↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SYO301^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:53:54 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.45s 1.29s
% Output   : Refutation 1.45s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (   3 unt;   0 typ;   1 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  109 (  33 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  132 (  26   ~;  12   |;  12   &;  72   @)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   9  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   10 (  10   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    9 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   32 (   0   ^;  21   !;  11   ?;  32   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(func_def_0,type,
    f: $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    cP: $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    sK0: ( $i > $o ) > $i ).

thf(func_def_9,type,
    ph2: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(f31,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f27,f30]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    ~ spl1_1,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f29]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl1_1 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f28]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | ~ spl1_1 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f26,f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ( cP @ ( f @ b ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ! [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i] :
        ( ( $true
         != ( X0 @ ( f @ X1 ) ) )
        | ( ( ( X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) )
            = $true )
          & ( $true
           != ( cP @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) ) ) ) )
    & ( ( cP @ ( f @ b ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f7,f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ! [X0: $i > $o] :
      ( ? [X2: $i] :
          ( ( $true
            = ( X0 @ X2 ) )
          & ( ( cP @ X2 )
           != $true ) )
     => ( ( ( X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) )
          = $true )
        & ( $true
         != ( cP @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ( ! [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i] :
        ( ( $true
         != ( X0 @ ( f @ X1 ) ) )
        | ? [X2: $i] :
            ( ( $true
              = ( X0 @ X2 ) )
            & ( ( cP @ X2 )
             != $true ) ) )
    & ( ( cP @ ( f @ b ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ( ! [X1: $i > $o,X0: $i] :
        ( ( ( X1 @ ( f @ X0 ) )
         != $true )
        | ? [X2: $i] :
            ( ( ( X1 @ X2 )
              = $true )
            & ( ( cP @ X2 )
             != $true ) ) )
    & ( ( cP @ ( f @ b ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ( ( ( cP @ ( f @ b ) )
        = $true )
     => ? [X1: $i > $o,X0: $i] :
          ( ( ( X1 @ ( f @ X0 ) )
            = $true )
          & ! [X2: $i] :
              ( ( ( X1 @ X2 )
                = $true )
             => ( ( cP @ X2 )
                = $true ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ( ( cP @ ( f @ b ) )
     => ? [X0: $i,X1: $i > $o] :
          ( ! [X2: $i] :
              ( ( X1 @ X2 )
             => ( cP @ X2 ) )
          & ( X1 @ ( f @ X0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( cP @ ( f @ b ) )
     => ? [X0: $i,X1: $i > $o] :
          ( ! [X2: $i] :
              ( ( X1 @ X2 )
             => ( cP @ X2 ) )
          & ( X1 @ ( f @ X0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ( ( cP @ ( f @ b ) )
   => ? [X0: $i,X1: $i > $o] :
        ( ! [X2: $i] :
            ( ( X1 @ X2 )
           => ( cP @ X2 ) )
        & ( X1 @ ( f @ X0 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.bAlT9J71nX/DTF2THF_16213.p',cBLEDSOE5) ).

thf(f26,plain,
    ( ! [X0: $i] :
        ( $true
       != ( cP @ ( f @ X0 ) ) )
    | ~ spl1_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f25]) ).

thf(f25,definition,
    ( spl1_1
  <=> ! [X0: $i] :
        ( $true
       != ( cP @ ( f @ X0 ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f27,plain,
    ( spl1_1
    | spl1_1 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f19,f25,f25]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( cP @ ( f @ X0 ) ) )
      | ( $true
       != ( cP @ ( f @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f17]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( cP @ ( f @ X1 ) ) )
      | ( $true != $true )
      | ( $true
       != ( cP @ ( f @ X0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f11,f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ! [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) )
        = $true )
      | ( $true
       != ( X0 @ ( f @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ! [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( cP @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) ) )
      | ( $true
       != ( X0 @ ( f @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SYO301^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.16/0.34  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 14:27:57 EST 2026
% 0.16/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.34  Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.29/0.46  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.29/0.46  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.29/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.29/0.46  % File     : SYO301^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.29/0.46  % Domain   : Syntactic
% 0.29/0.46  % Problem  : TPS problem from BASIC-HO-THMS
% 0.29/0.46  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.29/0.46  % English  :
% 0.29/0.46  
% 0.29/0.46  % Refs     : [Bro09] Brown (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.29/0.46  % Source   : [Bro09]
% 0.29/0.46  % Names    : tps_0775 [Bro09]
% 0.29/0.46  
% 0.29/0.46  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.29/0.46  % Rating   : 0.08 v9.1.0, 0.12 v9.0.0, 0.08 v8.2.0, 0.09 v8.1.0, 0.17 v7.4.0, 0.11 v7.3.0, 0.10 v7.2.0, 0.12 v7.1.0, 0.14 v7.0.0, 0.12 v6.4.0, 0.14 v6.3.0, 0.17 v6.2.0, 0.33 v6.1.0, 0.17 v6.0.0, 0.00 v5.1.0, 0.25 v5.0.0, 0.00 v4.0.0
% 0.29/0.46  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    4 (   0 unt;   3 typ;   0 def)
% 0.29/0.46  %            Number of atoms       :    2 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.29/0.46  %            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   2 avg)
% 0.29/0.46  %            Number of connectives :    9 (   0   ~;   0   |;   1   &;   6   @)
% 0.29/0.46  %                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.29/0.46  %            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   8 avg)
% 0.29/0.46  %            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
% 0.29/0.46  %            Number of type conns  :    3 (   3   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.29/0.46  %            Number of symbols     :    3 (   3 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
% 0.29/0.46  %            Number of variables   :    3 (   0   ^;   1   !;   2   ?;   3   :)
% 0.29/0.46  % SPC      : TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR
% 0.29/0.46  
% 0.29/0.46  % Comments : This problem is from the TPS library. Copyright (c) 2009 The TPS
% 0.29/0.46  %            project in the Department of Mathematical Sciences at Carnegie
% 0.29/0.46  %            Mellon University. Distributed under the Creative Commons copyleft
% 0.29/0.46  %            license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
% 0.29/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.29/0.46  thf(f,type,
% 0.29/0.46      f: $i > $i ).
