↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SYO317^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:45:35 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 4.35s 2.49s
% Output   : Refutation 4.58s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   12 (   5 unt;   0 typ;   1 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   45 (   9 equ;   3 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  146 (  12   ~;   8   |;  20   &;  93   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  13  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   18 (   7 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    6 (   6   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    8 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   39 (   1   ^;  31   !;   6   ?;  39   :)
%                                         (   0  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   1  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(cP_decl,type,
    cP: $i > $o ).

thf(f_decl,type,
    f: $i > $i ).

thf(cEQ_decl,type,
    cEQ: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(a_decl,type,
    a: $i ).

thf(sk1_decl,type,
    sk1: ( $i > $o ) > $i ).

thf(sk1_def,definition,
    ( sk1
    = ( ^ [A: $i > $o] :
        @+[B: $i] :
          ~ ( ( A @ ( f @ B ) )
           => ( cP @ B ) ) ) ) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ( ( ! [A: $i] : ( cEQ @ A @ A )
      & ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
          ( ( ( cEQ @ A @ B )
            & ( cP @ A ) )
         => ( cP @ B ) )
      & ( cP @ a )
      & ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
          ( ( cEQ @ ( f @ A ) @ ( f @ B ) )
         => ( cEQ @ A @ B ) ) )
   => ? [A: $i > $o] :
        ( ! [B: $i] :
            ( ( A @ ( f @ B ) )
           => ( cP @ B ) )
        & ? [B: $i] : ( A @ B ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cTHM304) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( ! [A: $i] : ( cEQ @ A @ A )
        & ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
            ( ( ( cEQ @ A @ B )
              & ( cP @ A ) )
           => ( cP @ B ) )
        & ( cP @ a )
        & ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
            ( ( cEQ @ ( f @ A ) @ ( f @ B ) )
           => ( cEQ @ A @ B ) ) )
     => ? [A: $i > $o] :
          ( ! [B: $i] :
              ( ( A @ ( f @ B ) )
             => ( cP @ B ) )
          & ? [B: $i] : ( A @ B ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ~ ( ( ! [A: $i] : ( cEQ @ A @ A )
        & ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
            ( ( ( cEQ @ A @ B )
              & ( cP @ A ) )
           => ( cP @ B ) )
        & ( cP @ a )
        & ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
            ( ( cEQ @ ( f @ A ) @ ( f @ B ) )
           => ( cEQ @ A @ B ) ) )
     => ? [A: $i > $o] :
          ( ! [B: $i] :
              ( ( A @ ( f @ B ) )
             => ( cP @ B ) )
          & ? [B: $i] : ( A @ B ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ! [G: $i,F: $i > $o,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( cEQ @ A @ A )
      & ( ~ ( cEQ @ B @ C )
        | ~ ( cP @ B )
        | ( cP @ C ) )
      & ( cP @ a )
      & ( ~ ( cEQ @ ( f @ D ) @ ( f @ E ) )
        | ( cEQ @ D @ E ) )
      & ( ( F @ ( f @ ( sk1 @ F ) ) )
        | ~ ( F @ G ) )
      & ( ~ ( cP @ ( sk1 @ F ) )
        | ~ ( F @ G ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[3]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( A @ ( f @ ( sk1 @ A ) ) )
      | ~ ( A @ B ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A
        = ( f @ ( sk1 @ ( (=) @ $i @ A ) ) ) )
      | ( A != A ) ),
    inference(replace_leibeq,[status(thm)],[7:[bind(A,$thf( (=) @ $i @ B ))]]) ).

thf(15,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A
        = ( f @ ( sk1 @ ( (=) @ $i @ A ) ) ) )
      | ( A != A ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(16,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( A
      = ( f @ ( sk1 @ ( (=) @ $i @ A ) ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( cEQ @ A @ A ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    cP @ a,
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(59,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[3,16,5,9]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYO317^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.10/0.21  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.21  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.21  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.21  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.21  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.21  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.21  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.21  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 16:45:15 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.21  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.21  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.06/0.81  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.24/1.00  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (191ms). 
% 1.24/1.01  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.06/1.43  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.06/1.44  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.24/1.54  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.24/1.58  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.24/1.58  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.24/1.58  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.24/1.59  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 4.35/2.49  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 4.35/2.49  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 4.35/2.49  % Time passed: 2127ms (effective reasoning time: 1471ms)
% 4.35/2.49  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 4.35/2.49  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 4.35/2.49  % No. of inferences in proof: 11
% 4.35/2.49  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2127 ms resp. 1471 ms w/o parsing
% 4.58/2.54  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.58/2.54  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------