↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SYO300^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:53:53 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.59s 1.30s
% Output   : Refutation 1.59s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   12 (   4 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   36 (  15 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   79 (  11   ~;   1   |;   4   &;  58   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   89 (  89   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    5 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   50 (  24   ^;  20   !;   6   ?;  50   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(func_def_5,type,
    sK0: ( ( $i > $i ) > $i ) > ( ( $i > $i ) > $i ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    ph2: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(f13,plain,
    $false,
    inference(flex-flex_simplify,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ! [X0: ( $i > $i ) > $i] :
      ( ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i] :
            ( X0
            @ ^ [Y1: $i] : Y1 ) )
     != ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i] : ( X0 @ Y0 ) ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f11]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ! [X0: ( $i > $i ) > $i] :
      ( ( $true != $true )
      | ( ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i] :
              ( X0
              @ ^ [Y1: $i] : Y1 ) )
       != ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i] : ( X0 @ Y0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f9,f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ! [X2: ( $i > $i ) > $i] :
      ( ( sK0 @ X2 @ X2 )
      = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ! [X1: ( $i > $i ) > $i] :
      ( ! [X2: ( $i > $i ) > $i] :
          ( ( sK0 @ X2 @ X2 )
          = $true )
      & ( $true
       != ( sK0
          @ ^ [Y0: $i > $i] :
              ( Y0
              @ ( X1
                @ ^ [Y1: $i] : Y1 ) )
          @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f6,f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ( ? [X0: ( ( $i > $i ) > $i ) > ( ( $i > $i ) > $i ) > $o] :
      ! [X1: ( $i > $i ) > $i] :
        ( ! [X2: ( $i > $i ) > $i] :
            ( ( X0 @ X2 @ X2 )
            = $true )
        & ( $true
         != ( X0
            @ ^ [Y0: $i > $i] :
                ( Y0
                @ ( X1
                  @ ^ [Y1: $i] : Y1 ) )
            @ X1 ) ) )
   => ! [X1: ( $i > $i ) > $i] :
        ( ! [X2: ( $i > $i ) > $i] :
            ( ( sK0 @ X2 @ X2 )
            = $true )
        & ( $true
         != ( sK0
            @ ^ [Y0: $i > $i] :
                ( Y0
                @ ( X1
                  @ ^ [Y1: $i] : Y1 ) )
            @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ? [X0: ( ( $i > $i ) > $i ) > ( ( $i > $i ) > $i ) > $o] :
    ! [X1: ( $i > $i ) > $i] :
      ( ! [X2: ( $i > $i ) > $i] :
          ( ( X0 @ X2 @ X2 )
          = $true )
      & ( $true
       != ( X0
          @ ^ [Y0: $i > $i] :
              ( Y0
              @ ( X1
                @ ^ [Y1: $i] : Y1 ) )
          @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: ( ( $i > $i ) > $i ) > ( ( $i > $i ) > $i ) > $o] :
      ? [X1: ( $i > $i ) > $i] :
        ( ! [X2: ( $i > $i ) > $i] :
            ( ( X0 @ X2 @ X2 )
            = $true )
       => ( $true
          = ( X0
            @ ^ [Y0: $i > $i] :
                ( Y0
                @ ( X1
                  @ ^ [Y1: $i] : Y1 ) )
            @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: ( ( $i > $i ) > $i ) > ( ( $i > $i ) > $i ) > $o] :
      ? [X1: ( $i > $i ) > $i] :
        ( ! [X2: ( $i > $i ) > $i] : ( X0 @ X2 @ X2 )
       => ( X0
          @ ^ [X3: $i > $i] :
              ( X3
              @ ( X1
                @ ^ [X4: $i] : X4 ) )
          @ X1 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0: ( ( $i > $i ) > $i ) > ( ( $i > $i ) > $i ) > $o] :
