↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SYO359^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:45:38 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.31s 2.16s
% Output   : Refutation 3.51s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (  10 unt;   0 typ;   1 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   73 (  22 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   75 (  11   ~;   2   |;   2   &;  48   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  12  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   2 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    8 (   8   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    7 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   15 (   0   ^;  14   !;   0   ?;  15   :)
%                                         (   0  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   1  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(b_type,type,
    b: $tType ).

thf(gtype_type,type,
    gtype: $tType ).

thf(g_decl,type,
    g: b > $o ).

thf(h_decl,type,
    h: ( b > $o ) > gtype ).

thf(f_decl,type,
    f: b > $o ).

thf(sk1_decl,type,
    sk1: b ).

thf(sk2_decl,type,
    sk2: b ).

thf(sk1_def,definition,
    ( sk1
    = ( @+[A: b] :
          ( ( f @ A )
         != ( g @ A ) ) ) ) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ( ( ! [A: b] :
          ( ( f @ A )
          = ( g @ A ) )
     => ! [A: ( b > $o ) > $o] :
          ( ( A @ f )
         => ( A @ g ) ) )
   => ( ! [A: b] :
          ( ( f @ A )
          = ( g @ A ) )
     => ( ( h @ f )
        = ( h @ g ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cEXT1) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( ! [A: b] :
            ( ( f @ A )
            = ( g @ A ) )
       => ! [A: ( b > $o ) > $o] :
            ( ( A @ f )
           => ( A @ g ) ) )
     => ( ! [A: b] :
            ( ( f @ A )
            = ( g @ A ) )
       => ( ( h @ f )
          = ( h @ g ) ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ~ ( ( ! [A: b] :
            ( ( f @ A )
            = ( g @ A ) )
       => ! [A: ( b > $o ) > $o] :
            ( ( A @ f )
           => ( A @ g ) ) )
     => ( ! [A: b] :
            ( ( f @ A )
            = ( g @ A ) )
       => ( ( h @ f )
          = ( h @ g ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ! [B: b,A: ( b > $o ) > $o] :
      ( ( ( ( f @ sk1 )
         != ( g @ sk1 ) )
        | ~ ( A @ f )
        | ( A @ g ) )
      & ( ( f @ B )
        = ( g @ B ) )
      & ( ( h @ f )
       != ( h @ g ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[3]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ( ( h @ f )
   != ( h @ g ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ( ( h @ f )
   != ( h @ g ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(15,plain,
    f != g,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(16,plain,
    ( ( f @ sk2 )
   != ( g @ sk2 ) ),
    inference(func_ext,[status(esa)],[15]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    ! [A: b] :
      ( ( f @ A )
      = ( g @ A ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ! [A: b] :
      ( ( f @ A )
      = ( g @ A ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ! [A: b] :
      ( ( f @ A )
      = ( g @ A ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(19,plain,
    ( ( g @ sk2 )
   != ( g @ sk2 ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[16,11]) ).

thf(20,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[19]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SYO359^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.11/0.20  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.20  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.20  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.20  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.20  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.20  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.20  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.20  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 16:48:47 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.20  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.21  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.87/0.78  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.17/0.97  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (185ms). 
% 1.17/0.99  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.74/1.39  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.91/1.40  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.91/1.49  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.08/1.52  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.08/1.52  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.08/1.53  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.08/1.53  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.31/2.16  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.31/2.16  % Time passed: 1805ms (effective reasoning time: 1164ms)
% 3.31/2.16  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.31/2.16  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 3.31/2.16  % No. of inferences in proof: 13
% 3.31/2.16  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1805 ms resp. 1164 ms w/o parsing
% 3.51/2.21  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.51/2.21  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------