↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SYO249^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:45:28 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.71s 1.70s
% Output   : Refutation 3.71s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    4 (   1 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  232 (  42 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   65 (  58 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  425 (   2   ~;   0   |;  90   &; 294   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  39  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   28 (  21 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    3 (   3   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   13 (  11 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   75 (   0   ^;  72   !;   3   ?;  75   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(cBIGPHI_decl,type,
    cBIGPHI: $i > $i ).

thf(cHOM_FROM_HH_1_decl,type,
    cHOM_FROM_HH_1: ( $i > $i ) > $o ).

thf(cPHI_2_decl,type,
    cPHI_2: $i > $i ).

thf(cHOM_FROM_SS_PRIME_decl,type,
    cHOM_FROM_SS_PRIME: ( $i > $i ) > $o ).

thf(cPHI_1_decl,type,
    cPHI_1: $i > $i ).

thf(cSS_PRIME_decl,type,
    cSS_PRIME: $i > $o ).

thf(el1_decl,type,
    el1: $i > ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(cHH_1_decl,type,
    cHH_1: $i > $o ).

thf(cBIGHI_decl,type,
    cBIGHI: $i > $i ).

thf(cHH_2_decl,type,
    cHH_2: $i > $o ).

thf(cTIMES_decl,type,
    cTIMES: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
          ( ( ( el1 @ A @ cHH_2 )
            & ( el1 @ B @ cHH_2 )
            & ( el1 @ C @ cHH_2 )
            & ( el1 @ D @ cHH_2 )
            & ( A = B )
            & ( C = D ) )
         => ( ( cTIMES @ A @ C )
            = ( cTIMES @ B @ D ) ) )
      & ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
          ( ( ( el1 @ A @ cSS_PRIME )
            & ( el1 @ B @ cSS_PRIME ) )
         => ( el1 @ ( cTIMES @ A @ B ) @ cSS_PRIME ) )
      & ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
          ( ( ( el1 @ A @ cHH_1 )
            & ( el1 @ B @ cHH_1 )
            & ( el1 @ C @ cHH_1 )
            & ( el1 @ D @ cHH_1 )
            & ( A = B )
            & ( C = D ) )
         => ( ( cTIMES @ A @ C )
            = ( cTIMES @ B @ D ) ) )
      & ! [A: $i > $i] :
          ( ( cHOM_FROM_SS_PRIME @ A )
          = ( ! [B: $i,C: $i] :
                ( ( ( el1 @ B @ cSS_PRIME )
                  & ( el1 @ C @ cSS_PRIME ) )
               => ( ( A @ ( cTIMES @ B @ C ) )
                  = ( cTIMES @ ( A @ B ) @ ( A @ C ) ) ) ) ) )
      & ( ( cHOM_FROM_HH_1 @ cBIGPHI )
        = ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
              ( ( ( el1 @ A @ cHH_1 )
                & ( el1 @ B @ cHH_1 ) )
             => ( ( cBIGPHI @ ( cTIMES @ A @ B ) )
                = ( cTIMES @ ( cBIGPHI @ A ) @ ( cBIGPHI @ B ) ) ) ) ) )
      & ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
          ( ( ( el1 @ A @ cHH_1 )
            & ( el1 @ B @ cHH_1 ) )
         => ( el1 @ ( cTIMES @ A @ B ) @ cHH_1 ) )
      & ! [A: $i] :
          ( ( el1 @ A @ cSS_PRIME )
         => ( el1 @ ( cPHI_2 @ A ) @ cHH_2 ) )
      & ! [A: $i] :
          ( ( el1 @ A @ cHH_1 )
         => ( el1 @ ( cBIGPHI @ A ) @ cHH_2 ) )
      & ! [A: $i] :
          ( ( el1 @ A @ cSS_PRIME )
         => ( el1 @ ( cPHI_1 @ A ) @ cHH_1 ) )
      & ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
          ( ( ( el1 @ A @ cHH_1 )
            & ( el1 @ B @ cHH_1 )
            & ( A = B ) )
         => ( ( cBIGHI @ A )
            = ( cBIGPHI @ B ) ) )
      & ! [A: $i] :
          ( ( el1 @ A @ cSS_PRIME )
         => ( ( cBIGPHI @ ( cPHI_1 @ A ) )
            = ( cPHI_2 @ A ) ) )
      & ! [A: $i] :
          ( ( el1 @ A @ cHH_1 )
         => ? [B: $i] :
              ( ( el1 @ B @ cSS_PRIME )
