↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SYO256^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:53:47 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.57s 1.32s
% Output   : Refutation 1.57s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (   8 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   58 (  13 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  107 (   8   ~;  15   |;   0   &;  70   @)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   18 (  18   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    7 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%                                         (  10  !!;   0  ??;   0 @@+;   0 @@-)
%            Number of variables   :   42 (  10   ^;  22   !;  10   ?;  42   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_6,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    sK0: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_9,type,
    sK1: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_10,type,
    sK2: $o > $o ).

thf(f15,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f14]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    $true = $false,
    inference(backward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f13,f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( ( sK2
      @ ( !! @ a
        @ ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
            | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
    = $false ),
    inference(condensation,[status(thm)],[f11]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ! [X3: $o] :
      ( ( ( sK2 @ X3 )
        = $false )
      | ( ( sK2
          @ ( !! @ a
            @ ^ [Y0: a] :
                ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
                | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ! [X3: $o] :
      ( ( sK2 @ X3 )
     != ( sK2
        @ ( !! @ a
          @ ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
              | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ! [X3: $o] :
      ( ( sK2 @ X3 )
     != ( sK2
        @ ( !! @ a
          @ ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
              | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f6,f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ( ? [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: $o > $o] :
      ! [X3: $o] :
        ( ( X2
          @ ( !! @ a
            @ ^ [Y0: a] :
                ( ( X0 @ Y0 )
                | ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
       != ( X2 @ X3 ) )
   => ! [X3: $o] :
        ( ( sK2 @ X3 )
       != ( sK2
          @ ( !! @ a
            @ ^ [Y0: a] :
                ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
                | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ? [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: $o > $o] :
    ! [X3: $o] :
      ( ( X2
        @ ( !! @ a
          @ ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( X0 @ Y0 )
              | ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
     != ( X2 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: $o > $o] :
      ? [X3: $o] :
        ( ( X2
          @ ( !! @ a
            @ ^ [Y0: a] :
                ( ( X0 @ Y0 )
                | ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
        = ( X2 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: $o > $o] :
      ? [X3: $o] :
        ( ( X2 @ X3 )
      <=> ( X2
          @ ! [X4: a] :
              ( ( X1 @ X4 )
              | ( X0 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X2: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X0: $o > $o] :
      ? [X3: $o] :
        ( ( X0 @ X3 )
      <=> ( X0
          @ ! [X4: a] :
              ( ( X1 @ X4 )
              | ( X2 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X2: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X0: $o > $o] :
    ? [X3: $o] :
      ( ( X0 @ X3 )
    <=> ( X0
        @ ! [X4: a] :
            ( ( X1 @ X4 )
            | ( X2 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.8SL8zOusUF/DTF2THF_3244.p',cTHM121) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( ( sK2
      @ ( !! @ a
        @ ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
            | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(condensation,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ! [X3: $o] :
      ( ( ( sK2
          @ ( !! @ a
            @ ^ [Y0: a] :
                ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
                | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
        = $true )
      | ( ( sK2 @ X3 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f9]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09  % Problem  : SYO256^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.10  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.11/0.29  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.29  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.29  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.29  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.29  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.29  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 14:26:57 EST 2026
% 0.11/0.29  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.29  Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.17/0.39  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.17/0.39  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.17/0.39  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.39  % File     : SYO256^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.17/0.39  % Domain   : Syntactic
% 0.17/0.39  % Problem  : TPS problem THM121
% 0.17/0.39  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.17/0.39  % English  : Test theorem for nested primitive substitutions.
