,P: b] :
            ( ( ( K @ O )
              & ( K @ P ) )
           => ( ( H @ ( L @ O @ P ) )
              = ( N @ ( H @ O ) @ ( H @ P ) ) ) ) )
     => ( ! [O: g,P: g] :
            ( ( ( I @ O )
              & ( I @ P ) )
           => ( I @ ( J @ O @ P ) ) )
        & ! [O: a,P: a] :
            ( ( ( M @ O )
              & ( M @ P ) )
           => ( M @ ( N @ O @ P ) ) )
        & ! [O: g] :
            ( ( I @ O )
           => ( M @ ( H @ ( G @ O ) ) ) )
        & ! [O: g,P: g] :
            ( ( ( I @ O )
              & ( I @ P )
              & ( I @ O )
              & ( I @ P ) )
           => ( ( H @ ( G @ ( J @ O @ P ) ) )
              = ( N @ ( H @ ( G @ O ) ) @ ( H @ ( G @ P ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cTHM126_CORRECTED_pme) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: g > b,B: b > a,C: g > $o,D: g > g > g,E: b > $o,F: b > b > b,G: g > b,H: b > a,I: g > $o,J: g > g > g,K: b > $o,L: b > b > b,M: a > $o,N: a > a > a] :
        ( ( ! [O: g,P: g] :
              ( ( ( I @ O )
                & ( I @ P ) )
             => ( I @ ( J @ O @ P ) ) )
          & ! [O: g] :
              ( ( I @ O )
             => ( K @ ( G @ O ) ) )
          & ! [O: g] :
              ( ( I @ O )
             => ( K @ ( G @ O ) ) )
          & ! [O: g] :
              ( ( I @ O )
             => ( K @ ( G @ O ) ) )
          & ! [O: g,P: g] :
              ( ( ( I @ O )
                & ( I @ P ) )
             => ( ( G @ ( J @ O @ P ) )
                = ( L @ ( G @ O ) @ ( G @ P ) ) ) )
          & ! [O: a,P: a] :
              ( ( ( M @ O )
                & ( M @ P ) )
             => ( M @ ( N @ O @ P ) ) )
          & ! [O: b] :
              ( ( K @ O )
             => ( M @ ( H @ O ) ) )
          & ! [O: b,P: b] :
              ( ( ( K @ O )
                & ( K @ P ) )
             => ( ( H @ ( L @ O @ P ) )
                = ( N @ ( H @ O ) @ ( H @ P ) ) ) ) )
       => ( ! [O: g,P: g] :
              ( ( ( I @ O )
                & ( I @ P ) )
             => ( I @ ( J @ O @ P ) ) )
          & ! [O: a,P: a] :
              ( ( ( M @ O )
                & ( M @ P ) )
             => ( M @ ( N @ O @ P ) ) )
          & ! [O: g] :
              ( ( I @ O )
             => ( M @ ( H @ ( G @ O ) ) ) )
          & ! [O: g,P: g] :
              ( ( ( I @ O )
                & ( I @ P )
                & ( I @ O )
                & ( I @ P ) )
             => ( ( H @ ( G @ ( J @ O @ P ) ) )
                = ( N @ ( H @ ( G @ O ) ) @ ( H @ ( G @ P ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ~ ! [A: g > b,B: b > a,C: g > $o,D: g > g > g,E: b > $o,F: b > b > b,G: a > $o,H: a > a > a] :
        ( ( ! [I: g,J: g] :
              ( ( ( C @ I )
                & ( C @ J ) )
             => ( C @ ( D @ I @ J ) ) )
          & ! [I: g] :
              ( ( C @ I )
             => ( E @ ( A @ I ) ) )
          & ! [I: g] :
              ( ( C @ I )
             => ( E @ ( A @ I ) ) )
          & ! [I: g] :
              ( ( C @ I )
             => ( E @ ( A @ I ) ) )
          & ! [I: g,J: g] :
              ( ( ( C @ I )
                & ( C @ J ) )
             => ( ( A @ ( D @ I @ J ) )
                = ( F @ ( A @ I ) @ ( A @ J ) ) ) )
          & ! [I: a,J: a] :
              ( ( ( G @ I )
                & ( G @ J ) )
             => ( G @ ( H @ I @ J ) ) )
          & ! [I: b] :
              ( ( E @ I )
             => ( G @ ( B @ I ) ) )
          & ! [I: b,J: b] :
              ( ( ( E @ I )
                & ( E @ J ) )
             => ( ( B @ ( F @ I @ J ) )
                = ( H @ ( B @ I ) @ ( B @ J ) ) ) ) )
       => ( ! [I: g,J: g] :
              ( ( ( C @ I )
                & ( C @ J ) )
             => ( C @ ( D @ I @ J ) ) )
          & ! [I: a,J: a] :
              ( ( ( G @ I )
                & ( G @ J ) )
             => ( G @ ( H @ I @ J ) ) )
          & ! [I: g] :
              ( ( C @ I )
             => ( G @ ( B @ ( A @ I ) ) ) )
          & ! [I: g,J: g] :
              ( ( ( C @ I )
                & ( C @ J )
                & ( C @ I )
                & ( C @ J ) )
             => ( ( B @ ( A @ ( D @ I @ J ) ) )
                = ( H @ ( B @ ( A @ I ) ) @ ( B @ ( A @ J ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(36,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SYO225^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.09/0.21  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.21  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.21  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.21  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.21  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.21  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.21  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.21  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 16:40:01 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.22  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.22  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.89/0.80  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.25/1.01  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (206ms). 
% 1.25/1.02  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.17/1.44  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.17/1.45  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.41/1.57  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.62/1.62  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.62/1.63  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.62/1.63  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.62/1.64  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 4.55/2.44  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 4.55/2.44  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 4.55/2.44  % Time passed: 2081ms (effective reasoning time: 1416ms)
% 4.55/2.44  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 4.55/2.45  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 4.55/2.45  % No. of inferences in proof: 4
% 4.55/2.45  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2081 ms resp. 1416 ms w/o parsing
% 4.55/2.49  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.55/2.49  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------