↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SYO299^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:53:53 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.49s 1.27s
% Output   : Refutation 1.49s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   24 (   3 unt;   0 typ;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  146 (  67 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   16 (   6 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  115 (  38   ~;  35   |;  19   &)
%                                         (  17 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   1 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of FOOLs       :  152 (  63 fml;  89 var)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   5 usr;   7 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
%            Number of variables   :   45 (  26   !;  19   ?;  45   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(f51,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f25,f36,f50]) ).

tff(f50,plain,
    ( spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f49]) ).

tff(f49,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f41,f39]) ).

tff(f39,plain,
    ( ! [X0: $o,X1: $o] : ( (X0) = (X1) )
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f24,f24]) ).

tff(f24,plain,
    ( ! [X3: $o] : ( sK1 = (X3) )
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f23]) ).

tff(f23,definition,
    ( spl3_2
  <=> ! [X3: $o] : ( sK1 = (X3) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

tff(f41,plain,
    ( ! [X0: $o] : ( $true != (X0) )
    | spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f20,f39]) ).

tff(f20,plain,
    ( ( $true != sK0 )
    | spl3_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f19]) ).

tff(f19,definition,
    ( spl3_1
  <=> ( $true = sK0 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

tff(f36,plain,
    ~ spl3_1,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f17,f19]) ).

tff(f17,plain,
    $true != sK0,
    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[f16]) ).

tff(f16,plain,
    ! [X3: $o] :
      ( ( $true != sK0 )
      | ( sK1 != (X3) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

tff(f12,plain,
    ! [X3: $o] :
      ( ( ( $true != sK0 )
        | ( sK1 != (X3) ) )
      & ( ( $true = sK0 )
        | ( sK1 = (X3) ) )
      & ( ( sK1 = sK0 )
        | ( sK2 != $true ) )
      & ( ( sK2 = $true )
        | ( sK1 != sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f10,f11]) ).

tff(f11,plain,
    ( ? [X0: $o,X1: $o,X2: $o] :
      ! [X3: $o] :
        ( ( ( $true != (X0) )
          | ( (X1) != (X3) ) )
        & ( ( $true = (X0) )
          | ( (X1) = (X3) ) )
        & ( ( (X0) = (X1) )
          | ( $true != (X2) ) )
        & ( ( $true = (X2) )
          | ( (X0) != (X1) ) ) )
   => ! [X3: $o] :
        ( ( ( $true != sK0 )
          | ( sK1 != (X3) ) )
        & ( ( $true = sK0 )
          | ( sK1 = (X3) ) )
        & ( ( sK1 = sK0 )
          | ( sK2 != $true ) )
        & ( ( sK2 = $true )
          | ( sK1 != sK0 ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

tff(f10,plain,
    ? [X0: $o,X1: $o,X2: $o] :
    ! [X3: $o] :
      ( ( ( $true != (X0) )
        | ( (X1) != (X3) ) )
      & ( ( $true = (X0) )
        | ( (X1) = (X3) ) )
      & ( ( (X0) = (X1) )
        | ( $true != (X2) ) )
      & ( ( $true = (X2) )
        | ( (X0) != (X1) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f9]) ).

tff(f9,plain,
    ? [X2: $o,X0: $o,X1: $o] :
    ! [X3: $o] :
      ( ( ( $true != (X2) )
        | ( (X0) != (X3) ) )
      & ( ( $true = (X2) )
        | ( (X0) = (X3) ) )
      & ( ( (X0) = (X2) )
        | ( $true != (X1) ) )
      & ( ( $true = (X1) )
        | ( (X0) != (X2) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f8]) ).

tff(f8,plain,
    ? [X2: $o,X0: $o,X1: $o] :
    ! [X3: $o] :
      ( ( ( $true != (X2) )
        | ( (X0) != (X3) ) )
      & ( ( $true = (X2) )
        | ( (X0) = (X3) ) )
      & ( ( (X0) = (X2) )
        | ( $true != (X1) ) )
      & ( ( $true = (X1) )
        | ( (X0) != (X2) ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f7]) ).

