↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : SYO265^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:47:19 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.28s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   20
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   51 (  12 unt;   0 typ;   4 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  181 ( 110 equ;   1 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  163 (  47   ~;  47   |;  18   &;  36   @)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   19 (  14 usr;  11 con; 0-4 aty)
%                                         (   0  !!;  11  ??;   0 @@+;   0 @@-)
%            Number of variables   :   49 (   0 sgn   9   !;   3   ?;  49   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(type_def_6,type,
    sTfun: ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    x: a ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    db1: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    db0: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    vEQ: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( X0 > X0 > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    vLAM: 
      !>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( X1 > X0 > X1 ) ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    vSIGMA: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    vAND: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_10,type,
    sK0: a ).

thf(func_def_11,type,
    sK1: a ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ( ( ^ [X0: a,X1: a] : ( X0 = X1 )
      @ x )
    = ( ^ [X2: a] :
        ? [X1: a] :
          ( ( X1 = x )
          & ( X2 = X1 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cX5210) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ^ [X0: a,X1: a] : ( X0 = X1 )
      @ x )
   != ( ^ [X2: a] :
        ? [X1: a] :
          ( ( X1 = x )
          & ( X2 = X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f3,plain,
    ( ( ^ [X0: a,X1: a] : ( X0 = X1 )
      @ x )
   != ( ^ [X2: a] :
        ? [X3: a] :
          ( ( x = X3 )
          & ( X2 = X3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ?? @ a
          @ ^ [Y1: a] :
              ( ( Y0 = Y1 )
              & ( x = Y1 ) ) ) )
   != ( ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : ( Y0 = Y1 )
      @ x ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f3]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ?? @ a
          @ ^ [Y1: a] :
              ( ( Y0 = Y1 )
              & ( x = Y1 ) ) ) )
   != ( ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : ( Y0 = Y1 )
      @ x ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ?? @ a
          @ ^ [Y1: a] :
              ( ( Y0 = Y1 )
              & ( x = Y1 ) ) ) )
   != ( ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : ( Y0 = Y1 )
      @ x ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ?? @ a
          @ ^ [Y1: a] :
              ( ( Y0 = Y1 )
              & ( x = Y1 ) ) ) )
   != ( (=) @ x ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f6]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ?? @ a
          @ ^ [Y1: a] :
              ( ( Y0 = Y1 )
              & ( x = Y1 ) ) )
      @ sK0 )
   != ( x = sK0 ) ),
    inference(negative_extensionality,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ?? @ a
            @ ^ [Y1: a] :
                ( ( Y0 = Y1 )
                & ( x = Y1 ) ) )
        @ sK0 )
      = $true )
    | ( $true
      = ( x = sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(xor_proxy_clausification,[],[f10]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ?? @ a
            @ ^ [Y1: a] :
                ( ( Y0 = Y1 )
                & ( x = Y1 ) ) )
        @ sK0 )
      = $false )
    | ( $false
      = ( x = sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(xor_proxy_clausification,[],[f10]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ?? @ a
            @ ^ [Y1: a] :
                ( ( Y0 = Y1 )
                & ( x = Y1 ) ) )
        @ sK0 )
      = $false )
    | ( x != sK0 ) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f12]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( ( ( ?? @ a
        @ ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK0 = Y0 )
            & ( x = Y0 ) ) )
      = $false )
    | ( x != sK0 ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f13]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ! [X1: a] :
      ( ( x != sK0 )
      | ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( sK0 = Y0 )
              & ( x = Y0 ) )
          @ X1 )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f14]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ! [X1: a] :
      ( ( x != sK0 )
      | ( ( ( sK0 = X1 )
          & ( x = X1 ) )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f15]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ! [X1: a] :
      ( ( ( x = X1 )
        = $false )
      | ( x != sK0 )
      | ( ( sK0 = X1 )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f16]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ! [X1: a] :
      ( ( x != sK0 )
      | ( x != X1 )
      | ( ( sK0 = X1 )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f17]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ! [X1: a] :
      ( ( sK0 != X1 )
      | ( x != sK0 )
      | ( x != X1 ) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f18]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ( ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ?? @ a
            @ ^ [Y1: a] :
                ( ( Y0 = Y1 )
                & ( x = Y1 ) ) )
        @ sK0 )
      = $true )
    | ( x = sK0 ) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ( ( x = sK0 )
    | ( ( ?? @ a
        @ ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK0 = Y0 )
            & ( x = Y0 ) ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f20]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ( ( x = sK0 )
    | ( $true
      = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK0 = Y0 )
            & ( x = Y0 ) )
        @ sK1 ) ) ),
    inference(sigma_proxy_clausification,[],[f21]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ( ( x = sK0 )
    | ( ( ( sK0 = sK1 )
        & ( x = sK1 ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f22]) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ( ( x = sK0 )
    | ( $true
      = ( x = sK1 ) ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f23]) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    ( ( x = sK0 )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK0 = sK1 ) ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f23]) ).

