%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : cocATP---0.2.0 % Problem : SYO290^5 : TPTP v7.5.0. Released v4.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % Computer : n001.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 0s % DateTime : Tue Mar 29 00:51:05 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 0.47s 0.66s % Output : Proof 0.47s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.11/0.11 % Problem : SYO290^5 : TPTP v7.5.0. Released v4.0.0. % 0.11/0.12 % Command : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPUModel : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.33 % RAMPerCPU : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Mar 12 01:21:42 EST 2022 % 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.12/0.33 ModuleCmd_Load.c(213):ERROR:105: Unable to locate a modulefile for 'python/python27' % 0.12/0.34 Python 2.7.5 % 0.47/0.66 Using paths ['/home/cristobal/cocATP/CASC/TPTP/', '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/', '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/'] % 0.47/0.66 FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x1e995a8>, <kernel.Type object at 0x1e99638>) of role type named a_type % 0.47/0.66 Using role type % 0.47/0.66 Declaring a:Type % 0.47/0.66 FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x1e9df80>, <kernel.DependentProduct object at 0x1e995f0>) of role type named g2 % 0.47/0.66 Using role type % 0.47/0.66 Declaring g2:(a->a) % 0.47/0.66 FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x1e993f8>, <kernel.DependentProduct object at 0x213ab90>) of role type named g1 % 0.47/0.66 Using role type % 0.47/0.66 Declaring g1:(a->a) % 0.47/0.66 FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x1e99128>, <kernel.DependentProduct object at 0x1e99248>) of role type named p % 0.47/0.66 Using role type % 0.47/0.66 Declaring p:((a->a)->Prop) % 0.47/0.66 FOF formula ((or ((p (fun (Xw:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xw))))->False)) (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx))))) of role conjecture named cTRANS_BUG_EX2 % 0.47/0.66 Conjecture to prove = ((or ((p (fun (Xw:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xw))))->False)) (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx))))):Prop % 0.47/0.66 Parameter a_DUMMY:a. % 0.47/0.66 We need to prove ['((or ((p (fun (Xw:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xw))))->False)) (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx)))))'] % 0.47/0.66 Parameter a:Type. % 0.47/0.66 Parameter g2:(a->a). % 0.47/0.66 Parameter g1:(a->a). % 0.47/0.66 Parameter p:((a->a)->Prop). % 0.47/0.66 Trying to prove ((or ((p (fun (Xw:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xw))))->False)) (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx))))) % 0.47/0.66 Found classic0:=(classic (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx))))):((or (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx))))) (not (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx)))))) % 0.47/0.66 Found (classic (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx))))) as proof of ((or (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx))))) ((p (fun (Xw:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xw))))->False)) % 0.47/0.66 Found (classic (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx))))) as proof of ((or (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx))))) ((p (fun (Xw:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xw))))->False)) % 0.47/0.66 Found (or_comm_i00 (classic (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx)))))) as proof of ((or ((p (fun (Xw:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xw))))->False)) (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx))))) % 0.47/0.66 Found ((or_comm_i0 ((p (fun (Xw:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xw))))->False)) (classic (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx)))))) as proof of ((or ((p (fun (Xw:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xw))))->False)) (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx))))) % 0.47/0.66 Found (((or_comm_i (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx))))) ((p (fun (Xw:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xw))))->False)) (classic (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx)))))) as proof of ((or ((p (fun (Xw:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xw))))->False)) (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx))))) % 0.47/0.66 Found (((or_comm_i (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx))))) ((p (fun (Xw:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xw))))->False)) (classic (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx)))))) as proof of ((or ((p (fun (Xw:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xw))))->False)) (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx))))) % 0.47/0.66 Got proof (((or_comm_i (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx))))) ((p (fun (Xw:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xw))))->False)) (classic (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx)))))) % 0.47/0.66 Time elapsed = 0.054044s % 0.47/0.66 node=20 cost=12.000000 depth=5 % 0.47/0.66 :::::::::::::::::::::: % 0.47/0.66 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.47/0.66 % SZS output start Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.47/0.66 (((or_comm_i (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx))))) ((p (fun (Xw:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xw))))->False)) (classic (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx)))))) % 0.47/0.66 % SZS output end Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p %------------------------------------------------------------------------------