tff(f7,plain,
    ? [X2: $o,X0: $o,X1: $o] :
    ! [X3: $o] :
      ( ( ( (X0) = (X3) )
      <~> ( $true = (X2) ) )
      & ( ( (X0) = (X2) )
      <=> ( $true = (X1) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

tff(f6,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: $o,X2: $o,X1: $o] :
      ? [X3: $o] :
        ( ( ( (X0) = (X2) )
        <=> ( $true = (X1) ) )
       => ( ( (X0) = (X3) )
        <=> ( $true = (X2) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

tff(f5,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: $o,X1: $o,X2: $o] :
      ? [X3: $o] :
        ( ( ( (X0)
          <=> (X2) )
        <=> (X1) )
       => ( ( (X0)
          <=> (X3) )
        <=> (X2) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

tff(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1: $o,X2: $o,X0: $o] :
      ? [X3: $o] :
        ( ( ( (X1)
          <=> (X0) )
        <=> (X2) )
       => ( ( (X1)
          <=> (X3) )
        <=> (X0) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

tff(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X1: $o,X2: $o,X0: $o] :
    ? [X3: $o] :
      ( ( ( (X1)
        <=> (X0) )
      <=> (X2) )
     => ( ( (X1)
        <=> (X3) )
      <=> (X0) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.YRy8ceTJXt/DTF2THF_24547.p',cTHM51) ).

tff(f25,plain,
    ( spl3_1
    | spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f15,f23,f19]) ).

