↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SYO358^5 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 08:08:56 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 3.86s 4.05s
% Output   : Proof 3.86s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : SYO358^5 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Fri Oct  3 13:29:23 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.86/4.05  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.86/4.05  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.86/4.05  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq
% 3.86/4.05    (Not
% 3.86/4.05      ((∀ (Xq : atype → Prop), Xq u → Xq v) → ∀ (P : atype → Prop), And (Or a (Not a)) (P u) → And (Or b (Not b)) (P v)))
% 3.86/4.05    True
% 3.86/4.05  Clause #1 (by clausification #[0]): Eq ((∀ (Xq : atype → Prop), Xq u → Xq v) → ∀ (P : atype → Prop), And (Or a (Not a)) (P u) → And (Or b (Not b)) (P v))
% 3.86/4.05    False
% 3.86/4.05  Clause #2 (by clausification #[1]): Eq (∀ (Xq : atype → Prop), Xq u → Xq v) True
% 3.86/4.05  Clause #3 (by clausification #[1]): Eq (∀ (P : atype → Prop), And (Or a (Not a)) (P u) → And (Or b (Not b)) (P v)) False
% 3.86/4.05  Clause #4 (by clausification #[2]): ∀ (a : atype → Prop), Eq (a u → a v) True
% 3.86/4.05  Clause #5 (by clausification #[4]): ∀ (a : atype → Prop), Or (Eq (a u) False) (Eq (a v) True)
% 3.86/4.05  Clause #7 (by neHoist #[5]): ∀ (a : atype → Sort _abstMVar.0) (a_1 a_2 : (x : atype) → a x),
% 3.86/4.05    Or (Eq ((fun x => Ne (a_1 x) (a_2 x)) v) True) (Or (Eq True False) (Eq (a_1 u) (a_2 u)))
% 3.86/4.05  Clause #18 (by clausification #[3]): ∀ (a_1 : atype → Prop), Eq (Not (And (Or a (Not a)) (skS.0 0 a_1 u) → And (Or b (Not b)) (skS.0 0 a_1 v))) True
% 3.86/4.05  Clause #19 (by clausification #[18]): ∀ (a_1 : atype → Prop), Eq (And (Or a (Not a)) (skS.0 0 a_1 u) → And (Or b (Not b)) (skS.0 0 a_1 v)) False
% 3.86/4.05  Clause #20 (by clausification #[19]): ∀ (a_1 : atype → Prop), Eq (And (Or a (Not a)) (skS.0 0 a_1 u)) True
% 3.86/4.05  Clause #21 (by clausification #[19]): ∀ (a : atype → Prop), Eq (And (Or b (Not b)) (skS.0 0 a v)) False
% 3.86/4.05  Clause #22 (by clausification #[20]): ∀ (a : atype → Prop), Eq (skS.0 0 a u) True
% 3.86/4.05  Clause #36 (by betaEtaReduce #[7]): ∀ (a : atype → Sort _abstMVar.0) (a_1 a_2 : (x : atype) → a x),
% 3.86/4.05    Or (Eq (Ne (a_1 v) (a_2 v)) True) (Or (Eq True False) (Eq (a_1 u) (a_2 u)))
% 3.86/4.05  Clause #37 (by clausification #[36]): ∀ (a : atype → Sort _abstMVar.0) (a_1 a_2 : (x : atype) → a x),
% 3.86/4.05    Or (Eq True False) (Or (Eq (a_1 u) (a_2 u)) (Ne (a_1 v) (a_2 v)))
% 3.86/4.05  Clause #38 (by clausification #[37]): ∀ (a : atype → Sort _abstMVar.0) (a_1 a_2 : (x : atype) → a x), Or (Eq (a_1 u) (a_2 u)) (Ne (a_1 v) (a_2 v))
% 3.86/4.05  Clause #39 (by equality resolution #[38]): Eq ((fun x => x) u) ((fun x => v) u)
% 3.86/4.05  Clause #47 (by betaEtaReduce #[39]): Eq u v
% 3.86/4.05  Clause #215 (by clausification #[21]): ∀ (a : atype → Prop), Or (Eq (Or b (Not b)) False) (Eq (skS.0 0 a v) False)
% 3.86/4.05  Clause #216 (by clausification #[215]): ∀ (a : atype → Prop), Or (Eq (skS.0 0 a v) False) (Eq (Not b) False)
% 3.86/4.05  Clause #217 (by clausification #[215]): ∀ (a : atype → Prop), Or (Eq (skS.0 0 a v) False) (Eq b False)
% 3.86/4.05  Clause #218 (by clausification #[216]): ∀ (a : atype → Prop), Or (Eq (skS.0 0 a v) False) (Eq b True)
% 3.86/4.05  Clause #219 (by forward demodulation #[218, 47]): ∀ (a : atype → Prop), Or (Eq (skS.0 0 a u) False) (Eq b True)
% 3.86/4.05  Clause #220 (by superposition #[219, 22]): Or (Eq b True) (Eq False True)
% 3.86/4.05  Clause #236 (by clausification #[220]): Eq b True
% 3.86/4.05  Clause #254 (by forward demodulation #[217, 47]): ∀ (a : atype → Prop), Or (Eq (skS.0 0 a u) False) (Eq b False)
% 3.86/4.05  Clause #255 (by forward demodulation #[254, 236]): ∀ (a : atype → Prop), Or (Eq (skS.0 0 a u) False) (Eq True False)
% 3.86/4.05  Clause #256 (by clausification #[255]): ∀ (a : atype → Prop), Eq (skS.0 0 a u) False
% 3.86/4.05  Clause #257 (by superposition #[256, 22]): Eq False True
% 3.86/4.05  Clause #274 (by clausification #[257]): False
% 3.86/4.05  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------