↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : SYO351^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:47:30 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.28s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   19
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   54 (  13 unt;   0 typ;   3 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  236 (  65 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  180 (  48   ~;  46   |;   0   &;  66   @)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   20 (  20   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   18 (  14 usr;   8 con; 0-4 aty)
%                                         (  11  !!;   0  ??;   0 @@+;   0 @@-)
%            Number of variables   :   72 (  27 sgn  12   !;   0   ?;  72   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(type_def_6,type,
    sTfun: ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    vPI: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    vIMP: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    db1: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    db0: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    vLAM: 
      !>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( X1 > X0 > X1 ) ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    vEQ: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( X0 > X0 > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_9,type,
    vNOT: $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_10,type,
    sK0: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_11,type,
    sK1: a ).

thf(func_def_13,type,
    sK3: a ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ( ( ^ [X0: a > $o] :
        ! [X1: a] :
          ( ( X0 @ X1 )
         => $false ) )
    = ( ^ [X2: a > $o] :
          ( X2
          = ( ^ [X1: a] : $false ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cE6EXT_pme) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ^ [X0: a > $o] :
        ! [X1: a] :
          ( ( X0 @ X1 )
         => $false ) )
   != ( ^ [X2: a > $o] :
          ( X2
          = ( ^ [X1: a] : $false ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f3,plain,
    ( ( ^ [X0: a > $o] :
        ! [X1: a] :
          ( ( X0 @ X1 )
         => $false ) )
   != ( ^ [X2: a > $o] :
          ( X2
          = ( ^ [X3: a] : $false ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a > $o] :
          ( Y0
          = ( ^ [Y1: a] : $false ) ) )
   != ( ^ [Y0: a > $o] :
          ( !! @ a
          @ ^ [Y1: a] :
              ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
             => $false ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f3]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a > $o] :
          ( Y0
          = ( ^ [Y1: a] : $false ) ) )
   != ( ^ [Y0: a > $o] :
          ( !! @ a
          @ ^ [Y1: a] :
              ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
             => $false ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a > $o] :
          ( Y0
          = ( ^ [Y1: a] : $false ) ) )
   != ( ^ [Y0: a > $o] :
          ( !! @ a
          @ ^ [Y1: a] :
              ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
             => $false ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a > $o] :
          ( Y0
          = ( ^ [Y1: a] : $false ) ) )
   != ( ^ [Y0: a > $o] :
          ( !! @ a
          @ ^ [Y1: a] :
              ~ ( Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(boolean_simplification,[],[f6]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a > $o] :
          ( !! @ a
          @ ^ [Y1: a] :
              ~ ( Y0 @ Y1 ) )
      @ sK0 )
   != ( ^ [Y0: a > $o] :
          ( Y0
          = ( ^ [Y1: a] : $false ) )
      @ sK0 ) ),
    inference(negative_extensionality,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( ^ [Y0: a > $o] :
            ( Y0
            = ( ^ [Y1: a] : $false ) )
        @ sK0 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( ^ [Y0: a > $o] :
            ( !! @ a
            @ ^ [Y1: a] :
                ~ ( Y0 @ Y1 ) )
        @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(xor_proxy_clausification,[],[f10]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( ^ [Y0: a > $o] :
            ( Y0
            = ( ^ [Y1: a] : $false ) )
        @ sK0 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ^ [Y0: a > $o] :
            ( !! @ a
            @ ^ [Y1: a] :
                ~ ( Y0 @ Y1 ) )
        @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(xor_proxy_clausification,[],[f10]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK0
        = ( ^ [Y0: a] : $false ) ) )
    | ( ( !! @ a
        @ ^ [Y0: a] :
            ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f12]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( ( ( ^ [Y0: a] : $false )
     != sK0 )
    | ( ( !! @ a
        @ ^ [Y0: a] :
            ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f13]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 )
        @ sK1 ) )
    | ( ( ^ [Y0: a] : $false )
     != sK0 ) ),
    inference(sigma_proxy_clausification,[],[f14]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ( ( ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK1 ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ^ [Y0: a] : $false )
     != sK0 ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f15]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ( ( ( ^ [Y0: a] : $false )
     != sK0 )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK1 ) ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f16]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK0
        = ( ^ [Y0: a] : $false ) ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( !! @ a
        @ ^ [Y0: a] :
            ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ( ( ( ^ [Y0: a] : $false )
      = sK0 )
    | ( $true
      = ( !! @ a
        @ ^ [Y0: a] :
            ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f18]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ! [X1: a] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 )
          @ X1 ) )
      | ( ( ^ [Y0: a] : $false )
        = sK0 ) ),
    inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f19]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ! [X1: a] :
      ( ( ( ~ ( sK0 @ X1 ) )
        = $true )
      | ( ( ^ [Y0: a] : $false )
        = sK0 ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f20]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ! [X1: a] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( sK0 @ X1 ) )
      | ( ( ^ [Y0: a] : $false )
        = sK0 ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f21]) ).