thf(f26,plain,
    ( ( x = sK0 )
    | ( sK0 = sK1 ) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f25]) ).

thf(f27,plain,
    ( ( x = sK0 )
    | ( x = sK1 ) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f24]) ).

thf(f29,definition,
    ( spl2_1
  <=> ( x = sK0 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    ( ( x = sK0 )
    | ~ spl2_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f29]) ).

thf(f33,definition,
    ( spl2_2
  <=> ! [X1: a] :
        ( ( sK0 != X1 )
        | ( x != X1 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f34,plain,
    ( ! [X1: a] :
        ( ( x != X1 )
        | ( sK0 != X1 ) )
    | ~ spl2_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f33]) ).

thf(f35,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_1
    | spl2_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f19,f33,f29]) ).

thf(f37,definition,
    ( spl2_3
  <=> ( sK0 = sK1 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_3])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f39,plain,
    ( ( sK0 = sK1 )
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f37]) ).

thf(f40,plain,
    ( spl2_3
    | spl2_1 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f26,f29,f37]) ).

thf(f42,definition,
    ( spl2_4
  <=> ( x = sK1 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_4])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f44,plain,
    ( ( x = sK1 )
    | ~ spl2_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f42]) ).

thf(f45,plain,
    ( spl2_4
    | spl2_1 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f27,f29,f42]) ).

thf(f46,plain,
    ( ( x = sK0 )
    | ~ spl2_3
    | ~ spl2_4 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f44,f39]) ).

thf(f49,plain,
    ( spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_3
    | ~ spl2_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f46,f42,f37,f29]) ).

thf(f50,plain,
    ( ! [X1: a] :
        ( ( x != X1 )
        | ( x != X1 ) )
    | ~ spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_2 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f34,f30]) ).

thf(f51,plain,
    ( ! [X1: a] : ( x != X1 )
    | ~ spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_2 ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f50]) ).

thf(f53,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_2 ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f51]) ).

thf(f56,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_2 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f53]) ).

cnf(s1,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_1
    | spl2_2 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f35]) ).

cnf(s2,plain,
    ( spl2_1
    | spl2_3 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f40]) ).

cnf(s3,plain,
    ( spl2_1
    | spl2_4 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f45]) ).

cnf(s5,plain,
    ( spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_3
    | ~ spl2_4 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f49]) ).

cnf(s7,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_2 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f56]) ).

cnf(s8,plain,
    spl2_1,
    inference(rat,[],[s5,s2,s3]) ).

cnf(s9,plain,
    ~ spl2_2,
    inference(rat,[],[s7,s8]) ).

cnf(s10,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rat,[],[s1,s9,s8]) ).

thf(f57,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s10]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SYO265^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.18  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.18  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.18  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.18  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.18  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.18  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.18  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.18  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 16:44:26 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.18  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.18  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.22  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.08/0.23  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.28  % (322611)Detected a higher-order problem, will run a greedy HOL sequence.
% 0.21/0.28  % (322622)WARNING Broken Constraint: if ho_split_queue_ratios(1,8) has been set then ho_split_queue(off) is equal to on
% 0.21/0.28  % (322622)WARNING Broken Constraint: if sine_to_age_tolerance(5) has been set then sine_to_age(off) is equal to on or sine_to_pred_levels(off) is not equal to off or sine_level_split_queue(off) is equal to on
% 0.21/0.28  % (322622)dis+1002_8_to=kbo:sil=128000:tgt=full:drc=off:si=on:sp=const_max:lma=off:spb=non_intro:cbe=off:uwa=interpreted_only:random_seed=2995816662:hsqr=1,8:i=157:s2at=5:add=on:nm=2:rtra=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/157Mi)
% 0.21/0.28  % (322622) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-322611-322622"...
% 0.21/0.28  % (322622)...printing done.
% 0.21/0.28  % (322617)lrs+10_16_si=on:nwc=1.5:random_seed=1224950398:i=18:kws=arity_squared:rtra=on:fe=abstraction:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 0.21/0.28  % (322618)lrs+10_1_cnfonf=off:si=on:uwa=one_side_interpreted:random_seed=2449635871:i=3:rtra=on:inj=on:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.21/0.28  % (322622)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.21/0.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.28  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.28  % (322622)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.28  % (322622)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.21/0.28  % (322622)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.21/0.28  % (322622)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.21/0.28  % (322622)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.21/0.28  % (322622)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.28  % (322622)Peak memory usage: 13 MB
% 0.21/0.28  % (322622)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.21/0.28  % (322611)Success in time 0.041 s
% 0.21/0.28  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------