%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SYO267^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:42:40 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.09s 0.26s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.09s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 6 ( 1 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 3 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 0 avg)
% Number of connectives : 68 ( 5 ~; 2 |; 9 &; 46 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 9 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 19 ( 19 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 5 ^; 14 !; 3 ?; 22 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_23,type,
epred1_0: $i > $o ).
thf(decl_24,type,
esk1_1: ( ( $i > $i ) > $o ) > $i > $i ).
thf(decl_25,type,
esk2_1: ( ( $i > $i ) > $o ) > $i > $i ).
thf(decl_26,type,
esk3_1: ( ( $i > $i ) > $o ) > $i ).
thf(cTHM111,conjecture,
! [X1: $i > $o] :
? [X2: ( $i > $i ) > $o] :
! [X3: $i > $i,X4: $i > $i] :
( ( ( X2 @ X3 )
& ( X2 @ X4 ) )
=> ( ( X2
@ ^ [X5: $i] : ( X3 @ ( X4 @ X5 ) ) )
& ! [X6: $i] :
( ( X1 @ X6 )
=> ( X1 @ ( X3 @ X6 ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qbW03FzBhO/E---3.1_1286974.p',cTHM111) ).
thf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1: $i > $o] :
? [X2: ( $i > $i ) > $o] :
! [X3: $i > $i,X4: $i > $i] :
( ( ( X2 @ X3 )
& ( X2 @ X4 ) )
=> ( ( X2
@ ^ [X5: $i] : ( X3 @ ( X4 @ X5 ) ) )
& ! [X6: $i] :
( ( X1 @ X6 )
=> ( X1 @ ( X3 @ X6 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM111]) ).
thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1: $i > $o] :
? [X2: ( $i > $i ) > $o] :
! [X3: $i > $i,X4: $i > $i] :
( ( ( X2 @ X3 )
& ( X2 @ X4 ) )
=> ( ( X2
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( X3 @ ( X4 @ Z0 ) ) )
& ! [X6: $i] :
( ( X1 @ X6 )
=> ( X1 @ ( X3 @ X6 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_1]) ).
thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
! [X13: ( $i > $i ) > $o] :
( ( X13 @ ( esk1_1 @ X13 ) )
& ( X13 @ ( esk2_1 @ X13 ) )
& ( ( epred1_0 @ ( esk3_1 @ X13 ) )
| ~ ( X13
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( esk1_1 @ X13 @ ( esk2_1 @ X13 @ Z0 ) ) ) )
& ( ~ ( epred1_0 @ ( esk1_1 @ X13 @ ( esk3_1 @ X13 ) ) )
| ~ ( X13
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( esk1_1 @ X13 @ ( esk2_1 @ X13 @ Z0 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
! [X2: ( $i > $i ) > $o] : ( X2 @ ( esk1_1 @ X2 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(flex_resolve,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYO267^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.19 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.19 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.19 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.19 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.19 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.19 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.19 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.19 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 16:43:19 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.19 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.19 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.24 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.25 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qbW03FzBhO/E---3.1_1286974.p
% 0.09/0.26 % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.09/0.26 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
% 0.09/0.26 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.26 % Starting sh2lt with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.09/0.26 % Starting new_ho_10_unif with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.26 % Starting full_lambda_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.26 % Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.26 % Starting ehoh_best3_rw with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.26 % sh2lt with pid 1286996 completed with status 0
% 0.09/0.26 % Result found by sh2lt
% 0.09/0.26 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
% 0.09/0.26 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.26 % Starting sh2lt with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.09/0.26 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true))
% 0.09/0.26 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true)
% 0.09/0.26 % Search class: HHHSS-FFSF11-SHHFFSBN
% 0.09/0.26 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 4 cores with 1200 seconds (1200 total)
% 0.09/0.26 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 109s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.26 % Starting sh2lt with 121s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.26 % Starting new_bool_3 with 109s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.26 % Starting new_bool_2 with 109s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.26 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1287001 completed with status 0
% 0.09/0.26 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.09/0.26 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
% 0.09/0.26 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.26 % Starting sh2lt with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.09/0.26 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true))
% 0.09/0.26 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true)
% 0.09/0.26 % Search class: HHHSS-FFSF11-SHHFFSBN
% 0.09/0.26 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 4 cores with 1200 seconds (1200 total)
% 0.09/0.26 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 109s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.26 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.09/0.26
% 0.09/0.26 % Proof found!
% 0.09/0.26 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.09/0.26 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.09/0.26 % Parsed axioms : 1
% 0.09/0.26 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.09/0.26 % Initial clauses : 5
% 0.09/0.26 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.09/0.26 % Initial clauses in saturation : 5
% 0.09/0.26 % Processed clauses : 1
% 0.09/0.26 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.09/0.26 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.09/0.26 % ...remaining for further processing : 0
% 0.09/0.26 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.09/0.26 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.09/0.26 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.09/0.26 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.09/0.26 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.09/0.26 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.09/0.26 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.09/0.26 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.09/0.26 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.09/0.26 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.09/0.26 % NegExts : 0
% 0.09/0.26 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.09/0.26 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.09/0.26 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.09/0.26 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.09/0.26 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.09/0.26 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.09/0.26 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.09/0.26 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.09/0.26 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.09/0.26 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.09/0.26 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.26 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.26 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.26 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.26 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.26 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.26 % Current number of processed clauses : 0
% 0.09/0.26 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.09/0.26 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/0.26 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.24/0.26 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.24/0.26 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4
% 0.24/0.26 % ...number of literals in the above : 6
% 0.24/0.26 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/0.26 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.24/0.26 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.24/0.26 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.24/0.26 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.24/0.26 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.24/0.26 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/0.26 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.24/0.26 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.24/0.26 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/0.26 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/0.26 % Termbank termtop insertions : 400
% 0.24/0.26 % Search garbage collected termcells : 148
% 0.24/0.26
% 0.24/0.26 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.26 % User time : 0.003 s
% 0.24/0.26 % System time : 0.001 s
% 0.24/0.26 % Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.24/0.26 % Maximum resident set size: 3892 pages
% 0.24/0.26
% 0.24/0.26 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.26 % User time : 0.007 s
% 0.24/0.26 % System time : 0.007 s
% 0.24/0.26 % Total time : 0.014 s
% 0.24/0.26 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.24/0.26 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------