% 0.17/0.39  
% 0.17/0.39  % Refs     : [Bro09] Brown (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.17/0.39  % Source   : [Bro09]
% 0.17/0.39  % Names    : tps_0106 [Bro09]
% 0.17/0.39  %          : THM121 [TPS]
% 0.17/0.39  
% 0.17/0.39  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.17/0.39  % Rating   : 0.00 v6.2.0, 0.17 v6.1.0, 0.00 v4.0.0
% 0.17/0.39  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    2 (   0 unt;   1 typ;   0 def)
% 0.17/0.39  %            Number of atoms       :    0 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.17/0.39  %            Maximal formula atoms :    0 (   0 avg)
% 0.17/0.39  %            Number of connectives :    6 (   0   ~;   1   |;   0   &;   4   @)
% 0.17/0.39  %                                         (   1 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.17/0.39  %            Maximal formula depth :   10 (  10 avg)
% 0.17/0.39  %            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
% 0.17/0.39  %            Number of type conns  :    3 (   3   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.17/0.39  %            Number of symbols     :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
% 0.17/0.39  %            Number of variables   :    5 (   0   ^;   4   !;   1   ?;   5   :)
% 0.17/0.39  % SPC      : TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR
% 0.17/0.39  
% 0.17/0.39  % Comments : This problem is from the TPS library. Copyright (c) 2009 The TPS
% 0.17/0.39  %            project in the Department of Mathematical Sciences at Carnegie
% 0.17/0.39  %            Mellon University. Distributed under the Creative Commons copyleft
% 0.17/0.39  %            license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
% 0.17/0.39  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.39  thf(a_type,type,
% 0.17/0.39      a: $tType ).
% 0.17/0.39  
% 0.17/0.39  thf(cTHM121,conjecture,
% 0.17/0.39      ! [Xr: $o > $o,Xp: a > $o,Xq: a > $o] :
% 0.17/0.39      ? [Xh: $o] :
% 0.17/0.39        ( ( Xr @ Xh )
% 0.17/0.39      <=> ( Xr
% 0.17/0.39          @ ! [Xx: a] :
% 0.17/0.39              ( ( Xp @ Xx )
% 0.17/0.39              | ( Xq @ Xx ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.17/0.39  
% 0.17/0.39  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.39  ------------------------
% 1.37/1.28  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.37/1.28  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.37/1.28  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 14:26:58 EST 2026
% 1.37/1.28  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.37/1.28  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.37/1.28  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.37/1.28  
% 1.37/1.28  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.8SL8zOusUF/DTF2DTF3244.p
% See solution above
% 1.37/1.28  ------------------------
% 1.37/1.29  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.37/1.29  thf(a_type,type,
% 1.37/1.29      a: $tType ).
% 1.37/1.29  
% 1.37/1.29  thf(cTHM121,conjecture,
% 1.37/1.29      ! [Xr: $o > $o,Xp: a > $o,Xq: a > $o] :
% 1.37/1.29      ? [Xh: $o] :
% 1.37/1.29        ( ( Xr @ Xh )
% 1.37/1.29      <=> ( Xr
% 1.37/1.29          @ ! [Xx: a] :
% 1.37/1.29              ( ( Xp @ Xx )
% 1.37/1.29              | ( Xq @ Xx ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.37/1.29  ------------------------
% 1.57/1.31  % (3346)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_3244 for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 1.57/1.31  % (3341)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_3244 for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 1.57/1.31  % (3344)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_3244 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 1.57/1.31  % (3345)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_3244 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 1.57/1.31  % (3347)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_3244 for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 1.57/1.31  % (3342)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_3244 for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 1.57/1.31  % (3343)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_3244 for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 1.57/1.31  % (3344)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.57/1.31  % (3344)------------------------------
% 1.57/1.31  % (3344)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.57/1.31  % (3344)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.57/1.31  % (3345)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.57/1.31  % (3345)------------------------------
% 1.57/1.31  % (3345)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.57/1.31  % (3345)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.57/1.31  % (3345)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.57/1.31  
% 1.57/1.31  % (3345)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.57/1.31  % (3345)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.57/1.31  % (3345)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.57/1.31  % (3345)------------------------------
% 1.57/1.31  % (3345)------------------------------
% 1.57/1.31  % (3344)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.57/1.31  
% 1.57/1.31  % (3344)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.57/1.31  % (3344)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.57/1.31  % (3344)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.57/1.31  % (3344)------------------------------
% 1.57/1.31  % (3344)------------------------------
% 1.57/1.31  % (3347)First to succeed.
% 1.57/1.32  % (3343)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.57/1.32  % (3346)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.57/1.32  % (3347)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.57/1.32  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_3244
% 1.57/1.32  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_3244
% 1.57/1.32  thf(type_def_6, type, a: $tType).
% 1.57/1.32  thf(func_def_0, type, a: $tType).
% 1.57/1.32  thf(func_def_8, type, sK0: a > $o).
% 1.57/1.32  thf(func_def_9, type, sK1: a > $o).
% 1.57/1.32  thf(func_def_10, type, sK2: $o > $o).