              & ( ( cPHI_1 @ B )
                = A ) ) )
      & ( cHOM_FROM_SS_PRIME @ cPHI_1 )
      & ( cHOM_FROM_SS_PRIME @ cPHI_2 ) )
   => ( cHOM_FROM_HH_1 @ cBIGPHI ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cPROB757) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
            ( ( ( el1 @ A @ cHH_2 )
              & ( el1 @ B @ cHH_2 )
              & ( el1 @ C @ cHH_2 )
              & ( el1 @ D @ cHH_2 )
              & ( A = B )
              & ( C = D ) )
           => ( ( cTIMES @ A @ C )
              = ( cTIMES @ B @ D ) ) )
        & ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
            ( ( ( el1 @ A @ cSS_PRIME )
              & ( el1 @ B @ cSS_PRIME ) )
           => ( el1 @ ( cTIMES @ A @ B ) @ cSS_PRIME ) )
        & ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
            ( ( ( el1 @ A @ cHH_1 )
              & ( el1 @ B @ cHH_1 )
              & ( el1 @ C @ cHH_1 )
              & ( el1 @ D @ cHH_1 )
              & ( A = B )
              & ( C = D ) )
           => ( ( cTIMES @ A @ C )
              = ( cTIMES @ B @ D ) ) )
        & ! [A: $i > $i] :
            ( ( cHOM_FROM_SS_PRIME @ A )
            = ( ! [B: $i,C: $i] :
                  ( ( ( el1 @ B @ cSS_PRIME )
                    & ( el1 @ C @ cSS_PRIME ) )
                 => ( ( A @ ( cTIMES @ B @ C ) )
                    = ( cTIMES @ ( A @ B ) @ ( A @ C ) ) ) ) ) )
        & ( ( cHOM_FROM_HH_1 @ cBIGPHI )
          = ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
                ( ( ( el1 @ A @ cHH_1 )
                  & ( el1 @ B @ cHH_1 ) )
               => ( ( cBIGPHI @ ( cTIMES @ A @ B ) )
                  = ( cTIMES @ ( cBIGPHI @ A ) @ ( cBIGPHI @ B ) ) ) ) ) )
        & ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
            ( ( ( el1 @ A @ cHH_1 )
              & ( el1 @ B @ cHH_1 ) )
           => ( el1 @ ( cTIMES @ A @ B ) @ cHH_1 ) )
        & ! [A: $i] :
            ( ( el1 @ A @ cSS_PRIME )
           => ( el1 @ ( cPHI_2 @ A ) @ cHH_2 ) )
        & ! [A: $i] :
            ( ( el1 @ A @ cHH_1 )
           => ( el1 @ ( cBIGPHI @ A ) @ cHH_2 ) )
        & ! [A: $i] :
            ( ( el1 @ A @ cSS_PRIME )
           => ( el1 @ ( cPHI_1 @ A ) @ cHH_1 ) )
        & ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
            ( ( ( el1 @ A @ cHH_1 )
              & ( el1 @ B @ cHH_1 )
              & ( A = B ) )
           => ( ( cBIGHI @ A )
              = ( cBIGPHI @ B ) ) )
        & ! [A: $i] :
            ( ( el1 @ A @ cSS_PRIME )
           => ( ( cBIGPHI @ ( cPHI_1 @ A ) )
              = ( cPHI_2 @ A ) ) )
        & ! [A: $i] :
            ( ( el1 @ A @ cHH_1 )
           => ? [B: $i] :
                ( ( el1 @ B @ cSS_PRIME )
                & ( ( cPHI_1 @ B )
                  = A ) ) )
        & ( cHOM_FROM_SS_PRIME @ cPHI_1 )
        & ( cHOM_FROM_SS_PRIME @ cPHI_2 ) )
     => ( cHOM_FROM_HH_1 @ cBIGPHI ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ~ ( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
            ( ( ( el1 @ A @ cHH_2 )
              & ( el1 @ B @ cHH_2 )
              & ( el1 @ C @ cHH_2 )
              & ( el1 @ D @ cHH_2 )
              & ( A = B )
              & ( C = D ) )
           => ( ( cTIMES @ A @ C )
              = ( cTIMES @ B @ D ) ) )
        & ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
            ( ( ( el1 @ A @ cSS_PRIME )
              & ( el1 @ B @ cSS_PRIME ) )
           => ( el1 @ ( cTIMES @ A @ B ) @ cSS_PRIME ) )
        & ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
            ( ( ( el1 @ A @ cHH_1 )
              & ( el1 @ B @ cHH_1 )
              & ( el1 @ C @ cHH_1 )
              & ( el1 @ D @ cHH_1 )
              & ( A = B )
              & ( C = D ) )
           => ( ( cTIMES @ A @ C )
              = ( cTIMES @ B @ D ) ) )
        & ! [A: $i > $i] :
