↑ Up

cocATP---0.2.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : cocATP---0.2.0
% Problem  : SYO234^5 : TPTP v7.5.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 0s
% DateTime : Tue Mar 29 00:50:58 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.71s 0.88s
% Output   : Proof 0.71s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : SYO234^5 : TPTP v7.5.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.11  % Command    : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.32  % Computer   : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32  % Model      : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPUModel   : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32  % RAMPerCPU  : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32  % OS         : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % DateTime   : Fri Mar 11 20:27:52 EST 2022
% 0.12/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.18/0.33  ModuleCmd_Load.c(213):ERROR:105: Unable to locate a modulefile for 'python/python27'
% 0.18/0.34  Python 2.7.5
% 0.71/0.88  Using paths ['/home/cristobal/cocATP/CASC/TPTP/', '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/', '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/']
% 0.71/0.88  FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x19d7998>, <kernel.Type object at 0x19d70e0>) of role type named d_type
% 0.71/0.88  Using role type
% 0.71/0.88  Declaring d:Type
% 0.71/0.88  FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x19d8cf8>, <kernel.Type object at 0x19d7050>) of role type named c_type
% 0.71/0.88  Using role type
% 0.71/0.88  Declaring c:Type
% 0.71/0.88  FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x19d7d88>, <kernel.DependentProduct object at 0x19d7d40>) of role type named cB
% 0.71/0.88  Using role type
% 0.71/0.88  Declaring cB:(d->(c->Prop))
% 0.71/0.88  FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x19d7b90>, <kernel.DependentProduct object at 0x19d7950>) of role type named cA
% 0.71/0.88  Using role type
% 0.71/0.88  Declaring cA:(c->(d->Prop))
% 0.71/0.88  FOF formula ((ex (c->(d->Prop))) (fun (Xu:(c->(d->Prop)))=> (((eq (c->(d->Prop))) Xu) (fun (Xx:c) (Xy:d)=> ((or ((cA Xx) Xy)) ((cB Xy) Xx)))))) of role conjecture named cSV4
% 0.71/0.88  Conjecture to prove = ((ex (c->(d->Prop))) (fun (Xu:(c->(d->Prop)))=> (((eq (c->(d->Prop))) Xu) (fun (Xx:c) (Xy:d)=> ((or ((cA Xx) Xy)) ((cB Xy) Xx)))))):Prop
% 0.71/0.88  Parameter d_DUMMY:d.
% 0.71/0.88  Parameter c_DUMMY:c.
% 0.71/0.88  We need to prove ['((ex (c->(d->Prop))) (fun (Xu:(c->(d->Prop)))=> (((eq (c->(d->Prop))) Xu) (fun (Xx:c) (Xy:d)=> ((or ((cA Xx) Xy)) ((cB Xy) Xx))))))']
% 0.71/0.88  Parameter d:Type.
% 0.71/0.88  Parameter c:Type.
% 0.71/0.88  Parameter cB:(d->(c->Prop)).
% 0.71/0.88  Parameter cA:(c->(d->Prop)).
% 0.71/0.88  Trying to prove ((ex (c->(d->Prop))) (fun (Xu:(c->(d->Prop)))=> (((eq (c->(d->Prop))) Xu) (fun (Xx:c) (Xy:d)=> ((or ((cA Xx) Xy)) ((cB Xy) Xx))))))
% 0.71/0.88  Found eq_ref00:=(eq_ref0 x):(((eq (c->(d->Prop))) x) x)
% 0.71/0.88  Found (eq_ref0 x) as proof of (((eq (c->(d->Prop))) x) (fun (Xx:c) (Xy:d)=> ((or ((cA Xx) Xy)) ((cB Xy) Xx))))
