↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SYO356^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:54:01 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.48s 1.29s
% Output   : Refutation 1.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (   6 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   80 (  41 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  107 (  16   ~;   6   |;   6   &;  65   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  14  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   22 (  22   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    8 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   32 (  12   ^;  16   !;   4   ?;  32   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    v: a ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    u: a ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    sK0: ( a > a > $o ) > a ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    sK1: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_10,type,
    ph3: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(f38,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f37,f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ( sK1 @ v )
   != $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ! [X0: a > a > $o] :
        ( ( ( X0 @ u @ v )
          = $true )
        | ( $true
         != ( X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) ) ) )
    & ( ( sK1 @ u )
      = $true )
    & ( ( sK1 @ v )
     != $true ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f6,f8,f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ! [X0: a > a > $o] :
      ( ? [X1: a] :
          ( ( X0 @ X1 @ X1 )
         != $true )
     => ( $true
       != ( X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ( ? [X2: a > $o] :
        ( ( ( X2 @ u )
          = $true )
        & ( ( X2 @ v )
         != $true ) )
   => ( ( ( sK1 @ u )
        = $true )
      & ( ( sK1 @ v )
       != $true ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ( ! [X0: a > a > $o] :
        ( ( ( X0 @ u @ v )
          = $true )
        | ? [X1: a] :
            ( ( X0 @ X1 @ X1 )
           != $true ) )
    & ? [X2: a > $o] :
        ( ( ( X2 @ u )
          = $true )
        & ( ( X2 @ v )
         != $true ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ( ! [X0: a > a > $o] :
          ( ! [X1: a] :
              ( ( X0 @ X1 @ X1 )
              = $true )
         => ( ( X0 @ u @ v )
            = $true ) )
     => ! [X2: a > $o] :
          ( ( ( X2 @ u )
            = $true )
         => ( ( X2 @ v )
            = $true ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ( ! [X0: a > a > $o] :
          ( ! [X1: a] : ( X0 @ X1 @ X1 )
         => ( X0 @ u @ v ) )
     => ! [X2: a > $o] :
          ( ( X2 @ u )
         => ( X2 @ v ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [X0: a > a > $o] :
          ( ! [X1: a] : ( X0 @ X1 @ X1 )
         => ( X0 @ u @ v ) )
     => ! [X2: a > $o] :
          ( ( X2 @ u )
         => ( X2 @ v ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ( ! [X0: a > a > $o] :
        ( ! [X1: a] : ( X0 @ X1 @ X1 )
       => ( X0 @ u @ v ) )
   => ! [X2: a > $o] :
        ( ( X2 @ u )
       => ( X2 @ v ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.0w9yqq50yJ/DTF2THF_32260.p',cE1LEIBEQ2_pme) ).

thf(f37,plain,
    ( ( sK1 @ v )
    = $true ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f11,f23]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    u = v,
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f22]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( v = u ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f21]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | ( $true
      = ( v = u ) ) ),
    inference(boolean_simplification,[status(thm)],[f20]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sK0
          @ ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : ( Y1 = Y0 ) )
        = ( sK0
          @ ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : ( Y1 = Y0 ) ) )
     != $true )
    | ( $true
      = ( v = u ) ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f13]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( ( ( ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : ( Y1 = Y0 )
        @ u
        @ v )
      = $true )
    | ( $true
     != ( ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : ( Y1 = Y0 )
        @ ( sK0
          @ ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : ( Y1 = Y0 ) )
        @ ( sK0
          @ ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : ( Y1 = Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(primitive_instantiation,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ! [X0: a > a > $o] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) ) )
      | ( ( X0 @ u @ v )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( ( sK1 @ u )
    = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SYO356^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.13/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.15/0.33  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 14:28:29 EST 2026
% 0.15/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.33  Running /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.19/0.45  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.19/0.45  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.19/0.45  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.45  % File     : SYO356^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.19/0.45  % Domain   : Syntactic
% 0.19/0.45  % Problem  : TPS problem E1LEIBEQ2
% 0.19/0.45  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.19/0.45  % English  : Example from [Ben9] about alternative defns of equality.