      ? [X1: ( $i > $i ) > $i] :
        ( ! [X2: ( $i > $i ) > $i] : ( X0 @ X2 @ X2 )
       => ( X0
          @ ^ [X3: $i > $i] :
              ( X3
              @ ( X1
                @ ^ [X4: $i] : X4 ) )
          @ X1 ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X0: ( ( $i > $i ) > $i ) > ( ( $i > $i ) > $i ) > $o] :
    ? [X1: ( $i > $i ) > $i] :
      ( ! [X2: ( $i > $i ) > $i] : ( X0 @ X2 @ X2 )
     => ( X0
        @ ^ [X3: $i > $i] :
            ( X3
            @ ( X1
              @ ^ [X4: $i] : X4 ) )
        @ X1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6zYX3ZiLmZ/DTF2THF_30331.p',cUNIFTHM1) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ! [X1: ( $i > $i ) > $i] :
      ( $true
     != ( sK0
        @ ^ [Y0: $i > $i] :
            ( Y0
            @ ( X1
              @ ^ [Y1: $i] : Y1 ) )
        @ X1 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f8]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SYO300^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.16/0.34  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 14:26:26 EST 2026
% 0.16/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.34  Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.28/0.46  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.28/0.47  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.28/0.47  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/0.47  % File     : SYO300^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.28/0.47  % Domain   : Syntactic
% 0.28/0.47  % Problem  : TPS problem from BASIC-HO-THMS
% 0.28/0.47  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.28/0.47  % English  :
% 0.28/0.47  
% 0.28/0.47  % Refs     : [Bro09] Brown (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.28/0.47  % Source   : [Bro09]
% 0.28/0.47  % Names    : tps_0770 [Bro09]
% 0.28/0.47  
% 0.28/0.47  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.28/0.47  % Rating   : 0.08 v9.1.0, 0.12 v9.0.0, 0.08 v8.2.0, 0.09 v8.1.0, 0.25 v7.4.0, 0.22 v7.3.0, 0.30 v7.2.0, 0.25 v7.1.0, 0.29 v7.0.0, 0.25 v6.4.0, 0.29 v6.3.0, 0.33 v6.0.0, 0.17 v5.5.0, 0.00 v4.0.0
% 0.28/0.47  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    1 (   0 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
% 0.28/0.47  %            Number of atoms       :    0 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.28/0.47  %            Maximal formula atoms :    0 (   0 avg)
% 0.28/0.47  %            Number of connectives :    7 (   0   ~;   0   |;   0   &;   6   @)
% 0.28/0.47  %                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.28/0.47  %            Maximal formula depth :   10 (  10 avg)
% 0.28/0.47  %            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
% 0.28/0.47  %            Number of type conns  :   11 (  11   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.28/0.47  %            Number of symbols     :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
% 0.28/0.47  %            Number of variables   :    5 (   2   ^;   2   !;   1   ?;   5   :)
% 0.28/0.47  % SPC      : TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR
% 0.28/0.47  
% 0.28/0.47  % Comments : This problem is from the TPS library. Copyright (c) 2009 The TPS
% 0.28/0.47  %            project in the Department of Mathematical Sciences at Carnegie
% 0.28/0.47  %            Mellon University. Distributed under the Creative Commons copyleft
% 0.28/0.47  %            license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
% 0.28/0.47  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/0.47  thf(cUNIFTHM1,conjecture,
% 0.28/0.47      ! [P: ( ( $i > $i ) > $i ) > ( ( $i > $i ) > $i ) > $o] :
% 0.28/0.47      ? [X: ( $i > $i ) > $i] :
% 0.28/0.47        ( ! [Xz: ( $i > $i ) > $i] : ( P @ Xz @ Xz )
% 0.28/0.47       => ( P
% 0.28/0.47          @ ^ [U: $i > $i] :
% 0.28/0.47              ( U
% 0.28/0.47              @ ( X
% 0.28/0.47                @ ^ [V: $i] : V ) )
% 0.28/0.47          @ X ) ) ).
