↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SYO236^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:45:27 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.61s 2.16s
% Output   : Refutation 3.78s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (   7 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   23 (  22 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   62 (  11   ~;  12   |;   1   &;  32   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   2 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   10 (  10   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    6 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   14 (   0   ^;  14   !;   0   ?;  14   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(b_type,type,
    b: $tType ).

thf(a_type,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(g_decl,type,
    g: b > a ).

thf(f_decl,type,
    f: b > a ).

thf(sk1_decl,type,
    sk1: b ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ( ( ! [A: ( b > a ) > $o] :
          ( ( A @ f )
         => ( A @ g ) )
      | ! [A: b] :
          ( ( f @ A )
          = ( g @ A ) ) )
   => ( f = g ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cTHM504) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( ! [A: ( b > a ) > $o] :
            ( ( A @ f )
           => ( A @ g ) )
        | ! [A: b] :
            ( ( f @ A )
            = ( g @ A ) ) )
     => ( f = g ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ~ ( ( ! [A: ( b > a ) > $o] :
            ( ( A @ f )
           => ( A @ g ) )
        | ! [A: b] :
            ( ( f @ A )
            = ( g @ A ) ) )
     => ( f = g ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ! [B: b,A: ( b > a ) > $o] :
      ( ( ~ ( A @ f )
        | ( A @ g )
        | ( ( f @ B )
          = ( g @ B ) ) )
      & ( f != g ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[3]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    f != g,
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    f != g,
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ( ( f @ sk1 )
   != ( g @ sk1 ) ),
    inference(func_ext,[status(esa)],[9]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ! [B: b,A: ( b > a ) > $o] :
      ( ~ ( A @ f )
      | ( A @ g )
      | ( ( f @ B )
        = ( g @ B ) ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ! [A: b] :
      ( ( f != f )
      | ( f = g )
      | ( ( f @ A )
        = ( g @ A ) ) ),
    inference(replace_leibeq,[status(thm)],[5:[bind(A,$thf( (=) @ ( b > a ) @ f ))]]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ! [A: b] :
      ( ( f != f )
      | ( f = g )
      | ( ( f @ A )
        = ( g @ A ) ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ! [A: b] :
      ( ( f = g )
      | ( ( f @ A )
        = ( g @ A ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ! [A: b] :
      ( ( f @ A )
      = ( g @ A ) ),
    inference(simplifyReflect,[status(thm)],[11,9]) ).

thf(16,plain,
    ( ( g @ sk1 )
   != ( g @ sk1 ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[12,13]) ).

thf(17,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYO236^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.10/0.22  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.22  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.22  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.22  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.22  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.22  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.22  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.22  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 16:46:21 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.22  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.22  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.05/0.80  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.24/0.99  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (183ms). 
% 1.24/1.00  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.04/1.40  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.04/1.41  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.22/1.50  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.22/1.54  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.22/1.54  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.22/1.54  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.22/1.55  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.37/2.15  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.61/2.15  % Time passed: 1793ms (effective reasoning time: 1140ms)
% 3.61/2.15  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.61/2.15  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 3.61/2.15  % No. of inferences in proof: 14
% 3.61/2.16  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1793 ms resp. 1140 ms w/o parsing
% 3.78/2.20  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.78/2.20  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------