%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SYO260^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:42:39 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.08s 0.15s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.08s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 5 ( 1 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 9 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 8 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 100 ( 26 ~; 24 |; 11 &; 39 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 14 ( 9 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 10 ( 10 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 5 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 0 ^; 12 !; 4 ?; 16 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_23,type,
esk1_0: $i ).
thf(decl_24,type,
esk2_0: $i ).
thf(decl_25,type,
esk3_0: $i ).
thf(decl_26,type,
epred1_0: $i > $o ).
thf(cTHM125A,conjecture,
! [X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i > $o] :
? [X5: $i > $o,X6: $i > $o] :
( ( ( X5 @ X1 )
| ( X6 @ X1 ) )
& ( ( X4 @ X2 )
| ( X6 @ X2 ) )
& ( ( X5 @ X3 )
| ~ ( X4 @ X3 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.w91KI3ugMx/E---3.1_348429.p',cTHM125A) ).
thf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i > $o] :
? [X5: $i > $o,X6: $i > $o] :
( ( ( X5 @ X1 )
| ( X6 @ X1 ) )
& ( ( X4 @ X2 )
| ( X6 @ X2 ) )
& ( ( X5 @ X3 )
| ~ ( X4 @ X3 ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM125A]) ).
thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
! [X17: $i > $o,X18: $i > $o] :
( ( ~ ( X17 @ esk3_0 )
| ~ ( epred1_0 @ esk2_0 )
| ~ ( X17 @ esk1_0 ) )
& ( ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 )
| ~ ( epred1_0 @ esk2_0 )
| ~ ( X17 @ esk1_0 ) )
& ( ~ ( X17 @ esk3_0 )
| ~ ( X18 @ esk2_0 )
| ~ ( X17 @ esk1_0 ) )
& ( ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 )
| ~ ( X18 @ esk2_0 )
| ~ ( X17 @ esk1_0 ) )
& ( ~ ( X17 @ esk3_0 )
| ~ ( epred1_0 @ esk2_0 )
| ~ ( X18 @ esk1_0 ) )
& ( ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 )
| ~ ( epred1_0 @ esk2_0 )
| ~ ( X18 @ esk1_0 ) )
& ( ~ ( X17 @ esk3_0 )
| ~ ( X18 @ esk2_0 )
| ~ ( X18 @ esk1_0 ) )
& ( ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 )
| ~ ( X18 @ esk2_0 )
| ~ ( X18 @ esk1_0 ) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
! [X4: $i > $o,X5: $i > $o] :
( ~ ( X4 @ esk3_0 )
| ~ ( X5 @ esk2_0 )
| ~ ( X5 @ esk1_0 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(flex_resolve,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01 % Problem : SYO260^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.02 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.00/0.11 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.00/0.11 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.00/0.11 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.00/0.11 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.00/0.11 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.00/0.11 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.00/0.11 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.00/0.11 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 16:41:33 UTC 2026
% 0.00/0.11 % CPUTime :
% 0.00/0.11 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.13 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.08/0.14 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.w91KI3ugMx/E---3.1_348429.p
% 0.08/0.15 % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.08/0.15 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
% 0.08/0.15 % Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.08/0.15 % Starting post_as_ho12 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.15 % Starting new_bool_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.15 % Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.15 % Starting post_as_ho4 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.15 % Starting post_as_ho2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.15 % Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.15 % Starting full_lambda_10 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.15 % Starting new_ho_8 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.15 % post_as_ho12 with pid 348453 completed with status 0
% 0.08/0.15 % Result found by post_as_ho12
% 0.08/0.15 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
% 0.08/0.15 % Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.08/0.15 % Starting post_as_ho12 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.15 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.08/0.15 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.08/0.15 % Search class: HHHNF-FFSF00-SSSFFMBN
% 0.08/0.15 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.08/0.15 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.15 % SubtermCWHack with pid 348462 completed with status 0
% 0.08/0.15 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.08/0.15 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
% 0.08/0.15 % Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.08/0.15 % Starting post_as_ho12 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.15 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.08/0.15 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.08/0.15 % Search class: HHHNF-FFSF00-SSSFFMBN
% 0.08/0.15 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.08/0.15 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.15 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.08/0.15
% 0.08/0.15 % Proof found!
% 0.08/0.15 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.08/0.15 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.08/0.15 % Parsed axioms : 1
% 0.08/0.15 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.08/0.15 % Initial clauses : 8
% 0.08/0.15 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.08/0.15 % Initial clauses in saturation : 8
% 0.08/0.15 % Processed clauses : 7
% 0.08/0.15 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.08/0.15 % ...subsumed : 3
% 0.08/0.15 % ...remaining for further processing : 3
% 0.08/0.15 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.08/0.15 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.08/0.15 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.08/0.15 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.08/0.15 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.08/0.15 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.08/0.15 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.08/0.15 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.08/0.15 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.08/0.15 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.08/0.15 % NegExts : 0
% 0.08/0.15 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.08/0.15 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.08/0.15 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.08/0.15 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.08/0.15 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.08/0.15 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.08/0.15 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.08/0.15 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.08/0.15 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.08/0.15 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.08/0.15 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.15 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.15 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.15 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.15 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.15 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.15 % Current number of processed clauses : 2
% 0.08/0.15 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.08/0.15 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.08/0.15 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.08/0.15 % Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.08/0.15 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.08/0.15 % ...number of literals in the above : 3
% 0.08/0.15 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.08/0.15 % Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.08/0.15 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4
% 0.08/0.15 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.08/0.15 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 4
% 0.08/0.15 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.08/0.15 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.08/0.15 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.08/0.15 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.08/0.15 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.08/0.15 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.08/0.15 % Termbank termtop insertions : 520
% 0.08/0.15 % Search garbage collected termcells : 150
% 0.08/0.15
% 0.08/0.15 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.08/0.15 % User time : 0.001 s
% 0.08/0.15 % System time : 0.001 s
% 0.08/0.15 % Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.08/0.15 % Maximum resident set size: 3832 pages
% 0.08/0.15
% 0.08/0.15 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.08/0.15 % User time : 0.002 s
% 0.08/0.15 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.08/0.15 % Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.08/0.15 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.08/0.15 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------