tff(f15,plain,
    ! [X3: $o] :
      ( ( sK1 = (X3) )
      | ( $true = sK0 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SYO299^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.15/0.34  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 14:27:55 EST 2026
% 0.15/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.34  Running /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.28/0.46  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.28/0.46  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.28/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/0.46  % File     : SYO299^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.28/0.46  % Domain   : Syntactic
% 0.28/0.46  % Problem  : TPS problem from BASIC-HO-THMS
% 0.28/0.46  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.28/0.46  % English  :
% 0.28/0.46  
% 0.28/0.46  % Refs     : [Bro09] Brown (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.28/0.46  % Source   : [Bro09]
% 0.28/0.46  % Names    : tps_0762 [Bro09]
% 0.28/0.46  
% 0.28/0.46  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.28/0.46  % Rating   : 0.17 v9.1.0, 0.12 v9.0.0, 0.17 v8.2.0, 0.18 v8.1.0, 0.17 v7.4.0, 0.22 v7.3.0, 0.20 v7.2.0, 0.25 v7.1.0, 0.29 v7.0.0, 0.25 v6.4.0, 0.29 v6.3.0, 0.33 v6.0.0, 0.17 v5.5.0, 0.00 v4.0.0
% 0.28/0.46  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    1 (   0 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
% 0.28/0.46  %            Number of atoms       :    0 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.28/0.46  %            Maximal formula atoms :    0 (   0 avg)
% 0.28/0.46  %            Number of connectives :    5 (   0   ~;   0   |;   0   &;   0   @)
% 0.28/0.46  %                                         (   4 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.28/0.46  %            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   8 avg)
% 0.28/0.46  %            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
% 0.28/0.46  %            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.28/0.46  %            Number of symbols     :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
% 0.28/0.46  %            Number of variables   :    4 (   0   ^;   3   !;   1   ?;   4   :)
% 0.28/0.46  % SPC      : TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR
% 0.28/0.46  
% 0.28/0.46  % Comments : This problem is from the TPS library. Copyright (c) 2009 The TPS
% 0.28/0.46  %            project in the Department of Mathematical Sciences at Carnegie
% 0.28/0.46  %            Mellon University. Distributed under the Creative Commons copyleft
% 0.28/0.46  %            license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
% 0.28/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/0.46  thf(cTHM51,conjecture,
% 0.28/0.46      ! [P: $o,Q: $o,R: $o] :
% 0.28/0.46      ? [S: $o] :
% 0.28/0.46        ( ( ( P
% 0.28/0.46          <=> Q )
% 0.28/0.46        <=> R )
% 0.28/0.46       => ( P
% 0.28/0.46        <=> ( Q
% 0.28/0.46          <=> S ) ) ) ).
% 0.28/0.46  
% 0.28/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/0.47  ------------------------
% 1.49/1.24  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.49/1.24  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.49/1.24  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 14:27:56 EST 2026
% 1.49/1.24  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.49/1.24  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.49/1.24  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.49/1.24  
% 1.49/1.24  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.YRy8ceTJXt/DTF2DTF24547.p
% See solution above
% 1.49/1.24  ------------------------
% 1.49/1.25  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.49/1.25  thf(cTHM51,conjecture,
% 1.49/1.25      ! [P: $o,Q: $o,R: $o] :
% 1.49/1.25      ? [S: $o] :
% 1.49/1.25        ( ( ( P
% 1.49/1.25          <=> Q )
% 1.49/1.25        <=> R )
% 1.49/1.25       => ( P
% 1.49/1.25        <=> ( Q
% 1.49/1.25          <=> S ) ) ) ).
% 1.49/1.25  ------------------------
% 1.49/1.27  % (24764)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_24547 for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 1.49/1.27  % (24761)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_24547 for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 1.49/1.27  % (24764)First to succeed.
% 1.49/1.27  % (24761)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.49/1.27  % (24764)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.49/1.27  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_24547
% 1.49/1.27  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_24547
% 1.49/1.27  tff(f51,plain,(
% 1.49/1.27    $false),
% 1.49/1.27    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f25,f36,f50])).
% 1.49/1.27  tff(f50,plain,(
% 1.49/1.27    spl3_1 | ~spl3_2),
% 1.49/1.27    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f49])).
% 1.49/1.27  tff(f49,plain,(
% 1.49/1.27    $false | (spl3_1 | ~spl3_2)),
% 1.49/1.27    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f41,f39])).
% 1.49/1.27  tff(f39,plain,(