% 0.28/0.47  
% 0.28/0.47  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/0.47  ------------------------
% 1.45/1.26  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.45/1.26  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.45/1.26  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 14:26:26 EST 2026
% 1.45/1.26  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.45/1.26  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.45/1.26  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.45/1.26  
% 1.45/1.26  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6zYX3ZiLmZ/DTF2DTF30331.p
% See solution above
% 1.45/1.26  ------------------------
% 1.45/1.28  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.45/1.28  thf(cUNIFTHM1,conjecture,
% 1.45/1.28      ! [P: ( ( $i > $i ) > $i ) > ( ( $i > $i ) > $i ) > $o] :
% 1.45/1.28      ? [X: ( $i > $i ) > $i] :
% 1.45/1.28        ( ! [Xz: ( $i > $i ) > $i] : ( P @ Xz @ Xz )
% 1.45/1.28       => ( P
% 1.45/1.28          @ ^ [U: $i > $i] :
% 1.45/1.28              ( U
% 1.45/1.28              @ ( X
% 1.45/1.28                @ ^ [V: $i] : V ) )
% 1.45/1.28          @ X ) ) ).
% 1.45/1.28  ------------------------
% 1.45/1.29  % (30616)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_30331 for (2999ds/275Mi)
% 1.45/1.29  % (30613)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_30331 for (2999ds/27Mi)
% 1.45/1.29  % (30616)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.45/1.29  % (30616)------------------------------
% 1.45/1.29  % (30616)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.45/1.29  % (30616)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.45/1.29  
% 1.45/1.29  
% 1.45/1.29  % (30616)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.45/1.29  % (30616)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 1.45/1.29  % (30616)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 1.45/1.29  % (30616)------------------------------
% 1.45/1.29  % (30616)------------------------------
% 1.45/1.29  % (30613)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.45/1.29  % (30613)------------------------------
% 1.45/1.29  % (30613)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.45/1.29  % (30613)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.45/1.29  
% 1.45/1.29  
% 1.45/1.29  % (30613)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.45/1.29  % (30613)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 1.45/1.29  % (30613)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.45/1.29  % (30613)------------------------------
% 1.45/1.29  % (30613)------------------------------
% 1.59/1.30  % (30611)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_30331 for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 1.59/1.30  % (30612)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_30331 for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 1.59/1.30  % (30614)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_30331 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 1.59/1.30  % (30615)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_30331 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 1.59/1.30  % (30617)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_30331 for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 1.59/1.30  % (30611)First to succeed.
% 1.59/1.30  % (30614)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.59/1.30  % (30614)------------------------------
% 1.59/1.30  % (30614)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.59/1.30  % (30614)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.59/1.30  
% 1.59/1.30  
% 1.59/1.30  % (30614)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.59/1.30  % (30614)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.59/1.30  % (30614)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 1.59/1.30  % (30614)------------------------------
% 1.59/1.30  % (30614)------------------------------
% 1.59/1.30  % (30615)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.59/1.30  % (30615)------------------------------
% 1.59/1.30  % (30615)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.59/1.30  % (30615)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.59/1.30  % (30615)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.59/1.30  
% 1.59/1.30  % (30615)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.59/1.30  % (30615)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 1.59/1.30  % (30615)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 1.59/1.30  % (30615)------------------------------
% 1.59/1.30  % (30615)------------------------------
% 1.59/1.30  % (30612)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.59/1.30  % (30611)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.59/1.30  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_30331
% 1.59/1.30  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_30331
% 1.59/1.30  thf(func_def_5, type, sK0: (($i > $i) > $i) > (($i > $i) > $i) > $o).
% 1.59/1.30  thf(func_def_7, type, ph2: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 1.59/1.30  thf(f13,plain,(
% 1.59/1.30    $false),
% 1.59/1.30    inference(flex-flex_simplify,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.59/1.30  thf(f12,plain,(
% 1.59/1.30    ( ! [X0 : ($i > $i) > $i] : (((^[Y0 : $i > $i]: (X0 @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (Y1)))) != (^[Y0 : $i > $i]: (X0 @ Y0)))) )),
% 1.59/1.30    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f11])).
% 1.59/1.30  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.59/1.30    ( ! [X0 : ($i > $i) > $i] : (($true != $true) | ((^[Y0 : $i > $i]: (X0 @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (Y1)))) != (^[Y0 : $i > $i]: (X0 @ Y0)))) )),
% 1.59/1.30    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f9,f10])).
% 1.59/1.30  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.59/1.30    ( ! [X2 : ($i > $i) > $i] : (((sK0 @ X2 @ X2) = $true)) )),
% 1.59/1.30    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f8])).
