%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : LEO-II---2.3.1
% Problem : SYO257^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : leo --cores 7 --timeout 300 --proofoutput 1 --foatp e --atp e=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Oct 7 11:07:56 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.12s 0.20s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 19
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 23 ( 22 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 92 ( 21 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 227 ( 50 ~; 17 |; 5 &; 150 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 2 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 18 ( 18 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 7 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 67 ( 0 ^; 62 !; 5 ?; 67 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(tp_cP,type,
cP: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(tp_g,type,
g: $i > $i ).
thf(tp_h,type,
h: $i > $i ).
thf(tp_sK1_SY4,type,
sK1_SY4: $i > $i ).
thf(1,conjecture,
? [Xx: $i] :
! [Xy: $i] :
( ! [Xf: $i > $i,Xz: $i] :
( ( cP @ Xz @ ( Xf @ Xx ) )
& ( cP @ Xx @ Xy ) )
=> ( cP @ Xy @ ( g @ ( h @ Xy ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cTHM84) ).
thf(2,negated_conjecture,
( ( ? [Xx: $i] :
! [Xy: $i] :
( ! [Xf: $i > $i,Xz: $i] :
( ( cP @ Xz @ ( Xf @ Xx ) )
& ( cP @ Xx @ Xy ) )
=> ( cP @ Xy @ ( g @ ( h @ Xy ) ) ) ) )
= $false ),
inference(negate_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).
thf(3,plain,
( ( ? [Xx: $i] :
! [Xy: $i] :
( ! [Xf: $i > $i,Xz: $i] :
( ( cP @ Xz @ ( Xf @ Xx ) )
& ( cP @ Xx @ Xy ) )
=> ( cP @ Xy @ ( g @ ( h @ Xy ) ) ) ) )
= $false ),
inference(unfold_def,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(4,plain,
( ( ~ ? [Xx: $i] :
! [Xy: $i] :
( ! [Xf: $i > $i,Xz: $i] :
( ( cP @ Xz @ ( Xf @ Xx ) )
& ( cP @ Xx @ Xy ) )
=> ( cP @ Xy @ ( g @ ( h @ Xy ) ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(polarity_switch,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
thf(5,plain,
( ( ~ ? [Xx: $i] :
! [Xy: $i] :
( ! [Xf: $i > $i,Xz: $i] :
( ( cP @ Xz @ ( Xf @ Xx ) )
& ( cP @ Xx @ Xy ) )
=> ( cP @ Xy @ ( g @ ( h @ Xy ) ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(copy,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
thf(6,plain,
( ( ~ ~ ! [SX0: $i] :
~ ! [SX1: $i] :
( ~ ! [SX2: $i > $i,SX3: $i] :
~ ( ~ ( cP @ SX3 @ ( SX2 @ SX0 ) )
| ~ ( cP @ SX0 @ SX1 ) )
| ( cP @ SX1 @ ( g @ ( h @ SX1 ) ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(unfold_def,[status(thm)],[5]) ).
thf(7,plain,
( ( ~ ! [SX0: $i] :
~ ! [SX1: $i] :
( ~ ! [SX2: $i > $i,SX3: $i] :
~ ( ~ ( cP @ SX3 @ ( SX2 @ SX0 ) )
| ~ ( cP @ SX0 @ SX1 ) )
| ( cP @ SX1 @ ( g @ ( h @ SX1 ) ) ) ) )
= $false ),
inference(extcnf_not_pos,[status(thm)],[6]) ).
thf(8,plain,
( ( ! [SX0: $i] :
~ ! [SX1: $i] :
( ~ ! [SX2: $i > $i,SX3: $i] :
~ ( ~ ( cP @ SX3 @ ( SX2 @ SX0 ) )
| ~ ( cP @ SX0 @ SX1 ) )
| ( cP @ SX1 @ ( g @ ( h @ SX1 ) ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(extcnf_not_neg,[status(thm)],[7]) ).
thf(9,plain,
! [SV1: $i] :
( ( ~ ! [SY4: $i] :
( ~ ! [SY5: $i > $i,SY6: $i] :
~ ( ~ ( cP @ SY6 @ ( SY5 @ SV1 ) )
| ~ ( cP @ SV1 @ SY4 ) )
| ( cP @ SY4 @ ( g @ ( h @ SY4 ) ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[8]) ).
thf(10,plain,
! [SV1: $i] :
( ( ! [SY4: $i] :
( ~ ! [SY5: $i > $i,SY6: $i] :
~ ( ~ ( cP @ SY6 @ ( SY5 @ SV1 ) )
| ~ ( cP @ SV1 @ SY4 ) )
| ( cP @ SY4 @ ( g @ ( h @ SY4 ) ) ) ) )
= $false ),
inference(extcnf_not_pos,[status(thm)],[9]) ).