% 1.49/1.27    ( ! [X0 : $o,X1 : $o] : ((X0 = X1)) ) | ~spl3_2),
% 1.49/1.27    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f24,f24])).
% 1.49/1.27  tff(f24,plain,(
% 1.49/1.27    ( ! [X3 : $o] : ((sK1 = X3)) ) | ~spl3_2),
% 1.49/1.27    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f23])).
% 1.49/1.27  tff(f23,definition,(
% 1.49/1.27    spl3_2 <=> ! [X3 : $o] : (sK1 = X3)),
% 1.49/1.27    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_2])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.49/1.27  tff(f41,plain,(
% 1.49/1.27    ( ! [X0 : $o] : (($true != X0)) ) | (spl3_1 | ~spl3_2)),
% 1.49/1.27    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f20,f39])).
% 1.49/1.27  tff(f20,plain,(
% 1.49/1.27    ($true != sK0) | spl3_1),
% 1.49/1.27    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f19])).
% 1.49/1.27  tff(f19,definition,(
% 1.49/1.27    spl3_1 <=> ($true = sK0)),
% 1.49/1.27    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_1])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.49/1.27  tff(f36,plain,(
% 1.49/1.27    ~spl3_1),
% 1.49/1.27    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f17,f19])).
% 1.49/1.27  tff(f17,plain,(
% 1.49/1.27    ($true != sK0)),
% 1.49/1.27    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[f16])).
% 1.49/1.27  tff(f16,plain,(
% 1.49/1.27    ( ! [X3 : $o] : (($true != sK0) | (sK1 != X3)) )),
% 1.49/1.27    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.49/1.27  tff(f12,plain,(
% 1.49/1.27    ! [X3 : $o] : ((($true != sK0) | (sK1 != X3)) & (($true = sK0) | (sK1 = X3)) & ((sK1 = sK0) | (sK2 != $true)) & ((sK2 = $true) | (sK1 != sK0)))),
% 1.49/1.27    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f10,f11])).
% 1.49/1.27  tff(f11,plain,(
% 1.49/1.27    ? [X0 : $o,X1 : $o,X2 : $o] : ! [X3 : $o] : ((($true != X0) | (X1 != X3)) & (($true = X0) | (X1 = X3)) & ((X0 = X1) | ($true != X2)) & (($true = X2) | (X0 != X1))) => ! [X3 : $o] : ((($true != sK0) | (sK1 != X3)) & (($true = sK0) | (sK1 = X3)) & ((sK1 = sK0) | (sK2 != $true)) & ((sK2 = $true) | (sK1 != sK0)))),
% 1.49/1.27    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.49/1.27  tff(f10,plain,(
% 1.49/1.27    ? [X0 : $o,X1 : $o,X2 : $o] : ! [X3 : $o] : ((($true != X0) | (X1 != X3)) & (($true = X0) | (X1 = X3)) & ((X0 = X1) | ($true != X2)) & (($true = X2) | (X0 != X1)))),
% 1.49/1.27    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f9])).
% 1.49/1.27  tff(f9,plain,(
% 1.49/1.27    ? [X2 : $o,X0 : $o,X1 : $o] : ! [X3 : $o] : ((($true != X2) | (X0 != X3)) & (($true = X2) | (X0 = X3)) & ((X0 = X2) | ($true != X1)) & (($true = X1) | (X0 != X2)))),
% 1.49/1.27    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f8])).
% 1.49/1.27  tff(f8,plain,(
% 1.49/1.27    ? [X2 : $o,X0 : $o,X1 : $o] : ! [X3 : $o] : (((($true != X2) | (X0 != X3)) & (($true = X2) | (X0 = X3))) & (((X0 = X2) | ($true != X1)) & (($true = X1) | (X0 != X2))))),
% 1.49/1.27    inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f7])).
% 1.49/1.27  tff(f7,plain,(
% 1.49/1.27    ? [X2 : $o,X0 : $o,X1 : $o] : ! [X3 : $o] : (((X0 = X3) <~> ($true = X2)) & ((X0 = X2) <=> ($true = X1)))),
% 1.49/1.27    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6])).
% 1.49/1.27  tff(f6,plain,(
% 1.49/1.27    ~! [X0 : $o,X2 : $o,X1 : $o] : ? [X3 : $o] : (((X0 = X2) <=> ($true = X1)) => ((X0 = X3) <=> ($true = X2)))),
% 1.49/1.27    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.49/1.27  tff(f5,plain,(
% 1.49/1.27    ~! [X0 : $o,X1 : $o,X2 : $o] : ? [X3 : $o] : (((X0 <=> X2) <=> X1) => ((X0 <=> X3) <=> X2))),
% 1.49/1.27    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.49/1.27  tff(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.49/1.27    ~! [X1 : $o,X2 : $o,X0 : $o] : ? [X3 : $o] : (((X1 <=> X0) <=> X2) => ((X1 <=> X3) <=> X0))),
% 1.49/1.27    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1])).
% 1.49/1.27  tff(f1,conjecture,(
% 1.49/1.27    ! [X1 : $o,X2 : $o,X0 : $o] : ? [X3 : $o] : (((X1 <=> X0) <=> X2) => ((X1 <=> X3) <=> X0))),
% 1.49/1.27    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.YRy8ceTJXt/DTF2THF_24547.p',cTHM51)).
% 1.49/1.27  tff(f25,plain,(
% 1.49/1.27    spl3_1 | spl3_2),
% 1.49/1.27    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f15,f23,f19])).
% 1.49/1.27  tff(f15,plain,(
% 1.49/1.27    ( ! [X3 : $o] : ((sK1 = X3) | ($true = sK0)) )),
% 1.49/1.27    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.49/1.27  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_24547
% 1.49/1.27  % (24764)------------------------------
% 1.49/1.27  % (24764)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.49/1.27  % (24764)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.49/1.27  
% 1.49/1.27  % (24764)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.49/1.27  % (24764)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 1.49/1.27  % (24764)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 1.49/1.27  % (24764)------------------------------
% 1.49/1.27  % (24764)------------------------------
% 1.49/1.27  % (24758)Success in time 0.011 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------