% 0.29/0.46  
% 0.29/0.46  thf(cP,type,
% 0.29/0.46      cP: $i > $o ).
% 0.29/0.46  
% 0.29/0.46  thf(b,type,
% 0.29/0.46      b: $i ).
% 0.29/0.46  
% 0.29/0.46  thf(cBLEDSOE5,conjecture,
% 0.29/0.46      ( ( cP @ ( f @ b ) )
% 0.29/0.46     => ? [Xs: $i,A: $i > $o] :
% 0.29/0.46          ( ! [Xx: $i] :
% 0.29/0.46              ( ( A @ Xx )
% 0.29/0.46             => ( cP @ Xx ) )
% 0.29/0.46          & ( A @ ( f @ Xs ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.29/0.46  
% 0.29/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.29/0.46  ------------------------
% 1.45/1.26  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.45/1.26  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.45/1.26  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 14:27:58 EST 2026
% 1.45/1.26  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.45/1.26  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.45/1.26  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.45/1.26  
% 1.45/1.26  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.bAlT9J71nX/DTF2DTF16213.p
% See solution above
% 1.45/1.26  ------------------------
% 1.45/1.27  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.45/1.27  thf(f,type,
% 1.45/1.27      f: $i > $i ).
% 1.45/1.27  
% 1.45/1.27  thf(cP,type,
% 1.45/1.27      cP: $i > $o ).
% 1.45/1.27  
% 1.45/1.27  thf(b,type,
% 1.45/1.27      b: $i ).
% 1.45/1.27  
% 1.45/1.27  thf(cBLEDSOE5,conjecture,
% 1.45/1.27      ( ( cP @ ( f @ b ) )
% 1.45/1.27     => ? [Xs: $i,A: $i > $o] :
% 1.45/1.27          ( ! [Xx: $i] :
% 1.45/1.27              ( ( A @ Xx )
% 1.45/1.27             => ( cP @ Xx ) )
% 1.45/1.27          & ( A @ ( f @ Xs ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.45/1.27  ------------------------
% 1.45/1.28  % (16494)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_16213 for (2999ds/275Mi)
% 1.45/1.28  % (16493)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_16213 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 1.45/1.28  % (16493)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.45/1.28  % (16493)------------------------------
% 1.45/1.28  % (16493)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.45/1.28  % (16493)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.45/1.28  % (16493)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.45/1.28  
% 1.45/1.28  % (16493)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.45/1.28  % (16493)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 1.45/1.28  % (16493)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.45/1.28  % (16493)------------------------------
% 1.45/1.28  % (16493)------------------------------
% 1.45/1.28  % (16494)First to succeed.
% 1.45/1.29  % (16494)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.45/1.29  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_16213
% 1.45/1.29  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_16213
% 1.45/1.29  thf(func_def_0, type, f: $i > $i).
% 1.45/1.29  thf(func_def_1, type, cP: $i > $o).
% 1.45/1.29  thf(func_def_6, type, sK0: ($i > $o) > $i).
% 1.45/1.29  thf(func_def_9, type, ph2: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 1.45/1.29  thf(f31,plain,(
% 1.45/1.29    $false),
% 1.45/1.29    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f27,f30])).
% 1.45/1.29  thf(f30,plain,(
% 1.45/1.29    ~spl1_1),
% 1.45/1.29    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f29])).
% 1.45/1.29  thf(f29,plain,(
% 1.45/1.29    $false | ~spl1_1),
% 1.45/1.29    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f28])).
% 1.45/1.29  thf(f28,plain,(
% 1.45/1.29    ($true != $true) | ~spl1_1),
% 1.45/1.29    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f26,f10])).
