%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SYO349_8 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:46:12 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.11s 0.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.11s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 10 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 40 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 14 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 53 ( 23 ~; 21 |; 9 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 0 ( 0 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 4 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_23,type,
cB: $o ).
tff(decl_24,type,
cP: $o > $o ).
tff(decl_25,type,
cA: $o ).
fof(cTHM617,conjecture,
( cP(cB)
| ~ cP(cA)
| ~ cB
| ~ cA ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cTHM617) ).
fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ( cP(cB)
| ~ cP(cA)
| ~ cB
| ~ cA ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM617]) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( ( cP($false)
| cB )
& ( cP($true)
| ~ cB ) )
| ~ ( ( cP($false)
| cA )
& ( cP($true)
| ~ cA ) )
| ~ cB
| ~ cA ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( ( ~ cP($true)
| ~ cP($false) )
& ( ~ cP($true)
| ~ cB )
& ( cB
| ~ cP($false) )
& ( cB
| ~ cB )
& ( cP($false)
| cA )
& ( cP($true)
| ~ cA )
& cB
& cA ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( ~ cA
| cP($true) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
cA,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( ~ cP($true)
| ~ cB ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
cB,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
cP($true),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYO349_8 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 11:46:33 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.43 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.11/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % sh5l with pid 2841053 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.11/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.11/0.43 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.11/0.43 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.43 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2841057 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.11/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.11/0.43 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.11/0.43 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.43 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.11/0.43
% 0.11/0.43 % Proof found!
% 0.11/0.43 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.11/0.43 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.43 % Parsed axioms : 4
% 0.11/0.43 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 3
% 0.11/0.43 % Initial clauses : 8
% 0.11/0.43 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.11/0.43 % Initial clauses in saturation : 7
% 0.11/0.43 % Processed clauses : 6
% 0.11/0.43 % ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.11/0.43 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % ...remaining for further processing : 3
% 0.11/0.43 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % NegExts : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Total rewrite steps : 5
% 0.11/0.43 % ...of those cached : 2
% 0.11/0.43 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.43 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.43 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.43 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.43 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.43 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.43 % Current number of processed clauses : 3
% 0.11/0.43 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 0.11/0.43 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.11/0.43 % ...number of literals in the above : 2
% 0.11/0.43 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Termbank termtop insertions : 258
% 0.11/0.43 % Search garbage collected termcells : 33
% 0.11/0.43
% 0.11/0.43 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.43 % User time : 0.001 s
% 0.11/0.43 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.11/0.43 % Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.11/0.43 % Maximum resident set size: 3624 pages
% 0.11/0.43
% 0.11/0.43 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.43 % User time : 0.003 s
% 0.11/0.43 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.11/0.43 % Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.11/0.43 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.11/0.43 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------