↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SYO226^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:45:26 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.45s 1.92s
% Output   : Refutation 3.45s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (  11 unt;   0 typ;   3 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   21 (  20 equ;   4 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   69 (  12   ~;   4   |;   1   &;  42   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  10  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   16 (  16   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    6 (   3 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   23 (   1   ^;  19   !;   0   ?;  23   :)
%                                         (   0  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   3  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(sk1_decl,type,
    sk1: $i ).

thf(sk2_decl,type,
    sk2: $i ).

thf(sk3_decl,type,
    sk3: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $i ).

thf(sk1_def,definition,
    ( sk1
    = ( @+[A: $i] :
          ~ ! [B: $i] :
              ( ! [C: $i > $i > $o] :
                  ( ! [D: $i] : ( C @ D @ D )
                 => ( C @ A @ B ) )
             => ( A = B ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk2_def,definition,
    ( sk2
    = ( @+[A: $i] :
          ~ ( ! [B: $i > $i > $o] :
                ( ! [C: $i] : ( B @ C @ C )
               => ( B @ sk1 @ A ) )
           => ( sk1 = A ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk3_def,definition,
    ( sk3
    = ( ^ [A: $i > $i > $o] :
        @+[B: $i] :
          ~ ( A @ B @ B ) ) ) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ! [C: $i > $i > $o] :
          ( ! [D: $i] : ( C @ D @ D )
         => ( C @ A @ B ) )
     => ( A = B ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cTHM47B) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ! [C: $i > $i > $o] :
            ( ! [D: $i] : ( C @ D @ D )
           => ( C @ A @ B ) )
       => ( A = B ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ! [C: $i > $i > $o] :
            ( ! [D: $i] : ( C @ D @ D )
           => ( C @ A @ B ) )
       => ( A = B ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( ~ ( A @ ( sk3 @ A ) @ ( sk3 @ A ) )
        | ( A @ sk1 @ sk2 ) )
      & ( sk1 != sk2 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[3]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ~ ( A @ ( sk3 @ A ) @ ( sk3 @ A ) )
      | ( A @ sk1 @ sk2 ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ( ( ( sk3 @ ( (=) @ $i ) )
     != ( sk3 @ ( (=) @ $i ) ) )
    | ( sk1 = sk2 ) ),
    inference(replace_andrewseq,[status(thm)],[5:[bind(A,$thf( (=) @ $i ))]]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ( ( ( sk3 @ ( (=) @ $i ) )
     != ( sk3 @ ( (=) @ $i ) ) )
    | ( sk2 = sk1 ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    sk2 = sk1,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    sk1 != sk2,
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    sk2 != sk1,
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simplifyReflect,[status(thm)],[10,8]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYO226^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.09/0.22  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.22  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.22  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.22  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.22  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.22  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.22  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.22  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 16:35:37 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.22  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.22  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.96/0.71  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.17/0.88  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (167ms). 
% 1.17/0.89  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.84/1.29  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.07/1.30  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.23/1.40  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.23/1.43  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.23/1.44  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.23/1.44  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.23/1.44  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.45/1.92  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.45/1.92  % Time passed: 1512ms (effective reasoning time: 1021ms)
% 3.45/1.92  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.45/1.92  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 3.45/1.92  % No. of inferences in proof: 11
% 3.45/1.92  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1512 ms resp. 1021 ms w/o parsing
% 3.45/1.98  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.45/1.98  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------