% 0.71/0.88  Found ((eq_ref (c->(d->Prop))) x) as proof of (((eq (c->(d->Prop))) x) (fun (Xx:c) (Xy:d)=> ((or ((cA Xx) Xy)) ((cB Xy) Xx))))
% 0.71/0.88  Found ((eq_ref (c->(d->Prop))) x) as proof of (((eq (c->(d->Prop))) x) (fun (Xx:c) (Xy:d)=> ((or ((cA Xx) Xy)) ((cB Xy) Xx))))
% 0.71/0.88  Found ((eq_ref (c->(d->Prop))) x) as proof of (((eq (c->(d->Prop))) x) (fun (Xx:c) (Xy:d)=> ((or ((cA Xx) Xy)) ((cB Xy) Xx))))
% 0.71/0.88  Found (ex_intro000 ((eq_ref (c->(d->Prop))) x)) as proof of ((ex (c->(d->Prop))) (fun (Xu:(c->(d->Prop)))=> (((eq (c->(d->Prop))) Xu) (fun (Xx:c) (Xy:d)=> ((or ((cA Xx) Xy)) ((cB Xy) Xx))))))
% 0.71/0.88  Found ((ex_intro00 (fun (Xx:c) (Xy:d)=> ((or ((cA Xx) Xy)) ((cB Xy) Xx)))) ((eq_ref (c->(d->Prop))) (fun (Xx:c) (Xy:d)=> ((or ((cA Xx) Xy)) ((cB Xy) Xx))))) as proof of ((ex (c->(d->Prop))) (fun (Xu:(c->(d->Prop)))=> (((eq (c->(d->Prop))) Xu) (fun (Xx:c) (Xy:d)=> ((or ((cA Xx) Xy)) ((cB Xy) Xx))))))
% 0.71/0.88  Found (((ex_intro0 (fun (Xu:(c->(d->Prop)))=> (((eq (c->(d->Prop))) Xu) (fun (Xx:c) (Xy:d)=> ((or ((cA Xx) Xy)) ((cB Xy) Xx)))))) (fun (Xx:c) (Xy:d)=> ((or ((cA Xx) Xy)) ((cB Xy) Xx)))) ((eq_ref (c->(d->Prop))) (fun (Xx:c) (Xy:d)=> ((or ((cA Xx) Xy)) ((cB Xy) Xx))))) as proof of ((ex (c->(d->Prop))) (fun (Xu:(c->(d->Prop)))=> (((eq (c->(d->Prop))) Xu) (fun (Xx:c) (Xy:d)=> ((or ((cA Xx) Xy)) ((cB Xy) Xx))))))
% 0.71/0.88  Found ((((ex_intro (c->(d->Prop))) (fun (Xu:(c->(d->Prop)))=> (((eq (c->(d->Prop))) Xu) (fun (Xx:c) (Xy:d)=> ((or ((cA Xx) Xy)) ((cB Xy) Xx)))))) (fun (Xx:c) (Xy:d)=> ((or ((cA Xx) Xy)) ((cB Xy) Xx)))) ((eq_ref (c->(d->Prop))) (fun (Xx:c) (Xy:d)=> ((or ((cA Xx) Xy)) ((cB Xy) Xx))))) as proof of ((ex (c->(d->Prop))) (fun (Xu:(c->(d->Prop)))=> (((eq (c->(d->Prop))) Xu) (fun (Xx:c) (Xy:d)=> ((or ((cA Xx) Xy)) ((cB Xy) Xx))))))
% 0.71/0.88  Found ((((ex_intro (c->(d->Prop))) (fun (Xu:(c->(d->Prop)))=> (((eq (c->(d->Prop))) Xu) (fun (Xx:c) (Xy:d)=> ((or ((cA Xx) Xy)) ((cB Xy) Xx)))))) (fun (Xx:c) (Xy:d)=> ((or ((cA Xx) Xy)) ((cB Xy) Xx)))) ((eq_ref (c->(d->Prop))) (fun (Xx:c) (Xy:d)=> ((or ((cA Xx) Xy)) ((cB Xy) Xx))))) as proof of ((ex (c->(d->Prop))) (fun (Xu:(c->(d->Prop)))=> (((eq (c->(d->Prop))) Xu) (fun (Xx:c) (Xy:d)=> ((or ((cA Xx) Xy)) ((cB Xy) Xx))))))
% 0.71/0.88  Got proof ((((ex_intro (c->(d->Prop))) (fun (Xu:(c->(d->Prop)))=> (((eq (c->(d->Prop))) Xu) (fun (Xx:c) (Xy:d)=> ((or ((cA Xx) Xy)) ((cB Xy) Xx)))))) (fun (Xx:c) (Xy:d)=> ((or ((cA Xx) Xy)) ((cB Xy) Xx)))) ((eq_ref (c->(d->Prop))) (fun (Xx:c) (Xy:d)=> ((or ((cA Xx) Xy)) ((cB Xy) Xx)))))
% 0.71/0.88  Time elapsed = 0.257299s
% 0.71/0.88  node=48 cost=43.000000 depth=8
% 0.71/0.88  ::::::::::::::::::::::
% 0.71/0.88  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.71/0.88  % SZS output start Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.71/0.88  ((((ex_intro (c->(d->Prop))) (fun (Xu:(c->(d->Prop)))=> (((eq (c->(d->Prop))) Xu) (fun (Xx:c) (Xy:d)=> ((or ((cA Xx) Xy)) ((cB Xy) Xx)))))) (fun (Xx:c) (Xy:d)=> ((or ((cA Xx) Xy)) ((cB Xy) Xx)))) ((eq_ref (c->(d->Prop))) (fun (Xx:c) (Xy:d)=> ((or ((cA Xx) Xy)) ((cB Xy) Xx)))))
% 0.71/0.88  % SZS output end Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------