            ( ( cHOM_FROM_SS_PRIME @ A )
            = ( ! [B: $i,C: $i] :
                  ( ( ( el1 @ B @ cSS_PRIME )
                    & ( el1 @ C @ cSS_PRIME ) )
                 => ( ( A @ ( cTIMES @ B @ C ) )
                    = ( cTIMES @ ( A @ B ) @ ( A @ C ) ) ) ) ) )
        & ( ( cHOM_FROM_HH_1 @ cBIGPHI )
          = ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
                ( ( ( el1 @ A @ cHH_1 )
                  & ( el1 @ B @ cHH_1 ) )
               => ( ( cBIGPHI @ ( cTIMES @ A @ B ) )
                  = ( cTIMES @ ( cBIGPHI @ A ) @ ( cBIGPHI @ B ) ) ) ) ) )
        & ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
            ( ( ( el1 @ A @ cHH_1 )
              & ( el1 @ B @ cHH_1 ) )
           => ( el1 @ ( cTIMES @ A @ B ) @ cHH_1 ) )
        & ! [A: $i] :
            ( ( el1 @ A @ cSS_PRIME )
           => ( el1 @ ( cPHI_2 @ A ) @ cHH_2 ) )
        & ! [A: $i] :
            ( ( el1 @ A @ cHH_1 )
           => ( el1 @ ( cBIGPHI @ A ) @ cHH_2 ) )
        & ! [A: $i] :
            ( ( el1 @ A @ cSS_PRIME )
           => ( el1 @ ( cPHI_1 @ A ) @ cHH_1 ) )
        & ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
            ( ( ( el1 @ A @ cHH_1 )
              & ( el1 @ B @ cHH_1 )
              & ( A = B ) )
           => ( ( cBIGHI @ A )
              = ( cBIGPHI @ B ) ) )
        & ! [A: $i] :
            ( ( el1 @ A @ cSS_PRIME )
           => ( ( cBIGPHI @ ( cPHI_1 @ A ) )
              = ( cPHI_2 @ A ) ) )
        & ! [A: $i] :
            ( ( el1 @ A @ cHH_1 )
           => ? [B: $i] :
                ( ( el1 @ B @ cSS_PRIME )
                & ( ( cPHI_1 @ B )
                  = A ) ) )
        & ( cHOM_FROM_SS_PRIME @ cPHI_1 )
        & ( cHOM_FROM_SS_PRIME @ cPHI_2 ) )
     => ( cHOM_FROM_HH_1 @ cBIGPHI ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(68,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SYO249^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.06/0.17  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.06/0.17  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.06/0.17  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.06/0.17  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.06/0.17  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.06/0.17  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.06/0.17  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.06/0.17  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 16:40:48 UTC 2026
% 0.06/0.17  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.06/0.17  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.79/0.62  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 0.94/0.76  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (132ms). 
% 0.94/0.77  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.41/1.00  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.41/1.00  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.67/1.09  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 1.67/1.12  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 1.67/1.12  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 1.67/1.12  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 1.67/1.13  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.71/1.70  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 3.71/1.70  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.71/1.70  % Time passed: 1413ms (effective reasoning time: 931ms)
% 3.71/1.70  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.71/1.70  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 3.71/1.70  % No. of inferences in proof: 4
% 3.71/1.70  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1413 ms resp. 931 ms w/o parsing
% 3.71/1.75  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.71/1.75  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------