↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : SYO349_8 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 02:26:01 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.18s 1.02s
% Output   : Refutation 3.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (   9 unt;   0 typ;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   73 (  10 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   38 (  18   ~;  13   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    0 (   0 avg)
%            Number of FOOLs       :   32 (  32 fml;   0 var)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   5 usr;   6 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(func_def_0,type,
    bG0: $o ).

tff(func_def_3,type,
    bG1: $o ).

tff(pred_def_2,type,
    cP: $o > $o ).

tff(f1,conjecture,
    ( ~ cA
    | ~ cB
    | ~ cP(cA)
    | cP(cB) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cTHM617) ).

tff(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ~ cA
      | ~ cB
      | ~ cP(cA)
      | cP(cB) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

tff(f3,definition,
    ( cB
  <=> ( bG0 = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[bG0])],[fool_formula_definition]) ).

tff(f4,definition,
    ( cA
  <=> ( $true = bG1 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[bG1])],[fool_formula_definition]) ).

tff(f5,plain,
    ~ ( ~ cA
      | ~ cB
      | ~ cP(bG1)
      | cP(bG0) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f2,f4,f3]) ).

tff(f6,plain,
    ( cA
   => ( $true = bG1 ) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f4]) ).

tff(f7,plain,
    ( cB
   => ( bG0 = $true ) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f3]) ).

tff(f8,plain,
    ( cA
    & cB
    & cP(bG1)
    & ~ cP(bG0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tff(f9,plain,
    ( ( bG0 = $true )
    | ~ cB ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

tff(f10,plain,
    ( ( $true = bG1 )
    | ~ cA ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

tff(f11,plain,
    ~ cP(bG0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tff(f12,plain,
    cP(bG1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tff(f13,plain,
    cB,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tff(f14,plain,
    cA,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tff(f15,plain,
    ( ( bG0 = $true )
    | ~ cB ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

tff(f16,plain,
    ( ( $true = bG1 )
    | ~ cA ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

tff(f19,plain,
    bG0 = $true,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f15,f13]) ).

tff(f20,plain,
    ~ cP($true),
    inference(superposition,[],[f11,f19]) ).

tff(f21,plain,
    $true = bG1,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f16,f14]) ).

tff(f22,plain,
    cP($true),
    inference(superposition,[],[f12,f21]) ).

tff(f23,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f22,f20]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYO349_8 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.19  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.19  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.19  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.19  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.19  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.19  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.19  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.19  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 17:35:31 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.19  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.19  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.23  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.23  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.18/1.02  % (3572341)Detected formulas, will run a generic FOF schedule.
% 3.18/1.02  % (3572352)dis-21_1_sil=8000:lcm=predicate:random_seed=4036923523:st=5:avsq=on:i=129:avsqr=1,16:sd=3:aac=none:ep=RS:fsr=off:ss=included_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/129Mi)
% 3.18/1.02  % (3572352)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 3.18/1.02  % (3572352)------------------------------
% 3.18/1.02  % (3572352)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 3.18/1.02  % (3572352)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 3.18/1.02  % (3572352)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 3.18/1.02  % (3572352)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 3.18/1.02  % (3572352)Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 3.18/1.02  % (3572352)Peak memory usage: 88 MB
% 3.18/1.02  % (3572350)dis-1010_2:3_sil=16000:sp=reverse_frequency:random_seed=2070348618:i=119:av=off:ss=axioms_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/119Mi)
% 3.18/1.02  % (3572351)dis-1011_1_sil=16000:fde=unused:s2agt=70:random_seed=4041638158:s2a=on:i=139:gtg=position_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/139Mi)
% 3.18/1.02  % (3572349)lrs+1010_1_to=lpo:sil=32000:sos=on:spb=goal_then_units:bce=on:random_seed=819877841:i=109:sd=1:ins=1:gsp=on:ss=axioms_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/109Mi)
% 3.18/1.02  % (3572346)lrs+10_1_ncem=casc2026/models/loop8.pt:sil=128000:tgt=full:npcc=on:drc=off:sp=weighted_frequency:spb=goal:fd=preordered:foolp=on:random_seed=313727395:i=141193_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/141193Mi)
% 3.18/1.02  % (3572348)lrs+1010_1_anc=all:sfv=off:to=kbo:ncem=casc2026/models/loop7.pt:sil=128000:npcc=on:prc=on:sos=all:bsr=unit_only:sac=on:random_seed=1350974213:i=141695:sd=1:nm=32:gsp=on:ss=included_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/141695Mi)
% 3.18/1.02  % (3572347)lrs+11_1_ncem=casc2026/models/loop8.pt:sil=128000:npcc=on:lma=off:spb=units:urr=ec_only:bce=on:s2agt=64:updr=off:random_seed=1381307299:i=134677:sd=20:aac=none:nm=16:ss=included:sgt=10_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/134677Mi)
% 3.18/1.02  % (3572350)First to succeed.
% 3.18/1.02  % (3572351)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 3.18/1.02  % (3572349)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 3.18/1.02  % (3572350)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-3572341"
% 3.18/1.02  % (3572352)------------------------------
% 3.18/1.02  % (3572352)------------------------------
% 3.18/1.02  % (3572360)lrs+10_1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:random_seed=1770227305:i=285:sd=3:ss=axioms:sgt=8_2997 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/285Mi)
% 3.18/1.02  % (3572360)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 3.18/1.02  % (3572350)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 3.18/1.02  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 3.18/1.02  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 3.18/1.02  % (3572350)------------------------------
% 3.18/1.02  % (3572350)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 3.18/1.02  % (3572350)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 3.18/1.02  % (3572350)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 3.18/1.02  % (3572350)Termination reason: Refutation
% 3.18/1.02  % (3572350)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 3.18/1.02  % (3572350)Peak memory usage: 88 MB
% 3.18/1.02  % (3572350)------------------------------
% 3.18/1.02  % (3572350)------------------------------
% 3.18/1.02  % (3572341)Success in time 0.401 s
% 3.18/1.02  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------