thf(11,plain,
! [SV1: $i] :
( ( ~ ! [SY7: $i > $i,SY8: $i] :
~ ( ~ ( cP @ SY8 @ ( SY7 @ SV1 ) )
| ~ ( cP @ SV1 @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) ) )
| ( cP @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) @ ( g @ ( h @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) ) ) ) )
= $false ),
inference(extcnf_forall_neg,[status(esa)],[10]) ).
thf(12,plain,
! [SV1: $i] :
( ( ~ ! [SY7: $i > $i,SY8: $i] :
~ ( ~ ( cP @ SY8 @ ( SY7 @ SV1 ) )
| ~ ( cP @ SV1 @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) ) ) )
= $false ),
inference(extcnf_or_neg,[status(thm)],[11]) ).
thf(13,plain,
! [SV1: $i] :
( ( cP @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) @ ( g @ ( h @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) ) ) )
= $false ),
inference(extcnf_or_neg,[status(thm)],[11]) ).
thf(14,plain,
! [SV1: $i] :
( ( ! [SY7: $i > $i,SY8: $i] :
~ ( ~ ( cP @ SY8 @ ( SY7 @ SV1 ) )
| ~ ( cP @ SV1 @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(extcnf_not_neg,[status(thm)],[12]) ).
thf(15,plain,
! [SV1: $i,SV2: $i > $i] :
( ( ! [SY9: $i] :
~ ( ~ ( cP @ SY9 @ ( SV2 @ SV1 ) )
| ~ ( cP @ SV1 @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[14]) ).
thf(16,plain,
! [SV1: $i,SV2: $i > $i,SV3: $i] :
( ( ~ ( ~ ( cP @ SV3 @ ( SV2 @ SV1 ) )
| ~ ( cP @ SV1 @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[15]) ).
thf(17,plain,
! [SV1: $i,SV2: $i > $i,SV3: $i] :
( ( ~ ( cP @ SV3 @ ( SV2 @ SV1 ) )
| ~ ( cP @ SV1 @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) ) )
= $false ),
inference(extcnf_not_pos,[status(thm)],[16]) ).
thf(18,plain,
! [SV1: $i,SV2: $i > $i,SV3: $i] :
( ( ~ ( cP @ SV3 @ ( SV2 @ SV1 ) ) )
= $false ),
inference(extcnf_or_neg,[status(thm)],[17]) ).
thf(19,plain,
! [SV1: $i] :
( ( ~ ( cP @ SV1 @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) ) )
= $false ),
inference(extcnf_or_neg,[status(thm)],[17]) ).
thf(20,plain,
! [SV1: $i,SV2: $i > $i,SV3: $i] :
( ( cP @ SV3 @ ( SV2 @ SV1 ) )
= $true ),
inference(extcnf_not_neg,[status(thm)],[18]) ).
thf(21,plain,
! [SV1: $i] :
( ( cP @ SV1 @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) )
= $true ),
inference(extcnf_not_neg,[status(thm)],[19]) ).
thf(22,plain,
$false = $true,
inference(fo_atp_e,[status(thm)],[13,21,20]) ).
thf(23,plain,
$false,
inference(solved_all_splits,[solved_all_splits(join,[])],[22]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SYO257^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : leo --cores 7 --timeout 300 --proofoutput 1 --foatp e --atp e=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.16 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.16 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.16 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.16 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.16 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.17 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.17 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.17 % DateTime : Tue Oct 6 17:34:45 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.17 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.17 Running leo --cores 7 --timeout 300 --proofoutput 1 --foatp e --atp e=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.20
% 0.12/0.20 No.of.Axioms: 0
% 0.12/0.20
% 0.12/0.20 Length.of.Defs: 0
% 0.12/0.20
% 0.12/0.20 Contains.Choice.Funs: false
% 0.12/0.20
% 0.12/0.20 ********************************
% 0.12/0.20 * All subproblems solved! *
% 0.12/0.20 ********************************
% 0.12/0.20 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : (rf:1,axioms:0,ps:0,u:6,ude:true,rLeibEQ:true,rAndEQ:true,use_choice:true,use_extuni:true,use_extcnf_combined:false,expand_extuni:false,foatp:e,atp_timeout:25,atp_calls_frequency:5,ordering:none,proof_output:1,protocol_output:false,clause_count:22,loop_count:0,foatp_calls:1,translation:fof_full)
% 0.12/0.20
% 0.12/0.20 %**** Beginning of derivation protocol ****
% 0.12/0.20 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.20
% 0.12/0.20 %**** End of derivation protocol ****
% 0.12/0.20 %**** no. of clauses in derivation: 23 ****
% 0.12/0.20 %**** clause counter: 22 ****
% 0.12/0.20
% 0.12/0.20 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : (rf:1,axioms:0,ps:0,u:6,ude:true,rLeibEQ:true,rAndEQ:true,use_choice:true,use_extuni:true,use_extcnf_combined:false,expand_extuni:false,foatp:e,atp_timeout:25,atp_calls_frequency:5,ordering:none,proof_output:1,protocol_output:false,clause_count:22,loop_count:0,foatp_calls:1,translation:fof_full)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------