% 1.45/1.29  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.45/1.29    ((cP @ (f @ b)) = $true)),
% 1.45/1.29    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9])).
% 1.45/1.29  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.45/1.29    ! [X0 : $i > $o,X1 : $i] : (($true != (X0 @ (f @ X1))) | (((X0 @ (sK0 @ X0)) = $true) & ($true != (cP @ (sK0 @ X0))))) & ((cP @ (f @ b)) = $true)),
% 1.45/1.29    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f7,f8])).
% 1.45/1.29  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.45/1.29    ! [X0 : $i > $o] : (? [X2 : $i] : (($true = (X0 @ X2)) & ((cP @ X2) != $true)) => (((X0 @ (sK0 @ X0)) = $true) & ($true != (cP @ (sK0 @ X0)))))),
% 1.45/1.29    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.45/1.29  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.45/1.29    ! [X0 : $i > $o,X1 : $i] : (($true != (X0 @ (f @ X1))) | ? [X2 : $i] : (($true = (X0 @ X2)) & ((cP @ X2) != $true))) & ((cP @ (f @ b)) = $true)),
% 1.45/1.29    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f6])).
% 1.45/1.29  thf(f6,plain,(
% 1.45/1.29    ! [X1 : $i > $o,X0 : $i] : (((X1 @ (f @ X0)) != $true) | ? [X2 : $i] : (((X1 @ X2) = $true) & ((cP @ X2) != $true))) & ((cP @ (f @ b)) = $true)),
% 1.45/1.29    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.45/1.29  thf(f5,plain,(
% 1.45/1.29    ~(((cP @ (f @ b)) = $true) => ? [X1 : $i > $o,X0 : $i] : (((X1 @ (f @ X0)) = $true) & ! [X2 : $i] : (((X1 @ X2) = $true) => ((cP @ X2) = $true))))),
% 1.45/1.29    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4])).
% 1.45/1.29  thf(f4,plain,(
% 1.45/1.29    ~((cP @ (f @ b)) => ? [X0 : $i,X1 : $i > $o] : (! [X2 : $i] : ((X1 @ X2) => (cP @ X2)) & (X1 @ (f @ X0))))),
% 1.45/1.29    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.45/1.29  thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.45/1.29    ~((cP @ (f @ b)) => ? [X0 : $i,X1 : $i > $o] : (! [X2 : $i] : ((X1 @ X2) => (cP @ X2)) & (X1 @ (f @ X0))))),
% 1.45/1.29    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1])).
% 1.45/1.29  thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 1.45/1.29    (cP @ (f @ b)) => ? [X0 : $i,X1 : $i > $o] : (! [X2 : $i] : ((X1 @ X2) => (cP @ X2)) & (X1 @ (f @ X0)))),
% 1.45/1.29    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.bAlT9J71nX/DTF2THF_16213.p',cBLEDSOE5)).
% 1.45/1.29  thf(f26,plain,(
% 1.45/1.29    ( ! [X0 : $i] : (($true != (cP @ (f @ X0)))) ) | ~spl1_1),
% 1.45/1.29    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f25])).
% 1.45/1.29  thf(f25,definition,(
% 1.45/1.29    spl1_1 <=> ! [X0 : $i] : ($true != (cP @ (f @ X0)))),
% 1.45/1.29    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_1])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.45/1.29  thf(f27,plain,(
% 1.45/1.29    spl1_1 | spl1_1),
% 1.45/1.29    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f19,f25,f25])).
% 1.45/1.29  thf(f19,plain,(
% 1.45/1.29    ( ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($true != (cP @ (f @ X0))) | ($true != (cP @ (f @ X1)))) )),
% 1.45/1.29    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f17])).
% 1.45/1.29  thf(f17,plain,(
% 1.45/1.29    ( ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($true != (cP @ (f @ X1))) | ($true != $true) | ($true != (cP @ (f @ X0)))) )),
% 1.45/1.29    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f11,f12])).
% 1.45/1.29  thf(f12,plain,(
% 1.45/1.29    ( ! [X0 : $i > $o,X1 : $i] : (((X0 @ (sK0 @ X0)) = $true) | ($true != (X0 @ (f @ X1)))) )),
% 1.45/1.29    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9])).
% 1.45/1.29  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.45/1.29    ( ! [X0 : $i > $o,X1 : $i] : (($true != (cP @ (sK0 @ X0))) | ($true != (X0 @ (f @ X1)))) )),
% 1.45/1.29    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9])).
% 1.45/1.29  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_16213
% 1.45/1.29  % (16494)------------------------------
% 1.45/1.29  % (16494)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.45/1.29  % (16494)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.45/1.29  
% 1.45/1.29  % (16494)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.45/1.29  % (16494)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.45/1.29  % (16494)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 1.45/1.29  % (16494)------------------------------
% 1.45/1.29  % (16494)------------------------------
% 1.45/1.29  % (16488)Success in time 0.012 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------