thf(f24,definition,
    ( spl2_1
  <=> ( ( ^ [Y0: a] : $false )
      = sK0 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    ( ( ( ^ [Y0: a] : $false )
      = sK0 )
    | ~ spl2_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f24]) ).

thf(f26,plain,
    ( ( ( ^ [Y0: a] : $false )
     != sK0 )
    | spl2_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f24]) ).

thf(f28,definition,
    ( spl2_2
  <=> ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK1 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK1 ) )
    | ~ spl2_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f28]) ).

thf(f31,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_1
    | spl2_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f17,f28,f24]) ).

thf(f33,definition,
    ( spl2_3
  <=> ! [X1: a] :
        ( $false
        = ( sK0 @ X1 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_3])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f34,plain,
    ( ! [X1: a] :
        ( $false
        = ( sK0 @ X1 ) )
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f33]) ).

thf(f35,plain,
    ( spl2_1
    | spl2_3 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f22,f33,f24]) ).

thf(f36,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
     != ( ^ [Y0: a] : $false
        @ sK3 ) )
    | spl2_1 ),
    inference(negative_extensionality,[],[f26]) ).

thf(f37,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( ^ [Y0: a] : $false
        @ sK3 ) )
    | ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
      = $true )
    | spl2_1 ),
    inference(xor_proxy_clausification,[],[f36]) ).

thf(f40,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
      = $true )
    | ( $true = $false )
    | spl2_1 ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f37]) ).

thf(f41,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
      = $true )
    | spl2_1 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f40]) ).

thf(f42,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f41,f34]) ).

thf(f43,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f42]) ).

thf(f44,plain,
    ( spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f43]) ).

thf(f45,plain,
    ( ! [X1: a] :
        ( ( ^ [Y0: a] : $false
          @ X1 )
        = ( sK0 @ X1 ) )
    | ~ spl2_1 ),
    inference(argument_congruence,[],[f25]) ).

thf(f46,plain,
    ( ! [X1: a] :
        ( ( ( ^ [Y0: a] : $false
            @ X1 )
          = $true )
        | ( $false
          = ( sK0 @ X1 ) ) )
    | ~ spl2_1 ),
    inference(iff_proxy_clausification,[],[f45]) ).

thf(f49,plain,
    ( ! [X1: a] :
        ( ( $false
          = ( sK0 @ X1 ) )
        | ( $true = $false ) )
    | ~ spl2_1 ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f46]) ).

thf(f50,plain,
    ( ! [X1: a] :
        ( $false
        = ( sK0 @ X1 ) )
    | ~ spl2_1 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f49]) ).

thf(f51,plain,
    ( spl2_3
    | ~ spl2_1 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f50,f24,f33]) ).

thf(f52,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl2_2
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f34,f30]) ).

thf(f54,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl2_2
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f52]) ).

thf(f55,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_2
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f54]) ).

cnf(s1,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_1
    | spl2_2 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f31]) ).

cnf(s2,plain,
    ( spl2_1
    | spl2_3 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f35]) ).

cnf(s3,plain,
    ( spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f44]) ).

cnf(s4,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_1
    | spl2_3 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f51]) ).

cnf(s5,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_2
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f55]) ).

cnf(s7,plain,
    spl2_1,
    inference(rat,[],[s2,s3]) ).

cnf(s8,plain,
    spl2_3,
    inference(rat,[],[s4,s7]) ).

cnf(s9,plain,
    spl2_2,
    inference(rat,[],[s1,s7]) ).

cnf(s10,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rat,[],[s5,s8,s9]) ).

thf(f58,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s10]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYO351^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.19  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.19  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.19  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.19  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.19  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.19  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.19  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.19  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 16:48:07 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.19  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.19  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.22  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.08/0.24  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.28  % (1547898)Detected a higher-order problem, will run a greedy HOL sequence.
% 0.21/0.28  % (1547903)lrs+10_40_drc=off:e2e=on:si=on:uwa=one_side_interpreted:random_seed=4075726736:s2a=on:i=87:rtra=on:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/87Mi)
% 0.21/0.28  % (1547903) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-1547898-1547903"...
% 0.21/0.28  % (1547903)...printing done.
% 0.21/0.28  % (1547903)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.21/0.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.28  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.28  % (1547903)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.28  % (1547903)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.21/0.28  % (1547903)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.21/0.28  % (1547903)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.21/0.28  % (1547903)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.21/0.28  % (1547903)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.28  % (1547903)Peak memory usage: 13 MB
% 0.21/0.28  % (1547903)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.21/0.28  % (1547898)Success in time 0.034 s
% 0.21/0.28  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------