% 1.59/1.30  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.59/1.30    ! [X1 : ($i > $i) > $i] : (! [X2 : ($i > $i) > $i] : ((sK0 @ X2 @ X2) = $true) & ($true != (sK0 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $i]: (Y0 @ (X1 @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (Y1))))) @ X1)))),
% 1.59/1.30    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f6,f7])).
% 1.59/1.30  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.59/1.30    ? [X0 : (($i > $i) > $i) > (($i > $i) > $i) > $o] : ! [X1 : ($i > $i) > $i] : (! [X2 : ($i > $i) > $i] : ((X0 @ X2 @ X2) = $true) & ($true != (X0 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $i]: (Y0 @ (X1 @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (Y1))))) @ X1))) => ! [X1 : ($i > $i) > $i] : (! [X2 : ($i > $i) > $i] : ((sK0 @ X2 @ X2) = $true) & ($true != (sK0 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $i]: (Y0 @ (X1 @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (Y1))))) @ X1)))),
% 1.59/1.30    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.59/1.30  thf(f6,plain,(
% 1.59/1.30    ? [X0 : (($i > $i) > $i) > (($i > $i) > $i) > $o] : ! [X1 : ($i > $i) > $i] : (! [X2 : ($i > $i) > $i] : ((X0 @ X2 @ X2) = $true) & ($true != (X0 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $i]: (Y0 @ (X1 @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (Y1))))) @ X1)))),
% 1.59/1.30    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.59/1.30  thf(f5,plain,(
% 1.59/1.30    ~! [X0 : (($i > $i) > $i) > (($i > $i) > $i) > $o] : ? [X1 : ($i > $i) > $i] : (! [X2 : ($i > $i) > $i] : ((X0 @ X2 @ X2) = $true) => ($true = (X0 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $i]: (Y0 @ (X1 @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (Y1))))) @ X1)))),
% 1.59/1.30    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4])).
% 1.59/1.30  thf(f4,plain,(
% 1.59/1.30    ~! [X0 : (($i > $i) > $i) > (($i > $i) > $i) > $o] : ? [X1 : ($i > $i) > $i] : (! [X2 : ($i > $i) > $i] : (X0 @ X2 @ X2) => (X0 @ (^[X3 : $i > $i] : (X3 @ (X1 @ (^[X4 : $i] : (X4))))) @ X1))),
% 1.59/1.30    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.59/1.30  thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.59/1.30    ~! [X0 : (($i > $i) > $i) > (($i > $i) > $i) > $o] : ? [X1 : ($i > $i) > $i] : (! [X2 : ($i > $i) > $i] : (X0 @ X2 @ X2) => (X0 @ (^[X3 : $i > $i] : (X3 @ (X1 @ (^[X4 : $i] : (X4))))) @ X1))),
% 1.59/1.30    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1])).
% 1.59/1.30  thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 1.59/1.30    ! [X0 : (($i > $i) > $i) > (($i > $i) > $i) > $o] : ? [X1 : ($i > $i) > $i] : (! [X2 : ($i > $i) > $i] : (X0 @ X2 @ X2) => (X0 @ (^[X3 : $i > $i] : (X3 @ (X1 @ (^[X4 : $i] : (X4))))) @ X1))),
% 1.59/1.30    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6zYX3ZiLmZ/DTF2THF_30331.p',cUNIFTHM1)).
% 1.59/1.30  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.59/1.30    ( ! [X1 : ($i > $i) > $i] : (($true != (sK0 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $i]: (Y0 @ (X1 @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (Y1))))) @ X1))) )),
% 1.59/1.30    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f8])).
% 1.59/1.30  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_30331
% 1.59/1.30  % (30611)------------------------------
% 1.59/1.30  % (30611)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.59/1.30  % (30611)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.59/1.30  
% 1.59/1.30  % (30611)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.59/1.30  % (30611)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 1.59/1.30  % (30611)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 1.59/1.30  % (30611)------------------------------
% 1.59/1.30  % (30611)------------------------------
% 1.59/1.30  % (30610)Success in time 0.019 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------