% 1.57/1.32  thf(f15,plain,(
% 1.57/1.32    $false),
% 1.57/1.32    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f14])).
% 1.57/1.32  thf(f14,plain,(
% 1.57/1.32    ($true = $false)),
% 1.57/1.32    inference(backward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f13,f12])).
% 1.57/1.32  thf(f12,plain,(
% 1.57/1.32    ((sK2 @ (!! @ a @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((sK0 @ Y0) | (sK1 @ Y0))))) = $false)),
% 1.57/1.32    inference(condensation,[status(thm)],[f11])).
% 1.57/1.32  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.57/1.32    ( ! [X3 : $o] : (((sK2 @ X3) = $false) | ((sK2 @ (!! @ a @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((sK0 @ Y0) | (sK1 @ Y0))))) = $false)) )),
% 1.57/1.32    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f9])).
% 1.57/1.32  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.57/1.32    ( ! [X3 : $o] : (((sK2 @ X3) != (sK2 @ (!! @ a @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((sK0 @ Y0) | (sK1 @ Y0))))))) )),
% 1.57/1.32    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f8])).
% 1.57/1.32  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.57/1.32    ! [X3 : $o] : ((sK2 @ X3) != (sK2 @ (!! @ a @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((sK0 @ Y0) | (sK1 @ Y0))))))),
% 1.57/1.32    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f6,f7])).
% 1.57/1.32  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.57/1.32    ? [X0 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o,X2 : $o > $o] : ! [X3 : $o] : ((X2 @ (!! @ a @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((X0 @ Y0) | (X1 @ Y0))))) != (X2 @ X3)) => ! [X3 : $o] : ((sK2 @ X3) != (sK2 @ (!! @ a @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((sK0 @ Y0) | (sK1 @ Y0))))))),
% 1.57/1.32    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.57/1.32  thf(f6,plain,(
% 1.57/1.32    ? [X0 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o,X2 : $o > $o] : ! [X3 : $o] : ((X2 @ (!! @ a @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((X0 @ Y0) | (X1 @ Y0))))) != (X2 @ X3))),
% 1.57/1.32    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.57/1.32  thf(f5,plain,(
% 1.57/1.32    ~! [X0 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o,X2 : $o > $o] : ? [X3 : $o] : ((X2 @ (!! @ a @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((X0 @ Y0) | (X1 @ Y0))))) = (X2 @ X3))),
% 1.57/1.32    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4])).
% 1.57/1.32  thf(f4,plain,(
% 1.57/1.32    ~! [X0 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o,X2 : $o > $o] : ? [X3 : $o] : ((X2 @ X3) <=> (X2 @ ! [X4 : a] : ((X1 @ X4) | (X0 @ X4))))),
% 1.57/1.32    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.57/1.32  thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.57/1.32    ~! [X2 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o,X0 : $o > $o] : ? [X3 : $o] : ((X0 @ X3) <=> (X0 @ ! [X4 : a] : ((X1 @ X4) | (X2 @ X4))))),
% 1.57/1.32    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1])).
% 1.57/1.32  thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 1.57/1.32    ! [X2 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o,X0 : $o > $o] : ? [X3 : $o] : ((X0 @ X3) <=> (X0 @ ! [X4 : a] : ((X1 @ X4) | (X2 @ X4))))),
% 1.57/1.32    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.8SL8zOusUF/DTF2THF_3244.p',cTHM121)).
% 1.57/1.32  thf(f13,plain,(
% 1.57/1.32    ((sK2 @ (!! @ a @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((sK0 @ Y0) | (sK1 @ Y0))))) = $true)),
% 1.57/1.32    inference(condensation,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.57/1.32  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.57/1.32    ( ! [X3 : $o] : (((sK2 @ (!! @ a @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((sK0 @ Y0) | (sK1 @ Y0))))) = $true) | ((sK2 @ X3) = $true)) )),
% 1.57/1.32    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f9])).
% 1.57/1.32  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_3244
% 1.57/1.32  % (3347)------------------------------
% 1.57/1.32  % (3347)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.57/1.32  % (3347)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.57/1.32  
% 1.57/1.32  % (3347)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.57/1.32  % (3347)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.57/1.32  % (3347)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 1.57/1.32  % (3347)------------------------------
% 1.57/1.32  % (3347)------------------------------
% 1.57/1.32  % (3340)Success in time 0.018 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------