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  % Refs     : [Ben99] Benzmueller (1999), Equality and Extensionality in Hig
% 0.19/0.45  %          : [Bro09] Brown (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.19/0.45  % Source   : [Bro09]
% 0.19/0.45  % Names    : tps_0196 [Bro09]
% 0.19/0.45  %          : E1LEIBEQ2 [TPS]
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.19/0.45  % Rating   : 0.08 v9.1.0, 0.00 v8.1.0, 0.08 v7.4.0, 0.00 v7.3.0, 0.10 v7.2.0, 0.00 v6.2.0, 0.33 v6.1.0, 0.00 v5.4.0, 0.25 v4.1.0, 0.33 v4.0.1, 0.67 v4.0.0
% 0.19/0.45  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    4 (   0 unt;   3 typ;   0 def)
% 0.19/0.45  %            Number of atoms       :    0 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.19/0.45  %            Maximal formula atoms :    0 (   0 avg)
% 0.19/0.45  %            Number of connectives :    9 (   0   ~;   0   |;   0   &;   6   @)
% 0.19/0.45  %                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.19/0.45  %            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   7 avg)
% 0.19/0.45  %            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
% 0.19/0.45  %            Number of type conns  :    3 (   3   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.19/0.45  %            Number of symbols     :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
% 0.19/0.45  %            Number of variables   :    3 (   0   ^;   3   !;   0   ?;   3   :)
% 0.19/0.45  % SPC      : TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  % Comments : This problem is from the TPS library. Copyright (c) 2009 The TPS
% 0.19/0.45  %            project in the Department of Mathematical Sciences at Carnegie
% 0.19/0.45  %            Mellon University. Distributed under the Creative Commons copyleft
% 0.19/0.45  %            license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
% 0.19/0.45  %          : Polymorphic definitions expanded.
% 0.19/0.45  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.45  thf(a_type,type,
% 0.19/0.45      a: $tType ).
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  thf(v,type,
% 0.19/0.45      v: a ).
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  thf(u,type,
% 0.19/0.45      u: a ).
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  thf(cE1LEIBEQ2_pme,conjecture,
% 0.19/0.45      ( ! [Q: a > a > $o] :
% 0.19/0.45          ( ! [Z: a] : ( Q @ Z @ Z )
% 0.19/0.45         => ( Q @ u @ v ) )
% 0.19/0.45     => ! [Xq: a > $o] :
% 0.19/0.45          ( ( Xq @ u )
% 0.19/0.45         => ( Xq @ v ) ) ) ).
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.45  ------------------------
% 1.48/1.26  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.48/1.26  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.48/1.26  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 14:28:30 EST 2026
% 1.48/1.26  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.48/1.26  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.48/1.26  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.48/1.26  
% 1.48/1.26  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.0w9yqq50yJ/DTF2DTF32260.p
% See solution above
% 1.48/1.26  ------------------------
% 1.48/1.27  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.48/1.27  thf(a_type,type,
% 1.48/1.27      a: $tType ).
% 1.48/1.27  
% 1.48/1.27  thf(v,type,
% 1.48/1.27      v: a ).
% 1.48/1.27  
% 1.48/1.27  thf(u,type,
% 1.48/1.27      u: a ).
% 1.48/1.27  
% 1.48/1.27  thf(cE1LEIBEQ2_pme,conjecture,
% 1.48/1.27      ( ! [Q: a > a > $o] :
% 1.48/1.27          ( ! [Z: a] : ( Q @ Z @ Z )
% 1.48/1.27         => ( Q @ u @ v ) )
% 1.48/1.27     => ! [Xq: a > $o] :
% 1.48/1.27          ( ( Xq @ u )
% 1.48/1.27         => ( Xq @ v ) ) ) ).
% 1.48/1.27  ------------------------
% 1.48/1.29  % (32421)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_32260 for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 1.48/1.29  % (32424)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_32260 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 1.48/1.29  % (32424)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.48/1.29  % (32424)------------------------------
% 1.48/1.29  % (32424)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.48/1.29  % (32424)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.48/1.29  % (32424)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.48/1.29  
% 1.48/1.29  % (32424)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.48/1.29  % (32424)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 1.48/1.29  % (32424)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 1.48/1.29  % (32424)------------------------------
% 1.48/1.29  % (32424)------------------------------
% 1.48/1.29  % (32421)First to succeed.
% 1.48/1.29  % (32421)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.48/1.29  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_32260
% 1.48/1.29  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_32260
% 1.48/1.29  thf(type_def_5, type, a: $tType).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(func_def_0, type, a: $tType).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(func_def_1, type, v: a).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(func_def_2, type, u: a).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(func_def_6, type, sK0: (a > a > $o) > a).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(func_def_7, type, sK1: a > $o).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(func_def_10, type, ph3: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f38,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    $false),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f37,f10])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ((sK1 @ v) != $true)),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ! [X0 : a > a > $o] : (((X0 @ u @ v) = $true) | ($true != (X0 @ (sK0 @ X0) @ (sK0 @ X0)))) & (((sK1 @ u) = $true) & ((sK1 @ v) != $true))),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f6,f8,f7])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ! [X0 : a > a > $o] : (? [X1 : a] : ((X0 @ X1 @ X1) != $true) => ($true != (X0 @ (sK0 @ X0) @ (sK0 @ X0))))),
% 1.48/1.29    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ? [X2 : a > $o] : (((X2 @ u) = $true) & ((X2 @ v) != $true)) => (((sK1 @ u) = $true) & ((sK1 @ v) != $true))),
% 1.48/1.29    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f6,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ! [X0 : a > a > $o] : (((X0 @ u @ v) = $true) | ? [X1 : a] : ((X0 @ X1 @ X1) != $true)) & ? [X2 : a > $o] : (((X2 @ u) = $true) & ((X2 @ v) != $true))),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f5,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ~(! [X0 : a > a > $o] : (! [X1 : a] : ((X0 @ X1 @ X1) = $true) => ((X0 @ u @ v) = $true)) => ! [X2 : a > $o] : (((X2 @ u) = $true) => ((X2 @ v) = $true)))),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f4,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ~(! [X0 : a > a > $o] : (! [X1 : a] : (X0 @ X1 @ X1) => (X0 @ u @ v)) => ! [X2 : a > $o] : ((X2 @ u) => (X2 @ v)))),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.48/1.29    ~(! [X0 : a > a > $o] : (! [X1 : a] : (X0 @ X1 @ X1) => (X0 @ u @ v)) => ! [X2 : a > $o] : ((X2 @ u) => (X2 @ v)))),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 1.48/1.29    ! [X0 : a > a > $o] : (! [X1 : a] : (X0 @ X1 @ X1) => (X0 @ u @ v)) => ! [X2 : a > $o] : ((X2 @ u) => (X2 @ v))),
% 1.48/1.29    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.0w9yqq50yJ/DTF2THF_32260.p',cE1LEIBEQ2_pme)).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f37,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ((sK1 @ v) = $true)),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f11,f23])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f23,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    (u = v)),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f22])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f22,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ($true = (v = u))),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f21])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f21,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ($true != $true) | ($true = (v = u))),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(boolean_simplification,[status(thm)],[f20])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f20,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    (((sK0 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y1 = Y0))))) = (sK0 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y1 = Y0)))))) != $true) | ($true = (v = u))),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f13])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f13,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    (((^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y1 = Y0)))) @ u @ v) = $true) | ($true != ((^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y1 = Y0)))) @ (sK0 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y1 = Y0))))) @ (sK0 @ (^[Y0 : a]: ((^[Y1 : a]: (Y1 = Y0)))))))),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(primitive_instantiation,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f12,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ( ! [X0 : a > a > $o] : (($true != (X0 @ (sK0 @ X0) @ (sK0 @ X0))) | ((X0 @ u @ v) = $true)) )),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9])).
% 1.48/1.29  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.48/1.29    ((sK1 @ u) = $true)),
% 1.48/1.29    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9])).
% 1.48/1.29  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_32260
% 1.48/1.29  % (32421)------------------------------
% 1.48/1.29  % (32421)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.48/1.29  % (32421)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.48/1.29  
% 1.48/1.29  % (32421)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.48/1.29  % (32421)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 1.48/1.29  % (32421)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.48/1.29  % (32421)------------------------------
% 1.48/1.29  % (32421)------------------------------
% 1.48/1.29  % (32418)Success in time 0.014 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------